EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 247–270 | Cite as

Modeling the impacts of public transport reliability and travel information on passengers’ waiting-time uncertainty

Research Paper

Abstract

Public transport systems are subject to uncertainties related to traffic dynamic, operations, and passenger demand. Passenger waiting time is thus a random variable subject to day-to-day variations and the interaction between vehicle and passenger stochastic arrival processes. While the provision of real-time information could potentially reduce travel uncertainty, its impacts depend on the underlying service reliability, the performance of the prognosis scheme, and its perceived credibility. This paper presents a modeling framework for analyzing passengers’ learning process and adaptation with respect to waiting-time uncertainty and travel information. The model consists of a within-day network loading procedure and a day-to-day learning process, which are implemented in an agent-based simulation model. Each loop of within-day dynamics assigns travelers to paths by simulating the progress of individual travelers and vehicles as well as the generation and dissemination of travel information. The day-to-day learning model updates the accumulated memory of each traveler and updates consequently the credibility attributed to each information source based on the experienced waiting time. A case study in Stockholm demonstrates model capabilities and emphasizes the importance of behavioral adaptation when evaluating alternative measures which aim to improve service reliability.

Keywords

Public transport Assignment model Waiting time Reliability Real-time information Learning 

References

  1. Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP (2003) Modeling learning and adaptation processes in activity-travel choice. Transportation 30:37–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariely D (1998) Combining experiences over time: the effects of duration, intensity, changes and on-line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations. J Behav Decis Mak 11:19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avineri E (2004) A cumulative prospect theory. Approach to passengers behavior modeling: waiting time paradox revisited. Intell Transp Syst 8:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avineri E, Prashker JN (2005) Sensitivity to travel time variability: travellers’ learning perspective. Transp Res Part C 13:157–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balmer M, Rieser M, Meister K, Charypar D, Lefebvre N, Nagel K (2008) MATSim-T: architecture and simulation times. In: Bazzan ALC, Klügl F (eds.) multiagent systems for traffic and transportation engineering, Information Science Reference, Hershey, pp 57–78Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Elia E, Shiftan Y (2010) Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route choice behavior with real time information. Transp Res Part A 44:249–264Google Scholar
  7. Bogers EAI, Bierlaire M, Hoogendoorn SP (2007) Modeling learning in route choice. Transp Res Rec 2014:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borghout W (2004) Hybrid microscopic-mesoscopic traffic simulation model. Doctoral Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  9. Brakewood C, Barbeau S, Watkins K (2014) An experiment evaluating the impacts of real-time transit information on bus riders in Tampa, Florida. Transp Res Part A 69:409–422Google Scholar
  10. Cats (2013) Multi-agent transit operations and assignment model. Procedia Comput Sci 19:809–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cats O, Loutos G (2013) Real-time bus arrival information system—an empirical evaluation. In: The 16th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), The Netherlands, pp 1310–1315Google Scholar
  12. Cats O, Koutsopoulos HN, Burghout W, Toledo T (2011a) Effect of real-time transit information on dynamic passenger path choice. Transp Res Rec 2217:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cats O, Larijani AN, Burghout W, Koutsopoulos HN (2011b) Impacts of holding control strategies on transit performance: a bus simulation model analysis. Transp Res Rec 2216:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chorus CG, Arentze TA, Timmermans HJP (2008) A random regret-minimization model of travel choice. Transp Res Part B 42:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coppola P, Rosati L (2009) Simulation-based evaluation of advanced public transport information systems (APTIS). In: Wilson LNHM, Nuzzolo A (eds) Schedule-based modeling of transportation networks: theory and applications, Springer, New York, pp 195–216Google Scholar
  16. Dziekan K, Kottenhoff K (2007) Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers. Transp Res Part A 41:489–501Google Scholar
  17. Ettema D, Timmermans H (2006) Costs of travel time uncertainty and benefits of travel time information: conceptual model and numerical examples. Transp Res Part C 14:335–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ettema D, Tamminga G, Timmermans H, Arentze T (2005) A micro-simulation model system of departure time using a perception updating model under travel time uncertainty. Transp Res Part A 39(4):325–344Google Scholar
  19. Friman M, Gärling T (2001) Frequency of negative critical incidents and satisfaction with public transport services. II. J Retail Consum Serv 8:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gentile G, Nguyen S, Pallottino S (2005) Route choice on transit networks with online information at stops. Transp Sci 39(3):289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hickman MD, Wilson NHM (1995) Passenger travel time and path choice implications of real-time transit information. Transp Res Part C 3(4):211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jansson K, Ridderstolpe B (1992) A method for the route-choice problem in public transport systems. Transp Sci 26:246–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu Y, Bunker J, Ferreira L (2010) Transit users’ route choice modeling in transit assignment: a review. Transp Rev 30(6):753–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marguier PHJ, Ceder A (1984) Passenger waiting strategies for overlapping bus route. Transp Sci 18(3):207–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mishalani RG, McCord MM, Wirtz J (2006) Passenger wait time perceptions at bus stops: empirical results and impacts on evaluating real-time bus arrival information. J Public Transp 9(2):89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nielsen OA (2000) A stochastic transit assignment model considering differences in passengers utility functions. Transp Res Part B 34:377–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nökel K, Wekeck S (2009) Boarding and alighting in frequency-based transit assignment. Transp Res Rec 2111:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Noland RB, Polak JW (2002) Travel time variability: a review of theoretical and empirical issues. Transp Rev 22(1):39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Noland RB, Small KA (1995) Travel-time uncertainty, departure time choice, and the cost of morning commutes. Transp Res Rec 1493:150–158Google Scholar
  31. Nuzzolo A, Russo F, Crisalli U (2001) A doubly dynamic schedule-based assignment model for transit networks. Transp Sci 35(3):268–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oshyani FM, Cats O (2014) Real-time bus departure time predictions: vehicle trajectory and countdown display analysis. In: The 17th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), Qingdao, pp 2556–2561Google Scholar
  33. Peeta S, Ziliaskopoulos A (2001) Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: the past, the present and the future. Netw Spat Econ 1(3–4):233–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rasouli S, Timmermans H (2014) Applications of theories and models of choice and decision-making under conditions of uncertainty in travel behavior research. Travel Behav Soc 1:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spiess H, Florian M (1989) Optimal strategies. A new assignment model for transit networks. Transp Res Part B 23:83–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor MAP (2013) Travel through time: the story of research on travel time reliability. Transp B 1(3):174–194Google Scholar
  37. Toledo T, Cats O, Burghout W, Koutsopoulos HN (2010) Mesoscopic simulation for transit operations. Transp Res Part C 18(6):896–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wahba M, Shalaby A (2014) Learning-based framework for transit assignment modeling under information provision. Transportation 41:397–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zheng H, Son Y-J, Chiu Y-C, Head L, Feng Y, Xi H, Kim S, Hickman M (2013) A primer for agent-based simulation and modeling in transportation applications, U.S. Department of Transportation—Federal Highway Administration. Report FHWA-HRT-13-054Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Transport and PlanningDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Transport ScienceKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations