Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of GPC3 in human breast cancer and its 3D structure prediction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Network Modeling Analysis in Health Informatics and Bioinformatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glypican-3 (GPC3) is a heparan sulfate proteoglycan that may function as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer (BC). To evaluate the prognostic value of GPC3 in BC, systematic analysis was performed in this study. To evaluate gene alteration during breast carcinogenesis, GPC3 expression was analyzed using the Oncomine, GENT, UALCAN, bcGenExMiner, and UCSC Xena databases. The prognostic role of GPC3 in BC was investigated using KM Plotter and PrognoScan databases. Promoter methylation status and heat map of GPC3 were determined using UALCAN and UCSC Xena. GPC3 expression was significantly downregulated in BC compared to that in normal tissues and was correlated with prognosis. However, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status were positively correlated with GPC3 expression, whereas basal-like status, triple-negative breast cancer status, and Scarff, Bloom, and Richardson grade criteria were negatively correlated with GPC3 expression. Further analysis indicated that GPC3 was correlated with Ras-association domain family 6 (RASSF6) expression in BC tissues. GPC3 may thus be considered a significant marker for predicting BC prognosis along with RASSF6. Comparative protein modeling of GPC3 was performed using a FASTA formatted sequence from NCBI, in Swiss model, and GPC3 was visualized using PyMOL tools. The GPC3 active site was identified with CASTp server. The Ramachandran plot in PROCHECK showed significant scores for the protein model in its most favored regions. ProSA server indicated the high accuracy of the protein model. However, large-scale and comprehensive studies are needed to clarify these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

available at https://medical-genomics.kribb.re.kr/GENT/). Boxes represent the median and the 25th and 75th percentiles; dots represent outliers. Red boxes represent tumor tissues; green boxes represent normal tissues. Red and green dashed lines represent the average value of all tumor and normal tissues, respectively

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md. Shahedur Rahman.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

13721_2020_234_MOESM1_ESM.pptx

Supplementary Fig. 1. GPC3 analysis in breast cancer (Oncomine database). Box plot comparing specific GPC3 expression in normal breast (left) and cancerous breast tissue (right) generated from the Oncomine database. Curtis breast dataset (A-I): analysis is shown for (A) invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast carcinoma (90), (B) invasive ductal breast carcinoma, (C) invasive lobular breast carcinoma, (D) medullary breast carcinoma (32), (E) tubular breast carcinoma (67), (F) ductal breast carcinoma in-situ (10), (G) mucinous breast carcinoma (46), (H) invasive breast carcinoma (21), and (I) breast carcinoma (14); TCGA breast dataset analysis (J-N): analysis is shown for (J) mixed lobular and ductal breast carcinoma (7), (K) invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (3), (L) invasive breast carcinoma (76), (M) invasive ductal breast carcinoma (389), (N) invasive lobular breast carcinoma (36); Finak breast dataset, analysis is shown for (O) invasive breast carcinoma (53); Karnoub breast dataset, analysis is shown for (P) invasive ductal breast carcinoma (7); and Richardson breast-2 dataset, analysis is shown for (Q) ductal breast carcinoma (40). IDILBC- invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast carcinoma, IDBC- invasive ductal breast carcinoma, ILBC- invasive lobular breast carcinoma, MBC- medullary breast carcinoma, TBC- tubular breast carcinoma, DBCIS- ductal breast carcinoma in-situ, IBC- invasive breast carcinoma, BC- breast carcinoma, MLDBC- mixed lobular and ductal breast carcinoma, IDLC- invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma, DBC- ductal breast carcinoma, TNBC- triple negative breast cancer. (PPTX 174 kb)

13721_2020_234_MOESM2_ESM.pptx

Supplementary Fig. 2. (A) Heat map of GPC3 expression and DNA methylation status; (B) GPC3 expression in different breast cancer DNA methylation clusters. Results generated using the UCSC Xena browser based on the data in TCGA. (PPTX 76 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3. Data table of BLAST search. (PPTX 90 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barman, U.D., Saha, S.K., Kader, M.A. et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of GPC3 in human breast cancer and its 3D structure prediction. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinforma 9, 24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13721-020-00234-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13721-020-00234-x

Keywords

Navigation