Current Obesity Reports

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 354–362 | Cite as

Remotely Delivered Interventions for Obesity Treatment

  • Lauren E. BradleyEmail author
  • Christine E. Smith-Mason
  • Joyce A. Corsica
  • Mackenzie C. Kelly
  • Megan M. Hood
Psychological Issues (V Drapeau and V Ivezaj, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Psychological Issues


Purpose of Review

This review synthesizes recent research on remotely delivered interventions for obesity treatment, including summarizing outcomes and challenges to implementing these treatments as well as outlining recommendations for clinical implementation and future research.

Recent Findings

There are a wide range of technologies used for delivering obesity treatment remotely. Generally, these treatments appear to be acceptable and feasible, though weight loss outcomes are mixed. Engagement in these interventions, particularly in the long term, is a significant challenge. Newer technologies are rapidly developing and enable tailored and adaptable interventions, though research in this area is in its infancy.


Further research is required to optimize potential benefits of remotely delivered interventions for obesity.


Obesity eHealth mHealth Behavior interventions 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Lauren Bradley, Christine Smith-Mason, Joyce Corsica, Mackenzie Kelly, and Megan Hood declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Butryn ML, Webb V, Wadden TA. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011;34(4):841–59.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perri MG. Corsica JA. Improving the maintenance of weight lost in behavioral treatment of obesity. 2002;1:357–79.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mauro M, Taylor V, Wharton S, Sharma AM. Barriers to obesity treatment. Eur J Intern Med. 2008;19(3):173–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spruijt-Metz D, Wen CK, O’Reilly G, Li M, Lee S, Emken BA, et al. Innovations in the use of interactive technology to support weight management. Curr Obes Rep. 2015;4(4):510–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Internet/broadband fact sheet: Pew Research Center 2018. Available from:
  7. 7.
    Mobile fact sheet: Pew Research Center 2018. Available from:
  8. 8.
    Coons MJ, Demott A, Buscemi J, Duncan JM, Pellegrini CA, Steglitz J, et al. Technology interventions to curb obesity: a systematic review of the current literature. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2012;6(2):120–34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Krukowski R, Ells L, Harvey J, Morgan PJ, et al. eHealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(5):376–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Afshin A, Babalola D, Mclean M, Yu Z, Ma W, Chen CY, et al. Information technology and lifestyle: a systematic evaluation of Internet and mobile interventions for improving diet, physical activity, obesity, tobacco, and alcohol use. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang Y, Xue H, Huang Y, Huang L, Zhang D. A systematic review of application and effectiveness of mHealth interventions for obesity and diabetes treatment and self-management. Adv Nutr. 2017;8(3):449–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Podina IR, Fodor LA. Critical review and meta-analysis of multicomponent behavioral e-health interventions for weight loss. Health Psychol. 2018 Jun;37(6):501–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beleigoli AM, Andrade AQ, Cancado AG, Paulo MN, Diniz MFH, Ribeiro AL. Web-based digital health interventions for weight loss and lifestyle habit changes in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e298.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    •• Kozak AT, Buscemi J, Hawkins MA, Wang ML, Breland JY, Ross KM, et al. Technology-based interventions for weight management: current randomized controlled trial evidence and future directions. J Behav Med. 2017;40(1):99–111. This paper provides a comprehensive review of clinical trials evaluating effectiveness of interventions delivered via technology.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Godino JG, Merchant G, Norman GJ, Donohue MC, Marshall SJ, Fowler JH, et al. Using social and mobile tools for weight loss in overweight and obese young adults (Project SMART): a 2 year, parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(9):747–55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Little P, Stuart B, Hobbs FR, Kelly J, Smith ER, Bradbury KJ, et al. An internet-based intervention with brief nurse support to manage obesity in primary care (POWeR+): a pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(10):821–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spring B, Duncan JM, Janke EA, Kozak AT, McFadden HG, DeMott A, et al. Integrating technology into standard weight loss treatment: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(2):105–11.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu F, Kong X, Cao J, Chen S, Li C, Huang J, et al. Mobile phone intervention and weight loss among overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(5):337–48.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Siopis G, Chey T, Allman-Farinelli M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for weight management using text messaging. