Skip to main content

The Influence of Nutrition Labeling and Point-of-Purchase Information on Food Behaviours

Abstract

Point-of-purchase information on packaged food has been a highly debated topic. Various types of nutrition labels and point-of-purchase information have been studied to determine their ability to attract consumers’ attention, be well understood and promote healthy food choices. Country-specific regulatory and monitoring frameworks have been implemented to ensure reliability and accuracy of such information. However, the impact of such information on consumers’ behaviour remains contentious. This review summarizes recent evidence on the real-world effectiveness of nutrition labels and point-of-purchase information.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Abbreviations

FOP:

Front-of-pack

FSANZ:

Food Standard Australia New Zealand

TL:

Traffic-light

MTL:

Multiple traffic-light

DIG:

Daily intake guide

GDA:

Guideline daily amount

NIP:

Nutrition information panel

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.•

    Rayner M, Wood A, Lawrence M, et al. Monitoring the health-related labelling of foods and non-alcoholic beverages in retail settings. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 1:70–81. This manuscript provides classification of point-of-purchase labelling and proposes monitoring framework.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Williams P. Consumer understanding and use of health claims for foods. Nutr Rev. 2005;63(7):256–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hersey JC, Wohlgenant KC, Arsenault JE, et al. Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers. Nutr Rev. 2013;71(1):1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schermel A, Emrich TE, Arcand J, et al. Nutrition marketing on processed food packages in Canada: 2010 Food Label Information Program. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013;38(6):666–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann S, Celemín L, Larrañaga A, et al. Penetration of nutrition information on food labels across the EU-27 plus Turkey. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64(12):1379–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    European Food Information Council. Global update on nutrition labelling. Executive Summary. 2014. http://www.eufic.org/upl/1/default/doc/GlobalUpdateExecSumJan2014%2013%20Jan%202014_FINALwebSummary.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.

  7. 7.

    Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Review of the regulatory management of food allergens. 2010. http://www.foodstandards.govt.nz/consumer/foodallergies/review/documents/Review%20of%20the%20Regulatory%20Management%20of%20Food%20Allergens-FSANZ%20Dec%202010.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.

  8. 8.

    Vincent van Buul VJ, Fred Brouns FJ. Nutrition and health claims as marketing tools. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013. doi:10.1080/10408398.2012.754738.

  9. 9.

    Nocella G, Kennedy O. Food health claims – what consumers understand. Food Policy. 2012;37(5):571–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Campos S, Doxey J, Hammond D. Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(8):1496–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gortmaker SL, Swinburn BA, Levy D, et al. Changing the future of obesity: science, policy, and action. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):838–47.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sacks G, Veerman JL, Moodie M, et al. ‘Traffic-light’ nutrition labelling and ‘junk-food’ tax: a modelled comparison of cost-effectiveness for obesity prevention. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35(7):1001–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    van’t Riet J. Sales effects of product health information at points of purchase: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(3):418–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Storcksdieck Genannt Bonsmann S, Wills JM. Nutrition labeling to prevent obesity: reviewing the evidence from Europe. Curr Obes Rep. 2012;1(3):134–40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sinclair SE, Cooper M, Mansfield ED. The influence of menu labeling on calories selected or consumed: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:1375.e15–88.e15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Swartz JJ, Braxton D, Viera AJ. Calorie menu labeling on quick-service restaurant menus: an updated systematic review of the literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:135.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Thorndike AN, Sonnenberg L, Riis J, et al. A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(3):527–33.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Levy DE, Riis J, Sonnenberg LM, et al. Food choices of minority and low-income employees: a cafeteria intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):240–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Thorndike AN, Riis J, Sonnenberg LM, et al. Traffic-light labels and choice architecture: promoting healthy food choices. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(2):143–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Arsenault JE, Singleton MC, Funderburk LK. Use of the go-for-green nutrition labeling system in military dining facilities is associated with lower fat intake. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114:1067–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vyth EL, Steenhuis IHM, Heymans MW, et al. Influence of placement of a nutrition logo on cafeteria menu items on lunchtime food choices at Dutch work sites. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:131–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kiszko KM, Martinez OD, Abrams C, et al. The influence of calorie labelling on food orders and consumption: a review of the literature. J Community Health. 2014;39:1248–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Williams SL, Mummery KW. Characteristics of consumers using ‘better for you’ front-of-pack food labelling schemes - an example from the Australian Heart Foundation Tick. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(12):2265–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Coleman KL, Miah EM, Morris GA, et al. Impact of health claims in prebiotic-enriched breads on purchase intent, emotional response and product liking. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2014;65(2):164–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Andrews CJ, Burton S, Kees J. Is simpler always better? Consumer evaluations of front-of-package nutrition symbols. J Publ Policy Market. 2011;30(2):175–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hughes C, Wellard L, Lin J, et al. Regulating health claims on food labels using nutrient profiling: what will the proposed standard mean in the Australian supermarket? Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(12):2154–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Elbel B, Taksler GB, Mijanovich T, et al. Promotion of healthy eating through public policy: a controlled experiment. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(1):49–55.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rosentreter SC, Eyles H, Ni Mhurchu C. Traffic lights and health claims: a comparative analysis of the nutrient profile of packaged foods available for sale in New Zealand supermarkets. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2013;37(3):278–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code - Standard 1.2.7 - Nutrition, Health and Related Claims 2013; Available from: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Series/F2013L00054. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.

  30. 30.

    Sacks G, Rayner M, Swinburn B. Impact of front-of-pack ‘traffic-light’ nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(4):344–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sutherland LA, Kaley LA, Fischer L. Guiding stars: the effect of a nutrition navigation program on consumer purchases at the supermarket. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(4):1090s–4s.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gregori D, Ballali S, Vögele C, et al. Evaluating food front-of-pack labelling: a pan-European survey on consumers’ attitudes toward food labelling. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2014;65(2):177–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hieke S, Wilczynski P. Colour Me In - an empirical study on consumer responses to the traffic light signposting system in nutrition labelling. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(5):773–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Vemula SR, Gavaravarapu SM, Mendu VV, et al. Use of food label information by urban consumers in India - a study among supermarket shoppers. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(9):2104-14.

  35. 35.

    Watson WL, Chapman K, King L, et al. How well do Australian shoppers understand energy terms on food labels? Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(3):409–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Aschemann-Witzel J, Maroscheck N, Hamm U. Are organic consumers preferring or avoiding foods with nutrition and health claims? Food Qual Prefer. 2013;30(1):68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Moon W, Balasubramanian SK, Rimal A. Health claims and consumers’ behavioural intentions: the case of soy-based food. Food Policy. 2011;36(4):480–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wong CL, Arcand J, Mendoza J, et al. Consumer attitudes and understanding of low-sodium claims on food: an analysis of healthy and hypertensive individuals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97(6):1288–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.•

    Carter OB, Mills BW, Lloyd E, et al. An independent audit of the Australian food industry’s voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme for energy-dense nutrition-poor foods. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(1):31–5. This study explored a compliance of voluntary front-of-pack labels with existing guidelines, and association between presence of voluntary front-of-pack label with a product healthiness.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Williams PG. Auditing the Australian front-of-pack food labelling scheme. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(10):1117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Brownell KD, Koplan JP. Front-of-package nutrition labeling—an abuse of trust by the food industry? N Engl J Med. 2011;364(25):2373–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Guiding Stars: About. Available from: http://guidingstars.com/what-is-guiding-stars/. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.

  43. 43.

    Food Standards Agency. Front of pack nutritional signpost labelling: technical guidance. 2007. http://www.5aldia.org/datos/60/pdf_13_6051.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.

  44. 44.

    Draper AK, Adamson AJ, Clegg S, et al. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: are multiple formats a problem for consumers? Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(3):517–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hawley KL, Roberto CA, Bragg MA, et al. The science on front-of-package food labels. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(3):430–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bialkova S, Grunert KG, Juhl HJ, et al. Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers’ choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking. Appetite. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.021.

  47. 47.

    van Herpen E, Hieke S, van Trijp HC. Inferring product healthfulness from nutrition labelling: the influence of reference points. Appetite. 2014;72:138–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Maubach N, Hoek J, Mather D. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels: comparing competing recommendations. Appetite. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.006.

  49. 49.

    Aschemann-Witzel J, Grunert KG, van Trijp HC, et al. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice. Appetite. 2013;71C:63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.••

    Rahkovski I, Lin B-H, Lin C-TJ, et al. Effects of the Guiding Stars Program on purchases of ready-to-eat cereals with different nutritional attributes. Food Policy. 2013;43:100–7. This study assessed impact of an interpretive labelling scheme on food sales in real retail environment.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Cawley J, Sweeney MJ, Sobal J, et al. The impact of a supermarket nutrition rating system on purchases of nutritious and less nutritious foods. Public Health Nutr. 2014. doi:10.1017/S1368980014001529.

  52. 52.

    Sacks G, Tikellis K, Millar L, et al. Impact of ‘traffic-light’ nutrition information on online food purchases in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011;35(2):122–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Van Camp D, de Souza Monteiro DM, Hooker NH. Stop or go? How is the UK food industry responding to front-of-pack nutrition labels? Eur Rev Agric Econ. 2012;39(5):821–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    McLean R, Hoek J. Sodium and nutrition labelling: a qualitative study exploring New Zealand consumers’ food purchasing behaviours. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(5):1138–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Babio N, Vicent P, López L, et al. Adolescents’ ability to select healthy food using two different front-of-pack food labels: a cross-over study. Public Health Nutr. 2013. doi:10.1017/S1368980013001274.

  56. 56.

    McLean R, Hoek J, Hedderley D. Effects of alternative label formats on choice of high- and low-sodium products in a New Zealand population sample. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(5):783–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Méjean C, Macouillard P, Péneau S, et al. Perception of front-of-pack labels according to social characteristics, nutritional knowledge and food purchasing habits. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(3):392–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Roberto CA, Bragg MA, Seamans MJ, et al. Evaluation of consumer understanding of different front-of-package nutrition labels, 2010-2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:120015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Watson WL, Kelly B, Hector D, et al. Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers’ responses to seven labelling formats. Appetite. 2014;72:90–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Koenigstorfer J, Wąsowicz-Kiryło G, Styśko-Kunkowska M, et al. Behavioural effects of directive cues on front-of-package nutrition information: the combination matters! Public Health Nutr. 2013. doi:10.1017/S136898001300219X.

  61. 61.

    Goodman S, Hammond D, Hanning R, et al. The impact of adding front-of-package sodium content labels to grocery products: an experimental study. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(3):383–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Guide to creating a front of pack (FoP) nutrition label for pre-packed products sold through retail outlets. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/300886/2902158_FoP_Nutrition_2014.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.

  63. 63.

    Health Star Rating – new food labelling system. Ministry for Primary Industries.2014; Available from: http://www.foodsafety.govt.nz/industry/general/labelling-composition/health-star-rating/. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Ekaterina Volkova and Cliona Ni Mhurchu are supported by a Health Research Council of New Zealand programme grant (13/724).

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Ekaterina Volkova and Cliona Ni Mhurchu declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekaterina Volkova.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Etiology of Obesity

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volkova, E., Ni Mhurchu, C. The Influence of Nutrition Labeling and Point-of-Purchase Information on Food Behaviours. Curr Obes Rep 4, 19–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-014-0135-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Point-of-purchase information
  • Nutrition labeling
  • Claims
  • Nutrition policy
  • Front-of-pack nutrition labels
  • Purchase behaviour
  • Consumer