Ground Beetles in a Changing World: Communities in a Modified Wetland Landscape

Abstract

Wetlands are being increasingly affected by anthropogenic activities worldwide. The Lower Delta of the Paraná River, one of the most important wetlands in Argentina, has been profoundly altered because most of the natural environments were drained or diked to make them suitable for different agricultural activities. As a result, the landscape is characterized by a mosaic of Salicaceae afforestations of different ages interspersed with patches of secondary forests and grazing grasslands. The high susceptibility of Carabidae and Aphodiidae to natural and human-induced disturbances and management practices is reflected by changes in their spatiotemporal distribution. We performed a 1-year study to analyze and compare beetle’s communities inhabiting different habitat types in this modified wetland landscape. A total of 58 beetle species were recorded, of which 48 were carabids and 10 aphodids. Although species richness and diversity were higher in productive habitats (afforestations and grasslands) than in secondary forests, hydrophilic species were only found in the latter. Community parameters varied seasonally. Our results indicate a close relationship between wetland beetle communities and vegetation cover in each habitat type. Human activity increases heterogeneity across this landscape, which favors the colonization of new species but causes the loss or displacement of autochthonous species. The secondary forests could serve as alternative habitats for beetles typical of humid environments. We propose the maintenance of the current heterogeneous mosaic to favor the diversity of ground beetles and the implementation of changes in water management for the benefit of hydrophilic beetle species.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3

References

  1. Baigún CRM, Puig A, Minotti PG, Kandus P, Quintana RD, Vicari R, Bó RF, Oldani NO, Nestler JA (2008) Resource use in the Parana River Delta (Argentina): moving away from an ecohydrological approach? Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 8:245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker C, Lawrence RL, Montagne C, Patten D (2007) Change detection of wetland ecosystems using Landsat imagery and change vector analysis. Wetlands 27:610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bicknell JE, Phelps SP, Davies RG, Mann DJ, Struebig MJ, Davies ZG (2014) Dung beetles as indicators for rapid impact assessments: evaluating best practice forestry in the neotropics. Ecol Indic 43:154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bó RF, Quintana RD (2011) La fauna silvestre en el Bajo Delta Insular del Río Paraná. Diversidad, situación y uso tradicional. In: El Patrimonio natural y cultural del Bajo Delta Insular. Bases para su conservación y uso sustentable. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 120–133 pp

  5. Bó RF, Quintana RD, Courtalón P, Astrada E, Bolkovic ML, Coco GL, Magnano A (2010) Efectos de los cambios en el régimen hidrológico por las actividades humanas sobre la vegetación y la fauna silvestre del Delta del Río Paraná. In: Endicamientos y terraplenes en el Delta del Paraná. Situación, efectos ambientales y marco jurídico. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Fundación humedales/Wetlands International. 33–63 pp

  6. Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R. Springer Science & Business Media

  7. Brose U (2003) Regional diversity of temporary wetland carabid beetle communities: a matter of landscape features or cultivation intensity? Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:163–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Butovsky RO (2011) Heavy metals in carabids (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabrero-Sañudo FJ, Lobo JM (2003) Reconocimiento de los factores determinantes de la riqueza de especies: El caso de los Aphodiinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Aphodiidae) en la península ibérica. Graellsia 59(2–3):155–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Castro AV, Porrini DP, Cicchino AC (2012) Ensamble peridomiciliario de carábidos (Coleoptera: Carabidae) en un talar del sudeste bonaerense, Argentina. Rev Soc Entomol Argent 71(3–4):231–247

    Google Scholar 

  11. Castro AV, Porrini DP, Cicchino AC (2014) Annual activity density of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of a Celtis ehrenbergiana (Rosales: Celtidaceae) Forest of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. J Insect Sci 14(1):252–262

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chungu D (2014) Impact of land use on assemblages of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in Zambia. Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cicchino AC (2005) Carabidocenosis edáfica del Talar de Nahuel Rucá, Partido de Mar Chiquita, Buenos Aires. In: Publicaciones V Reunión Científico Técnica de Biología del Suelo y V Encuentro sobre Fijación Biológica de Nitrógeno, Comunidades Terrestres 2:1–13

  14. Cicchino AC (2006) Diversidad de Carábidos (Insecta, Coleoptera, Carabidae) de un talar joven de la Laguna Nahuel Rucá, partido de mar chiquita, provincia de Buenos Aires. In: Talares Bonaerenses y su Conservación. Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara-Universidad Maimónides, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 137–145 pp

  15. Cicchino AC, Farina JL (2005) Carabidofauna de los suelos lindantes con la laguna litoral de la Reserva Natural del Puerto de Mar del Plata, provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. In: Publicaciones V Reunión Científico Técnica de Biología del Suelo y V Encuentro sobre Fijación Biológica de Nitrógeno, Área Temática I, Comunidades Terrestres 3:1–15

