Religious Service Attendance, Moral Foundations, God Concept, and In-Group Giving: Testing Moderated Mediation
Studies demonstrate that religious people are more likely to donate money to charity, but these donations are more often given to in-group members (e.g., religiously affiliated organizations). Few studies test mechanisms by which religious attendance affects the bias toward in-group giving. Moral foundations are proposed as mediators of the association between religious attendance and the in-group giving bias, and traditional God concept is proposed as a moderator of the relation between attendance and moral foundations. Data were collected from Christians in the USA. (N = 311), and participants were given an opportunity to donate their payment to Christian (in-group), Muslim (out-group), or secular charities. The traditional God concept variable moderated the indirect effect of the fairness/reciprocity foundation in explaining the relation between religious attendance and giving. People with highly traditional God concepts and higher religious attendance reported higher fairness/reciprocity scores, and they gave less to in-group charities and more to out-group charities.
KeywordsMoral foundations Generosity In-group giving Religious attendance God concept
The preparation of this article was supported by a fellowship from Fuller Theological Seminary, an award from the Society for the Psychology of Religion & Spirituality (Division 36 of the American Psychological Association), and grants from the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy’s Generosity for Life Initiative funded by the John Templeton Foundation and the Biola University Center for Christian Thought.
- Batson, C.D., and A.A. Powell. 2003. Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology, vol. 5, ed. I.B. Weiner, 463–484. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bekkers, R. 2006a. Keeping the faith: Origins of confidence in charitable organizations and its consequences for philanthropy. Paper presented at the Researching the Voluntary Sector Conference, Warwick University, Coventry, United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.559.6535&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
- Bekkers, R., and T. Schuyt. 2008. And who is your neighbor? Explaining denominational differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the Netherlands. Review of Religious Research 50(1): 74–96.Google Scholar
- Bekkers, R., and P. Wiepking. 2007. Understanding philanthropy: A review of 50 years of theories and research. In 35th Annual Conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit and Voluntary Action, Chicago, IL. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/2814285/BekkersR-Philantropy-2007.pdf.
- Bielefeld, W., P. Rooney, and K. Steinberg. 2005. How do need, capacity, geography, and politics influence giving. In Gifts of money in Americas communities, ed. A.C. Brooks, 127–158. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Brooks, A.C. 2003. Charitable giving to humanitarian organizations in Spain. Hacienda Publica Espanola/Revista de Economia Publica 165: 9–24.Google Scholar
- Brooks, A.C. 2006. Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism–America’s charity divide—who gives, who doesn’t, and why it matters. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Eger, R., B. McDonald, and A.L. Wilsker. 2015. Religious attitudes and charitable donations. Journal of Applied Business and Economics 17: 52–65.Google Scholar
- Greenway, T.S., S.A. Schnitker, and A.M. Shepherd. 2018. Can prayer increase charitable giving? Examining the effects of intercessory prayer, moral intuitions, and theological orientation on generous behavior. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 28: 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2017.1406790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haidt, J., and C. Joseph. 2007. The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In The innate mind, vol. 3, ed. P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. Stich, 367–392. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A.F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kochhar, R., and R. Fry. 2014. Wealth inequality has widened along racial, ethnic lines since end of Great Recession. Pew Research Center 12: 1–15.Google Scholar
- Levy, S.R., A.L. Freitas, and P. Salovey. 2002. Construing action abstractly and blurring social distinctions: Implications for perceiving homogeneity among, but also empathizing with and helping, others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 1224–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35188.8.131.524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lincoln, R., C.A. Morrissey, and P. Mundey. 2008. Religious giving: A literature review. Science of Generosity. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
- Lyons, M., and I. Nivison-Smith. 2006. Religion and giving in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues 41: 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2006.tb00028.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Regnerus, M.D., C. Smith, and D. Sikkink. 1998. Who gives to the poor? The influence of religious tradition and political location on the personal generosity of Americans toward the poor. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37: 481–493. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roeger, K.L., A.S. Blackwood, and S.L. Pettijohn. 2012. The nonprofit almanac 2012. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
- Ronsvalle, J.L., and S. Ronsvalle. 2007. The state of church giving through 2005: Abolition of the institutional enslavement of overseas missions. Champaign, IL: Empty Tomb Inc.Google Scholar
- Scheepers, P., M.T. Grotenhuis, and J. Reitsma. 2006. Dimensions of individual religiosity and charity: Cross national effect differences in European countries? Review of Religious Research 47: 347.Google Scholar
- Smith, C., and J.P. Hill. 2009. Toward the measurement of interpersonal generosity (IG): An IG Scale conceptualized, tested, and validated. Retrieved from http://generosityresearch.nd.edu/assets/13798/ig_paper_smith_hill_rev.pdf.
- Stich, S., and K. Tobia. 2016. Intuition and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar