Media and Its Influence on Obesity
Purpose of Review
To review how the media frames obesity and the effect it has upon on public perceptions.
The scientific and public health understanding of obesity increasingly points away from individual behaviors and toward medical and community factors, but diffusion of this knowledge is slow. Growing awareness of the importance of body positivity is driving attention to the harms of weight bias and fat shaming.
Health science reporting related to obesity, nutrition, and physical activity tends to perpetuate myths and misunderstandings. Moving forward, greater attention to accurate messages about obesity and evidence-based interventions will be essential for progress to reduce suffering and the impact on public health from this chronic disease.
KeywordsMedia Weight bias Weight stigma Obesity Health policy
This work was supported in part by NIH NIDDK R01 DK103946 03.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Fatima Cody Stanford and Zujaja Tauqeer declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Theodore K. Kyle has received compensation from Novo Nordisk, Nutrisystem, the Obesity Action Coalition, and The Obesity Society for service as a consultant.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.• Kyle TK, Dhurandhar EJ, Allison DB. Regarding obesity as a disease: evolving policies and their implications. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2016;45(3):511–20. Provides a concise review of the how views of obesity have changed over three decades and the response to those changes. Google Scholar
- 4.Kilov D, Kilov G. Philosophical determinants of obesity as a disease. Obes Rev 2017.Google Scholar
- 8.• Greenhalgh S. Fat-talk nation: the human costs of America’s war on fat: Cornell University Press, 2015; 2015. Describes how cultural assumptions about body weight and health are often based on false, contested, or incomplete scientific ideas. Google Scholar
- 11.Jackson SE, Beeken RJ, Wardle J. Perceived weight discrimination and changes in weight, waist circumference, and weight status. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(12):2485–8.Google Scholar
- 18.Implicit P. Project Implicit: take a test 2011 [Available from: https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html.
- 25.Scudellari M. ‘Strange. Very strange’: retracted nutrition study reappears in new journal.” The Center for Scientific Integrity; 2017 [Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/2017/03/28/strange-strange-retracted-nutrition-study-reappears-new-journal/.
- 28.• Frederick DA, Saguy AC, Sandhu G, Mann T. Effects of competing news media frames of weight on antifat stigma, beliefs about weight and support for obesity-related public policies. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40(3):543–9. Documents the importantance of media for influencing beliefs about obesity and attitudes about policies to address it. Google Scholar
- 38.Gomez G, Stanford FC. US health policy and prescription drug coverage of FDA-approved medications for the treatment of obesity. Int J Obes 2017.Google Scholar
- 39.• Leathers S. Obesity uncovered: diagnosis without treatment in plans offered on the 2015 health insurance marketplace. Institutional Repository at the University of Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh; 2016. Documents the result of misperceptions of obesity—severely limited access to evidence-based obesity care. Google Scholar
- 40.Bradley DD, WH. Provider competencies for the prevention and management of obesity 2017 [Available from: bipartisanpolicy.org/library/provider-competencies-for-the-prevention-and-management-of-obesity/.