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015;28(Suppl 2):1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang JB, Cadmus-Bertram LA, Natarajan L, White MM, Madanat H, Nichols JF, et al. Wearable sensor/device (Fitbit One) and SMS text-messaging prompts to increase physical activity in overweight and obese adults: a randomized controlled trial. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(10):782–92.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Semper HM, Povey R, Clark-Carter D. A systematic review of the effectiveness of smartphone applications that encourage dietary self-regulatory strategies for weight loss in overweight and obese adults. Obes Rev. 2016;17(9):895–906.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thomas JG, Wing RR. Health-e-call, a smartphone-assisted behavioral obesity treatment: pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013;1(1):e3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    West JH, Belvedere LM, Andreasen R, Frandsen C, Hall PC, Crookston BT. Controlling your “App”etite: how diet and nutrition-related mobile apps lead to behavior change. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(7):e95.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hales S, Turner-McGrievy GM, Wilcox S, Fahim A, Davis RE, Huhns M, et al. Social networks for improving healthy weight loss behaviors for overweight and obese adults: a randomized clinical trial of the social pounds off digitally (Social POD) mobile app. Int J Med Inform. 2016;94:81–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Svetkey LP, Batch BC, Lin PH, Intille SS, Corsino L, Tyson CC, et al. Cell phone intervention for you (CITY): a randomized, controlled trial of behavioral weight loss intervention for young adults using mobile technology. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(11):2133–41.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bardus M, van Beurden SB, Smith JR, Abraham C. A review and content analysis of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and change techniques in the most popular commercial apps for weight management. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:35 016-0359-9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nikolaou CK, Lean ME. Mobile applications for obesity and weight management: current market characteristics. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41(1):200–2.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cheatham SW, Stull KR, Fantigrassi M, Motel I. The efficacy of wearable activity tracking technology as part of a weight loss program: a systematic review. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2018;58(4):534–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thomas JG, Raynor HA, Bond DS, Luke AK, Cardoso CC, Wojtanowski AC, et al. Weight loss and frequency of body-weight self-monitoring in an online commercial weight management program with and without a cellular-connected ‘smart’ scale: a randomized pilot study. Obes Sci Pract. 2017;3(4):365–72.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thomas JG, Raynor HA, Bond DS, Luke AK, Cardoso CC, Foster GD, et al. Weight loss in Weight Watchers Online with and without an activity tracking device compared to control: a randomized trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017;25(6):1014–21.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ross KM, Wing RR. Impact of newer self-monitoring technology and brief phone-based intervention on weight loss: a randomized pilot study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016\;24(8):1653–9.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    • Spring B, Pellegrini CA, Pfammatter A, Duncan JM, Pictor A, McFadden HG, et al. Effects of an abbreviated obesity intervention supported by mobile technology: The ENGAGED randomized clinical trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017;25(7):1191–8. This study examined the effects of technology-based self-monitoring and coaching on a brief lifestyle intervention.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    • Jakicic JM, Davis KK, Rogers RJ, King WC, Marcus MD, Helsel D, et al. Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss: the IDEA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(11):1161–71. This trial evaluated the addition of activity trackers to a standard behavioral weight management program.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goldstein CM, Thomas JG, Wing RR, Bond DS. Successful weight loss maintainers use health-tracking smartphone applications more than a nationally representative sample: comparison of the National Weight Control Registry to Pew Tracking for Health. Obes Sci Pract. 2017;3(2):117–26.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Social media use in 2018:2018 Pew Research Center. Available from:
  36. 36.
    Waring ME, Jake-Schoffman DE, Holovatska MM, Mejia C, Williams JC, Pagoto SL. Social Media and obesity in adults: a review of recent research and future directions. Curr Diab Rep. 2018 18;18(6):34,018–1001-9.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Willis EA, Szabo-Reed AN, Ptomey LT, Steger FL, Honas JJ, Al-Hihi EM, et al. Distance learning strategies for weight management utilizing online social networks versus group phone conference call. Obes Sci Pract. 2017;3(2):134–42.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pagoto S, Waring M, Jake-Schoffman D, Goetz J, Michaels Z, Oleski J, et al. What type of engagement predicts success in a Facebook weight loss group? In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2018, Hawaii, USA; 2018. p. 5–8.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Merchant G, Weibel N, Patrick K, Fowler JH, Norman GJ, Gupta A, et al. Click “like” to change your behavior: a mixed methods study of college students’ exposure to and engagement with Facebook content designed for weight loss. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e158.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Laranjo L, Lau AYS, Martin P, Tong HL, Coiera E. Use of a mobile social networking intervention for weight management: a mixed-methods study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e016665,2017–016665.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Napolitano MA, Whiteley JA, Mavredes MN, Faro J, DiPietro L, Hayman LL, et al. Using social media to deliver weight loss programming to young adults: design and rationale for the Healthy Body Healthy U (HBHU) trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017;60:1–13.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, Fryar CD, Kruszon-Moran D, Kit BK, et al. Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. JAMA. 2016;315(21):2292–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Singh AS, Mulder C, Twisk JW, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):474–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Darling KE, Sato AF. Systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effectiveness of mobile health technologies in using self-monitoring for pediatric weight management. Child Obes. 2017;13(5):347–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chaplais E, Naughton G, Thivel D, Courteix D, Greene D. Smartphone interventions for weight treatment and behavioral change in pediatric obesity: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(10):822–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Slusser W, Whitley M, Izadpanah N, Kim SL, Ponturo D. Multidisciplinary pediatric obesity clinic via telemedicine within the Los Angeles metropolitan area: lessons learned. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016;55(3):251–9.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bohlin A, Hagman E, Klaesson S, Danielsson P. Childhood obesity treatment: telephone coaching is as good as usual care in maintaining weight loss - a randomized controlled trial. Clin Obes. 2017;7(4):199–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Teens, social media & technology [Internet].: Pew Research Center; 2018. Available from:
  49. 49.
    Knoblock-Hahn AL, Wray R, LeRouge CM. Perceptions of adolescents with overweight and obesity for the development of user-centered design self-management tools within the context of the chronic care model: a qualitative study. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(6):957–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Livingood WC, Monticalvo D, Bernhardt JM, Wells KT, Harris T, Kee K, et al. Engaging adolescents through participatory and qualitative research methods to develop a digital communication intervention to reduce adolescent obesity. Health Educ Behav. 2017;44(4):570–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Turner T, Spruijt-Metz D, Wen CK, Hingle MD. Prevention and treatment of pediatric obesity using mobile and wireless technologies: a systematic review. Pediatr Obes. 2015;10(6):403–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Saez L, Langlois J, Legrand K, Quinet MH, Lecomte E, Omorou AY, et al. Reach and acceptability of a mobile reminder strategy and Facebook group intervention for weight management in less advantaged adolescents: insights from the PRALIMAP-INES trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(5):e110.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tu AW, Watts AW, Chanoine JP, Panagiotopoulos C, Geller J, Brant R, et al. Does parental and adolescent participation in an e-health lifestyle modification intervention improves weight outcomes? BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):352,017–4220-0.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Keating SR, McCurry MK. Systematic review of text messaging as an intervention for adolescent obesity. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2015;27(12):714–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schippers M, Adam PC, Smolenski DJ, Wong HT, de Wit JB. A meta-analysis of overall effects of weight loss interventions delivered via mobile phones and effect size differences according to delivery mode, personal contact, and intervention intensity and duration. Obes Rev. 2017;18(4):450–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Levine DM, Savarimuthu S, Squires A, Nicholson J, Jay M. Technology-assisted weight loss interventions in primary care: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(1):107–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Unick JL, Dorfman L, Leahey TM, Wing RR. A preliminary investigation into whether early intervention can improve weight loss among those initially non-responsive to an internet-based behavioral program. J Behav Med. 2016 Apr;39(2):254–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nahum-Shani I, Smith SN, Spring BJ, Collins LM, Witkiewitz K, Tewari A, et al. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Ann Behav Med. 2018;52(6):446–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bond DS, Thomas JG, Raynor HA, Moon J, Sieling J, Trautvetter J, et al. B-MOBILE--a smartphone-based intervention to reduce sedentary time in overweight/obese individuals: a within-subjects experimental trial. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100821.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Goldstein SP, Evans BC, Flack D, Juarascio A, Manasse S, Zhang F, et al. Return of the JITAI: applying a just-in-time adaptive intervention framework to the development of m-Health solutions for addictive behaviors. Int J Behav Med. 2017;24(5):673–82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Forman EM, Goldstein SP, Zhang F, Evans BC, Manasse SM, Butryn ML, et al. OnTrack: development and feasibility of a smartphone app designed to predict and prevent dietary lapses. Transl Behav Med. 2019;9(2):236–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Thomas JG, Bond DS. Behavioral response to a just-in-time adaptive intervention (JITAI) to reduce sedentary behavior in obese adults: implications for JITAI optimization. Health Psychol. 2015;34S:1261–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Forman EM, Kerrigan SG, Butryn ML, Juarascio AS, Manasse SM, Ontañón S, et al. Can the artificial intelligence technique of reinforcement learning use continuously-monitored digital data to optimize treatment for weight loss? J Behav Med. 2019;42(2):276–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wylie-Rosett J. Weight-loss intervention by telephone: lessons learned. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(8):2078–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Holzapfel C, Merl M, Stecher L, Hauner H. One-year weight loss with a telephone-based lifestyle program. Obes Facts. 2016;9(4):230–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kim H, Faw M, Michaelides A. Mobile but connected: harnessing the power of self-efficacy and group support for weight loss success through mHealth intervention. J Health Commun. 2017;22(5):395–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kim H, Ray CD, Veluscek AM. Complementary support from facilitators and peers for promoting mhealth engagement and weight loss. J Health Commun. 2017 Nov;22(11):905–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Dennison L, Morrison L, Lloyd S, Phillips D, Stuart B, Williams S, et al. Does brief telephone support improve engagement with a web-based weight management intervention? Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(3):e95.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hutchesson MJ, Tan CY, Morgan P, Callister R, Collins C. Enhancement of self-monitoring in a web-based weight loss program by extra individualized feedback and reminders: randomized trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(4):e82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lin PH, Intille S, Bennett G, Bosworth HB, Corsino L, Voils C, et al. Adaptive intervention design in mobile health: intervention design and development in the cell phone intervention for You trial. Clin Trials. 2015;12(6):634–45.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Walthouwer MJ, Oenema A, Lechner L, de Vries H. Use and Effectiveness of a Video- and Text-driven web-based computer-tailored intervention: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(9):e222.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Nebeker C, Harlow J, Espinoza Giacinto R, Orozco-Linares R, Bloss CS, Weibel N. Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017;8(4):266–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Nebeker C, Murray K, Holub C, Haughton J, Arredondo EM. Acceptance of mobile health in communities underrepresented in biomedical research: barriers and ethical considerations for scientists. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(6):e87.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Eagleson R, Altamirano-Diaz L, McInnis A, Welisch E, De Jesus S, Prapavessis H, et al. Implementation of clinical research trials using web-based and mobile devices: challenges and solutions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):43,017–0324-6.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lycett K, Wittert G, Gunn J, Hutton C, Clifford SA, Wake M. The challenges of real-world implementation of web-based shared care software: the HopSCOTCH Shared-Care Obesity trial in children. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14:61 6947-14-61.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Bennett GG, Steinberg DM, Stoute C, Lanpher M, Lane I, Askew S, et al. Electronic health (eHealth) interventions for weight management among racial/ethnic minority adults: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2014;15(Suppl 4):146–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bradley LE, Thomas JG, Hood MM, Corsica JA, Kelly MC, Sarwer DB. Remote assessments and behavioral interventions in post-bariatric surgery patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(10):1632–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher V. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(5 Suppl):S112–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Thomas JG, Bond DS. Review of innovations in digital health technology to promote weight control. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(5):485,014–0485-1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren E. Bradley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christine E. Smith-Mason
    • 1
  • Joyce A. Corsica
    • 1
  • Mackenzie C. Kelly
    • 1
  • Megan M. Hood
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations