Abstract
Dermatologic surgery, including cancer surgery, cosmetic surgery, and laser and energy device procedures, is a well-established branch of dermatology known for minimally invasive, effective, and safe solutions to patient problems. Over time, clinical research pertaining to dermatologic surgery has improved in terms of methodologic rigor, with dermatologic surgery accounting for a large proportion of the comparative effectiveness studies and randomized controlled trials in dermatology. Further improvements in the quality of studies examining dermatologic surgery therapies will require understanding and overcoming several remaining challenges.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Hanke CW, Moy RL, Roenigk RK, Roenigk Jr HH, Spencer JM, Tierney EP, et al. Current status of surgery in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(6):972–1001.
Park KK. Fellowships after dermatology residency: the traditional and beyond. Cutis. 2015;95(3):E31–4.
Alam M, Rauf M, Ali S, Nodzenski M, Minkis K. A systematic review of reporting in randomized controlled trials in Dermatologic Surgery: Jadad scores, power analysis, and sample size determination. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(12):1299–305. Assesses dermatologic surgery randomized control trials on standard quality parameters over a longitudinal period of approximately 2 decades.
Bangash HK, Ibrahimi OA, Green LJ, Alam M, Eisen DB, Armstrong AW. Who do you prefer? A study of public preferences for health care provider type in performing cutaneous surgery and cosmetic procedures in the United States. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(6):671–8.
Alam M. Evidence-based procedural dermatology. In: Maibach HI, Farzam G, editors. Evidence-based dermatology. USA: PMPH; 2011. p. 539–546. + 3.
Alam M, Olson JM, Asgari MM. Needs assessment for cosmetic dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(1):177–87.
Asgari MM, Olson JM, Alam M. Needs assessment for Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(1):167–75.
Olson JM, Alam M, Asgari MM. Needs assessment for general dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(1):153–66.
Imadojemu S, Sarwer DB, Percec I, Sonnad SS, Goldsack JE, Berman M, et al. Influence of surgical and minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures on psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(11):1325–33. Reviews psychosocial changes attributable to cosmetic dermatologic interventions. Such changes, along with visible changes in appearance, are among the most relevant outcomes pertaining to elective procedures designed to enhance beauty or retard physical aging.
Alam M, White LE, Martin N, Witherspoon J, Yoo S, West DP. Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(2):262–9.
Hollander JE, Blasko B, Singer AJ, Valentine S, Thode Jr HC, Henry MC. Poor correlation of short- and long-term cosmetic appearance of repaired lacerations. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2(11):983–7.
Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The Vancouver scar scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995;16(5):535–8.
Goodman GJ. Treatment of acne scarring. Int J Dermatol. 2011;50(10):1179–94.
Geister TL, Bleßmann-Gurk B, Rzany B, Harrington L, Görtelmeyer R, Pooth R. Validated assessment scale for platysmal bands. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(8):1217–25.
Sattler G, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, et al. Validated assessment scale for neck volume. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2 Spec No):343–50.
Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, Hardas B, Himmrich S, et al. Validated assessment scales for the mid face. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2 Spec No):320–32.
Flynn TC, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, Hardas B, et al. Validated assessment scales for the upper face. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2 Spec No):309–19.
Narins RS, Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, Hardas B, et al. Validated assessment scales for the lower face. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(2 Spec No):333–42.
Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Snell L, Pusic AL. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: development of the FACE-Q. Facial Plast Surg. 2010;26(4):303–9.
Sobanko JF, Sarwer DB, Zvargulis Z, Miller CJ. Importance of physical appearance in patients with skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(2):183–8. Study showing the importance of not only cancer cure, but also avoidance of disfigurement after skin cancer surgery. Patient-reported outcomes and less obvious outcomes that may be of significant relevance should not be omitted from effectiveness analyses.
Gargon E, Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M. The COMET Initiative database: progress and activities from 2011 to 2013. Trials. 2014;15:279. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-279.
Maher IA, Fosko S, Alam M. Experience vs experiments with the purse-string closure: unexpected results. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(3):259–60.
Alam M, Kakar R, Nodzenski M, Ibrahim O, Disphanurat W, Bolotin D, et al. Multicenter prospective cohort study of the incidence of adverse events associated with cosmetic dermatologic procedures: lasers, energy devices, and injectable neurotoxins and fillers. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(3):271–7. The largest prospective cohort study of adverse events associated with cosmetic dermatologic injectable and energy procedures. Similar other trials are needed to assess effectiveness, and other desired outcomes.
Alam M, Ibrahim O, Nodzenski M, Strasswimmer JM, Jiang SI, Cohen JL, et al. Adverse events associated with Mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(12):1378–85. The largest prospective cohort study of adverse events associated with Mohs surgery for skin cancer. Similar other trials are needed to assess effectiveness, and other desired outcomes.
Trojahn C, Schario M, Dobos G, Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J. Reliability and validity of two in vivo measurements for skin surface topography in aged adults. Skin Res Technol. 2015;21(1):54–60.
Chang SL, Huang YL, Lee MC, Chang CH, Chung WH, Wu EH, et al. Combination therapy of focused ultrasound and radio-frequency for noninvasive body contouring in Asians with MRI photographic documentation. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(1):165–72.
Alam M. Usefulness of Cochrane intervention reviews for the practicing dermatologic surgeon. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(9):1345–50.
Alam M, Dover JS, ASDS Dermatologic Surgery Lexicon Task Force. American Society for Dermatologic Surgery dermatologic surgery drug and device nomenclature recommendations. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(8):1158–66.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Murad Alam, Ian A. Maher, Joseph F. Sobanko, Simon S. Yoo, Mathew M. Avram, Hayes B. Gladstone, Andrei Metelitsa, Marian E. Northington, Zakia Rahman, Thuzar M. Shin, and Todd V. Cartee declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Medical Surgery
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alam, M., Maher, I.A., Sobanko, J.F. et al. Rationalizing Outcome Measures in Dermatologic Surgery. Curr Derm Rep 4, 140–146 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-015-0106-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-015-0106-5