Current Obesity Reports

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 131–140 | Cite as

Expected Satiety: Application to Weight Management and Understanding Energy Selection in Humans

  • Ciarán G. FordeEmail author
  • Eva Almiron-Roig
  • Jeffrey M. Brunstrom
Psychological Issues (M Hetherington and V Drapeau, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Psychological Issues


Recent advances in the approaches used to quantify expectations of satiation and satiety have led to a better understanding of how humans select and consume food, and the associated links to energy intake regulation. When compared calorie for calorie some foods are expected to deliver several times more satiety than others, and multiple studies have demonstrated that people are able to discriminate between similar foods reliably and with considerable sensitivity. These findings have implications for the control of meal size and the design of foods that can be used to lower the energy density of diets. These methods and findings are discussed in terms of their implications for weight management. The current paper also highlights why expected satiety may also play an important role beyond energy selection, in moderating appetite sensations after a meal has been consumed, through memory for recent eating and the selection of foods across future meals.


Expected satiety Portion selection Food intake 



Jeff Brunstrom’s research is supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013 under Grant Agreement 607310 [Nudge-it]) and by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, grant references BB/I012370/1 and BB/J00562/1).

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Ciarán G. Forde, Eva Almiron-Roig, and Jeffrey M. Brunstrom declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Brunstrom JM, Shakeshaft NG, Scott-Samuel NE. Measuring 'expected satiety' in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite. 2008;51(3):604–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griffioen-Roose S et al. Effect of replacing sugar with non-caloric sweeteners in beverages on the reward value after repeated exposure. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e81924.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolhuis DP, Lakemond CMM, de Wijk RA, Luning PA, de Graaf C. Consumption with large sip sizes increases food intake and leads to underestimation of the amount consumed. Plos One. 2013;8(1):e53288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053288.
  4. 4.
    Forde CG et al. Texture and savoury taste influences on food intake in a realistic hot lunch time meal. Appetite. 2013;60:180–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forde CG et al. Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation. Appetite. 2013;60(1):208–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arboleya J-C et al. Effect of highly aerated food on expected satiety. Int J Gastron Food Sci. 2014;2(1):14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yeomans MR et al. Effects of repeated consumption on sensory-enhanced satiety. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(6):1137–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Green SM, Blundell JE. Subjective and objective indices of the satiating effect of foods. Can people predict how filling a food will be? Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50(12):798–806.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Masic U, Yeomans MR. Does monosodium glutamate interact with macronutrient composition to influence subsequent appetite? Physiol Behav. 2013;116–117:23–9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.03.017.
  10. 10.
    Brogden N, Almiron-Roig E. Food liking, familiarity and expected satiation selectively influence portion size estimation of snacks and caloric beverages in men. Appetite. 2010;55(3):551–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Graaf C et al. Beliefs about the satiating effect of bread with spread varying in macronutrient content. Appetite. 1992;18(2):121–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brunstrom JM, Rogers PJ. How many calories are on our plate? Expected fullness, not liking, determines meal-size selection. Obesity. 2009;17(10):1884–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brunstrom JM, Shakeshaft NG. Measuring affective (liking) and non-affective (expected satiety) determinants of portion size and food reward. Appetite. 2009;52(1):108–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hardman CA, McCrickerd K, Brunstrom JM. Children's familiarity with snack foods changes expectations about fullness. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(5):1196–1201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilkinson LL et al. Computer-based assessments of expected satiety predict behavioural measures of portion-size selection and food intake. Appetite. 2012;59(3):933–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.•
    Brunstrom JM. Mind over platter: pre-meal planning and the control of meal size in humans. Int J Obes. 2014;38:S9–12. This review provides a concise overview of the expected satiety method, current knowledge and directions for future research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drapeau V et al. Appetite sensations as a marker of overall intake. Br J Nutr. 2005;93(2):273–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yeomans MR. Rating changes over the course of meals: what do they tell us about motivation to eat? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000;24(2):249–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Piqueras-Fiszman B, Spence C. The weight of the container influences expected satiety, perceived density, and subsequent expected fullness. Appetite. 2012;58(2):559–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kral TVE. Effects on hunger and satiety, perceived portion size and pleasantness of taste of varying the portion size of foods: a brief review of selected studies. Appetite. 2006;46(1):103–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Almiron-Roig E et al. Estimating food portions. Influence of unit number, meal type and energy density. Appetite. 2013;71:95–103.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brogden N. Effects of appetite status and percieved satiation on portion size estimation in men. 2009, University of Chester.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tetley AC, Brunstrom JM, Griffiths PL. The role of sensitivity to reward and impulsivity in food-cue reactivity. Eat Behav. 2010;11(3):138–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holt SHA et al. A satiety index of common foods. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1995;49(9):675–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holliday A et al. A novel tool to predict food intake: the visual meal creator. Appetite. 2014;79:68–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rolls ET. Chemosensory learning in the cortex. Front Syst Neurosci. 2011;5:78.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cassady BA, Considine RV, Mattes RD. Beverage consumption, appetite, and energy intake: what did you expect? Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(3):587–93.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brunstrom JM et al. 'Expected satiety' changes hunger and fullness in the inter-meal interval. Appetite. 2011;56(2):310–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Crum AJ et al. Mind over milkshakes: mindsets, not just nutrients, determine ghrelin response. Health Psychol. 2011;30(4):424–9. discussion 430-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hogenkamp PS et al. Texture, not flavor, determines expected satiation of dairy products. Appetite. 2011;57(3):635–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carels RA, Harper J, Konrad K. Qualitative perceptions and caloric estimations of healthy and unhealthy foods by behavioral weight loss participants. Appetite. 2006;46(2):199–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brunstrom JM, Collingwood J, Rogers PJ. Perceived volume, expected satiation, and the energy content of self-selected meals. Appetite. 2010;55(1):25–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Forde CG, et al. Expectations of satiation and satiety are a better predictor of self-selected portion size than liking. In: British feeding and drinking group. 2011. Appetite.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brunstrom JM, Shakeshaft NG, Alexander E. Familiarity changes expectations about fullness. Appetite. 2010;54(3):587–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Irvine MA et al. Increased familiarity with eating a food to fullness underlies increased expected satiety. Appetite. 2013;61:13–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fay SH et al. What determines real-world meal size? Evidence for pre-meal planning. Appetite. 2011;56(2):284–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wansink B, Johnson KA. The clean plate club: about 92% of self-served food is eaten. Int J Obes. 2014.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hinton EC et al. Using photography in 'The Restaurant of the Future'. A useful way to assess portion selection and plate cleaning? Appetite. 2013;63:31–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yeomans MR. Palatability and the micro-structure of feeding in humans: the appetizer effect. Appetite. 1996;27(2):119–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    De Graaf C, De Jong LS, Lambers AC. Palatability affects satiation but not satiety. Physiol Behav. 1999;66(4):681–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ferriday D, et al. Exploring relationships between expected satiation, eating topography and actual satiety across a range of meals. In: British feeding and drinking group. 2013, Appetite. p. 474.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    McCrickerd K, Chambers L, Yeomans MR. Does modifying the thick texture and creamy flavour of a drink change portion size selection and intake? Appetite. 2014;73:114–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    McCrickerd K et al. Subtle changes in the flavour and texture of a drink enhance expectations of satiety. Flavour Sci Recent Dev. 2012;1(20):1–11.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hogenkamp PS. The effect of sensory-nutrient congruency on food intake after repeated exposure: do texture and/or energy density matter? Physiol Behav. 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.03.025.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yeomans MR, Chambers L. Satiety-relevant sensory qualities enhance the satiating effects of mixed carbohydrate-protein preloads. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(6):1410–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chambers L, Ells H, Yeomans MR. Can the satiating power of a high energy beverage be improved by manipulating sensory characteristics and label information? Food Qual Prefer. 2013;28(1):271–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fay SH et al. Product labelling can confer sustained increases in expected and actual satiety. Appetite. 2011;57(2):557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brunstrom JM, et al. Episodic memory and appetite regulation in humans. Plos One, 2012; 7(12)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Morewedge CK, Huh YE, Vosgerau J. Thought for food: imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. Science. 2010;330(6010):1530–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Higgs S, Williamson AC, Attwood AS. Recall of recent lunch and its effect on subsequent snack intake. Physiol Behav. 2008;94(3):454–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Robinson E, Blissett J, Higgs S. Changing memory of food enjoyment to increase food liking, choice and intake. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(8):1505–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    O'Sullivan HL et al. Effects of repeated exposure on liking for a reduced-energy-dense food. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(6):1584–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Morell P et al. Hydrocolloids for enhancing satiety: relating oral digestion to rheology, structure and sensory perception. Food Hydrocoll. 2014;41:343–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tarrega A et al. Hydrocolloids as a tool for modulating the expected satiety of milk-based snacks. Food Hydrocoll. 2014;39:51–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Oldham-Cooper RE, Hardman CA, Brunstrom JM. Changing ‘mode of presentation’ to increase the expected satiety of large portions. Directions for future research. Appetite. 2013;71:483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kissileff HR et al. Portion size perception and anxiety response to food cues in anorexia nervosa. Appetite. 2011;57(2):535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sclafani A, Ackroff K. The relationship between food reward and satiation revisited. Physiol Behav. 2004;82(1):89–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pérez C, Sclafani A. Cholecystokinin conditions flavor preferences in rats. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(1):R179–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    de Araujo IE. Multiple Reward Layers in Food Reinforcement. In: Neurobiology of Sensation and Reward. Boca Raton: CRC; 2011. p. 263–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lee RB. What hunters do for a living, or, how to make out on scarce resources. In: Lee RB, DeVore I, editors. Man the hunter. Piscataway: Aldine Transaction; 1968. p. 30–48.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Davidson TL, Swithers SE. A Pavlovian approach to the problem of obesity. Int J Obes. 2004;28(7):933–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Spetter MS et al. Taste matters – effects of bypassing oral stimulation on hormone and appetite responses. Physiol Behav. 2014;137:9–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cecil JE, Francis J, Read NW. Relative contributions of intestinal, gastric, oro-sensory influences and information to changes in appetite induced by the same liquid meal. Appetite. 1998;31:377–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Brunstrom JM, Mitchell GL. Effects of distraction on the development of satiety. Br J Nutr. 2006;96(4):761–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bellisle F, Dalix AM. Cognitive restraint can be offset by distraction, leading to increased meal intake in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74(2):197–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Booth DA. Conditioned satiety in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972;81(3):457–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Davis JD, Smith GP. The conditioned satiating effect of orosensory stimuli. Physiol Behav. 2009;97(3–4):293–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Warwick ZS, Bowen KJ, Synowski SJ. Learned suppression of intake based on anticipated calories: cross-nutrient comparisons. Physiol Behav. 1997;62(6):1319–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    van Dongen MV et al. Taste–nutrient relationships in commonly consumed foods. Br J Nutr. 2012;108(01):140–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Graham L, Murty G, Bowrey DJ. Taste, smell and appetite change after roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2014;24(9):1463–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Halmi KA et al. Appetitive behavior after gastric bypass for obesity. Int J Obes. 1981;5(5):457–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Melissas J et al. Sleeve gastrectomy - a restrictive procedure? Obes Surg. 2007;17(1):57–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Boakes RA, Patterson AE, Kwok DWS. Flavor avoidance learning based on missing calories but not on palatability reduction. Learn Behav. 2012;40(4):542–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ciarán G. Forde
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eva Almiron-Roig
    • 2
  • Jeffrey M. Brunstrom
    • 3
  1. 1.Clinical Nutrition Research CentreSingapore Institute for Clinical SciencesSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.MRC Human Nutrition ResearchCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Nutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of BristolBristolUK

Personalised recommendations