Advertisement

Current Dermatology Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 77–82 | Cite as

Mobile Device Use in Dermatologic Patient Care

  • Seth J. Lofgreen
  • Kurt Ashack
  • Kyle A. Burton
  • Robert P. DellavalleEmail author
Teledermatology (D Oh, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Teledermatology

Abstract

Rapidly evolving technology, improved mobile device optics, and the uniquely visual nature of dermatology all promote mobile device use in the clinic. This paper examines how dermatologists use mobile device technology in direct patient care. We discuss mobile applications (apps) for both dermatologists and patients, as well as for integration with the electronic health record. Furthermore, we discuss aspects of teledermatology (including teledermoscopy), both from consults from a primary care provider and in using teledermatology to directly connect to the patient. Finally, we address patient perception of mobile devices in the clinic.

Keywords

Mobile phone patient care Smartphones Mobile apps Applications teledermatology Telemedicine Teledermoscopy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Dr. RP Dellavalle is an employee of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs had no role in the writing of this manuscript. Any opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr. SJ Lofgreen, Mr. KA Burton, and Mr. KA Ashack report no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Mobile trends report 2014. Epocrates. Web. 17 Aug 2015. http://www.epocrates.com/oldsite/2014MobileTrendsReport/MT14_WP_03.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Landman A, Emani S, Carlile N, et al. A mobile app for securely capturing and transferring clinical images to the electronic health record: description and preliminary usability study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patel S, Eluri M, Boyers LN, Karimkhani C, Dellavalle RP. Update on mobile applications in dermatology. Dermatol Online J. 2014;9:21(2).Google Scholar
  4. 4.•
    March J, Hand M, Grossman D. Practical application of new technologies for melanoma diagnosis: part I. Noninvasive approaches. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(6):929–41. quiz 941-2. Article reviews the current state of technology in non-invasive technologies regarding melanoma diagnosis.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wolf JA, Moreau JF, Akilov O, et al. Diagnostic inaccuracy of smartphone applications for melanoma detection. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:422–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.•
    Brewer AC, Endly DC, Henley J, et al. Mobile applications in dermatology. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:1300–4. Comprehensive overview of the types of apps currently being used in dermatology.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.•
    Mayer JE, Swetter SM, Fu T, Geller AC. Screening, early detection, education, and trends for melanoma: current status (2007-2013) and future directions: part I. Epidemiology, high-risk groups, clinical strategies, and diagnostic technology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:599. e1-.e12; quiz 610, 599.e12. Summary of new technologies for the detection of melanoma.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ali FR. The unadulterated smartphone camera: obviating the need for apps. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:e119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen DK, Nardone B, Cotton M, West DP, Kundu RV. Use of a mobile application to characterize a remote and global population of acne patients and to disseminate peer-reviewed acne-related health education. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:660–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu X, Oliveria SA, Yagerman S, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of patient-initiated mobile teledermoscopy for short-term monitoring of clinically atypical nevi. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:489–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pak H, Triplett CA, Lindquist JH, Grambow SC, Whited JD. Store-and-forward teledermatology results in similar clinical outcomes to conventional clinic-based care. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:26–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Whited JD, Warshaw EM, Edison KE, et al. Effect of store and forward teledermatology on quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149:584–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Whited JD, Hall RP, Foy ME, et al. Patient and clinician satisfaction with a store-and-forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10:422–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coates SJ, Kvedar J, Granstein RD. Teledermatology: from historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: part I: history, rationale, and current practice. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(4):563–74. quiz 75-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vidmar DA. The history of teledermatology in the Department of Defense. Dermatol Clin. 1999;17(1):113–24. ix.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thaker DA, Monypenny R, Olver I, Sabesan S. Cost savings from a telemedicine model of care in northern Queensland, Australia. Med J Aust. 2013;199(6):414–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lipoff JB, Cobos G, Kaddu S, Kovarik CL. The Africa Teledermatology Project: a retrospective case review of 1229 consultations from sub-Saharan Africa. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(6):1084–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Livingstone J, Solomon J. An assessment of the cost-effectiveness, safety of referral and patient satisfaction of a general practice teledermatology service. Lon J Prim Care. 2015;7(2):31–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boyers LN, Schultz A, Baceviciene R, et al. Teledermatology as an educational tool for teaching dermatology to residents and medical students. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(4):312–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.•
    Peart JM, Kovarik C. Direct-to-patient teledermatology practices. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(5):907–9. Explains the pros and cons of a possible new avenue of patient care.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Giambrone D, Rao BK, Esfahani A, Rao S. Obstacles hindering the mainstream practice of teledermatopathology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(4):772–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Romero G, Sanchez P, Garcia M, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing store-and-forward teledermatology alone and in combination with web-camera videoconferencing. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2010;35(3):311–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mehrotra A. The convenience revolution for treatment of low-acuity conditions. JAMA. 2013;310(1):35–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frühauf J, Kröck S, Quehenberger F, et al. Mobile teledermatology helping patients control high-need acne: a randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(5):919–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kanthraj GR. Patient-assisted teledermatology practice: what is it? When, where, and how it is applied? Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2015;81(2):136–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fruhauf J, Schwantzer G, Ambros-Rudolph CM, et al. Pilot study on the acceptance of mobile teledermatology for the home monitoring of high-need patients with psoriasis. Australas J Dermatol. 2012;53(1):41–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lamel SA, Haldeman KM, Ely H, et al. Application of mobile teledermatology for skin cancer screening. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67(4):576–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coates SJ, Kvedar J, Granstein RD. Teledermatology: from historical perspective to emerging techniques of the modern era: part II: emerging technologies in teledermatology, limitations and future directions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(4):577–86. quiz 87-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krupinski E, Burdick A, Pak H, et al. American Telemedicine Association’s practice guidelines for teledermatology. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(3):289–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American Academy of Dermatology and AAD Association Position Statement on Teledermatology. Available at: https://www.aad.org/forms/policies/uploads/ps/ps-teledermatology.pdf.
  31. 31.
    Blum A, Giacomel J. “Tape dermatoscopy”: constructing a low-cost dermatoscope using a mobile phone, immersion fluid and transparent adhesive tape. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2015;5(2):87–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borve A, Terstappen K, Sandberg C, Paoli J. Mobile teledermoscopy—there’s an app for that! Dermatol Pract Concept. 2013;3(2):41–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chao JT, Loescher LJ, Soyer HP, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. Barriers to mobile teledermoscopy in primary care. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(5):821–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    “Handyscope - Mobile Dermatoscope: Handyscope.” Handyscope—mobile dermatoscope: handyscope. Web. 17 Aug. 2015. <http://www.handyscope.net/>.
  35. 35.
    Manahan MN, Soyer HP, Loescher LJ, et al. A pilot trial of mobile, patient-performed teledermoscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(4):1072–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Braun RP, Marghoob A. High-dynamic-range dermoscopy imaging and diagnosis of hypopigmented skin cancers. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(4):456–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kaliyadan F, Ashique KT. A simple and cost-effective device for mobile dermoscopy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013;79(6):817–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Anyanwu CO, Lipoff JB. Smartphones, photography, and security in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(1):193–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.•
    Hsieh C, Yun D, Bhatia AC, Hsu JT, de Luzuriaga AM R. Patient perception on the usage of smartphones for medical photography and for reference in dermatology. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(1):149–54. Article provides actual statistics on acceptability of medical photography from a patient perspective.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seth J. Lofgreen
    • 1
  • Kurt Ashack
    • 2
  • Kyle A. Burton
    • 3
  • Robert P. Dellavalle
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.University of Colorado-Denver School of MedicineAuroraUSA
  2. 2.Michigan State University College of Human MedicineGrand RapidsUSA
  3. 3.University of Central Florida College of MedicineOrlandoUSA
  4. 4.Department of DermatologyUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraUSA
  5. 5.Dermatology Service, U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs Medical CenterEastern Colorado Health Care SystemDenverUSA
  6. 6.Department of EpidemiologyColorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraUSA

Personalised recommendations