Skip to main content
Log in

Predation Potential of Chilocorus cacti (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to the Prickly Pear Cacti Pest Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae)

  • Biological Control
  • Published:
Neotropical Entomology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Functional response of the predator Chilocorus cacti (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on five densities of Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae) female adults was assessed under laboratory conditions. The searching efficiency of C. cacti significantly decreased as prey density increased. The logistic regression for the predator had a negative and significant linear parameter indicating a type II functional response. Non-linear regression for Holling predator equation estimated a handling time of 1.79 ± 0.129 h and attack rate coefficient of 0.1003 ± 0.030. Most of this handling time was because the predator spent a lot of time removing the waxy coating that protects adult females of D. opuntiae. Chilocorus cacti consumes females of D. opuntiae in their reproductive stage; therefore, it could be an effective natural enemy to suppress or regulate low density populations of D. opuntiae, preventing them to reach high densities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badii HM, Flores EA (2001) Prickly pear cacti pests and their control in Mexico. The Fla Entomol 84:503–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberra G (1995) History, economic and agro-ecological importance of cactus pear. In: Barberra G, Inglese P, Pimienta-Barrios E (eds) Agro-ecology, cultivation and uses of cactus pear. Paper 132, FAO Plant Production and Protection, Rome, pp 1–11

  • Brutsch MO, Zimmermann HG (1993) The prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) (Cactaceae) in South Africa: utilization of the naturalized weed, and of the cultivated plants. Econ Bot 47:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas J, Hullinger B (1994) Statistical analysis of functional response experiments. Biocontrol Sci Technol 4:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins MD, Wards S, Dixon AFG (1981) Handling time and the functional response of Aphelinus thomsoni, a predator and parasite of the aphid Drepanosiphum platanoides. J Anim Ecol 50:479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defelice MS (2004) Prickly pear cactus, Opuntia spp.: a spine-tingling tale. Weed Technol 18:869–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot JM (2003) A comparative study of the functional response of four species of carnivorous stoneflies. Freshw Biol 48:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenlon JS, Malcolm JF (2006) Modelling predation in functional response. Ecol Model 198:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Arhex VY, Corley JC (2004) La respuesta funcional: una revisión y guía experimental. Ecol Austral 14:83–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores MA, Rodríguez NS, Ramos EM, Payán ZF (2010) Estudio de Harmonia axirydis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae) como bioagente de control de Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Interciencia 35:506–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Githure CW, Zimmermann HG, Hoffmann JH (1999) Host specificity of biotypes of Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae): prospects for biological control of Opuntia stricta (Haworth) Haworth (Cactaceae) in Africa. Afr Entomol 7:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith MP (2004) The origins of an important cactus crop, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence. Am J Bot 91:1915–1921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gunog S, Donald LD (2011) A predator–prey model with a Holling type I functional response including a predator mutual interference. J Nonlinear Sci 21:811–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP (2000) The spatial and temporal dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Hassell MP, Lawton JH, Beddington JR (1977) Sigmoid functional response by invertebrate and parasitoids. J Anim Ecol 46:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JR, Sullivan PR, Welsby SM (1994) Biological control of Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw. var. stricta using Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) in an area of New South Wales, Australia, where Cactoblastiscactorum (Berg) is not a successful biological control agent. Agric Ecosyst Environ 48:241–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Biological Programme (1976) Studies in biological control. V.L. Deluchi (ed). Syndics of the Cambridge University Press, London

  • Isikber AA (2005) Functional response of two coccinellid predators, Scymnus levaillanti and Cycloneda sanguinea, to the cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii. Turk J Agric Forestry 29:347–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Juliano SA (2001) Non-linear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 178–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Juliano SA, Williams FM (1987) A comparison of methods for estimating the functional response parameters of the random predator equation. J Anim Ecol 56:641–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratina P, Vos M, Bateman A, Anholt BR (2007) Species diversity modulates predation. Ecology 88:1917–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kratina P, Vos M, Bateman A, Anholt BR (2009) Functional responses modified by predator density. Oecologia 159:425–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:1–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell DM, Wratten SD, Pugh AR, Barnes A-M (2012) ‘New species association’ biological control? Two coccinellid species and an invasive psyllid pest in New Zealand. Bio Control 62:86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira E, Oliveira CL, Sarmento RA, Rezende LM, Fadini MAM (2004) Aspectos biológicos do predador Cycloneda sanguinea (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) alimentado com Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae) e Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Homoptera: Aphididae). Biosci J 21:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Omkar Pervez A (2004) Functional and numerical responses of Propylea dissecta (Mulsant) (Col., Coccinellidae). J Appl Entomol 128:140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervez A, Omkar (2003) Predation potential and handling time estimates of a generalist ladybird beetle, Propylea dissecta. Biol Mem 29: 91-97

  • Pervez A, Omkar (2005) Functional responses of coccinellid predators: an illustration of a logistic approach. J Insect Sci 5(5): 1–6. Available online: insectscience.org/5.5

  • Rocha LDA, Redaelli LR (2004) Functional response of Cosmoclopius nigroannulatus (Hem.: Reduviidae) to different densities of Spartocera dentiventris (Hem.: Coreidae) nymphae. Braz J Biol 64:309–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers D (1972) Random search and insect population models. J Anim Ecol 41:369–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2001) SAS user’s guide: statistics. SAS Institute Inc. Version 8, North Carolina, USA

  • Trexler JC, Maculloch CE, Travis J (1988) How can the functional response best be determined? Oecologia 76:206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanegas RJM, Lomeli FJR, Rodríguez LE, Mora AG, Valdez JM (2010) Enemigos naturales de Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) en Opuntia Ficus-Indica (L.) Miller en el centro de México. Acta Zool Mex 26:415–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedenmann RN, O’neil RJ (1991) Laboratory measurement of the functional response of Podisus maculiventris (Say) (Heteroptera, Pentatomidae). Environ Entomol 20:610–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams FM, Juliano SA (1985) Further difficulties in the analysis of functional response experiments and a resolution. Can Entomol 117:605–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HG, Moran VC (1991) Biological control of prickly pear, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae), in South Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 37:29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank to Dr. Refugio Lomelí Flores, Colegio de Posgraduados, Montecillo, Mexico, for confirming the insect identification and providing helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Flores.

Additional information

Edited by Madelaine Venzon – EPAMIG

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flores, A., Olvera, H., Rodríguez, S. et al. Predation Potential of Chilocorus cacti (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to the Prickly Pear Cacti Pest Dactylopius opuntiae (Hemiptera: Dactylopiidae). Neotrop Entomol 42, 407–411 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0139-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-013-0139-z

Keywords

Navigation