Characterization of stationary phases based on monosubstituted benzene retention indices using correspondence factor analysis and linear solvation energy relationships in RPLC

Original Paper
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

In reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), the comparison of experimental results obtained from different columns is a complex problem. A correspondence factor analysis (CFA) and a linear solvation energy relationship (LSER) were applied on retention data to characterize second-order intermolecular interactions responsible for retention on a set of RPLC columns. Seven octadecyl-C18 columns with different packing materials are obtained from different manufacturers and one octyl-C8 column. The retention data were determined under isocratic conditions using a methanol–water (65:35, v/v) mobile phase. The chromatographic retention indices based on alkan-2-ones and alkyl aryl ketones retention index scales are calculated using a multiparametric least-squares regressions iterative method. The CFA and LSER results permitted to highlight that the retention indices were appropriate for studying the second-order retention mechanisms on the eight chromatographic systems investigated and exhibited the best reproducibility. Although many earlier studies have reported the use of chemometric methods to characterize chemical factors affecting retention in RPLC using retention factors as retention parameters, this is the first study based on retention indices.

Keywords

Retention indices Correspondence factor analysis Solvation parameter model Monosubstituted benzenes Characterization of RPLC stationary phases Retention mechanism 

References

  1. 1.
    R. Kaliszan, Quantitative Structure-Chromatographic Retention Relationships (Wiley, New York, 1987), pp. 54–55Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.M. Smith, J. Chromatogr. A 236(2), 313 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.M. Smith, T.G. Hurdley, R. Gill, A.C. Moffat, Chromatographia, 19(1), (1984) 407Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.K. Baker, L.A. Cates, M.D. Corbett, J.W. Huber, D.L. Lattin, J. Liq. Chromatogr. 5(5), 829 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Bogusz, in Retention and selectivity in liquid chromatography. Prediction, standardization and phase comparisons, ed. by R.M. Smith ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995), p. 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.E. Reese, L.Y. Huang, S.H. Hsu, S. Tripathi, C.H. Lochmüller, J. Chromatogr. Sci. 34, 101 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Wen, M. Talebi, R.I.J. Amos, R. Szucs, J.W. Dolan, C.A. Pohl, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.01.053 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Talebi, G. Schuster, R.A. Shelli, R. Szucs, P.R. Haddad, J. Chromatogr. A 1424, 69 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.H. Park, M. Talebi, R.I.J. Amos, E. Tyteca, P.R. Haddad, R. Szucs, C.A. Pohl, J.W. Dolan, J. Chromatogr. A 1523, 173 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Righezza, J.R. Chrétien, J. Chromatogr. A 556, 169 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Righezza, J.R. Chrétien, J. Chromatogr. A 544, 393 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Kaliszan, M.A. Van Straten, M. Markuszewski, C.A. Cramers, H.A. Classens, J. Chromatogr. A 855(2), 455 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.F. Poole, S.K. Poole, J. Chromatogr. A 965, 263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Andrić, K. Héberger, K. How, J. Chromatogr. A. 1488, 45 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Daghir-Wojtkowiak, S. Studzińska, B. Buszewski, R. Kaliszan, M.J. Markuszewski, Anal. Methods 6, 1189 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Plenis, L. Konieczna, N. Miękus, T. Bączek, Chromatographia 76, 255 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Kritikos, A. Tsantili-Kakoulidou, Y. L. Loukas. Y. Dotsikas, J. Chromatogr. A. 1403, 70 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P.E. Morgan, D.J. Barlow, M. Hanna-Brown, R.J. Flanagan, Chromatographia 75, 693 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.H. Abraham, A. Ibrahim, A.M. Zissimos, J. Chromatogr. A 1037, 29 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.H. Abraham, G.S. Whiting, J. Chromatogr. A 594, 229 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.H. Abraham, H.S. Chadha, R.A.E. Leitao, R.C. Mitchell, W.J. Lambert, R. Kaliszan, A. Nasal, P. Haber, J. Chromatogr. A 766, 35 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. West, E. Lesellier, J. Chromatogr. A 1110, 181 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. K.Valkó, C. Plass, D. Bevan, M.H. Reynolds, Abraham, J. Chromatogr. A 797, 41 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. B.Walczak, M. Morin-Allory, M. Lafosse, J.R. Dreux, Chrétien, J. Chromatogr. A 395, 183 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.R. Chrétien, B. Walczak, L. Morin-Allory, M. Dreux, M. Lafosse, J. Chromatogr. A 371, 253 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R.M. Smith,. C.M. Burr, J. Chromatogr. A 481, 71 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    R.M. Smith, C.M. Burr, J. Chromatogr. A 475, 57 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Maeck, A.Y. Badjah Hadj Ahmed, A. Touabet, B.Y. Meklati, Chromatographia 22, 245 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. Didaoui, A. Touabet, B.Y. Meklati, U. Lewin-Kretzschmar, W. Engewald, J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 22(11), 613 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    L. Didaoui, H. Larbi, A. Touabet, Chromatographia 70(5/6), 921 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Larbi, L. Didaoui, Y. Foudil Cherif, A. Touabet, Chromatographia 74, 459 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Ounnar, M. Righezza, B. Delatousche, J.R. Chretien, J. Toullec, Chromatographia 47(3/4), 164 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. Ounnar, M. Righezza, J.R. Chretien., J. Liq. Chrom. Rel. Technol. 21(13), 2017 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iranian Chemical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire d´Analyse Organique Fonctionnelle, Faculté de ChimieUniversité des Sciences et de la Technologie Houari BoumedieneAlgiersAlgeria
  2. 2.Centrale Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, ISM2 UMR 7313MarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations