Advertisement

Iranian Polymer Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 989–1002 | Cite as

Structure and performance characterization of PDMS/PES-based pervaporation membranes for ethanol/water separation

  • Mina Jafarinasab
  • Jalal BarzinEmail author
  • Hamid Reza Mortaheb
  • Hamid Mobedi
Original Paper

Abstract

Composite membranes, with a supporting layer of polyethersulfone (PES) and different active layers based on poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS), were prepared to perform pervaporative separation of ethanol from water. Two approaches were adopted to enhance the ethanol selectivity of PDMS by: (1) evaluation of the effects of PDMS viscosity of two different grades and (2) the incorporation of new hydrophobic silica in the active layer. First, the structural morphology of support and active layers of the composite membranes was characterized. AFM images were evidence of the nodular structure of the membrane surfaces. Mean pore size and pore size distribution of PES layer, mean nodular size of PDMS layer, and their surface roughness and water contact angle were determined. The relationship between these structural properties and the pervaporation performance of composite membranes has then investigated. The effects of operating parameters, feed concentration and temperature on the membrane performance indicated that increasing the feed temperature improved PDMS/PES membranes pervaporative efficiency. Based on the results obtained, it was found that PDMS viscosity influenced the pervaporation performance; low-viscosity PDMS had a greater separation factor and greater permeation fluxes than high-viscosity PDMS. Moreover, silica-filled membranes improved the separation factor and enhanced the ethanol flux relatively.

Keywords

PDMS/PES composite membrane Pervaporation Ethanol Viscosity Silica 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Mrs. Khosravi from AFM and SEM labs of Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute and Mrs. Salehi Shahrabi for her sincere cooperation and valuable suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Pakkethati K, Boonmalert A, Chaisuwan T, Wongkasemjit S (2011) Development of polybenzoxazine membranes for ethanol–water separation via pervaporation. Desalination 267:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhan X, Lu J, Tan T, Li J (2012) Mixed matrix membranes with HF acid etched ZSM-5 for ethanol/water separation: preparation and pervaporation performance. Appl Surf Sci 259:547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Le NL, Wang Y, Chung TS (2011) Pebax/POSS mixed matrix membranes for ethanol recovery from aqueous solutions via pervaporation. J Membr Sci 379:174–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chovau S, Gaykawad S, Straathof AJJ, Van der Bruggen B (2011) Influence of fermentation by-products on the purification of ethanol from water using pervaporation. Bioresour Technol 102:1669–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lue SJ, Chien C, Mahesh KPO (2011) Pervaporative concentration of ethanol–water mixtures using heterogeneous polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 384:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balat M, Balat H (2009) Recent trends in global production and utilization of bioethanol fuel. Appl Energy 86:2273–2282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jha AK, Chen L, Offeman RD, Balsara NP (2011) Effect of nanoscale morphology on selective ethanol transport through block copolymer membranes. J Membr Sci 373:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tin PS, Lin HY, Ong RC, Chung T (2011) Carbon molecular sieve membranes for biofuel separation. Carbon 49:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choedkiatsakul I, Charojrochkul S, Kiatkittipong W, Wiyaratn W, Soottitantawat A, Arpornwichanop A, Laosiripojana N, Assabumrungrat S (2011) Performance improvement of bioethanol-fuelled solid oxide fuel cell system by using pervaporation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:5067–5075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dobrak A, Figoli A, Chovau S, Galiano F, Simone S, Vankelecom IFJ, Drioli E, Van der Bruggen B (2010) Performance of PDMS membranes in pervaporation: effect of silicalite fillers and comparison with SBS membranes. J Colloid Interf Sci 346:254–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Claes S, Vandezande P, Mullens S, Leysen R, De Sitter K, Andersson A, Maurer FHJ, Van den Rul H, Peeters R, Van Bael MK (2010) High flux composite PTMSP-silica nanohybrid membranes for the pervaporation of ethanol/water mixtures. J Membr Sci 351:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee H, Cho EJ, Kim Y, Choi IS, Bae H (2012) Pervaporative separation of bioethanol using a polydimethylsiloxane/polyetherimide composite hollow-fiber membrane. Bioresour Technol 109:110–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wei W, Xia S, Liu G, Dong X, Jin W, Xu N (2011) Effects of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molecular weight on performance of PDMS/ceramic composite membranes. J Membr Sci 375:334–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang Y, Zhang P, Fu J, Zhou Y, Huang X, Tang X (2009) Pervaporation of ethanol aqueous solution by polydimethylsiloxane/polyphosphazene nanotube nanocomposite membranes. J Membr Sci 339:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yi S, Su Y, Wan Y (2010) Preparation and characterization of vinyltriethoxysilane (VTES) modified silicalite-1/PDMS hybrid pervaporation membrane and its application in ethanol separation from dilute aqueous solution. J Membr Sci 360:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chang K, Chung Y, Yang T, Lue SJ, Tung K, Lin Y (2012) Free volume and alcohol transport properties of PDMS membranes: insights of nano-structure and interfacial affinity from molecular modeling. J Membr Sci 417–418:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li Y, Verbiest T, Vankelecom I (2013) Improving the flux of PDMS membranes via localized heating through incorporation of gold nanoparticles. J Membr Sci 428:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vane LM, Namboodiri VV, Bowen TC (2008) Hydrophobic zeolite–silicone rubber mixed matrix membranes for ethanol–water separation: effect of zeolite and silicone component selection on pervaporation performance. J Membr Sci 308:230–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang W, Su X, Shi B, Wang L, Wang Q, Li S (2015) Influence of molecular weight of polydimethylsiloxane precursors and crosslinking content on degree of ethanol swelling of crosslinked networks. React Funct Polym 86:264–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lau WWY, Finlayson J, Dickson JM, Jiang J, Brook MA (1997) Pervaporation performance of oligosilylstyrene–polydimethylsiloxane membrane for separation of organics from water. J Membr Sci 134:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tan M, He G, Li X, Liu Y, Dong C, Feng J (2012) Prediction of the effects of preparation conditions on pervaporation performances of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/ceramic composite membranes by backpropagation neural network and genetic algorithm. Sep Purif Technol 89:142–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rezakazemi M, Shahidi K, Mohammadi T (2015) Synthetic PDMS composite membranes for pervaporation dehydration of ethanol. Desalin Water Treat 54:1542–1549Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jadav GL, Aswal VK, Bhatt H, Chaudhari JC, Singh PS (2012) Influence of film thickness on the structure and properties of PDMS membrane. J Membr Sci 415–416:624–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hyder MN, Huang RYM, Chen P (2008) Effect of selective layer thickness on pervaporation of composite poly(vinyl alcohol)–poly(sulfone) membranes. J Membr Sci 318:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van der Bruggen B, Jansen JC, Figoli A, Geens J, Boussu K, Drioli E (2006) Characteristics and performance of a ‘universal’ membrane suitable for gas separation, pervaporation and nanofiltration applications. J Phys Chem B 110:13799–13803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ahmad NA, Leo CP, Ahmad AL, Ramli WKW (2015) Membranes with great hydrophobicity: a review on preparation and characterization. Sep Purif Rev 44:109–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jafarinasab M, Barzin J, Mobedi H, Mortaheb HR, Salehi Jouzani G, Abbasalizadeh S (2012) Effect of surface roughness on the pervaporative performance of PDMS/PES composite membranes for ethanol/water separation. The 14th Iran national chemical engineering congress (IChEC 2012), Sharif University of Technology, Tehran. Accessed Oct 16–18Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tan S, Li L, Zhang Z, Wang Z (2010) The influence of support layer structure on mass transfer in pervaporation of composite PDMS–PSF membranes. Chem Eng J 157:304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Han X, Wang L, Li J, Zhan X, Chen J, Yang J (2011) Separation of ethanol from ethanol/water mixtures by pervaporation with silicone rubber membranes: effect of silicone rubbers. J Appl Polym Sci 119:3413–3421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zeidler S, Katzel U, Kreis P (2013) Systematic investigation on the influence of solutes on the separation behavior of a PDMS membrane in organic solvent nanofiltration. J Membr Sci 429:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yadav A, Lind ML, Ma X, Lin YS (2013) Nanocomposite silicalite-1/polydimethylsiloxane membranes for pervaporation of ethanol from dilute aqueous solutions. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:5207–5212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang N, Liu J, Li J, Gao J, Ji S, Li JR (2015) Tuning properties of silicalite-1 for enhanced ethanol/water pervaporation separation in its PDMS hybrid membrane. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 201:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhou H, Su Y, Wan Y (2014) Phase separation of an acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE)–water mixture in the permeate during pervaporation of a dilute ABE solution. Sep Purif Technol 132:354–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu G, Xiangli F, Wei W, Liu S, Jin W (2011) Improved performance of PDMS/ceramic composite pervaporation membranes by ZSM-5 homogeneously dispersed in PDMS via a surface graft/coating approach. Chem Eng J 174:495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Han X, Zhang X, Ma X, Li J (2014) Modified ZSM-5/polydimethylsiloxane mixed matrix membranes for ethanol/water separation via pervaporation. Polym Compos. doi: 10.1002/pc.23294 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sun D, Li BB, Xu ZL (2013) Pervaporation of ethanol/water mixture by organophilic nano-silica filled PDMS composite membranes. Desalination 322:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhou H, Shi R, Jin W (2014) Novel organic–inorganic pervaporation membrane with a superhydrophobic surface for the separation of ethanol from an aqueous solution. Sep Purif Technol 127:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shirazi Y, Ghadimi A, Mohammadi T (2012) Recovery of alcohols from water using polydimethylsiloxane–silica nanocomposite membranes: characterization and pervaporation performance. J Appl Polym Sci 124:2871–2882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li BB, Wang L, Sun D (2011) Organophilic modification and application of nano-fumed silica in pervaporation of ethanol/water mixture. Appl Mech Mater 117–119:679–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vane LM, Namboodiri VV, Meier RG (2010) Factors affecting alcohol–water pervaporation performance of hydrophobic zeolite–silicone rubber mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 364:102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Offeman RD, Ludvik CN (2011) Poisoning of mixed matrix membranes by fermentation components in pervaporation of ethanol. J Membr Sci 367:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Barzin J, Feng C, Khulbe KC, Matsuura T, Madaeni SS, Mirzadeh H (2004) Characterization of polyethersulfone hemodialysis membrane by ultrafiltration and atomic force microscopy. J Membr Sci 237:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Soroush A, Barzin J, Barikani M, Fathizadeh M (2012) Interfacially polymerized polyamide thin film composite membranes: preparation characterization and performance evaluation. Desalination 287:310–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jafarinasab M, Barzin J, Mobedi H, Mortaheb HR, Salehi Jouzani G, Abbasalizadeh S (2014) Design of support layers based on PES membrane to improve the permeability performance. The 8th international chemical engineering congress and exhibition (IChEC 2014) Kish. Accessed Feb 24–27Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Salehi Shahrabi S, Mortaheb HR, Barzin J, Ehsani MR (2012) Pervaporative performance of a PDMS/blended PES composite membrane for removal of toluene from water. Desalination 287:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mohammadi T, Aroujalian A, Bakhshi A (2005) Pervaporation of dilute alcoholic mixtures using PDMS membrane. Chem Eng Sci 60:1875–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Li L, Xiao Z, Tan S, Pu L, Zhang Z (2004) Composite PDMS membrane with high flux for the separation of organics from water by pervaporation. J Membr Sci 243:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chen J, Li J, Qi R, Ye H, Chen C (2008) Pervaporation performance of crosslinked polydimethylsiloxane membranes for deep desulfurization of FCC gasoline. I. Effect of different sulfur species. J Membr Sci 322:113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Khulbe KC, Feng CY, Matsuura T (2008) Synthetic polymeric membranes characterization by atomic force microscopy. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Singh S, Khulbe KC, Matsuura T, Ramamurthy P (1998) Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy. J Membr Sci 142:111–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Khayet M, Feng CY, Khulbe KC, Matsuura T (2002) Preparation and characterization of polyvinylidene fluoride hollow fiber membranes for ultrafiltration. Polymer 43:3879–3890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hobæk TC, Leinan KG, Leinaas HP, Thaulow C (2011) Surface nanoengineering inspired by evolution. Bio Nano Sci 1:63–77Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Molina JM, Vatai G, Molnar EB (2002) Comparison of pervaporation of different alcohols from water on CMG-OM-010 and SULZER membranes. Desalination 149:89–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vankelecom IFJ, Depre D, Beukelaer SD, Uytterhoeven JB (1995) Influence of zeolites in PDMS membranes: pervaporation of water/alcohol mixtures. J Phys Chem 99:13193–13197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jafarinasab M, Barzin J, Mobedi H, Mortaheb HR, Salehi Jouzani G, Abbasalizadeh S (2012) Effect of PDMS viscosity on the pervaporative performance of PDMS/PES composite membranes for ethanol/water separation. ISPST 2012, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran. Accessed Oct 21–25Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Teng MY, Lee KR, Liaw DJ, Lin YS, Lai JY (2000) Plasma deposition of acrylamide onto novel aromatic polyamide membrane for pervaporation. Eur Polym J 36:663–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran Polymer and Petrochemical Institute 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mina Jafarinasab
    • 1
  • Jalal Barzin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hamid Reza Mortaheb
    • 2
  • Hamid Mobedi
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomaterials DepartmentIran Polymer and Petrochemical InstituteTehranIran
  2. 2.Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Research Center of IranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations