The 2019 H. Paul Douglass Lecture: I Can’t Keep Quiet: Engaging with Scholarly Research on Religion

  • Tricia C. BruceEmail author
Original Research


Methodologies used by social scientists grant access to quiet worlds and otherwise hidden truths. Social scientists are akin to strangers, trusted with secrets. The 2019 H. Paul Douglass Lecture proposes that scholars who engage with research on religion ought to listen quietly, but not keep quiet. We can transform the quiet to which we are privy into the collective. I illustrate the imperative to speak research out loud using the case example of the National Abortion Attitudes Study. Personal knowledge becomes collective revelation and, sometimes, social change.


Douglass lecture Public scholarship Interviews Abortion Social change 



This H. Paul Douglass Lecture was presented to the October 2019 Religious Research Association/Society for the Scientific Study of Religion annual meeting in St. Louis, Missouri. Thank you to RRA President Patricia Wittberg for the invitation to give this address.


The National Abortion Attitudes Study was funded by the McGrath Institute for Church Life of the University of Notre Dame.


  1. Almeida, Paul. 2019. Social Movements: The Structure of Collective Mobilization. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammerman, Nancy. 2014. Sacred Stories, Spiritual Tribes: Finding Religion in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bruce, Tricia C. 2014 [2011]. Faithful Revolution: How Voice of the Faithful Is Changing the Church. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bruce, Tricia C. 2017. Parish and Place: Making Room for Diversity in the American Catholic Church. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruce, Tricia C., Jerry Park, and Stephen Cherry. 2015. Asian and Pacific Island Catholics in the United States. Report of findings from an original research project commissioned by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat for Cultural Diversity. Accessed 1 September 2019.
  6. Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1992. Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ecklund, Elaine. 2010. Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fichter, Joseph. 1951. Dynamics of a City Church (Southern Parish: Volume 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fichter, Joseph. 1973. One Man Research: Reminiscences of a Catholic Sociologist. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Godin, Seth. 2017. Yelling Upstairs. Accessed 1 September 2019.
  11. Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, Rachel K., and Jenna Jerman. 2017. Population Group Abortion Rates and Lifetime Incidence of Abortion: United States, 2008–2014. American Journal of Public Health 107(12): 1904–1909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, Andrew R. 2017. The Rights Turn in Conservative Christian Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Munson, Ziad. 2009. The Making of Pro-life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Munson, Ziad. 2018. Abortion Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. NPR. 2019. A Song Called ‘Quiet’ Struck A Chord With Women. Two Years Later, It’s Still Ringing. Accessed 1 September 2019.
  18. Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. In Wolff, ed. H. Kurt. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, Tom W., Michael Davern, Jeremy Freese, and Stephen Morgan. 2018. General Social Survey. Chicago: NORC. Accessed 1 September 2019.
  20. The Investigative Staff of the Boston Globe. 2008. Betrayal: The Crisis in the Catholic Church. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
  21. This Is Spinal Tap. 1984. Dir. Rob Reiner. Embassy Pictures. Film.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Study of Religion and SocietyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations