Advertisement

Optimal control of molecular weight and particle size distributions in a batch suspension polymerization reactor

  • Abdollah Koolivand
  • Mohammad ShahrokhiEmail author
  • Hamzeh Farahzadi
Original Research
  • 47 Downloads

Abstract

Mechanistic modelling is an engineering approach to simulate reasonable physical and chemical processes to develop a model to describe the behaviour of a system. Mathematical models are commonly adopted to explore the physical limits of a process, and are applied to process development, optimization and control. In this work, the population balance model and the moment technique have been utilized to model a suspension polymerization reactor and predict the dynamic evolution of particle size and molecular weight distributions. These distributions are two important factors that affect the physical, rheological and mechanical properties of a polymer, and its final product quality. The cell average technique has been applied to solve the population balance equation, and demonstrate the model predictive capability by comparing its predictions with those obtained from experimental data published in the literature. In addition, the effects of initiator, chain transfer agent, stabilizer concentrations, temperature, and agitation rate on the final particle size and molecular weight distributions have been investigated. An optimal control strategy has been used to obtain the desired molecular weight distribution by manipulating the initiator concentration, concentration of the chain transfer agent and its addition time, and controlling the reactor temperature. Also, the impeller speed and initial value of the stabilizer have been utilized to achieve the desired final particle size distribution. The simulation results indicate that the control objectives have been achieved, and show that the proposed controllers are robust to a mismatched model.

Keywords

Mechanistic modelling Suspension polymerization Population balance model Sensitivity analysis Optimal control Model uncertainties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with the present work. There has been no financial support for this work.

Supplementary material

13726_2019_737_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kotoulas C, Kiparissides C (2006) A generalized population balance model for the prediction of particle size distribution in suspension polymerization reactors. Chem Eng Sci 61:332–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eliseeva VI, Ivanchev S, Kuchanov S, Lebedev A (2012) Emulsion polymerization and its applications in industry. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pardeshi S, Singh SK (2016) Precipitation polymerization: a versatile tool for preparing molecularly imprinted polymer beads for chromatography applications. Rsc Adv 6:23525–23536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li GL, Möhwald H, Shchukin DG (2013) Precipitation polymerization for fabrication of complex core–shell hybrid particles and hollow structures. Chem Soc Rev 42:3628–3646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jerca VV, Nicolescu FA, Vasilescu DS, Vuluga DM (2011) Synthesis of a new oxazoline macromonomer for dispersion polymerization. Polym Bull 66:785–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jerca VV, Nicolescu FA, Trusca R, Vasile E, Baran A, Anghel DF, Vasilescu DS, Vuluga DM (2011) Oxazoline-functional polymer particles graft with azo-dye. React Funct Polym 71:373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jerca VV, Nicolescu AF, Albu A-M, Vuluga DM (2008) Polymer architectures based on oxazoline monomers. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 483:78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arshady R (1992) Suspension, emulsion, and dispersion polymerization: a methodological survey. Colloid Polym Sci 270:717–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saliakas V, Kotoulas C, Meimaroglou D, Kiparissides C (2008) Dynamic evolution of the particle size distribution in suspension polymerization reactors: a comparative study on Monte Carlo and sectional grid methods. Can J Chem Eng 86:924–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferrari J, Castilhos F, Araújo P, Sayer C (2016) Modelingparticle size distribution in heterogeneous polymerization systems usingmultimodal logonormal function. Braz J Chem Eng 33:469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jahanzad F, Sajjadi S, Brooks BW (2004) On the evolution of particle size average and size distribution in suspension polymerization processes. Macromol Sy 1:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Machado R, Pinto J, Araújo P, Bolzan A (2000) Mathematical modeling of polystyrene particle size distribution produced by suspension polymerization. Braz J Chem Eng 17:395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pladis P, Alexopoulos AH, Kiparissides C (2014) Mathematical modeling and simulation of vinylidene fluoride emulsion polymerization. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:7352–7364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xie L, Luo ZH (2016) Modeling of the methyl methacrylate atom transfer radical suspension polymerization process: polymerization and particle kinetics. Macromol React Eng 10:479–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gonçalves MA, Pinto VD, Dias R, Hernándes-Ortiz JC, Costa MRP (2013) Dynamics of network formation in aqueous suspension RAFT styrene/divinylbenzene copolymerization. Macromol Sy 1:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yoon WJ, Ryu JH, Park YH (1998) Calculation of molecular weight distribution in styrene polymerization initiated by a binary initiator system. Korean J Chem Eng 15:330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang JS, Liao PH (1999) Molecular weight control of a batch polymerization reactor: experimental study. Ind Eng Chem Res 38:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clay PA, Gilbert RG (1995) Molecular weight distributions in free-radical polymerizations. 1. Model development and implications for data interpretation. Macromolecules 28:552–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Capeletto CA, Costa C, Sayer C, Araújo PH (2017) Mathematical modeling of molecular weight distribution in miniemulsion polymerization with oil-soluble initiator. AIChE J 63:2128–2140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gao H, Konstantinov IA, Arturo SG, Broadbelt LJ (2017) On the modeling of number and weight average molecular weight of polymers. Chem Eng J 327:906–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sundaram BS, Upreti SR, Lohi A (2005) Optimal control of batch MMA polymerization with specified time, monomer conversion, and average polymer molecular weights. Macromol Theory Simul 14:374–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shahrokhi M, Fanaei MA (2002) Nonlinear temperature control of a batch suspension polymerization reactor. Polym Eng Sci 42:1296–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Amaro B, Immanuel CD, Pistikopoulos EN, Daiß A, Hungenberg K, Saraiva PA (2010) Dynamic process optimisation in free-radical multicomponent polymerisation: butyl methacrylate and butyl acrylate case study. Comput Aided Chem Eng 28:577–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pereira PR, Fileti AM (2009) Optimization of MMA batch polymerization reaction by the implementation of IDP technique. Comput Aided Chem Eng 27:699–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tjiam C, Gomes VG (2014) Optimal operating strategies for emulsion polymerization with chain transfer agent. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:7526–7537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gao H, Waechter A, Konstantinov IA, Arturo SG, Broadbelt LJ (2018) Application and comparison of derivative-free optimization algorithms to control and optimize free radical polymerization simulated using the kinetic Monte Carlo method. Comput Chem Eng 108:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Christofides PD, El-Farra N, Li M, Mhaskar P (2008) Model-based control of particulate processes. Chem Eng Sci 63:1156–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Da Silva B, Dufour P, Sheibat-Othman N, Othman S (2012) Inferential MIMO predictive control of the particle size distribution in emulsion polymerization. Comput Chem Eng 38:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vafa E, Shahrokhi M, Abedini H (2010) Inferential closed-loop control of particle size and molecular weight distribution in emulsion polymerization of styrene. Polym Eng Sci 50:2306–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Farahzadi H, Shahrokhi M (2010) Dynamic evolution of droplet/particle size distribution in suspension polymerization of styrene. IranJ Chem Eng 7:49–60Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Achilias D, Kiparissides C (1992) Development of a general mathematical framework for modeling diffusion-controlled free-radical polymerization reactions. Macromolecules 25:3739–3750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crowley TJ, Choi KY (1997) Calculation of molecular weight distribution from molecular weight moments in free radical polymerization. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:1419–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Crowley TJ, Choi KY (1997) Discrete optimal control of molecular weight distribution in a batch free radical polymerization process. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:3676–3684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Crowley TJ, Choi KY (1998) Experimental studies on optimal molecular weight distribution control in a batch-free radical polymerization process. Chem Eng Sci 53:2769–2790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoon WJ, Ryu JH, Cheong C, Choi KY (1998) Calculation of molecular weight distribution in a batch thermal polymerization of styrene. Macromol Theory Simul 7:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kiparissides C, Alexopoulos A, Roussos A, Dompazis G, Kotoulas C (2004) Population balance modeling of particulate polymerization processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:7290–7302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Coulaloglou C, Tavlarides L (1977) Description of interaction processes in agitated liquid–liquid dispersions. Chem Eng Sci 32:1289–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Maggioris D, Goulas A, Alexopoulos A, Chatzi E, Kiparissides C (2000) Prediction of particle size distribution in suspension polymerization reactors: effect of turbulence nonhomogeneity. Chem Eng Sci 55:4611–4627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kumar J, Peglow M, Warnecke G, Heinrich S (2008) An efficient numerical technique for solving population balance equation involving aggregation, breakage, growth and nucleation. Powder Technol 182:81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Blavier L, Villermaux J (1984) Free radical polymerization engineeringII: modeling of homogeneous polymerization of styrene in a batch reactor, influence of initiator. Chem Eng Sci 39:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chaimberg M, Cohen Y (1990) Kinetic modeling of free-radical polymerization: a conservational polymerization and molecular weight distribution model. Ind Eng Chem Res 29:1152–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Konno M, Arai K, Saito S (1982) The effect of stabilizer on coalescence of dispersed drops in suspension polymerization of styrene. J Chem Eng Jpn 15:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Merquior D, Fontoura J, Pinto J, Lima E (2001) Studies of multiobjective optimization of batch free-radical polymerization process. Latin Am Appl Res 31:513–517Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Upreti SR, Sundaram BS, Lohi A (2005) Optimal control determination of MMA polymerization in non-isothermal batch reactor using bifunctional initiator. Eur Polym J 41:2893–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Soroush M, Kravaris C (1993) Optimal design and operation of batch reactors. 2. A case study. Ind Eng Chem Res 32:882–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdollah Koolivand
    • 1
  • Mohammad Shahrokhi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hamzeh Farahzadi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Petroleum EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations