Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rationalizing Outcome Measures in Dermatologic Surgery

  • Medical Surgery (M Alam, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Dermatology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dermatologic surgery, including cancer surgery, cosmetic surgery, and laser and energy device procedures, is a well-established branch of dermatology known for minimally invasive, effective, and safe solutions to patient problems. Over time, clinical research pertaining to dermatologic surgery has improved in terms of methodologic rigor, with dermatologic surgery accounting for a large proportion of the comparative effectiveness studies and randomized controlled trials in dermatology. Further improvements in the quality of studies examining dermatologic surgery therapies will require understanding and overcoming several remaining challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Hanke CW, Moy RL, Roenigk RK, Roenigk Jr HH, Spencer JM, Tierney EP, et al. Current status of surgery in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):972–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park KK. Fellowships after dermatology residency: the traditional and beyond. Cutis. 2015;95(3):E31–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alam M, Rauf M, Ali S, Nodzenski M, Minkis K. A systematic review of reporting in randomized controlled trials in Dermatologic Surgery: Jadad scores, power analysis, and sample size determination. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(12):1299–305. Assesses dermatologic surgery randomized control trials on standard quality parameters over a longitudinal period of approximately 2 decades.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bangash HK, Ibrahimi OA, Green LJ, Alam M, Eisen DB, Armstrong AW. Who do you prefer? A study of public preferences for health care provider type in performing cutaneous surgery and cosmetic procedures in the United States. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(6):671–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alam M. Evidence-based procedural dermatology. In: Maibach HI, Farzam G, editors. Evidence-based dermatology. USA: PMPH; 2011. p. 539–546. + 3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alam M, Olson JM, Asgari MM. Needs assessment for cosmetic dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(1):177–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Asgari MM, Olson JM, Alam M. Needs assessment for Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(1):167–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Olson JM, Alam M, Asgari MM. Needs assessment for general dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(1):153–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Imadojemu S, Sarwer DB, Percec I, Sonnad SS, Goldsack JE, Berman M, et al. Influence of surgical and minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures on psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(11):1325–33. Reviews psychosocial changes attributable to cosmetic dermatologic interventions. Such changes, along with visible changes in appearance, are among the most relevant outcomes pertaining to elective procedures designed to enhance beauty or retard physical aging.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alam M, White LE, Martin N, Witherspoon J, Yoo S, West DP. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(2):262–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hollander JE, Blasko B, Singer AJ, Valentine S, Thode Jr HC, Henry MC. Poor correlation of short- and long-term cosmetic appearance of repaired lacerations. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2(11):983–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The Vancouver scar scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995;16(5):535–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodman GJ. Treatment of acne scarring. Int J Dermatol. 2011;50(10):1179–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Geister TL, Bleßmann-Gurk B, Rzany B, Harrington L, Görtelmeyer R, Pooth R. Validated assessment scale for platysmal bands. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(8):1217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sattler G, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, et al. Validated assessment scale for neck volume. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2 Spec No):343–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, Hardas B, Himmrich S, et al. Validated assessment scales for the mid face. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2 Spec No):320–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Flynn TC, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, Hardas B, et al. Validated assessment scales for the upper face. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2 Spec No):309–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Narins RS, Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, Hardas B, et al. Validated assessment scales for the lower face. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2 Spec No):333–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Snell L, Pusic AL. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: development of the FACE-Q. Facial Plast Surg. 2010;26(4):303–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sobanko JF, Sarwer DB, Zvargulis Z, Miller CJ. Importance of physical appearance in patients with skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(2):183–8. Study showing the importance of not only cancer cure, but also avoidance of disfigurement after skin cancer surgery. Patient-reported outcomes and less obvious outcomes that may be of significant relevance should not be omitted from effectiveness analyses.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gargon E, Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M. The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013. Trials. 2014;15:279. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-279.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maher IA, Fosko S, Alam M. Experience vs experiments with the purse-string closure: unexpected results. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(3):259–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alam M, Kakar R, Nodzenski M, Ibrahim O, Disphanurat W, Bolotin D, et al. Multicenter prospective cohort study of the incidence of adverse events associated with cosmetic dermatologic procedures: lasers, energy devices, and injectable neurotoxins and fillers. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(3):271–7. The largest prospective cohort study of adverse events associated with cosmetic dermatologic injectable and energy procedures. Similar other trials are needed to assess effectiveness, and other desired outcomes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alam M, Ibrahim O, Nodzenski M, Strasswimmer JM, Jiang SI, Cohen JL, et al. Adverse events associated with Mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(12):1378–85. The largest prospective cohort study of adverse events associated with Mohs surgery for skin cancer. Similar other trials are needed to assess effectiveness, and other desired outcomes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trojahn C, Schario M, Dobos G, Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J. Reliability and validity of two in vivo measurements for skin surface topography in aged adults. Skin Res Technol. 2015;21(1):54–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang SL, Huang YL, Lee MC, Chang CH, Chung WH, Wu EH, et al. Combination therapy of focused ultrasound and radio-frequency for noninvasive body contouring in Asians with MRI photographic documentation. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(1):165–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alam M. Usefulness of Cochrane intervention reviews for the practicing dermatologic surgeon. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(9):1345–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alam M, Dover JS, ASDS Dermatologic Surgery Lexicon Task Force. American Society for Dermatologic Surgery dermatologic surgery drug and device nomenclature recommendations. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(8):1158–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Murad Alam, Ian A. Maher, Joseph F. Sobanko, Simon S. Yoo, Mathew M. Avram, Hayes B. Gladstone, Andrei Metelitsa, Marian E. Northington, Zakia Rahman, Thuzar M. Shin, and Todd V. Cartee declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murad Alam.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Medical Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alam, M., Maher, I.A., Sobanko, J.F. et al. Rationalizing Outcome Measures in Dermatologic Surgery. Curr Derm Rep 4, 140–146 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-015-0106-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-015-0106-5

Keywords

Navigation