  16. Colwell RK (2005) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples

  17. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cumming G, Fidler F, Vaux DL (2007) Error bars in experimental biology. J Cell Biol 177(1):7–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Di Rienzo JA, Casanofes F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2016) InfoStat Software Page. InfoStat, Córdoba

    Google Scholar 

  20. Digweed SC (1995) Digging out the “digging-in effect” of pitfall traps: influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pedobiologia 39:561–576

    Google Scholar 

  21. Errouissi F, Jay-Robert PJ (2019) Consequences of habitat change in euromediterranean landscapes on the composition and diversity of dung beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea). Insect Conserv 23:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fracassi N (2012) Diversidad de mamíferos y aves en pajonales y forestaciones de salicáceas del Bajo Delta del río Paraná. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Google Scholar 

  23. Galafassi G (2011) Sistemas productivos, actores sociales y manejo del ambiente en el Bajo Delta Insular del río Paraná. In: El Patrimonio natural y cultural del Bajo Delta Insular del Río Paraná. Bases para su conservación y uso sostenible. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 161–178 pp

  24. Gardner RC, Barchiesi S, Beltrame C et al (2015) State of the world’s wetlands and their services to people: a compilation of recent analyses. Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grimbacher PS, Stork NE (2009) Seasonality of a diverse beetle assemblage inhabiting lowland tropical rain forest in Australia. Biotropica 41(3):328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanski I (1991) The dung insect community. In: Dung beetle ecology. Princeton University Press, New Jersey. 5–21 pp

  27. Harvey JA, van der Putten WH, Turin H, Wagenaar R, Bezemer TM (2008) Effects of changes in plant species richness and community traits on carabid assemblages and feeding guilds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127(1):100–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hayes RL, Summers C, Seitz W (1981) Estimating wildlife habitat variables, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service

  29. Ings TC, Hartley SE (1999) The effect of habitat structure on carabid communities during the regeneration of a native Scottish forest. For Ecol Manag 119(1–3):123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Junk WJ, An S, Finlayson CM, Gopal B, Květ J, Mitchell SA et al (2013) Current state of knowledge regarding the world’s wetlands and their future under global climate change: a synthesis. Aquat Sci 75(1):151–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kalesnik FA (2000) Relación entre las comunidades vegetales de los neoecosistemas de Albardón y la heterogeneidad ambiental del Bajo Delta del Río Paraná: Tendencias sucesionales y proyecciones sobre la composición futura. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kalesnik F, Valles L, Quintana R, Aceñolaza P (2008) Parches relictuales de Selva en Galería (Monte Blanco) en la región del Bajo Delta del Río Paraná. INSUGEO, Misc. (17)

  33. Kandus P, Malvárez AI (2004) Vegetation patterns and change analysis in the lower delta islands of the Paraná River (Argentina). Wetlands 4:620–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kandus P, Quintana RD, Bó RF (2006) Patrones de paisajes y biodiversidad del Bajo Delta del Río Paraná: mapa de ambientes. Buenos Aires, Argentina

  35. Kotze DJ, O’Hara RB (2003) Species decline-but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) declines in Europe. Oecologia 135:138–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Krebs JR, Davies NB (1993) An introduction to behavioural ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kwiatkowski A (2011) Assemblages of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in humid forest habitats of different stage of succession in the Puszcza Knyszynska Forest (northeastern Poland). Zookeys 100:447–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM (2000) Habitat managment to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu Rev Entomol 45:175–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lövei GL, Sunderland KD (1996) The ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annu Rev Entomol 41:241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Magnano AL, Fracassi N, Nanni AS, Quintana RD (2019) Changes in bird assemblages in an afforestation landscape in the Lower Delta of the Paraná River, Argentina. Emu. https://doi.org/10.1080/01584197.2019.1581032

  41. Magurran AE (2013) Measuring biological diversity. Eds. J. Wiley & Sons

  42. Menalled FD, Smith RG, Dauer JT, Fox TB (2007) Impact of agricultural management on carabid communities and weed seed predation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118(1):49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca (República Argentina) (2011) Programa de servicios agrícolas provinciales. Proyecto desarrollo sustentable del Delta Bonaerense. Anexo VI. Estudio de Impacto Ambiental y Social, Buenos Aires

  44. Morello J, Buzai G, Baxendale C, Matteucci S, Rodriguez A, Godagnone R, Casas R (2000) Urbanización y consumo de tierra fértil. Cienc Hoy 55(10)

  45. Mostacedo B, Fredericksen T (2000) Manual de métodos básicos de muestreo y análisis en ecología vegetal. Proyecto de Manejo Forestal Sostenible (BOLFOR): Santa Cruz, Bolivia

  46. Myers N, Knoll A (2001) The biotic crisis and the future of evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci Biol 98:5389–5392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Nanni AS, Quintana RD, Fracassi NG, Cicchino AC (2016) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) inhabiting anthropogenic habitats in the lower delta of the Paraná river, Argentina: geographic distribution and ecological characteristics. Aust Entomol 56(3):244–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. National Meteorological Service (1992) Estadística Climatológica, Serie B n° 6, Fuerza Aérea Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  49. Niemelä J (2001) Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and habitat fragmentation: a review. Eur J Entomol 98:127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Novacek MJ, Cleland EE (2001) The current biodiversity extinction event: scenarios for mitigation and recovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci Biol 98(10):5466–5470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Numa C, Lobo JM, Verdu JR (2012) Scaling local abundance determinants in Mediterranean dung beetles. Insect Conserv Divers 5(2):106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’hara B, Simpson GL, Solymos P, ... Wagner H (2016) The vegan package 2008

  53. Paleologos M, Cicchino A, Marasa ME, Sarandon SJ (2007) Las estructuras de dominancia de los ensambles carabidológicos como indicadoras de disturbio en agorecosistemas. Un ejemplo en dos viñedos bajo diferentes manejos en la costa de Berisso, Buenos Aires. RBA 2(2):655–659

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pielou EC (1976) Ecological diversity. Wiley InterScience. New York

  55. Quintana RD (2011) Del paisaje natural al paisaje cultural: la intervención antrópica del Bajo Delta Insular del Río Paraná. In: El Patrimonio natural y cultural del Bajo Delta Insular del Río Paraná. Bases para su conservación y uso sostenible. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 171–177 pp

  56. Quintana RD (2018) Humedales, biodiversidad y servicios ecosistémicos. ¿Hacia dónde vamos? In: Aguas + Humedales. UNSAM EDITA Buenos Aires, Argentina

  57. Quintana RD, Bó RF (2011) ¿Por qué el Delta del Paraná es una región única dentro del territorio de la Argentina? In: El Patrimonio natural y cultural del Bajo Delta Insular del Río Paraná. Bases para su conservación y uso sostenible. Buenos Aires, Argentina. 43–53 pp

  58. Quintana RD, Kalesnik FA (2007) Wetlands modification and wildlife habitat suitability: can capybaras survive in a matrix of poplar and willow afforestations. Miscelánea 17:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  59. Quintana RD, Bó RF, Astrada E, Reeves C (2014) Lineamientos para una Ganadería Ambientalmente Sustentable en el Delta del Paraná (Guidelines for environmentally sustainable livestock farming in the Delta of the Paraná River). Fundación Humedales/Wetlands International LAC, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  60. Ridsill-Smith TJ, Kirk AA (1981) Dung beetles and dispersal of cattle dung. Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Grassland Invertebrate. Ecology 3:215–219

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sica YV, Quintana RD, Radeloff VC, Gavier-Pizarro GI (2016) Wetland loss due to land use change in the Lower Paraná River Delta, Argentina. Sci Total Environ 568:967–978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Team RC (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna 2016

    Google Scholar 

  63. van Asselen S, Verburg PH, Vermaat JE, Janse JH (2013) Drivers of wetland conversion: a global meta-analysis. PLoS One 8:e81292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA, Watt AD, Niemelä J (2005) Effect of land-use heterogeneity on carabid communities at the landscape scale. Ecography 28:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Vanbergen AJ, Woodcock BA, Koivula M, Niemelä J, Kotze DJ, Bolger T, ... Lencina JL (2010) Trophic level modulates carabid beetle responses to habitat and landscape structure: a pan-European study. Ecol Entomol 35(2):226–235

  66. Vu VQ (2011) ggbiplot: a ggplot2 based biplot. R package

  67. Wolda H (1988) Insect seasonality: why? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 19:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Woodcock BA (2005) Pitfall trapping in ecological studies. In: Insect sampling in forest ecosystems. 37–57 pp

  69. Zedler JB, Kercher S (2005) Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Rev Lit Arts Am 30:39–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank at the Agricultural Experimental Station (EEA) – Delta INTA for their support for conducting field work. This study was conducted in the framework of projects PICT Bicentenario No. 2227 of the National Agency for Science and Technology and PIP No. 0092 of the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RQ and NF originally formulated the idea, AN and AC developed the methodology, AN and AM conducted the fieldwork, AN prepared the samples, AC and AN performed the taxonomic identification, AN performed the statistical analyses, and AN, NF, and RQ wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A S Nanni.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by Heraldo Vasconcelos – UFU

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nanni, A.S., Fracassi, N.G., Magnano, A.L. et al. Ground Beetles in a Changing World: Communities in a Modified Wetland Landscape. Neotrop Entomol 48, 729–738 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-019-00689-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Carabidae
  • Aphodiidae
  • habitat type
  • secondary forests
  • hydrophilic beetle