Corporate Leanwashing and Consumer Beliefs About Obesity
Purpose of Review
Caloric overconsumption, rather than lack of exercise, is the primary driver of overweight and obesity. We review people’s beliefs about the causes of obesity, the origins and consequences of these beliefs, and suggest possible mechanisms for corrective action.
In multiple samples across the world, approximately half of the population mistakenly believes that lack of exercise is the primary cause of obesity. These misbeliefs have consequences: people who underestimate the importance of one’s diet are more likely to be overweight or obese than people who correctly believe that diet is the primary cause of obesity. Next, we discuss the systematic misrepresentation of these factors—which we call “leanwashing”—by the food and beverage industry. Corporate messaging and actions are likely contributing factors to these mistaken beliefs being so widespread, and thus corrective actions are required. These include regulation and taxation.
People’s beliefs have important medical consequences, and the origins of these beliefs and misbeliefs need to be monitored and regulated.
KeywordsObesity crisis Consumer behavior Market failure Public policy Corporate social responsibility Sugar tax
B. McFerran is supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada. A. Mukhopadhyay is supported by the HKUST Institute for Emerging Market Studies and the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong. We thank Agnes Chan for the excellent research assistance.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Aneel Karnani, Brent McFerran, and Anirban Mukhopadhyay declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published, with one exception. All reported studies/experiments complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 2.• Dobbs R, Sawers C, Thompson F, Manyika J, Woetzel J, Child P, McKenna S, Spatharou A. Overcoming obesity: an initial economic analysis. McKinsey Global Institute, discussion paper. 2014; November. This paper assesses the global economic impact of obesity. Google Scholar
- 8.Malhotra A. Take off that Fitbit. Exercise alone won’t make you lose weight. Washington Post. 2015; May 15. https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/05/15/take-off-that-fitbit-exercise-alone-wont-make-you-lose-weight/?utm_term=.45dd448c3a93
- 10.Wansink B. Mindless eating: why we eat more than we think. New York: Bantam - Dell; 2006.Google Scholar
- 13.Dweck CS. Self-theories: their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis; 2000.Google Scholar
- 14.Wyer RS Jr. Social comprehension and judgment: the role of situation models, narratives, and implicit theories. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 2004.Google Scholar
- 15.Mukhopadhyay A. An ounce of prevention, an apple a day: effects of consumers’ lay theories on health-related behaviors. In: Batra R, Keller PA, Strecher VA, editors. Leveraging Consumer Psychology for Effective Health Communications: The Obesity Challenge. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe; 2011. p. 87–103.Google Scholar
- 18.• Werle COC, Wansink B, Payne CR. Is it fun or exercise? The framing of physical activity biases subsequent snacking. Mark Lett. 2015;26(4):691–702. doi: 10.1007/s11002-014-9301-6. This paper demonstrates that if exercise is labeled as “fun” versus “exercise,” people subsequently eat less unhealthy food. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.• Lustig RH. Fat chance: beating the odds against sugar, processed food, obesity, and disease. New York: Hudson Street Press; 2013. This book reviews possible links between processed foods and obesity. Google Scholar
- 21.Huber B. Michelle Obama’s moves. 2012. www.thenation.com/article/170485/michelles- moves#.
- 22.O'Connor A. Coca-Cola funds scientists who shift blame for obesity away from bad diets. The New York Times. 2015;August 9.Google Scholar
- 23.Kent M. Coca-Cola: we’ll do better. The Wall Street Journal. 2015;August 19.Google Scholar
- 24.• Moss M. Salt sugar fat: how the food giants hooked us. New York: Random House; 2013. This book reviews the marketing practices of food companies. Google Scholar
- 25.Zakaria F. Interview with Indra Nooyi. In: The Global Public Square. CNN.com. 2011. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1104/17/fzgps.01.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2017.
- 26.Mangalindan JP. PepsiCo CEO: if all consumers exercised...obesity wouldn’t exist. In: Fortune 500. 2010. http://archive.fortune.com/2010/04/27/news/companies/indra_nooyi_pepsico.fortune/index.htm. Accessed 16 Feb 2017.
- 27.•• Karnani A, McFerran B, Mukhopadhyay A. The obesity crisis as market failure: an analysis of systemic causes and corrective mechanisms. J Assoc Consum Res. 2016;1(3):445–70. This paper reviews imperfections in the market for food and assesses mechanisms to address the problem of obesity. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.• Soman D. The last mile: creating economic and social value from behavioural insights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2015. This book reviews the principles of behavioral economics and provides a framework for understanding how public policy can be guided by psychological principles. Google Scholar
- 36.Whitehead R, Watson E, Chu W, Michail N, Gore L. The year of the sugar tax. Beverage daily.com. 2016;December 15. http://www.beveragedaily.com/Trends/Soda-taxes-regulation/2016-The-year-of-the-sugar-tax. Accessed 16 Feb 2017.
- 37.O'Connor A, Sanger-Katz M. As soda taxes gain wider acceptance, your bottle may be next. The New York Times. 2016;November 26.Google Scholar
- 38.• World Health Organization. Fiscal policies for diet and prevention of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva; 2016. This paper suggests that taxation at appreciable levels can motivate reduced consumption of unhealthy nutrients. Google Scholar