Advertisement

Review of Religious Research

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 57–74 | Cite as

How Pornography Use Reduces Participation in Congregational Leadership: A Research Note

  • Samuel L. PerryEmail author
Research Note

Abstract

Research on the link between religion and pornography suggests that more frequent pornography viewing can lead to declines in individuals’ religious commitment, likely stemming from the guilt, shame, and dissonance adherents experience for violating sacralized moral values. No research, however, has considered the implications of this phenomenon for religious organizations. The current study addresses this gap by examining how pornography use contributes to potential congregational problems by discouraging individuals from participating in lay leadership. Multivariate analyses of panel data from the 2006–2012 Portraits of American Life Study reveal that the more frequently respondents viewed pornography at wave 1 the less likely they were to hold a leadership position or serve on a committee in their congregation within the following 6 years. This effect was robust to controls for religious commitment, tradition, and other correlates of lay leadership participation. Interactions with religious tradition and gender suggest that participation in leadership is more negatively tied to porn use for conservative Protestants and Catholics compared to mainline Protestants and women compared to men. Findings ultimately suggest that increasingly pervasive pornography consumption among adherents could portend a potential dearth of volunteer leadership for congregations.

Keywords

Pornography Church Congregations Leadership Gender 

References

  1. Assad, Audrey. 2016. Q&A with Audrey Assad. In The porn phenomenon: The impact of pornography in a digital age, ed. Barna Group, 58–59. Ventura: Barna.Google Scholar
  2. Baltazar, Alina, Herbert W. Helm Jr., Duane McBride, Gary Hopkins, and John V. Stevens Jr. 2010. Internet pornography use in the context of external and internal religiosity. Journal of Psychology and Theology 38: 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, Kelsy. 2016. Christians under covers: Evangelicals and sexual pleasure on the internet. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carroll, Jason S., Laura M. Padilla-Walker, Larry J. Nelson, Chad D. Olson, Carolyn McNamara Barry, and Stephanie D. Madsen. 2008. Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research 23: 6–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christerson, Brad, and Michael O. Emerson. 2003. The cost of diversity in religious organizations: An in-depth case study. Sociology of Religion 64: 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doring, Nicola M. 2009. The internet’s impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15 years of research. Computers in Human Behavior 25: 1089–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dougherty, Kevin D., and Andrew L. Whitehead. 2011. A place to belong: Small group involvement in religious congregations. Sociology of Religion 72 (1): 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferguson, Todd W. 2018. Organizational resources and the gender gap in congregational lay leadership. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  9. Ferguson, Todd W. 2018b. Female leadership and role congruity within the clergy: Communal leaders experience no gender differences yet agentic women continue to suffer backlash. Sex Roles 78 (5–6): 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grubbs, Joshua B., Julie J. Exline, Kenneth I. Pargament, Fred Volk, and Matthew J. Lindberg. 2015. Internet pornography use, perceived addiction, and religious/spiritual struggles. Archives of Sexual Behavior 46 (6): 1733–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grubbs, Joshua B., and Samuel L. Perry. 2018. Moral incongruence and pornography use: A critical review and integration. Journal of Sex Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1427204.Google Scholar
  12. Grubbs, Joshua B., Samuel L. Perry, Joshua A. Wilt, and Rory C. Reid. 2018. Pornography problems due to moral incongruence: An integrative model with a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1248-x.Google Scholar
  13. Hardy, Sam A., Michael A. Steelman, Sarah M. Coyne, and Robert D. Ridge. 2013. Adolescent religious as a protective factor against pornography use. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 34 (3): 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martinez, Brandon C., and Kevin D. Dougherty. 2013. Race, belonging, and participation in religious congregations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (4): 713–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nelson, Larry J., Laura M. Padilla-Walker, and Jason S. Carroll. 2010. I believe it is wrong but i still do it”: A comparison of religious young men who do versus do not use pornography. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 2: 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ogas, Ogi, and Sai Gaddam. 2011. A billion wicked thoughts: What the world’s largest experiment reveals about human desire. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  17. Perry, Samuel L. 2017. Does viewing pornography diminish religiosity over time? Evidence from two-wave panel data. Journal of Sex Research 54 (2): 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Perry, Samuel L. 2018. Not practicing what you preach: religion and incongruence between pornography beliefs and usage. Journal of Sex Research 55 (3): 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Perry, Samuel L. 2019. Addicted to lust: Pornography in the lives of conservative protestants. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Perry, Samuel L., and George M. Hayward. 2017. Seeing is (Not) believing: How viewing pornography shapes the religious lives of young Americans. Social Forces 95 (4): 1757–1788.Google Scholar
  21. Perry, Samuel L., and Cyrus Schleifer. 2018a. Are the sanctified becoming the pornified? Religious conservatism, commitment, and pornography use, 1984–2016. Social Science Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12524.Google Scholar
  22. Perry, Samuel L., and Cyrus Schleifer. 2018b. Till porn do us part? A longitudinal examination of pornography use and divorce. Journal of Sex Research 55 (3): 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Price, Joseph, Rich Patterson, Mark Regnerus, and Jacob Walley. 2016. How much more XXX is generation X consuming? Evidence of changing attitudes and behaviors related to pornography since 1973. Journal of Sex Research 53 (1): 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rasmussen, Kyler, and Alex Bierman. 2017. Religious and community hurdles to pornography consumption: A national study of emerging adults. Emerging Adulthood 5: 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Regnerus, Mark D., and Jeremy Uecker. 2006. Finding faith, losing faith: The prevalence and context of religious transformations during adolescence. Review of Religious Research 47 (3): 217–237.Google Scholar
  26. Short, Mary B., Thomas E. Kasper, and Chad T. Wetterneck. 2015. The relationship between religiosity and internet pornography use. Journal of Religion and Health 54: 571–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Steensland, Brian, Jerry Z. Park, Mark Regnerus, W. Lynn Robinson, Bradford Wilcox, and Robert Woodberry. 2000. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79: 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stroope, Samuel. 2012. Social networks and religion: The role of congregational social embeddedness in religious belief and practice. Sociology of Religion 73 (3): 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thomas, Jeremy N. 2013. Outsourcing moral authority: The internal secularization of evangelicals’ anti-pornography narratives. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (3): 457–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thornton, Arland, and Donald Camburn. 1989. Religious participation and adolescent sexual behavior and attitudes. Journal of Marriage and Family 51 (3): 641–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Uecker, Jeremy E., Mark D. Regnerus, and Margaret L. Vaaler. 2007. Losing my religion: The social sources of religious decline in early adulthood. Social Forces 85: 1667–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations