Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gait and Balance Assessment of Older Adults

  • Invited Commentary
  • Published:
Current Geriatrics Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review will outline seminal and contemporary balance and gait measures most commonly used with geriatric clients, along with the administration procedures, clinical utility, and psychometric qualities that support their use.

Recent Findings

Ten balance and five gait performance tests were reviewed. Balance instruments range from the simple to the complex. These tools quantify older adults’ ability to maintain postural stability during tasks that manipulate sensory conditions and functional activities, and challenge their base of support. Gait assessment is common in geriatric rehabilitation. Frail clients who ambulate with an assistive device can benefit from a more basic locomotion test, whereas seniors at higher mobility levels should be challenged with tasks superimposed on the gait sequence. Recent adaptations of traditional tests include surface changes, technology application, and clinical utility with subsets of older adults such as those with lumbar surgery and postural tremor. Timed floor rise ability more thoroughly addresses the fall risk dimension.

Summary

Balance and gait assessments quantify physical performance in older adults and are utilized to establish interventions to improve mobility, reduce fall risk, and increase balance confidence. A wide variety of outcome measures exists in geriatric rehabilitation, though tests should be tapered for the functional level of the client. Practitioners should consider test administration for older adults with atypical diagnoses, along with flooring changes, technology adaptation, and timed supine to stand ability. Future research should revisit commonly accepted threshold scores for fall risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Karinkanta S, Heinonen A, Sievanen H, Uusi-Rasi K, Kannus P. Factors predicting dynamic balance and quality of life in home-dwelling elderly women. Gerontol. 2005;51(2):116–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000082196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schaap LA, Koster A, Visser M. Adiposity, muscle mass, and muscle strength in relation to functional decline in older persons. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35(1):51–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxs006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. •• Gouveia ER, Ihle A, Gouveia BR, Kliegel M, Marques A, Freitas DL. Muscle mass and muscle strength relationships to balance: the role of age and physical activity. J Aging Phys Act. 2019:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2018-0113This cross-sectional study analyzed the relationship between balance ability and both muscle and muscle strength among 802 older adult volunteers. There was a positive correlation between both variable domains and balance ability using the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale.

  4. Carty CP, Cronin NJ, Nicholson D, et al. Reactive stepping behaviour in response to forward loss of balance predicts future falls in community-dwelling older adults. Age Ageing. 2015;44(1):109–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. • Selbach NM, O’Brian K, Brooks D, et al. Speed and distance requirements for community ambulation: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:117–28 The systematic review outlines from seven studies distance requirements needed to navigate community locations such as stores, warehouses, and cemeteries. Twenty-four US sites were identified in the review; moreover, speeds required to traverse a street with traffic light changes varied greatly between locations.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fritz S, Lusardi M. Walking speed: the sixth vital sign. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):46–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duncan PW, Studenski S, Chandler J, Prescott B. Functional reach: predictive validity in a sample of elderly male veterans. J Gerontol. 1992;47(3):M93–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berg K, Wood-Dauphine SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Pub Health. 1992;83:S9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Newton RA. Validity of the multidirectional reach test: a practical measure for limits of stability in older adults. J Gerontol: Med Sci. 2001;56A(4):M248–52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Newton RA. Balance screening of an inner city older adult population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:587–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Steffen TM, Mollinger LA. Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling adults. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005;29(4):181–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPT.0000282315.17359.95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tinetti M. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility programs in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;34:119–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cipriany-Dacko LM, Innerst D, Johannsen J, Rude V. Interrater reliability of the Tinetti balance scores in novice and experienced physical therapy clinicians. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1160–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knobe M, Giesen M, Plate S, Gradl-Dietsch G, Buecking B, Eschbach D, et al. The Aachen Mobility and Balance Index to measure physiological falls risk: a comparison with the Tinetti POMA Scale. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:537–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0693-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivolta MW, Aktaruzzaman M, Rizzo G, Lafortuna CL, Ferrarin M, Bovi G, et al. Evaluation of the tinetti score and fall risk assessment via accelerometry-based movement analysis. Artif Intell Med. 2019;95:38–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bogle-Thorbahn LD, Newton RA. Use of the Berg Balance Test to predict falls in elderly person. Phys Ther. 1997;76(6):576–83.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Pollisar N, Gruber W. Predicting the probability of falls in community-dwelling adults. Phys Ther. 1997;77:812–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Riddle DL, Stratford PW. Interpreting indexes for diagnostic tests: an illustration using the Berg Balance Test. Phys Ther. 1999;79(10):939–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Muir SW, Berg K, Chesworth B, Speechley M. Use of the Berg Balance Scale for predicting multiple falls in community-dwelling elderly people: a prospective study. Phys Ther. 2008;88(4):449–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Conradsson M, Lundin-Olsson L, Lindelöf N, Littbrand H, Malmqvist L, Gustafson Y, et al. Berg Balance Scale: intrarater test-retest reliability among older people dependent in activities of daily living and living in residential care facilities. Phys Ther. 2007;87(9):1155–63. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dite W, Temple VA. A clinical test of stepping and change of direction to identify multiple falling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1566–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Batting M, Barker KL. Reliability and validity of the Four Square Step Test in patients with hip osteoarthritis before and after total hip replacement. Physiother. 2019 Jun;105(2):244–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mathurapongsakul P, Siriphorn A. Four Square Step Test with foam is more accurate than those without foam for discriminating between older adults with and without fall history. J Aging Phys Act. 2018;26(4):624–8. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2017-0363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rose DJ, Lucchese N, Wiersma LD. Development of a multidimensional balance scale for use with functionally independent older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1478–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Klein PJ, Fiedler RC, Rose DJ. Rasch analysis of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale. Physiother Can. 2011;63(1):115–25. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2009-51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Klima D, Morgan L, Baylor M, Reilly C, Gladmon D, Davey A. Physical performance and fall risk in persons with traumatic brain injury. Percept Motor Skills. 2019;126(1):50–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512518809203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schlenstedt C, Brombacher S, Hartwigsen G, Weisser B, Möller B, Deuschl G. A comparison of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale, Mini-BESTest, and Berg Balance Scale to predict falls in Parkinson disease. Phys Ther. 2016;96(4):494–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Horak FB, Wrisley DM, Frank J. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits. Phys Ther. 2009;89(5):484–98. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080071.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Jácome C, Cruz J, Oliveira A, Marques A. Validity, reliability, and ability to identify fall status of the Berg Balance Scale, BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest in patients with COPD. Phys Ther. 2016;96(11):1807–15. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20150391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Godi M, Franchignoni F, Caligari M, Giordano A, Turcato AM, Nardone A. Comparison of reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale in patients with balance disorders. Phys Ther. 2013;93(2):158–67. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20120171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yingyongyudha A, Saengsirisuwan V, Panichaporn W, Boonsinsukh R. The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) demonstrates higher accuracy in identifying older adult participants with history of falls than do the BESTest, Berg Balance Scale, or Timed Up and Go Test. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016;39(2):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. • Klima DW, Anderson C, Samrah D, Patel D, Chui K, Newton R. Standing from the floor in community-dwelling older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2016;24(2):207–13. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2015-0081The study analyzes in older adults, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the supine to stand maneuver and relevant performance correlate. Findings demonstrate that floor rise ability is significantly related to age, grip strength, balance confidence, and physical performance variables.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ulbrich J, Raheja A, Alexander NB. Body positions used by healthy and frail older adults to rise from the floor. J Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1626–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bohannon RM, Lusardi MM. Getting up from the floor. Determinants and techniques among healthy older adults. Physiother Theory Prac. 2004;20:233–41.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bloch F. Critical falls: why remaining on the ground after a fall can be dangerous, whatever the fall. J Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:1375–6.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brito LB, Ricardo DR, Araujo DS, Ramos PS, Myers J, Araujo CG. Ability to sit and rise from the floor as a predictor of all-cause mortality. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;21:892–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Legters K. Fear of falling. Phys Ther. 2002;82:264–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Maki BE, Holiday PJ, Topper AK. Fear of falling and postural performance in the elderly. J Gerontol. 1991;46:M123–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tinetti ME, Rickman D, Powell L. Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol B Psych Soc Sci. 1990;45:P239–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Med Sci. 1995;50A:M28–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Myers AM, Fletcher PC, Myers AH, Sherk W. Discriminative and evaluative properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol Med Sci. 1998;53A(4):M287–94.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lajoie Y, Girard A, Guay M. Comparison of the reaction time, the Berg Scale, and the ABC in non fallers and fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2002;35:215–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish DE. Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-meter walk test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2013;36(1):24–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2001;56A3:M146–56.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chui K, Hood E, Klima DW. Meaningful change in walking speed. Topics Geriatr Rehabil. 2012;28:97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing. 1997;26:15–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The Timed “Up and Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bohannon RW. Reference values for the Timed Up and Go Test: a descriptive meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2006;292:64–8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up & go test. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):896–903.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. • Casey CM, Parker EM, Winkler G, Liu X, Lambert GH, Eckstrom E. Lessons learned from implementing CDC’s STEADI falls prevention algorithm in primary care. Gerontol. 2017;57(4):787–96 This descriptive study depicts how the Center for Disease Control’s STEADI initiatives were implemented in an internal medicine clinic to screen for fall risk. The authors describe key implementation strategies using Kotter framework underpinnings to facilitate clinical practice.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kristensen MT, Foss NB, Kehlet H. Timed “Up and Go” Test as a predictor of falls within six months after hip fracture surgery. Phys Ther. 2007;871:24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chiu YP, Fritz SL, Light KE, Velozo CA. Use of item response analysis to investigate measurement properties and clinical validity of data for the Dynamic Gait Index. Phys Ther. 2006;86(6):778–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wrisley DM, Walker ML, Echternach JL, Strasnick B. Reliability of the dynamic gait index in people with vestibular disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(10):1528–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Whitney S, Wrisley D, Furman J. Concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale and Dynamic Gait Index in people with vestibular dysfunction. Physiother Res. 2003;8(4):178–86.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Herman T, Inbar-Borovsky N, Brozgol M, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. The Dynamic Gait Index in healthy older adults: the role of stair climbing, fear of falling, and gender. Gait Posture. 2009;29:237–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sittichoke C, Buasord J, Boripuntakul S, Sungkarat S. Effects of compliant flooring on dynamic balance and gait characteristics of community-dwelling older persons. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(7):665–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-019-1211-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, Whitney SL. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Phys Ther. 2004;84(10):906–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wrisley DM, Kumar NA. Functional gait assessment: concurrent, discriminative, and predictive validity in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 2010;90(5):761–73. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rasekaba T, Lee AL, Naughton MT, Williams TJ, Holland AE. The six-minute walk test: a useful metric for the cardiopulmonary patient. Intern Med J. 2009;39:495–501.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Keeratichananont W, Thanadetsuntorn C, Keeratichananont S. Value of preoperative 6-minute walk test for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2016;10(1):18–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Parry SM, Nalamalapu SR, Nunna K, Rabiee A, Friedman LA, Colantuoni E, et al. Six-minute walk distance after critical illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care Med. 2019:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066619885838.

  62. Bohannon RW, Crouch R. Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23:377–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Harada ND, Chiu V, Stewart AL. Mobility-related function in older adults: assessment with a 6-minute walk test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:837–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, et al. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:111–7.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L. Age and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: six-minute walk test, berg balance scale, timed up & go test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther. 2002;82(2):128–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mohanan H, Kutty RK, Kamaraj B. Impact of six minute walk distance with quality of life in geriatrics population. Int J Appl Res. 2018;4(6):37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Chuang CY, Lin SY, Li MH, Chang YJ, Hsu MJ. Six-minute walk test in community-dwelling older adults. Topics Geri Rehabil. 2019;35(4):266–72.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Chui KK, Lusardi MM. Spatial and temporal parameters of self-selected and fast walking speeds in healthy community-living adults aged 72–98 years. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2010;33(4):173–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ghislieri M, Gastaldi L, Pastorelli S, Tadano S, Agostini V. Wearable inertial sensors to assess standing balance: a systematic review. Sensors. 2019;19(19):4075. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19194075.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Sheehan KJ, Greene BR, Cunningham C, Crosby L, Kenny RA. Early identification of declining balance in higher functioning older adults: an inertial sensor based method. Gait Posture. 2014 Apr;39(4):1034–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Van Diest M, Lamoth CJ, Stegenga J, Verkerke GJ, Postema K. Exergaming for balance training of elderly: state of the art and future developments. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2013;10(1):101. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wallmann HW. Comparison of elderly nonfallers and fallers on performance measures of functional reach, sensory organization, and limits of stability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci. 2001;56(9):M580–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Loughran S, Tennant N, Kishore A, Swan IR. Interobserver reliability in evaluation stability between clinicians and posturography. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30(3):255–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Sparto PJ, Newman AB, Simonsick EM, et al. Contributions to lateral balance control in ambulatory older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018;30(6):633–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0819-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Levin I, Lewek MD, Giuliani C, Faldowski R, Thorpe DE. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change for measures of balance and gait in adults with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2019;72:96–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lubetzky AV, Soroka A, Harel D, Errico T, Bendo J, Leitner J, et al. Static and dynamic balance in adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;1:e553–9. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Xu X, Chen J, Chen M, Gu Z, Ji S, Liu S, et al. Postural tremor is associated with gait and balance impairments in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(4):799–803.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Gray VL, Goldberg AP, Rogers MW, Anthony L, Terrin ML, Guralnik JM, et al. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is associated with mobility and cognitive dysfunction and heightens falls in older adults. J Vasc Surg. 2019:1937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.020.

  79. Schoene D, Wu SM, Mikolaizak AS, et al. Discriminative ability and predictive validity of the timed up and go test in identifying older people who fall: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(2):202–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Tinetti ME, Kumar C. The patient who falls: “It's always a trade-off”. JAMA. 2010;303(3):258–266. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.2024

Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Maryland Eastern Shore-Hazel Hall, Princess Anne, MD, 21853, USA

    Dennis W. Klima

  2. DeSales University- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, 2755 Station Avenue, Center Valley, PA, 18034-9568, USA

    Ethan Hood

Authors
  1. Dennis W. Klima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ethan Hood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis W. Klima.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klima, D.W., Hood, E. Gait and Balance Assessment of Older Adults. Curr Geri Rep 9, 154–162 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-020-00327-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-020-00327-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation