Advertisement

Iranian Polymer Journal

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 639–649 | Cite as

Pervaporation properties of oleyl alcohol-filled polydimethylsiloxane membranes for the recovery of phenol from wastewater

  • Hong YeEmail author
  • Xiang Yan
  • Xiang Zhang
  • Weiwei Song
Original Paper

Abstract

In the present work, the modified polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membranes incorporated by oleyl alcohol (OA) were prepared for the first time. The polymeric membranes were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after modification. These membranes were used for the pervaporative separation of phenol from wastewater. The effects of OA loading and feed temperature on the pervaporation performances have been investigated. The influence of ignoring the partial pressure at the permeate side was compared and discussed. The results showed that the OA presence increased phenol flux and separation factor, and decreased water flux greatly with less than 9 wt% OA loading. The highest pervaporation separation index was obtained with 5 wt% OA loading. The driving force of phenol across the membranes was much lower than that of water, and permeation of phenol was much higher than water in nature. It is necessary to discuss and compare the intrinsic properties of different membranes using permeation and selectivity, even though the membranes are tested under the same feed temperature and concentration. The partial pressure of phenol at the permeation side cannot be simply omitted for its great effect on the permeation. Increasing feed temperature will result in the increase of flux and separation factor, but decrease of permeation.

Keywords

Pervaporation Oleyl alcohol Polydimethylsiloxane Modification Separation membrane 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (2172020, L140009), The Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions (CIT&TCD201404032).

Supplementary material

13726_2017_549_MOESM1_ESM.docx (93 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 92 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hong J, Qu Z, Ying L, Huang J, Chen R, Xing W (2016) One-step semi-continuous cyclohexanone production via hydrogenation of phenol in a submerged ceramic membrane reactor. Chem Eng J 284:724–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Busca G, Berardinelli S, Resini C, Arrighi L (2008) Technologies for the removal of phenol from fluid streams: a short review of recent developments. J Hazard Mater 160:265–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu P, Field RW, England R, Brisdon BJ (2001) Optimisation of organofunction PDMS membranes for the pervaporative recovery of phenolic compounds from aqueous streams. Sep Purif Technol 40:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Das S, Banthia AK, Adhikari B (2006) Removal of chlorinated volatile organic contaminants from water by pervaporation using a novel polyurethane urea–poly (methyl methacrylate) interpenetrating network membrane. Chem Eng Sci 61:6454–6467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kujawski W, Warszawski A, Ratajczak WO, Porbski T, Capa AWA, Ostrowska I (2004) Application of pervaporation and adsorption to the phenol removal from wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 40:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ji L, Shi B, Wang L (2015) Pervaporation separation of ethanol/water mixture using modified zeolite filled PDMS membranes. J Appl Polym Sci 132:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhuang X, Chen X, Su Y, Luo J, Feng S, Zhou H, Wan Y (2016) Surface modification of silicalite-1 with alkoxysilanes to improve the performance of PDMS/silicalite-1 pervaporation membranes: preparation, characterization and modeling. J Membr Sci 499:386–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Naik PV, Kerkhofs S, Martens JA, Vankelecom IFJ (2016) PDMS mixed matrix membranes containing hollow silicalite sphere for ethanol/water separation by pervaporation. J Membr Sci 502:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu P, Field RW, England R, Brisdon BJ (2001) A fundamental study of organofunctionalized PDMS membranes for the pervaporative recovery of phenolic compounds from aqueous streams. J Membr Sci 190:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    UragamiT Matsuoka Y, Miyata T (2016) Permeation and separation characteristics in removal of dilute volatile organic compounds from aqueous solutions through copolymer membranes consisted of poly(styrene) and poly(dimethylsiloxane) containing a hydrophobic ionic liquid by pervaporation. J Membr Sci 506:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Uragami T, Fukuyama E, Miyata T (2016) Selective removal of dilute benzene from water by poly(methyl methacrylate)-graft-poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes containing hydrophobic ionic liquid by pervaporation. J Membr Sci 510:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Das P, Ray SK (2016) Pervaporative recovery of tetrahydrofuran from water with plasticized and filled polyvinylchloride membranes. J Ind Eng Chem 34:321–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keshav A, Wasewar KL, Chand S (2009) Extraction of acrylic, propionic, and butyric acid using Aliquat 336 in oleyl alcohol: equilibria and effect of temperature. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:888–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bumbac G, Dumitrescu AM (2012) Process modelling and simulation for 1-butanol removing from fermentation broth by extraction with oleyl alcohol. Rev Chim 63:727–729Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    NgocL L, Wang Y, Chung T (2011) PEBAX/POSS mixed matrix membranes for ethanol recovery from aqueous solutions via pervaporation. J Membr Sci 379:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baker RW, Wijmans JG, Huang Y (2010) Permeability, permeance and selectivity: a preferred way of reporting pervaporation performance data. J Membr Sci 348:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo WF, Chung TS, Matsuuraa T (2004) Pervaporation study on the dehydration of aqueous butanol solutions: a comparison of flux vs. permeance, separation factor vs. selectivity. J Membr Sci 245:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang Y, Chung TS, Neo BW, Gruender M (2011) Processing and engineering of pervaporation dehydration of ethylene glycol via dual-layer polybenzimidazole (PBI)/polyetherimide (PEI) membranes. J Membr Sci 378:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pan Y, Zonghui LI, Liu T, Zheng Z, Ding X, Peng Y (2012) Shape memory hydrogen-bonded P(MM A-co-HEA)/PDMS-OH complexes. Acta Polym Sin 12:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gomez MTDP, Klein A, Repke JU, Wozny G (2008) A new energy-integrated pervaporation distillation approach. Desalination 224:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wijmans JG, Baker RW (1995) The solution-diffusion model: a review. J Membr Sci 107:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiraratananon R, Sampranpiboon P, Uttapap D, Huang RYM (2002) Pervaporation separation and mass transport of ethylbutanoate solution by polyether block amide (PEBA) membranes. J Membr Sci 210:389–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blahušiak K, Marták J, Miranda F, Schlosser Š, Teixeira JA (2013) Effect of viscosity of a liquid membrane containing oleyl alcohol on the pertraction of butyric acid. Chem Pap 67:1560–1568Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Richter BE, Jones BA, Ezzell JL, Porter NL, Avdalovic N, Pohl C, Chem A (1996) Accelerated solvent extraction: a technique for sample preparation. Anal Chem 68:1033–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pithan F, Staudt-Bickel C (2003) Crosslinked copolyimide membranes for phenol recovery from process water by pervaporation. Chem Phys Chem 4:967–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Budd PM, Elabas ES, Ghanem BS, Makhseed S, McKeown NB, Msayib KJ, Tattershall CE, Wang D (2004) Solution-processed, organophilic membrane derived from a polymer of intrinsic microporosity. Adv Mater 16:456–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gupta T, Pradhan NC, Adhikari B (2002) Synthesis and performance of a novel polyurethaneurea as pervaporation membrane for the selective removal of phenol from industrial waste water. Bull Mater Sci 25:533–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hao X, Pritzker M, Feng X (2009) Use of pervaporation for the separation of phenol from dilute aqueous solutions. J Membr Sci 335:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Food AdditivesBeijing Technology and Business University (BTBU)BeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Cleaner Production and Integrated Resource Utilization of China National Light IndustryBeijing Technology and Business University (BTBU)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations