Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Germline variant of BRCA1 c.5332G>A has clinical features of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome

  • Case report
  • Published:
International Cancer Conference Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proband was a 39-year-old Japanese woman with stage I triple negative breast cancer. Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing revealed the presence of a BRCA1 c.5332G>A (p.Asp1778Asn) variant classified as a VUS in the heterozygous state. She underwent curative surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for her TNBC, but no intensive follow-up or risk-reducing surgery was performed in contrast to normal practice in a patient with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. At postoperative 2 years 6 months, elevation of CA15-3 led to the diagnosis of Stage III high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Studies and information in public databases at the time of the patient’s genetic testing showed only VUS results for c.5332G>A; within the next few years, one pathogenic and one likely pathogenic result were confirmed. Thus, according to a joint consensus recommendation of the ACMG/AMP, c.5332G>A is considered ‘likely pathogenic’. The public database should be checked regularly for VUS results, and practical management should be considered if reliable likely pathogenic or pathogenic reports were added.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melchor L, Benitez J (2013) The complex genetic landscape of familial breast cancer. Hum Genet 132:845–863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2019) Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology, Version 3

  3. Lindor NM, Goldgar DE, Tavtigian SV et al (2013) BRCA1/2 sequence variants of uncertain significance: a primer for providers to assist in discussions and in medical management. Oncologist 18(5):518–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kurian AW (2020) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations across race and ethnicity: distribution and clinical implications. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 22:72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hall MJ, Reid JE, Burbidge LA et al (2009) BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Cancer 115:2222–2233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai KN, Ho WK, Kang IN et al (2017) Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in multi-ethnic Asian cohort from a Malaysian case-control study. BMC Cancer 17:149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murray ML, Cerrato F, Bennett RL et al (2011) Follow-up of carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of unknown significance: variant reclassification and surgical decisions. Genet Med 13:998–1005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Macklin S, Durand N, Atwal P et al (2018) Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic. Genet Med 20(3):346–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mersch J, Brown N, Miller SP et al (2018) Prevalence of variant reclassification following hereditary cancer genetic testing. JAMA 320(12):1266–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahlborn LB, Dandanell M, Steffensen AY et al (2015) Splicing analysis of 14 BRCA1 missense variants classifies nine variants as pathogenic. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150(2):289–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Minucci A, Lalle M, Leo RD et al (2019) Additional molecular and clinical evidence open the way to definitive IARC classification of the BRCA1 c.5332G>A (p.Asp1778Asn) variant. Clin Biochem 63:54–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ClinVar [Internet]. National Center for Biotechnology Information. [VCV000055530.7]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/VCV000055530.7. Accessed 30 May 2021

  13. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S et al (2015) Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 17(5):405–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li H, Laduca H, Pesaran T et al (2020) Classification of variants of uncertain significance in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using personal and family history of cancer from individuals in a large hereditary cancer multigene panel testing cohort. Genet Med 22(4):701–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A et al (2016) Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 387:945–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiaki Saita.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

For this type of study formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saita, C., Aruga, T., Adachi, M. et al. Germline variant of BRCA1 c.5332G>A has clinical features of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Int Canc Conf J 11, 12–16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13691-021-00512-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13691-021-00512-z

Keywords

Navigation