Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Distinguishing Symbiotic Partners of Acropyga Ants from Free-Living Soil Inhabitants

  • Scientific Note
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fruitful study of associations between ants and scale insects yields insight into the mechanisms that shape these symbioses. Field collections provide the basic information linking partnered species, and as such it is critical that collection techniques from the field reflect true species-to-species partnerships in the published literature. It is equally critical that such practices limit the potential for mistaking free-living “neighbors” for symbiotic partners and publishing erroneous associations. This article describes a protocol for collecting subterranean scale insects and associated Acropyga Roger ants, which relies upon the activity of worker ants to sort and distinguish symbionts from free-living scale insects that happen to live near the colony. By collecting samples of ants and scales into nest boxes and allowing a resting period of several hours, worker ants will gather symbiotic partners into dense, protected clusters in which symbionts are actively tended. Free-living scale insects neighboring the colony can be collected from soil along with colony samples, but these free-living individuals are excluded from protective clusters and ignored by workers. Following confirmation of ant attendance, true symbiotic partners can be confidently collected, preserved, and recorded for future study. We illustrate the value of employing this collection protocol using a case study from Peru.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Balachowsky AS (1957) Sur un nouveau genre aberrant de cochenille radicole myrmécophile nuisable au caféier en Colombie. Rev Pathol Vég Entomol Agric France 36:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley JW (1970) Three new species of Chavesia Balachowsky from tropical America (Homoptera: Coccoidea). Proc Hawaii Entomol Soc 20:509–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaimer BB, LaPolla JS, Branstetter MG et al (2016) Phylogenomics, biogeography and diversification of obligate mealybug-tending ants in the genus Acropyga. Mol Phylogen Evol 102:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.05.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero A, Ramos-Portilla AA, Suárez-González D et al (2019) Scale insects (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha) on coffee roots (Coffea arabica L.) in Colombia, with records of associated ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Cien Tecnol Agropec Mosquera (Colombia) 20:93–116. https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol20_num1_art:1250

  • Deepthy K, Joshi S, Manoj V et al (2017) A new report of the myrmecophilous root mealy bug Xenococcus annandalei Silvestri (Rhizoecidae: Hemiptera) - a devastating pest. Entomon 42:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Delabie JH (2001) Trophobiosis between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): an overview. Neotrop Entomol 30:501–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill M, Williams DJ, Maschwitz U (2002) Herdsmen ants and their mealybug partners. Abh Senckenberg Naturforsch Gesellschaft 557:1–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer M, Shingleton A (2001) Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids. Funct Ecol 15:544–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullan PJ, Kosztarab M (1997) Adaptations in scale insects. Annu Rev Entomol 42:23–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C, Agosti D, Delabie JH et al (2001) Acropyga and Azteca ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with scale insects (Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea): 20 million years of intimate symbiosis. Am Mus Novit 3335:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0082(2001)335<0001:AAAAHF>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishimoto-Yamada K, Itioka T, Kawai S (2005) Biological characterization of the obligate symbiosis between Acropyga sauteri Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Eumyrmococcus smithii Silvestri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae: Rhizoecinae) on Okinawa Island, southern Japan. J Nat Hist 39:3501–3524. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930500393145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPolla JS (2004) Acropyga (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the world. Contrib Am Entomol Inst 33:1–130

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPolla JS (2005) Ancient trophophoresy: a fossil Acropyga (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Dominican amber. Trans Am Entomol Soc 131:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPolla JS, Spearman LA (2007) Characterization of an Acropyga arnoldi mating swarm and early stage colony founding behavior. Trans Am Entomol Soc 133:449–452. https://doi.org/10.3157/0002-8320-133.3.449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPolla JS, Cover SP, Mueller UG (2002) Natural history of the mealybug-tending ant, Acropyga epedana, with descriptions of the male and queen castes. Trans Am Entomol Soc 128:367–376

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPolla JS, Burwell C, Brady SG et al (2008) A new ortheziid (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) from Australia associated with Acropyga myops Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and a key to Australian Ortheziidae. Zootaxa 1946:55–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1946.1.3

  • Page RD (2003) Tangled trees: phylogeny, cospeciation, and coevolution. University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SA, LaPolla JS (2020) Trophobiosis between a new species of Williamsrhizoecus (Hemiptera: Coccomorpha: Rhizoecidae) and Acropyga silvestrii (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Tanzania. Zootaxa 4853:283–291. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4853.2.9

  • Schneider SA, LaPolla JS (2011) Systematics of the mealybug tribe Xenococcini (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Pseudococcidae), with a discussion of trophobiotic associations with Acropyga Roger ants. Syst Entomol 36:57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00546.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith CR, Oettler J, Kay A et al (2007) First recorded mating flight of the hypogeic ant, Acropyga epedana, with its obligate mutualist mealybug, Rhizoecus Colombiensis. J Insect Sci 7:1–5

  • Völkl W, Woodring J, Fischer M et al (1999) Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences. Oecologia 118:483–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward PS (2000) Broad-scale patterns of diversity in leaf litter ant communities. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants. Standard Methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithson. Inst. Press, Washington, DC, pp 99–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DJ (1970) The mealybugs (Homoptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae) or sugar-cane, rice, and sorghum. Bull Entomol Res 60:109–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DJ (1998) Mealybugs of the genera Eumyrmococcus Silvestri and Xenococcus Silvestri associated with the ant genus Acropyga Roger and a review of the subfamily Rhizoecinae (Hemiptera, Coccoidea, Pseudococcidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol (United Kingdom) 67:1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DJ (2004a) Mealybugs of southern Asia. Natural History Museum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DJ (2004b) A synopsis of the subterranean mealybug genus Neochavesia Williams and Granara de Willink (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae: Rhizoecinae). J Nat Hist 38:2883–2899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DJ, Granara de Willink MC (1992) Mealybugs of Central and South America. CAB International, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Roxana Arauco Aliaga for accommodation at Cocha Cashu Biological Station and for assistance with permitting (SERFOR #003620). Special thanks to Dr. Harald Beck (Towson University) and the 2019 Tropical Field Ecology class for allowing SAS and JSL to join in on their trip to Peru. Support for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (award number 1754242 to JSL and SAS). The research was supported also in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture; USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by SAS and JSL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SAS and JS and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott A. Schneider.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Edited by Heraldo Vasconcelos

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, S.A., Sodano, J. & LaPolla, J.S. Distinguishing Symbiotic Partners of Acropyga Ants from Free-Living Soil Inhabitants. Neotrop Entomol 51, 641–647 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-022-00948-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-022-00948-9

Keywords

Navigation