Neotropical Entomology

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 466–473 | Cite as

Old Fragments of Forest Inside an Urban Area Are Able to Keep Orchid Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini) Assemblages? The Case of a Brazilian Historical City

  • R P Ferreira
  • C Martins
  • M C Dutra
  • C B Mentone
  • Y Antonini
Ecology, Behavior and Bionomics

Abstract

Retention of habitat fragments within the urban matrix can provide critical resources for the maintenance of regional biodiversity while still providing socio-economic value. Euglossini bees are important components in a community as they are important pollinators for economically valuable plants as well as hundreds of orchid species. However, some species are very sensitive to environmental impacts like urbanization. This study presents the role of antique urban fragments in a historical city in Brazil and compares it with a conservation area on the aspects of orchid bee assemblage, such as richness, composition, and abundance. Four fragments inside the city of Ouro Preto and three inside Parque Estadual do Itacolomi (PEIT) were sampled for Euglossini bees. Sorensen similarity index was used to compare community composition. The Mantel test was applied to verify the hypothesis that an urban center is a barrier for the mobility of the individuals. Fourteen Euglossini species from the region were registered. Close to 75% of the sampled bees were collected from the PEIT sampling areas. The fragments presented differences in Euglossini richness and abundance. A majority of the sampled fragments were dominated by the Eulaema cingulata Fabricius, Eulaema nigrita Lepeletier, and Euglossa securigera Dressler species. We found differences on community composition between the fragments localized in PEIT and those located in the urban center. The data suggest that there is a possible flux of individuals between the sampled fragments. The various small forest fragments in Ouro Preto, primarily in backyards, may also serve as stepping stones between sampled fragments.

Keywords

Habitat fragment urbanization orchid bees 

References

  1. Ackerman JD (1983) Specificity and mutual dependency of the orchid–euglossine bee interaction. Biol J Linn Soc 20:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguiar WM, Gaglianone MC (2008) Comunidade de Abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em remanescentes de Mata Estacional Semidecidual sobre Tabuleiro no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Neotrop Entomol 37:118–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonini Y, Martins RP, Aguiar LMS, Loyola RD (2013) Richness, composition and trophic niche of stingless bee assemblages in urban forest remnants. Urb Ecosys (in press)Google Scholar
  4. Bierregaard RO Jr, Lovejoy TE, Kapos dos Santos V (1992) The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments. Bioscience 42:859–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cane JH (2001) Habitat fragmentation and native bees: a premature verdict? Conserv Ecol 5:1–12Google Scholar
  6. CBCN-Centro Brasileiro de Conservação da Natureza (2004) Diagnóstico Ambiental e Enriquecimento Florestal do Vale dos Contos e Horto Botânico Ouro Preto–Minas Gerais. Relatório da Prefeitura Municipal de Ouro PretoGoogle Scholar
  7. Dressler RL (1982) Biology of orchid bees (Euglossini). Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 13:373–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eltz T, Roubik DW, Lunau K (2005a) Experience-dependent choice ensure species-specific fragrance accumulation in male orchid bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eltz T, Sager A, Lunau K (2005b) Juggling with volatiles: exposure or perfumes by displaying male orchid bees. J Comp Physiol 191:575–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujaco MAG, Leite MGP, Messias MCTB (2010) Análise multitemporal das mudanças no uso e ocupação do Parque Estadual do Itacolomi (MG) através de técnicas de geoprocessamento. Rev Esc Minas 63:695–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaston KJ, Smith RM, Thompson K, Warren PH (2005) Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 14:395–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hernandez JL, Frankie GW, Thorp RW (2009) Ecology of urban bees: a review of current knowledge and directions for future study. Cities Environ 2:1–13Google Scholar
  13. Janzen DH (1971) Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science 171:203–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krebs CJ, Kenney AJ (2002) Fortran programs for Ecological Methodology. Exeter Software, East Setauket, New York 11733 (www.Exetersoftware.com)
  15. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 260 pGoogle Scholar
  16. Martins F, De Souza AKP (2005) Estratificação vertical de abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae) em uma área de Mata Atlântica, Paraíba. Rev Bras Zool 22:913–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marzluff JM, Rodewald AD (2008) Conserving biodiversity in urbanizing areas: non-traditional views from a bird’s perspective. Cities Environ 1:1–27Google Scholar
  18. McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Millet-Pinheiro P, Schlindwein C (2005) Do Euglossine males (Apidae: Euglossini) leave tropical rainforest to collect fragrances in sugarcane monocultures? Rev Bras Zool 22:853–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nemésio A (2007) The community structure of male orchid bees along the Neotropical region. Rev Bras Zooc 9:151–158, 2007Google Scholar
  21. Nemésio A (2008) Orchid bee community (Hymenoptera, Apidae) at an altitudinal gradient in a large forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Rev Bras Zool 10:251–258Google Scholar
  22. Nemésio A, Morato EF (2004) Euglossina (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apini) of the Humaitá Reserve, Acre State, Brazilian Amazon, with comments on bait trap. Rev Tecnol Amb 10:71–80Google Scholar
  23. Nemésio A, Morato EF (2006) The orchid-bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Acre state (northwestern Brazil) and a re-evaluation of Euglossine bait-trapping. Lundiana 7:59–64Google Scholar
  24. Nemésio A, Silveira FA (2006) Edge effects on the orchid bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apini: Euglossina) at a large remnant of Atlantic Rain Forest in southeastern Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 35:313–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nemésio A, Silveira FA (2007) Orchid bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossina) of Atlantic forest fragments inside an urban area in southeastern Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 36:186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oliveira ML (2006) Three new species of Amazonian bees belonging to the genus Eulaema (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Euglossini). Acta Amaz 36:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliveira ML, Campos LAO (1995) Abundância, riqueza e diversidade de abelhas Euglossinae (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em florestas contínuas de terra firme na Amazônia Central. Brasil Rev Bras Zool 12:547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palma S (1975) Contribución al estudio de los sifonoforos encontrados frente a la costa de Valparaiso. Aspectos ecologicos. In: II Simposio Latinoamericano sobre Oceanografia Biologica, vol 2. Univ. d’Orient, Venezuela, pp 119–133Google Scholar
  29. Peruquetti RC, Campos LAO, Coelho CDP, Abrantes CVM, Lisboa LCO (1999) Abelhas Euglossini (Apidae) de áreas de Mata Atlântica: abundância, riqueza e aspectos biológicos. Rev Bras Zool 16:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Powell AH, Powell GVN (1987) Population dynamics of male Euglossine bees in Amazonian forest fragments. Biotropica 19:176–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raw A (1989) The dispersal of Euglossine bees between isolated patches of eastern Brazilian wet forest (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Rev Bras Entomol 33:103–107Google Scholar
  32. Ramalho AV, Gaglianone MC, Oliveira ML (2009) Comunidades de abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica no Sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 53:95–101Google Scholar
  33. Rebêlo JMM, Garófalo CA (1997) Comunidades de machos de Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em matas semidecíduas do nordeste do estado de São Paulo. An Soc Entomol Bras 26:787–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roubik DW (1989) Ecology and natural history of tropical bees. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 514 pGoogle Scholar
  35. Rudd H, Vala J, Schaefer V (2002) Importance backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restor Ecol 10:368–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Silveira FA, Cure JR (1993) High altitude bee fauna of southeastern Brazil: implications for biogeographic patterns (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 28:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Somejima H, Markuzi M, Nagamitsu T, Nakasizuka T (2004) The effects of human disturbance on a stingless bee community in a tropical rainforest. Biol Conserv 120:577–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tonhasca A Jr, Albuquerque GS, Blackmer J (2002) Abundance and diversity of Euglossine bees in the fragmented landscape of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Biotropica 34:416–422Google Scholar
  39. Tonhasca A Jr, Albuquerque GS, Blackmer J (2003) Dispersal of Euglossine bees between fragments of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. J Trop Ecol 19:99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tratalos J, Fuller RA, Warren PH, Davies RG, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plan 83:308–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams NSG, McDonnell MJ, Seager EJ (2005) Factors influencing the loss of an endangered ecosystem in an urbanizing landscape: a case study of native grasslands from Melbourne, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 71:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zanette LR, Martins RP, Ribeiro SP (2005) Effects of urbanization on Neotropical wasp and bee assemblages in a Brazilian metropolis. Landsc Urban Plan 71:105–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zar JH (2002) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice- Hall, New Jersey, 662 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • R P Ferreira
    • 1
  • C Martins
    • 2
  • M C Dutra
    • 2
  • C B Mentone
    • 2
  • Y Antonini
    • 2
  1. 1.Apiário central, DBGUniv Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrasil
  2. 2.Lab de Biodiversidade–DEBIO–ICEBUniv Federal de Ouro PretoOuro PretoBrasil

Personalised recommendations