Advertisement

Estimating the operational and service efficiency of bus transit routes using a non-radial DEA approach

  • Samet Güner
  • Erman Coşkun
Research Paper

Abstract

In public transportation literature, researchers increasingly tend to evaluate the service efficiency of bus transit units in addition to their operational efficiency. Evaluation of both operational and service efficiencies provides a more comprehensive performance analysis for decision-makers. This paper proposes a non-radial data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach to measure the operational and service efficiencies simultaneously. Benefits of the proposed approach are demonstrated by applying the model to assess the performance of a bus transit company’s routes. The analysis results show that the proposed approach ensures optimal operational and service efficiency scores and provides applicable input targets for each route.

Keywords

Bus transit routes DEA Efficiency Non-radial Operational Service 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous referees for their useful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. American Public Transportation Association (APTA), Definition of terms and abbreviations. http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Documents/Ridership/missdef.pdf. Accessed date 28 Oct 2013
  2. Athanassopoulos AD (1996) Assessing the comparative spatial disadvantage (CSD) of Regions in the European Union Using Non-Radial Data Envelopment Analysis Methods. Eur J Oper Res 94:439–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 30(9):1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnum DT, Tandon S, McNeil S (2008) Comparing the performance of bus routes after adjusting for the environment using data envelopment analysis. J Transp Eng 137:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barros CP, Managi S, Matousek R (2012) The technical efficiency of the Japanese Banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output. Omega 40(1):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang KP, Kao PH (1992) The relative efficiency of public versus private municipal bus firms: an application of data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal 3:67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1985) Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res 2:59–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chu X, Fielding GJ, Lamar BW (1992) Measuring transit performance using data envelopment analysis. Transp Res Part A 26(3):223–230Google Scholar
  10. Cook WD, Hababou M, Tuenter HJH (2000) Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: an application to sales and service performance in bank branches. J Product Anal 14:209–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Färe R, Lovell CAK (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency. J Econ Theory 19:150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Güner S (2014) Çok Amaçli Etkinlik Ölçümünde Yeni Bir Yaklaşim Önerisi Olarak İlişkisel Veri Zarflama Analizi: Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi Otobüs İşletmesi Uygulaması. PhD diss. Sakarya UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Güner S, Coşkun E (2016) Determining the best performing benchmarks for transit routes with a multi-objective model: the implementation and a critique of the two-model approach. Public Transp 8(2):205–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karlaftis MG (2003) Investigating transit production and performance: a programming approach. Transp Res Part A 37:225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karlaftis MG (2004) DEA approach for evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of urban transit systems. Eur J Oper Res 152:354–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karlaftis MG, Tsamboulas D (2012) Efficiency measurement in public transport: are findings specification sensitive? Transp Res Part A 46:392–402Google Scholar
  17. Kerstens K (1999) Decomposing technical efficiency and effectiveness of French urban transport. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 54:129–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klimberg R, Puddecombe M (1999) A multiple objective approach to data envelopment analysis. Adv Math Program Fin Plan 5:201–231Google Scholar
  19. Lao Y, Liu L (2009) Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sanchez IMG (2009) Technical and scale efficiency in Spanish urban transport: estimating with data envelopment analysis. Adv Oper Res.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/721279 Google Scholar
  21. Sherman HD, Zhu J (2006) Benchmarking with quality-adjusted DEA (Q-DEA) to seek lower-cost high-quality service: evidence from a US bank application. Ann Oper Res 145:301–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shimshak DG, Lenard ML (2007) A two-model approach to measuring operating and quality efficiency with DEA. INFOR 45(3):143–151Google Scholar
  23. Tone K (2001) A slack-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhu J (1996) Data envelopment analysis with preference structure. J Oper Res Soc 47:136–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature and EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business, Sakarya University, Esentepe CampusSerdivanTurkey

Personalised recommendations