Advertisement

Current Nutrition Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 307–314 | Cite as

What Are They Really Eating? A Review on New Approaches to Dietary Intake Assessment and Validation

  • Megan E. Rollo
  • Rebecca L. Williams
  • Tracy Burrows
  • Sharon I. Kirkpatrick
  • Tamara Bucher
  • Clare E. Collins
Public Health and Translational Medicine (MEJ Lean, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Public Health and Translational Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Assessing food and nutrient intakes is critical to evolving our understanding of diet-disease relationships and the refinement of nutrition guidelines to support healthy populations. The aims of this narrative review are to summarise recent advances in dietary assessment methodologies, with a particular focus on approaches using new technologies, as well as strategies to evaluate tools, and to provide directions for future research.

Recent Findings

Technology as a mode to assess dietary intake has gained momentum in recent years, with the development of image-based methods and wearable devices, as well as the emergence of online methods of administering traditional paper-based approaches to dietary assessment. At the same time, there have been advances in the development of dietary biomarkers to evaluate measures of self-reported dietary intake. Common biomarkers, such as plasma carotenoids and red blood cell fatty acids, are still being utilised with new markers including urinary markers of sugar or wholegrain intake, skin carotenoids as a measure of fruit and vegetable intake. As well, the field of metabolomics shows promise.

Summary

Challenges remain in dietary intake assessment, and further efforts are required to refine and evaluate methods so that we can better understand diet-disease relationships and inform guidelines and interventions to promote health.

Keywords

Dietary assessment Technology Validation Biomarkers eHealth mHealth 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Megan E. Rollo, Rebecca L. Williams, Tracy Burrows, Sharon I. Kirkpatrick, Tamara Bucher and Clare E. Collins declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Risk factors contributing to chronic disease. In: Government A, editor.: AIHW; 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM, Miller PE, Liese AD, Kahle LL, Park Y, et al. Higher diet quality is associated with decreased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality among older adults. J Nutr. 2014;144(6):881–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacques PF, Tucker KL. Are dietary patterns useful for understanding the role of diet in chronic disease? Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(1):1–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Australian Government. Guideline development: Eat for Health; 2015. Available from: https://www.eatforhealth.gov.au/guidelines/guideline-development [cited 2016 June].
  5. 5.
    Risérus U, Willett WC, Hu FB. Dietary fats and prevention of type 2 diabetes. Prog Lipid Res. 2009;48(1):44–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siri-Tarino PW, Sun Q, Hu FB, Krauss RM. Saturated fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease: modulation by replacement nutrients. Current atherosclerosis reports. 2010;12(6):384–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Souza RJ, Mente A, Maroleanu A, Cozma AI, Ha V, Kishibe T, et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. 2015.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Astrup A, Dyerberg J, Elwood P, Hermansen K, Hu FB, Jakobsen MU, et al. The role of reducing intakes of saturated fat in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: where does the evidence stand in 2010? Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(4):684–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, Després J-P, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010;121(11):1356–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Medina-Remon A, Casas R, Tressserra-Rimbau A, Ros E, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Fito M, et al. Polyphenol intake from a Mediterranean diet decreases inflammatory biomarkers related to atherosclerosis: a sub-study of The PREDIMED trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    European Commission. World food consumption patterns—trends and drivers. Europa; 2015.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mueller S, Szolnoki G. The relative influence of packaging, labelling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: consumers differ in their responsiveness. Food Qual Prefer. 2010;21(7):774–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment. USA: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Institutes of Health. Dietary assessment primer: National Cancer Institute; 2014. Available from: http://dietassessmentprimer.cancer.gov [cited 2016 July].
  15. 15.
    • Hedrick VE, Dietrich AM, Estabrooks PA, Savla J, Serrano E, Davy BM. Dietary biomarkers: advances, limitations and future directions. Nutr J. 2012;11(1):1. This paper reviews existing literature on current biomarkers, including metabolomics, and discusses the limitations and future directions of the biomarker research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mishra G, McNaughton S, Bramwell G, Wadsworth M. Longitudinal changes in dietary patterns during adult life. Br J Nutr. 2006;96(04):735–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Popkin BM. Global nutrition dynamics: the world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(2):289–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Archer E, Hand GA, Blair SN. Validity of US nutritional surveillance: national health and nutrition examination survey caloric energy intake data, 1971–2010. PloS one. 2013;8(10):e76632.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Archer E, Pavela G, Lavie CJ, editors. The inadmissibility of what we eat in America and NHANES dietary data in nutrition and obesity research and the scientific formulation of national dietary guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc. Elsevier; 2015.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dhurandhar N, Schoeller D, Brown A, Heymsfield S, Thomas D, Sørensen T, et al. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (2005). 2015;39(7):1109–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ioannidis JP. Implausible results in human nutrition research. BMJ. 2013;347:f6698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitka M. Do flawed data on caloric intake from NHANES present problems for researchers and policy makers? JAMA. 2013;310(20):2137–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    • Subar AF, Freedman LS, Tooze JA, Kirkpatrick SI, Boushey C, Neuhouser ML, et al. Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data. J Nutr. 2015. This commentary provides a balanced discussion on the strengths and limitations of self-report dietary intake data and delivers recommendations for collecting, analysing and interpreting dietary intake data.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neuhouser ML, Tinker L, Shaw PA, Schoeller D, Bingham SA, Van Horn L, et al. Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the women’s health initiative. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(10):1247–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Sullivan A, Gibney MJ, Brennan L. Dietary intake patterns are reflected in metabolomic profiles: potential role in dietary assessment studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(2):314–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thompson FE, Subar AF, Loria CM, Reedy JL, Baranowski T. Need for technological innovation in dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(1):48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beaton GH, Milner J, Corey P, McGuire V, Cousins M, Stewart E, et al. Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. American J Clin Nutr (USA). 1979.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Freedman LS, Schatzkin A, Midthune D, Kipnis V. Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(14):1086–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prentice RL, Huang Y. Measurement error modeling and nutritional epidemiology association analyses. Can J Stat. 2011;39(3):498–509.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tooze JA, Kipnis V, Buckman DW, Carroll RJ, Freedman LS, Guenther PM, et al. A mixed effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: the NCI method. Stat Med. 2010;29(27):2857–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Illner A, Freisling H, Boeing H, Huybrechts I, Crispim S, Slimani N. Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(4):1187–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    •• Gemming L, Utter J, Ni MC. Image-assisted dietary assessment: a systematic review of the evidence. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(1):64–77. This is a comprehensive review that identifies studies using or evaluating validated image-assisted methods of dietary assessment. The review reports on the benefits of using image-assisted methods for reducing dietary misreporting.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stumbo PJ. New technology in dietary assessment: a review of digital methods in improving food record accuracy. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72(01):70–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Innovation U. How mobile phones are changing the developing world UNICEF Connect2015. Available from: https://blogs.unicef.org/innovation/how-mobile-phones-are-changing-the-developing-world/ [cited 6 Aug 2016].
  35. 35.
    Burrows TL, Khambalia AZ, Perry R, Carty D, Hendrie GA, Allman‐Farinelli MA, et al. Great ‘app‐eal’but not there yet: a review of iPhone nutrition applications relevant to child weight management. Nutr Diet. 2015;72(4):363–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    National Cancer Institute. Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24®) Dietary Assessment Tool: NCI, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences; 2016. Available from: http://epi.grants.cancer.gov/asa24/ [cited 2016 August].
  37. 37.
    Burrows TL, Collins K, Watson J, Guest M, Boggess MM, Neve M, et al. Validity of the Australian recommended food score as a diet quality index for pre-schoolers. Nutr J. 2014;13:87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Collins CE, Burrows TL, Rollo ME, Boggess MM, Watson JF, Guest M, et al. The comparative validity and reproducibility of a diet quality index for adults: the Australian recommended food score. Nutrients. 2015;7(2):785–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Khanna N, Boushey CJ, Kerr D, Okos M, Ebert DS, Delp EJ, editors. An overview of the technology assisted dietary assessment project at Purdue University. Multimedia (ISM), 2010 I.E. International Symposium on; 2010: IEEE.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Daugherty BL, Schap TE, Ettienne-Gittens R, Zhu FM, Bosch M, Delp EJ, et al. Novel technologies for assessing dietary intake: evaluating the usability of a mobile telephone food record among adults and adolescents. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(2):e58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhu F, Bosch M, Khanna N, Boushey CJ, Delp EJ. Multiple hypotheses image segmentation and classification with application to dietary assessment. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015;19(1):377–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhu F, Bosch M, Woo I, Kim S, Boushey CJ, Ebert DS, et al. The use of mobile devices in aiding dietary assessment and evaluation. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process. 2010;4(4):756–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Harray AJ, Boushey CJ, Pollard CM, Delp EJ, Ahmad Z, Dhaliwal SS, et al. A novel dietary assessment method to measure a healthy and sustainable diet using the mobile food record: protocol and methodology. Nutrients. 2015;7(7):5375–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kerr DA, Harray AJ, Pollard CM, Dhaliwal SS, Delp EJ, Howat PA, et al. The connecting health and technology study: a 6-month randomized controlled trial to improve nutrition behaviours using a mobile food record and text messaging support in young adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13:52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rollo ME, Ash S, Lyons-Wall P, Russell AW. Evaluation of a mobile phone image-based dietary assessment method in adults with type 2 diabetes. Nutrients. 2015;7(6):4897–910.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sun M, Burke LE, Mao ZH, Chen Y, Chen HC, Bai Y, et al. eButton: a wearable computer for health monitoring and personal assistance. Proc Des Autom Conf. 2014;2014:1–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sun M, Fernstrom JD, Jia W, Hackworth SA, Yao N, Li Y, et al. A wearable electronic system for objective dietary assessment. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(1):45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gemming L, Doherty A, Kelly P, Utter J, Ni MC. Feasibility of a SenseCam-assisted 24-h recall to reduce under-reporting of energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(10):1095–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gemming L, Rush E, Maddison R, Doherty A, Gant N, Utter J, et al. Wearable cameras can reduce dietary under-reporting: doubly labelled water validation of a camera-assisted 24 h recall. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(2):284–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kong F, He H, Raynor HA, Tan J. DietCam: multi-view regular shape food recognition with a camera phone. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 2015;19:108–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jia W, Chen H-C, Yue Y, Li Z, Fernstrom J, Bai Y, et al. Accuracy of food portion size estimation from digital pictures acquired by a chest-worn camera. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(08):1671–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Martin CK, Nicklas T, Gunturk B, Correa JB, Allen HR, Champagne C. Measuring food intake with digital photography. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014;27 Suppl 1:72–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lunden I. 6.1B Smartphone Users Globally By 2020, Overtaking Basic Fixed Phone Subscriptions: Techcrunch; 2015. Available from: http://techcrunch.com/2015/06/02/6-1b-smartphone-users-globally-by-2020-overtaking-basic-fixed-phone-subscriptions/ [cited 4 May 2016].
  54. 54.
    Dong Y, Hoover A, Scisco J, Muth E. A new method for measuring meal intake in humans via automated wrist motion tracking. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012;37(3):205–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Salley JN, Hoover AW, Wilson ML, Muth ER. Comparison between human and bite-based methods of estimating caloric intake. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Farooq M, Fontana JM, Sazonov E. A novel approach for food intake detection using electroglottography. Physiol Meas. 2014;35(5):739–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fontana JM, Higgins JA, Schuckers SC, Bellisle F, Pan Z, Melanson EL, et al. Energy intake estimation from counts of chews and swallows. Appetite. 2015;85:14–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sazonov ES, Fontana JM. A sensor system for automatic detection of food intake through non-invasive monitoring of chewing. IEEE Sens J. 2012;12(5):1340–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fontana JM, Farooq M, Sazonov E. Automatic ingestion monitor: a novel wearable device for monitoring of ingestive behavior. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61(6):1772–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Farooq M, Chandler-Laney PC, Hernandez-Reif M, Sazonov E. Monitoring of infant feeding behavior using a jaw motion sensor. J Healthcare Eng. 2015;6(1):23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Farooq M, Sazonov E. A novel wearable device for food intake and physical activity recognition. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2016;16(7):1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Jenab M, Slimani N, Bictash M, Ferrari P, Bingham SA. Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology: applications, needs and new horizons. Hum Genet. 2009;125(5):507–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Corella D, Ordovás JM. Biomarkers: background, classification and guidelines for applications in nutritional epidemiology. Nutr Hosp. 2015;31(s03):177–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Burrows T, Truby H, Morgan P, Callister R, Davies P, Collins CE. A comparison and validation of child versus parent reporting of children’s energy intake using food frequency questionnaires versus food records: who’s an accurate reporter? Clin Nutr. 2013;32(4):613–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Puiggròs F, Solà R, Bladé C, Salvadó M-J, Arola L. Nutritional biomarkers and foodomic methodologies for qualitative and quantitative analysis of bioactive ingredients in dietary intervention studies. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(42):7399–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Collins CE, Burrows TL, Truby H, Morgan PJ, Wright IM, Davies PS, et al. Comparison of energy intake in toddlers assessed by food frequency questionnaire and total energy expenditure measured by the doubly labeled water method. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(3):459–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Burrows TL, Martin RJ, Collins CE. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(10):1501–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Freedman LS, Commins JM, Moler JE, Willett W, Tinker LF, Subar AF, et al. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for potassium and sodium intake. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(7):473–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bingham SA. Urine nitrogen as a biomarker for the validation of dietary protein intake. J Nutr. 2003;133(3):921S–4S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Subar AF, Kipnis V, Troiano RP, Midthune D, Schoeller DA, Bingham S, et al. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Burrows TL, Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Boggess MM, Guest M, Collins CE. Fruit and vegetable intake assessed by food frequency questionnaire and plasma carotenoids: a validation study in adults. Nutrients. 2015;7(5):3240–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Burrows TL, Warren JM, Colyvas K, Garg ML, Collins CE. Validation of overweight children’s fruit and vegetable intake using plasma carotenoids. Obesity. 2009;17(1):162–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Burrows T, Berthon B, Garg ML, Collins CE. A comparative validation of a child food frequency questionnaire using red blood cell membrane fatty acids. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(7):825–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yeung EH, Saudek CD, Jahren AH, Kao WHL, Islas M, Kraft R, et al. Evaluation of a novel isotope biomarker for dietary consumption of sweets. Am J Epidemiol. 2010:kwq247.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Davy BM, Jahren AH, Hedrick VE, Comber DL. Association of δ 13 C in fingerstick blood with added-sugar and sugar-sweetened beverage intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(6):874–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kuhnle GGC. Nutritional biomarkers for objective dietary assessment. J Sci Food Agric. 2012;92(6):1145–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Tasevska N. Urinary sugars—a biomarker of total sugars intake. Nutrients. 2015;7(7):5816–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    O’Brien DM, Black JA, Niles K, Schoeller D. The breath carbon isotope ratio is a promising biomarker of added sugar intake. FASEB J. 2016;30(1 Supplement):43.5.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Choy K, Nash SH, Kristal AR, Hopkins S, Boyer BB, O’Brien DM. The carbon isotope ratio of alanine in red blood cells is a new candidate biomarker of sugar-sweetened beverage intake. J Nutr. 2013;143(6):878–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    van Dam RM, Hu FB. Are alkylresorcinols accurate biomarkers for whole grain intake? Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87(4):797–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ermakov IV, Gellermann W. Optical detection methods for carotenoids in human skin. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2015;572:101–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Pezdirc K, Hutchesson MJ, Whitehead R, Ozakinci G, Perrett D, Collins CE. Fruit, vegetable and dietary carotenoid intakes explain variation in skin-color in young Caucasian women: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients. 2015;7(7):5800–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Gibbons H, Brennan L. Metabolomics as a tool in the identification of dietary biomarkers. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016; FirstView:1–12.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Hanhineva K, Lankinen MA, Pedret A, Schwab U, Kolehmainen M, Paananen J, et al. Nontargeted metabolite profiling discriminates diet-specific biomarkers for consumption of whole grains, fatty fish, and bilberries in a randomized controlled trial. J Nutr. 2015;145(1):7–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Brennan L. Metabolomics in nutrition research: current status and perspectives. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013;41(2):670–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Adeva MM, Calvino J, Souto G, Donapetry C. Insulin resistance and the metabolism of branched-chain amino acids in humans. Amino Acids. 2012;43(1):171–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    • O’Gorman A, Brennan L. Metabolomic applications in nutritional research: a perspective. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95(13):2567–70. This paper provides a summary of the application of metabolomics to the field of nutrition including biomarker identification, diet-related diseases and nutritional interventions.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Collins CE, Boggess MM, Watson JF, Guest M, Duncanson K, Pezdirc K, et al. Reproducibility and comparative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for Australian adults. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(5):906–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Freedman LS, Commins JM, Moler JE, Arab L, Baer DJ, Kipnis V, et al. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Am J Epi. 2014;80(2):172–188.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lara JJ, Scott JA, Lean MEJ. Intentional mis-reporting of food consumption and its relationship with body mass index and psychological scores in women. J Human Nutr and Diet. 2004;17(3):209–218.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Lachat C, Hawwash D, Ocké MC, Berg C, Forsum E, Hörnell A, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology - Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): an extension of the STROBE statement. PLoS Med. 2016;13(6):e1002036.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megan E. Rollo
    • 1
  • Rebecca L. Williams
    • 1
  • Tracy Burrows
    • 1
  • Sharon I. Kirkpatrick
    • 2
  • Tamara Bucher
    • 1
  • Clare E. Collins
    • 1
  1. 1.Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition and the School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and MedicineUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  2. 2.School of Public Health and Health SystemsUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations