Abstract
The effects of body size, age, feeding and mating status, conspecific volatiles from live adults, synthetic aggregation pheromone, and a pheromone synergist, ethyl acetate, on the mating behavior of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier, were investigated. To evaluate these factors, variables such as mating latency, frequency and duration, and refractory period were assessed. While both, body size and age, influenced the mating behavior, the latter showed a stronger effect. The large males recorded frequent and longer matings, whereas the young males outperformed the old weevils in all the studied variables. The difference in body size or age of females showed a limited effect. After 72 h without food, the males showed a significant decline in mating frequency and duration, and refractory period. Mating status showed comparatively stronger effects on mating variables. In the case of females, mating status emerged as the most important factor affecting four out of five variables. The volatiles from the males, grouped males and females, and synthetic aggregation pheromone both alone and in combination with ethyl acetate triggered mating initiation, propelled mating frequency, prolonged total mating duration, and reduced the refractory period. However, the presence of females or ethyl acetate alone was a weak mating stimulator.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Azim MM, Batt AM, Okil AM, Haggag SM (2009) Influence of feeding with various concentrations of sugar cane solution on some biological aspects of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Oliv. (Curculionidae: Coleoptera). Egypt J Appl Sci 24:700–708
Abdel-Azim MM, Vidyasagar PSPV, Al-Dosari SA, Mumtaz R (2012) Impact of mating frequency on fecundity, fertility and longevity of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curuclionidae). J Agric Sci Technol A2:520–528
Aldhafer HM, Alahmadi AZ, Alsuhaibani AM (1998) Biological studies on the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Oliv. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. King Saud University, Agricultural Research Center. Res Bull 75:5–30
Al-Nujiban AA, Aldosari SA, Al Suhaibani AM, Abdel-Azim MM, Ibrahim SMM, Shukla P (2015) Effect of date palm cultivar on fecundity and development of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. Bull Insectol 68(2):199–206
Andres JA, Cordero-Rivera A (2000) Copulation duration and fertilization success in a damselfly: an example of cryptic female choice? Anim Behav 59(4):695–703. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1372
Arnaud L, Haubruge E (1999) Mating behaviour and male mate choice in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Behav 136(1):67–77. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853999500677
Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400850600
Avalos JA, Soto A (2015) Study of chromatic attraction of the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus using bucket traps. Bull Insectol 68(1):83–90
Avand-Faghih A (2004) Identification et application agronomique de synergistes végétaux de la phéromone du charançon Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) 1790. These pour obtenir le titre de docteur de l’INA-PG, Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon et Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique France
Bauerfeind SS, Fischer K (2005) Effects of food stress and density in different life stages on reproduction in a butterfly. Oikos 111(3):514–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13888.x
Benelli G (2015) Should I fight or should I flight? How studying insect aggression can help integrated pest management. Pest Manag Sci 71(7):885–892. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3974
Birkinshaw LA, Smith RH (2001) Prostephanus truncatus mate choice on contact: does pheromone signaling by males affect their mating success? Entomol Exp Appl 98(3):345–351. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2001.00791.x
Bista M, Omkar (2015) Age dependent mate choice influences reproductive and progeny attributes in aphidophagous ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur J Entomol 112(4):648–657
Blanckenhorn WU, Mühlhäuser C, Morf C, Reusch T, Reuter M (2000) Female choice, female reluctance to mate and sexual selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Ethology 106(7):577–593. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2000.00573.x
Cook DF (1988) Sexual selection in dung beetles. II. Female fecundity as an estimate of male reproductive success in relation to horn size, and alternative behavioral strategies in Onthophagus binodis (Scarabeidae: Onthophagini). Aust J Zool 36(5):521–532. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9880521
Crean CS, Dunn DW, Day TH, Gilburn AS (2000) Female mate choice for large male size in several species of seaweed flies (Diptera: Coelopidae). Animal Behav 58:121–126
Dickinson JL (1986) Prolonged mating in the milkweed leaf beetle Labidomera clivicollis clivicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): a test of the ‘sperm loading’ hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18(5):331–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299664
El-Sabea AMR, Faleiro JR, Abo-El-Saad MM (2009) The threat of red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus to date plantations of the gulf region in the middle-east: an economic perspective. Outlooks Pest Manag 20(3):131–134. https://doi.org/10.1564/20jun11
Fedina TY, Lewis SM (2006) Proximal traits and mechanisms for biasing paternity in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60(6):844–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0228-7
French BW, Hammack L (2014) Male reproductive competition and components of female fitness in relation to body size in northern corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 107(1):279–287. https://doi.org/10.1603/AN13153
French BW, Hammack L, Tallamy DW (2015) Mating success, longevity, and fertility of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (chrysomelidae: coleoptera) in relation to body size and cry3bb1-resistant and cry3bb1-susceptible genotypes. Insects 6(4):943–960. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects6040943
Friberg U (2006) Male perception of female mating status: its effect on copulation duration, sperm defence and female fitness. Anim Behav 72(6):1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.021
Ghosh CC (1912) Life-histories of Indian insects—III. The rhinoceros beetle (Oryctes rhinoceros) and the red or palm weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus). Mem Dep Agric India 2(10):193–217
Gould F (1991) Arthropod behavior and the efficacy of plant protectants. Annu Rev Entomol 36(1):305–330. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.001513
Hagley EAC (1965) On the life history and habits of the palm weevil, Rhynchophorus palmarum. Ann Entomol Soc Am 58(1):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/58.1.22
Hanks LM, Millar JG, Paine TD (1996) Body size influences mating success of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J Insect Behav 9(3):369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214016
Harvey-Samuel T, Ant T, Alphey L (2017) Towards the genetic control of invasive species. Biol Invasions 19(6):1683–1703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1384-6
Jones TM, Elgar MA (2004) The role of male age, sperm age and mating history on fecundity and fertilization success in the hide beetle. Proc R Soc London B: Biol Sci 271(1545):1311–1318. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2723
Kaakeh W (1998) The mating behaviour of the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Emir J Agric Sci 10(1):24–46. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v10i1.5128
Labeyrie E, Blanckenhorn WU, Rahier M (2003) Mate choice and toxicity in two species of leaf beetles with different types of chemical defense. J Chem Ecol 29(7):1665–1680. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024283016219
Lebreton S, Grabe V, Omondi AB, Ignell R, Becher PG, Hansson BS, Sachse S, Witzgall P (2014) Love makes smell blind: mating suppresses pheromone attraction in Drosophila females via Or65a olfactory neurons. Sci Rep 4:7119
Leftwich PT, Bolton M, Chapman T (2015) Evolutionary biology and genetic techniques for insect control. Evol Appl 9(1):212–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12280
Mclain DK, Boromisa RD (1987) Male choice, fighting ability, assortative mating and intensity of sexual selection in the milkweed longhorn beetle, Tetrapes tetraophthalmus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20(4):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292176
Milonas PG, Andow DA (2010) Virgin male age and mating success in Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Anim Behav 79(2):509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.005
Nirula KK (1956) Investigations on the pests of coconut palm, part-IV. Rhynchophorus ferrugineus F. Indian Coconut J 9:229–247
Omkar, Singh SK, Mishra G (2010) Parental age at mating affects reproductive attributes of the aphidophagous ladybird beetle, Coelophora saucia (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur J Entomol 107(3):341–347. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2010.043
Pervez AO, Omkar, Richmond AS (2004) The influence of age on reproductive performance of the predatory ladybird beetle, Propylaea dissecta. J Insect Sci 4:22
Prabhu ST, Patil RS (2009) Studies on the biological aspects of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Oliv.) Karnataka J Agric Sci 22:732–733
Savalli UM, Fox CW (1999) The effect of male size, age, and mating behavior on sexual selection in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Ethol Ecol Evol 11(1):49–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1999.9522841
Scharf I, Filin I, Ovadia O (2009) A trade-off between growth and starvation endurance in a pit-building antlion. Oecologia 160(3):453–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1316-y
Silva WD, Mascarin GM, Romagnoli EM, Bento JMS (2012) Mating behavior of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J Insect Behav 25(4):408–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-011-9314-4
Siva-Jothy MT, Stutt AD (2003) A matter of taste: direct detection of female mating status in the bedbug. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 270:679–652
Tallamy DW, Powell BE, McClafferty JA (2002) Male traits under cryptic female choice in the spotted cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Behav Ecol 13(4):511–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/13.4.511
Thornhill H, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674433960
Vanderbilt CF, Giblin-Davis RM, Weissling TJ (1998) Mating behavior and sexual response to aggregation pheromone of Rhynchophorus cruentatus (Curculionidae: Coleoptera). Fla Entomol 81(3):351–360. https://doi.org/10.2307/3495925
Viado GBS, Bigornia AE (1949) A biological study of the Asiatic palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Oliv. (Curculionidae: Coleoptera). Philipp Agric 33:1–27
Wattanapongsiri A (1966) A revision of the genera Rhynchophorus and Dynamis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Dep Agric Sci Bull, Bangkok, Thailand 1(1):1–328
Xie J, De Clercq P, Zhang Y, Wu H, Pan C, Pang H (2015) Nutrition-dependent phenotypes affect sexual selection in a ladybird. Sci Rep 5(1):13111. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13111
Zada A, Soroker V, Harel M, Nakache J, Dunkelblum E (2002) Quantitative GC analysis of secondary alcohol pheromones: determination of release rate of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, pheromone from lures. J Chem Ecol 28(11):2299–2306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021057501459
Acknowledgments
We thank KSU – Deanship of Scientific Research, Research Chair Program, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
Funding
This research was supported by Grants-in-aid for Scientific Research No. 11-AGR1477-02, King Abdul Aziz City for Science and Technology – National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (KACST-NSTIP) (MAARIFAH), Saudi Arabia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Edited by Andres Gonzáles - Univ de la República, Uruguay
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdel-Azim, M.M., Aldosari, S.A. & Shukla, P. Factors Influencing Mating Behavior and Success in the Red Palm Weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae). Neotrop Entomol 48, 25–37 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-018-0592-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-018-0592-9