Using visual features based on MPEG-7 and deep learning for movie recommendation

Abstract

Item features play an important role in movie recommender systems, where recommendations can be generated by using explicit or implicit preferences of users on traditional features (attributes) such as tag, genre, and cast. Typically, movie features are human-generated, either editorially (e.g., genre and cast) or by leveraging the wisdom of the crowd (e.g., tag), and as such, they are prone to noise and are expensive to collect. Moreover, these features are often rare or absent for new items, making it difficult or even impossible to provide good quality recommendations. In this paper, we show that users’ preferences on movies can be well or even better described in terms of the mise-en-scène features, i.e., the visual aspects of a movie that characterize design, aesthetics and style (e.g., colors, textures). We use both MPEG-7 visual descriptors and Deep Learning hidden layers as examples of mise-en-scène features that can visually describe movies. These features can be computed automatically from any video file, offering the flexibility in handling new items, avoiding the need for costly and error-prone human-based tagging, and providing good scalability. We have conducted a set of experiments on a large catalog of 4K movies. Results show that recommendations based on mise-en-scène features consistently outperform traditional metadata attributes (e.g., genre and tag).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    recsys.deib.polimi.it.

  2. 2.

    www.youtube.com.

  3. 3.

    recsys.deib.polimi.it.

References

  1. 1.

    Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(6):734–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bao X, Fan S, Varshavsky A, Li K, Roy Choudhury R (2013) Your reactions suggest you liked the movie: automatic content rating via reaction sensing. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, pp 197–206

  3. 3.

    Bastan M, Cam H, Gudukbay U, Ulusoy O (2010) Bilvideo-7: an mpeg-7-compatible video indexing and retrieval system. IEEE MultiMed 17(3):62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bogdanov D, Serrà J, Wack N, Herrera P, Serra X (2011) Unifying low-level and high-level music similarity measures. IEEE Trans Multimed 13(4):687–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Braunhofer M, Elahi M, Ricci F (2014) Techniques for cold-starting context-aware mobile recommender systems for tourism. Intelligenza Artificiale 8(2):129–143

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Brezeale D, Cook DJ (2008) Automatic video classification: a survey of the literature. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 38(3):416–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Buckland W (2008) What does the statistical style analysis of film involve? A review of moving into pictures. More on film history, style, and analysis. Lit Linguist Comput 23(2):219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cantador I, Szomszor M, Alani H, Fernández M, Castells P (2008) Enriching ontological user profiles with tagging history for multi-domain recommendations. In: 1st International workshop on collective semantics: collective intelligence & the semantic web (CISWeb 2008), Tenerife, Spain

  9. 9.

    Cremonesi P, Elahi M, Garzotto F (2015) Interaction design patterns in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th biannual conference on Italian SIGCHI chapter. ACM, pp 66–73

  10. 10.

    Cremonesi P, Elahi M, Garzotto F (2017) User interface patterns in recommendation-empowered content intensive multimedia applications. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):5275–5309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cremonesi P, Garzotto F, Negro S, Papadopoulos AV, Turrin R (2011) Looking for good recommendations: a comparative evaluation of recommender systems. In: Human–computer interaction–INTERACT 2011. Springer, pp 152–168

  12. 12.

    Cremonesi P, Koren Y, Turrin R (2010) Performance of recommender algorithms on top-n recommendation tasks. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on recommender systems, RecSys 2010, Barcelona, Spain, September 26–30, 2010, pp 39–46

  13. 13.

    Deldjoo Y, Atani RE (2016) A low-cost infrared-optical head tracking solution for virtual 3d audio environment using the nintendo wii-remote. Entertain Comput 12:9–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Deldjoo Y, Constantin MG, Schedl M, Ionescu B, Cremonesi P (2018) Mmtf-14k: a multifaceted movie trailer feature dataset for recommendation and retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM multimedia systems conference. ACM

  15. 15.

    Deldjoo Y, Cremonesi P, Schedl M, Quadrana M (2017) The effect of different video summarization models on the quality of video recommendation based on low-level visual features. In: Proceedings of the 15th international workshop on content-based multimedia indexing. ACM, p 20

  16. 16.

    Deldjoo Y, Elahi M, Cremonesi P, Garzotto F, Piazzolla P (2016) Recommending movies based on mise-en-scene design. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 1540–1547

  17. 17.

    Deldjoo Y, Elahi M, Cremonesi P, Garzotto F, Piazzolla P, Quadrana M (2016) Content-based video recommendation system based on stylistic visual features. J Data Semant 5:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Deldjoo Y, Elahi M, Quadrana M, Cremonesi P, Garzotto F (2015) Toward effective movie recommendations based on mise-en-scène film styles. In: Proceedings of the 11th biannual conference on Italian SIGCHI chapter. ACM, pp 162–165

  19. 19.

    Deldjoo Y, Elahi Y, Cremonesi P, Moghaddam FB, Caielli ALE (2017) How to combine visual features with tags to improve movie recommendation accuracy? In: E-commerce and web technologies: 17th international conference, EC-Web 2016, Porto, Portugal, September 5–8, 2016, Revised Selected Papers, vol. 278. Springer, p 34

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Deldjoo Y, Frà C, Valla M, Cremonesi P (2017) Letting users assist what to watch: an interactive query-by-example movie recommendation system. In: Proceedings of the 8th Italian information retrieval workshop, Lugano, Switzerland, June 05–07, 2017, pp 63–66. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1911/10.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017

  21. 21.

    Dorai C, Venkatesh S (2001) Computational media aesthetics: finding meaning beautiful. IEEE MultiMed 8(4):10–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Elahi M, Braunhofer M, Ricci F, Tkalcic M (2013) Personality-based active learning for collaborative filtering recommender systems. In: Congress of the Italian association for artificial intelligence. Springer, pp 360–371

  23. 23.

    Elahi M, Deldjoo Y, Bakhshandegan Moghaddam F, Cella L, Cereda S, Cremonesi P (2017) Exploring the semantic gap for movie recommendations. In: Proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender systems. ACM, pp 326–330

  24. 24.

    Elahi M, Ricci F, Repsys V (2011) System-wide effectiveness of active learning in collaborative filtering. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on social web mining, co-located with IJCAI, Barcelona, Spain

  25. 25.

    Elahi M, Ricci F, Rubens N (2013) Active learning strategies for rating elicitation in collaborative filtering: a system-wide perspective. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST) 5(1):13

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Elahi M, Ricci F, Rubens N (2016) A survey of active learning in collaborative filtering recommender systems. Comput Sci Rev 20:29–50

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fleischman M, Hovy E (2003) Recommendations without user preferences: a natural language processing approach. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, pp 242–244

  28. 28.

    Gedikli F, Jannach D, Ge M (2014) How should i explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems. Int J Hum Comput Stud 72(4):367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Haghighat M, Abdel-Mottaleb M, Alhalabi W (2016) Fully automatic face normalization and single sample face recognition in unconstrained environments. Expert Syst Appl 47:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hardoon DR, Szedmak S, Shawe-Taylor J (2004) Canonical correlation analysis: an overview with application to learning methods. Neural Comput 16(12):2639–2664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Harper FM, Konstan JA (2015) The movielens datasets: history and context. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst (TiiS) 5(4):19

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    He R, McAuley J (2015) Vbpr: visual bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.01784

  33. 33.

    Hu W, Xie N, Li L, Zeng X, Maybank S (2011) A survey on visual content-based video indexing and retrieval. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 41(6):797–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jakob N, Weber SH, Müller MC, Gurevych I (2009) Beyond the stars: exploiting free-text user reviews to improve the accuracy of movie recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 1st international CIKM workshop on Topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion. ACM, pp 57–64

  35. 35.

    Lika B, Kolomvatsos K, Hadjiefthymiades S (2014) Facing the cold start problem in recommender systems. Expert Syst Appl 41(4):2065–2073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Manjunath BS, Ohm JR, Vasudevan VV, Yamada A (2001) Color and texture descriptors. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 11(6):703–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Manjunath BS, Salembier P, Sikora T (2002) Introduction to MPEG-7: multimedia content description interface, vol 1. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Melville P, Sindhwani V (2011) Recommender systems. In: Encyclopedia of machine learning. Springer, pp 829–838

  39. 39.

    Musto C, Narducci F, Lops P, Semeraro G, de Gemmis M, Barbieri M, Korst J, Pronk V, Clout R (2012) Enhanced semantic tv-show representation for personalized electronic program guides. In: User modeling, adaptation, and personalization. Springer, pp 188–199

  40. 40.

    Nasery M, Elahi M, Cremonesi P (2015) Polimovie: a feature-based dataset for recommender systems. In: ACM RecSys workshop on crowdsourcing and human computation for recommender systems (CrawdRec), vol 3, pp 25–30

  41. 41.

    Ning X, Karypis G (2012) Sparse linear methods with side information for top-n recommendations. In: Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, pp 155–162

  42. 42.

    Rasheed Z, Shah M (2003) Video categorization using semantics and semiotics. In: Video mining. Springer, pp 185–217

  43. 43.

    Rasheed Z, Sheikh Y, Shah M (2005) On the use of computable features for film classification. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 15(1):52–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rendle S, Freudenthaler C, Gantner Z, Schmidt-Thieme L (2009) Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence. AUAI Press, pp 452–461

  45. 45.

    Rubens N, Elahi M, Sugiyama M, Kaplan D (2015) Active learning in recommender systems. In: Recommender systems handbook. Springer, pp 809–846

  46. 46.

    Saveski M, Mantrach A (2014) Item cold-start recommendations: learning local collective embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on recommender systems. ACM, pp 89–96

  47. 47.

    Schedl M, Zamani H, Chen CW, Deldjoo Y, Elahi M (2018) Current challenges and visions in music recommender systems research. Int J Multimed Inf Retr. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13735-018-0154-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Schein AI, Popescul A, Ungar LH, Pennock DM (2002) Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, pp 253–260

  49. 49.

    Shi Y, Larson M, Hanjalic A (2014) Collaborative filtering beyond the user-item matrix: a survey of the state of the art and future challenges. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 47(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A (2015) Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 1–9

  51. 51.

    Szomszor M, Cattuto C, Alani H, O’Hara K, Baldassarri A, Loreto V, Servedio VDP (2007) Folksonomies, the semantic web, and movie recommendation. In: 4th European Semantic Web Conference, Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web 2.0, Innsbruck, Austria

  52. 52.

    Tubularinsights: 500 hours of video uploaded to youtube every minute [forecast]. http://tubularinsights.com/hours-minute-uploaded-youtube/. Accessed 19 Jan 2018

  53. 53.

    Vig J, Sen S, Riedl J (2009) Tagsplanations: explaining recommendations using tags. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. ACM, pp 47–56

  54. 54.

    Wang XY, Zhang BB, Yang HY (2014) Content-based image retrieval by integrating color and texture features. Multimed Tools Appl 68(3):545–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wang Y, Xing C, Zhou L (2006) Video semantic models: survey and evaluation. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 6:10–20

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Xu S, Jiang H, Lau F (2008) Personalized online document, image and video recommendation via commodity eye-tracking. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on recommender systems. ACM, pp 83–90

  57. 57.

    Yang B, Mei T, Hua XS, Yang L, Yang SQ, Li M (2007) Online video recommendation based on multimodal fusion and relevance feedback. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM international conference on image and video retrieval. ACM, pp 73–80

  58. 58.

    Zettl H (2002) Essentials of applied media aesthetics. In: Dorai C, Venkatesh S (eds) Media computing. The Springer international series in video computing, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–38

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Zettl H (2013) Sight, sound, motion: applied media aesthetics. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Zhang ZK, Liu C, Zhang YC, Zhou T (2010) Solving the cold-start problem in recommender systems with social tags. EPL (Europhys Lett 92(2):28,002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Zhao X, Li G, Wang M, Yuan J, Zha ZJ, Li Z, Chua TS (2011) Integrating rich information for video recommendation with multi-task rank aggregation. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, pp 1521–1524

  62. 62.

    Zhou H, Hermans T, Karandikar AV, Rehg JM (2010) Movie genre classification via scene categorization. In: Proceedings of the international conference on multimedia. ACM, pp 747–750

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Telecom Italia S.p.A., Open Innovation Department, Joint Open Lab S-Cube, Milan. The work has been also supported by the Amazon AWS Cloud Credits for Research program.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Elahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deldjoo, Y., Elahi, M., Quadrana, M. et al. Using visual features based on MPEG-7 and deep learning for movie recommendation. Int J Multimed Info Retr 7, 207–219 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13735-018-0155-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Multimedia recommendation
  • Video analysis
  • Deep learning
  • Cold start
  • Visual features