Advertisement

Biological Theory

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 401–412 | Cite as

Prisoners of Abstraction? The Theory and Measure of Genetic Variation, and the Very Concept of “Race”

  • Jonathan Michael Kaplan
  • Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther
Thematic Issue Article: The Meaning of “Theory” in Biology

Abstract

It is illegitimate to read any ontology about “race” off of biological theory or data. Indeed, the technical meaning of “genetic variation” is fluid, and there is no single theoretical agreed-upon criterion for defining and distinguishing populations given a particular set of genetic variation data. By analyzing three formal senses of “genetic variation,” viz., diversity, differentiation, and heterozygosity, we argue that the use of biological theory for making claims about race inevitably amounts to a pernicious reification. Biological theory does not force the concept of “race” upon us; our social discourse, social ontology, and social expectations do. We become prisoners of our abstractions at our own hands, and at our own expense.

Keywords

Biological ontology Differentiation Diversity Models Population genetics Populations Race Reification Variation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Matthew Kopec, Michael J. Wade, and the editors of this special issue of Biological Theory, Kim Sterelny, Massimo Pigliucci, and Werner Callebaut, kindly provided feedback on this paper. Kaplan would like to thank the participants at the KLI “The Meaning of ‘Theory’ in Biology” workshop for their comments, and the Oregon State University Center for the Humanities, whose support helped make this work possible. Winther thanks Ian Hacking, Carlos López-Beltrán, and Amir Najmi for ongoing discussions on these topics. Kim Sneppen’s support of Winther’s guest research stay at the Biocomplexity Center, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, is also gratefully acknowledged. This paper, written fully jointly, with authors listed alphabetically, is the result of an ongoing collaboration that emerged from an e-mail exchange between the authors that began with Kaplan reading Winther (2011).

References

  1. Andreasen RO (2000) Race: biological reality or social construct? Phil Sci 67:S653–S666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreasen RO (2004) The cladistic race concept: a defense. Biol Philos 19:425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appiah KA, Gutmann A (1996) Color conscious: the political morality of race. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet 19:233–257Google Scholar
  5. Cognato AI (2007) A standard DNA taxonomy for insects? USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-45, pp 11–12Google Scholar
  6. Edwards AWF (2003) Human genetic diversity: Lewontin’s fallacy. BioEssays 25:798–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giuliano P, Spilimbergo A,Tonon G (2007) Genetic, cultural and geographical distances. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2229. http://www.economics.harvard.edu/files/faculty/97_Genetics_August2007.pdf. Accessed 3 Nov 2011
  8. Hacking I (2005) Why race still matters. Dædalus 134(1):102–116Google Scholar
  9. Haslanger S (2010) Language, politics, and “the folk”: looking for “the meaning” of “race”. Monist 93:169–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoffmann S, Hoffmann A (2008) Is there a “true” diversity? Ecol Econ 65:213–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalinowski ST (2011) The computer program STRUCTURE does not reliably identify the main genetic clusters within species: simulations and implications for human population structure. Heredity 106:625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaplan JM (2010) When socially determined categories make biological realities: understanding Black/White health disparities in the U.S. Monist 93:281–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaplan JM (2011) “Race”: what biology can tell us about a social construct. In: Encyclopedia of life sciences. Wiley, Chichester. doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0005857
  15. Kitcher P (2007) Does “race” have a future? Philos Public Aff 35:293–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kronholm I, Loudet O, de Meaux J (2010a) Influence of mutation rate on estimators of genetic differentiation-lessons from Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genet 11:33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kronholm I, Loudet O, de Meaux J (2010b) Correction: influence of mutation rate on estimators of genetic differentiation: lessons from Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genet 11:88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levins R, Lewontin RC (1980) Dialectics and reductionism in ecology. Synthese 43:47–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lewontin RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. Evol Biol 6:381–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewontin RC, Rose S, Kamin LJ (1984) Not in our genes: biology, ideology, and human nature. Pantheon Books. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Li W-H, Sadler LA (1991) Low nucleotide diversity in man. Genetics 129:513–523Google Scholar
  22. Libiger O, Nievergelt CM, Schork NJ (2009) Comparison of genetic distance measures using human SNP genotype data. Hum Biol 81:389–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Livingstone FB, Dobzhansky T (1962) On the non-existence of human races. Curr Anthropol 3:279–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lowe A, Harris S, Ashton P (2004) Ecological genetics. Design, analysis, and application. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonald D (2008) Distances summary. http://www.uwyo.edu/dbmcd/molmark/GenDistEqns.pdf. Accessed 3 November 2011
  26. Mills CW (1988) “But What Are You Really? The Metaphysics of Race.” Blackness visible: essays on philosophy and race. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, pp 41–66Google Scholar
  27. Novembre J, Johnson T, Bryc K, Kutalik Z, Boyko AR, Auton A, Indap A, King KS, Bergmann S, Nelson MR, Stephens M, Bustamante CD (2008) Genes mirror geography within Europe. Nature 456:98–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Omi M, Winant H (1989) Racial formation in the United States: from the 1960s to the 1980s. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959Google Scholar
  30. Provine WB (1986) Sewall Wright and evolutionary biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenberg NA, Pritchard JK, Weber JL, Cann HM, Kidd KK, Zhivotovsky LA, Feldman MW (2002) Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298:2381–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wade MJ (1992) Sewall Wright: gene interaction and the shifting balance theory. In: Antonovics J, Futuyma D (eds) Oxford Surveys of evolutionary biology, vol VI. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 35–62Google Scholar
  33. Wade MJ (2002) A gene’s eye view of epistasis, selection, and speciation. J Evol Biol 15:337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wetherell M (1996) Identities, groups, and social issues. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitlock MC (2011) G’ST and D do not replace FST. Mol Ecol 20:1083–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Winther RG (2006) Fisherian and Wrightian perspectives in evolutionary genetics and model-mediated imposition of theoretical assumptions. J Theor Biol 240:218–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Winther RG (2011) ¿La cosificación genética de la “raza”? Un análisis crítico. In: López-Beltrán C (ed) Genes & mestizos: genómica y raza en la biomedicina Mexicana. UNAM, Mexico City, pp 237–258Google Scholar
  38. Yu N, Chen F-C, Ota S, Jorde LB, Pamilo P, Patthy L, Ramsay M, Jenkins T, Shyue S-K, Li W-H (2002) Larger genetic differences within Africans than between Africans and Eurasians. Genetics 161:269–274Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Michael Kaplan
    • 1
  • Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther
    • 2
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations