Iranian Polymer Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 287–296 | Cite as

Tensile, thermal, flammability and morphological properties of sepiolite filled ethylene propylene diene monomer (EDPM) rubber composites

  • Nurul Aizan Mohd Zaini
  • Hanafi Ismail
  • Arjulizan Rusli
Original Research
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of sepiolite loading content on the curing characteristics, tensile mechanical, thermal, swelling, flammability and morphological properties of sepiolite-filled ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) composites was investigated. The composites were prepared with sepiolite loadings of 0–70 part per hundred (phr) of rubber using a two-roll mill. The results highlighted the improvement in the tensile properties and cross-link density values peaked at 60 phr of sepiolite loading. The scorch time, curing time, swelling percentage, and linear burning rate of the composites decreased with an increase in sepiolite loading. Thermogravimetric analysis showed an increasing trend with increase in sepiolite loading. The temperatures corresponding to 5, 25 and 50% weight loss (T5wt%, T25wt% and T50wt%) and the percentage of char residue gradually increased with increase in sepiolite loading. The homogenous dispersion of the sepiolite particles in the EPDM matrix and the formation of zigzag structures, especially at 60 phr, were the main reasons of the improvement of mechanical properties which were confirmed by the morphological studies. The formation of a protective layer, which acted as a barrier against heat transfer into the deeper layers, enhanced the flammability resistance of the composites. Notably, the EPDM filled with 60 phr sepiolite exhibited excellent performance in the aspects of mechanical, thermal stability and flammability properties and resistance towards swelling.

Keywords

Sepiolite Cure characteristics Tensile properties Swelling behaviour Thermal stability Flammability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all levels of staff in the Department of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM). They provided a wide variety of unconditional facilities to make this research success. One of the authors is also deeply indebted to the Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia (KPT(BS)821115065540) and Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) (600-BPD (PKH.1/2/9946) for providing funding to conduct this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Rattanasom N, Saowapark T, Deeprasertkul C (2007) Reinforcement of natural rubber with silica/carbon black hybrid filler. Polym Test 26:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Razzaghi-Kashani M, Hasankhani H, Kokabi M (2007) Improvement in physical and mechanical properties of butyl rubber with montmorillonite organo-clay. Iran Polym J 16:671–679Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Datta J, Kosiorek P, Wloch M (2016) Effect of high loading of titanium dioxide particles on the morphology, mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of the natural rubber-based composites. Iran Polym J 25:1021–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rooj S, Das A, Heinrich G (2011) Tube-like natural halloysite/fluoroelastomer nanocomposites with simultaneous enhanced mechanical, dynamic mechanical and thermal properties. Eur Polym J 47:1746–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Praveen S, Chattopadhyay PK, Albert P, Dalvi VG, Chakraborty BC, Chattopadhyay S (2009) Synergistic effect of carbon black and nanoclay fillers in styrene butadiene rubber matrix: development of dual structure. Compos A 40:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pavlidou S, Papaspyrides CD (2008) A review on polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 33:1119–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen QT, Baird DG (2006) Preparation of polymer–clay nanocomposites and their properties. Adv Polym Technol 25:270–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pojanavaraphan T, Schiraldi DA, Magaraphan R (2010) Mechanical, rheological, and swelling behavior of natural rubber/montmorillonite aerogels prepared by freeze-drying. Appl Clay Sci 50:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Razavi-Nouri M, Karami M, Naderi G (2017) Rheological behavior and morphology of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber/poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) blends filled by various organoclay contents. Appl Clay Sci 145:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chivrac F, Pollet E, Schmutz M, Avérous L (2010) Starch nano-biocomposites based on needle-like sepiolite clays. Carbohydr Polym 80:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olivato JB, Marini J, Yamashita F, Pollet E, Grossmann MVE, Avérous L (2017) Sepiolite as a promising nanoclay for nano-biocomposites based on starch and biodegradable polyester. Mater Sci Eng C 70:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zotti A, Borriello A, Ricciardi M, Antonucci V, Giordano M, Zarrelli M (2015) Effects of sepiolite clay on degradation and fire behaviour of a bisphenol A-based epoxy. Compos B 73:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tartaglione G, Tabuani D, Camino G, Moisio M (2008) PP and PBT composites filled with sepiolite: morphology and thermal behaviour. Compos Sci Technol 68:451–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kotal M, Bhowmick AK (2015) Polymer nanocomposites from modified clays: recent advances and challenges. Prog Polym Sci 51:127–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen H, Lu H, Zhou Y, Zheng M, Ke C, Zeng D (2012) Study on thermal properties of polyurethane nanocomposites based on organo-sepiolite. Polym Degrad Stab 97:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bilotti E, Zhang R, Deng H, Quero F, Fischer HR, Peijs T (2009) Sepiolite needle-like clay for PA6 nanocomposites: an alternative to layered silicates? Compos Sci Technol 69:2587–2595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Darder M, Matos CRS, Aranda P, Gouveia RF, Ruiz-Hitzky E (2016) Bionanocomposite foams based on the assembly of starch and alginate with sepiolite fibrous clay. Carbohydr Polym 157:1933–1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hapuarachchi TD, Peijs T (2010) Multiwalled carbon nanotubes and sepiolite nanoclays as flame retardants for polylactide and its natural fibre reinforced composites. Compos A 41:954–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lowe DJ, Chapman AV, Cook S, Busfield JJC (2011) Natural rubber nanocomposites by in situ modification of clay. Macromol Mater Eng 296:693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bidsorkhi HC, Soheilmoghaddam M, Heidar Pour R, Adelnia H, Mohamad Z (2014) Mechanical, thermal and flammability properties of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA)/sepiolite nanocomposites. Polym Test 37:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takei T, Oda R, Miura A, Kumada N, Kinomura N, Ohki R, Koshiyama H (2013) Effect of dispersion of sepiolite in sepiolite-NBR composite on the tensile strength. Compos Part B 44:260–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shokrzadeh A, Naderi G, Esmizadeh E (2014) Mechanical and rheological properties of calcium carbonate-filled ethylene propylene diene elastomer reinforced by metallic acrylate salt. Fibers Polym 15:1694–1700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang F, Tang QG, Chen C, Chen YL, Liu HM, Liu HF (2013) Effect of sepiolite nanofibers on properties of EPDM nanocomposites. Appl Mech Mater 320:595–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mohd Zaini NA, Ismail H, Rusli A (2017) Short review on sepiolite-filled polymer nanocomposites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 56:1665–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flory PJ, Rehner J (1943) Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks II. swelling. J Chem Phys 11:521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    America Society for Testing and Materials: ASTM D635-14. Standard test method for rate of burning and/or extent and time of burning of plastics in horizontal positionGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chikh A, Benhamida A, Kaci M, Pillin I, Bruzaud S (2016) Synergistic effect of compatibilizer and sepiolite on the morphology of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/poly(butylene succinate) blends. Polym Test 53:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suárez M, García-Romero E (2012) Variability of the surface properties of sepiolite. Appl Clay Sci 67–68:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Malas A, Das CK (2011) Carbon black–clay hybrid nanocomposites based upon EPDM elastomer. J Mater Sci 47:2016–2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Teh PL, Ishak ZAM, Hashim AS, Karger-Kocsis J, Ishiaku US (2004) Effects of epoxidized natural rubber as a compatibilizer in melt compounded natural rubber-organoclay nanocomposites. Eur Polym J 40:2513–2521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Khimi SR, Pickering KL (2014) A new method to predict optimum cure time of rubber compound using dynamic mechanical analysis. J Appl Polym Sci 131:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fröhlich J, Niedermeier W, Luginsland HD (2005) The effect of filler-filler and filler-elastomer interaction on rubber reinforcement. Compos A 36:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kamal MM, Clarke J, Ahmad A (2009) Comparison of properties of natural rubber compounds with various fillers. J Rubber Res 12:27–44Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nabil H, Ismail H, Azura AR (2013) Compounding, mechanical and morphological properties of carbon-black-filled natural rubber/recycled ethylene-propylene-diene-monomer (NR/R-EPDM) blends. Polym Test 32:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sombatsompop N, Kumnuantip C (2003) Rheology, cure characteristics, physical and mechanical properties of tire tread reclaimed rubber/natural rubber compounds. J Appl Polym Sci 87:1723–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bidsorkhi HC, Adelnia H, Naderi N, Moazeni N, Mohamad Z (2017) Ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer nanocomposites based on (un)modified sepiolite: flame retardancy, thermal, and mechanical properties. Polym Compos 38:1302–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Roy N, Bhowmick AK (2010) Novel in situ polydimethylsiloxane-sepiolite nanocomposites: structure-property relationship. Polymer 51:5172–5185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen H, Zheng M, Sun H, Jia Q (2007) Characterization and properties of sepiolite/polyurethane nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng A 445–446:725–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Khobragade PS, Hansora DP, Naik JB, Chatterjee A (2016) Flame retarding performance of elastomeric nanocomposites: a review. Polym Degrad Stab 130:194–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gong J, Tian N, Wen X, Chen X, Liu J, Jiang Z, Mijowska E, Tang T (2014) Synergistic effect of fumed silica with Ni2O3 on improving flame retardancy of poly(lactic acid). Polym Degrad Stab 104:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dittrich B, Wartig KA, Hofmann D, Mülhaupt R, Schartel B (2013) Flame retardancy through carbon nanomaterials: carbon black, multiwall nanotubes, expanded graphite, multi-layer graphene and graphene in polypropylene. Polym Degrad Stab 98:1495–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nurul Aizan Mohd Zaini
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hanafi Ismail
    • 1
  • Arjulizan Rusli
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Engineering CampusUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Applied SciencesUniversiti Teknologi Mara PerlisArauMalaysia

Personalised recommendations