Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High Foraging Fidelity and Plant-Pollinator Network Dominance of Non-native Honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the Ecuadorian Andes

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pollinator foraging fidelity (i.e., consistent and repeated visitation to a particular plant species or area) is poorly understood for most bee species, but is important information for both the conservation of plant and pollinator species and the ecosystem services they provide to humans. We used plant–pollinator surveys and mark–recapture of floral-visiting Hymenoptera to study the foraging fidelity and species interaction network properties of a plant–pollinator community in the tropical Andes of southern Ecuador. After marking 92 bees visiting six plant taxa along four 100-m transects between July 16th and July 31st of 2019, only honeybees were resighted at a recapture rate of 47.7% (41/86). During our surveys, we observed nine bee and two wasp taxa feeding from the flowers of 10 morphospecies of plants, and we found significantly low network nestedness and significantly high network-level specialization. Specialization (d′) was also significant for honeybees and bumblebees and for three plant taxa. Overall, our findings indicated that feral, non-native honeybees in this region dominated the local plant–pollinator network, yet this species is acting as a specialist forager at the individual level. Our results suggest that honeybees may be replacing the pollination services of some native bees and wasps in the region, but more research is needed to determine the effectiveness of honeybee pollination for the local plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data availability

Upon request from corresponding author.

References

  • Amaya Márquez M (2009) Memory and learning in bees’ floral choices. Acta Biológica Colomb 14

  • Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melian CJ et al (2003) The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:9383–9387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2013) lme4: linear-mixed effects models using S4 classes. Retrieved from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 (R package version 0.999999–2)

  • Bronstein JL, Barker JL, Lichtenberg EM et al (2017) The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant? Curr Opin Insect Sci 21:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cárdenas S, Nivelo-Villavicencio C, Cárdenas JD et al (2017) First record of flower visitation by a rodent in Neotropical Proteaceae, Oreocallis grandiflora. J Trop Ecol 33:174–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecala JM, Wilson Rankin E (2020) Mark-recapture experiments reveal foraging behavior and plant fidelity of native bees in plant nurseries. Ecology 101:e03021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chacón-Vintimilla G (2016) Mazán y Llaviuco: 40 años después. Cuenca, Ecuador: UDA AKADEM

  • Dormann CF (2011) How to be a specialist? Quantifying specialisation in pollination networks. Netw Biol 1:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D (2003) Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst Annual Reviews Inc p. 1–26

  • Heinrich B (1976) The foraging specializations of individual bumblebees. Ecol Monogr 46:105–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato M, Shibata A, Yasui T et al (1999) Impact of introduced honeybees, Apis mellifera, upon native bee communities in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Popul Ecol 41:217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH et al (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc B Biol 274:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenth R (2019) emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.3.3. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans

  • Levin MD (1983) Value of bee pollination to US agriculture. Am Entomol 29:50–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Maglianesi MA, Blüthgen N, Böhning-Gaese K et al (2014) Morphological traits determine specialization and resource use in plant–hummingbird networks in the neotropics. Ecology 95:3325–3334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mola JM, Williams NM (2019) A review of methods for the study of bumble bee movement. Apidologie 50:497–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvie JE, Thomson JD (2016) Site fidelity by bees drives pollination facilitation in sequentially blooming plant species. Ecology 97:1442–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paini DR (2004) Impact of the introduced honey bee (Apis mellifera) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) on native bees: a review. Austral Ecol 29:399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Available from: http://www.r-project.org/

  • Russell AL, Morrison SJ, Moschonas EH, Papaj DR (2017) Patterns of pollen and nectar foraging specialization by bumblebees over multiple timescales using RFID. Sci Rep 7:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer WM, Zeh DW, Buchmann SL et al (1983) Competition for nectar between introduced honey bees and native North American bees and ants. Ecology 64:564–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valido A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez M, Jordano P (2019) Honeybees disrupt the structure and functionality of plant-pollinator networks. Sci Rep 9:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA, Heard MS, Chapman DS (2017) Network size, structure and mutualism dependence affect the propensity for plant-pollinator extinction cascades. Funct Ecol 31:1285–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan IP, Gotelli NJ, Memmott J et al (2017) econullnetr: an r package using null models to analyse the structure of ecological networks and identify resource selection. Methods Ecol Evol 9:728–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM (1986) Flower constancy: definition, cause, and measurement. Am Nat 127:593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser N, Ollerton J (2006) Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization. Waser N, Ollerton J, editors. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press

  • Williams NM, Minckley RL, Silveira FA (2001) Variation in native bee faunas and its implications for detecting community changes. Conserv Ecol 5:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto M, Junqueira CN, Barbosa AAA et al (2014) Estimating crop pollinator population using mark-recapture method. Apidologie 45:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Samantha Rios, Ariana Velez, Andres Alvarez, and Melissa Jernakoff for fieldwork assistance and Ministerio del Ambiente Ecuador for the collecting permits.

Funding

We thank Wheaton College, Massachusetts, USA, and the Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador, for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Rachel E. Crafford collected the data. Erin E. Wilson Rankin analyzed the data and edited the manuscript. Jessie L. Knowlton wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Boris A. Tinoco and Pablo S. Padrón provided taxonomic identifications and manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessie L. Knowlton.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All authors declare that any authorization needed for collecting biological specimens on environmental protected areas has been obtained from government authorities of the countries where collecting has taken place.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Edited by Fábio S Nascimento

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 486 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knowlton, J.L., Crafford, R.E., Tinoco, B.A. et al. High Foraging Fidelity and Plant-Pollinator Network Dominance of Non-native Honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the Ecuadorian Andes. Neotrop Entomol 51, 795–800 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-022-00967-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-022-00967-6

Keywords

Navigation