Review of Religious Research

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 305–329 | Cite as

Religious Beliefs, Religious Contexts, and Perceived Interactions with Ex-Offenders

  • Logan A. YeldermanEmail author
  • Matthew P. West
  • Monica K. Miller
Original Paper


Religious institutions can provide a means of support and resources for many people, particularly, individuals who have criminal histories, specifically parolees, sex offenders, and insanity acquittees. When these individuals are released into the community, they often face difficulties in acquiring shelter, work, and social support. Out of their own volition or as a result of faith-based prison programs, they might turn to religious institutions for help reintegrating into the community. However, whether congregation members are more or less accepting of these individuals is unaddressed in the current literature. Two studies assess the relationship between religious beliefs, religious contexts, legal attitudes, and perceived social interactions with parolees, sex offenders, and insanity acquittees. Results suggest that religious beliefs, legal attitudes, and religious contexts play an important role in individuals’ perceived interactions with these individuals. Religious contexts, specifically, might facilitate more positive social interactions with parolees. Implications are discussed.


Religious beliefs Authoritarianism Criminal offenders Insanity Social distance Churches Fundamentalism Priming 


  1. Alarid, L.F., P. Cromwell, and R.V. Del Carmen. 2008. Community-based corrections. Belmont: Thomson-Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T., and C. Lo. 2010. Religiosity, spirituality, and substance abuse. Journal of Drug Issues 40: 433–459. Scholar
  3. Allport, G.W. 1954. The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Anagnostopoulos, F., and A. Hantzi. 2011. Familiarity with and social distance from people with mental illness: Testing the mediating effects of prejudiced attitudes. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 21: 451–460. Scholar
  5. Altemeyer, B., and B.E. Hunsberger. 2004. A revised fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 14: 47–54. Scholar
  6. Arboleda-Florez, J., H. Holley, and A. Crisanti. 1998. Mental illness and violence. International Medical Journal 5: 3–8. Scholar
  7. Assari, S. 2013. Race and ethnicity, religion involvement, church-based social support and subjective health in United States: A case of moderated mediation. International Journal of Preventive Medicine 4: 208–217.Google Scholar
  8. Barden, J., W.M. Maddux, R.E. Petty, and M.B. Brewer. 2004. Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87: 5–22. Scholar
  9. Bargh, J.A., and T.L. Chartrand. 2000. The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, ed. H.T. Reis, and C.M. Judd, 253–285. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bogardus, E.S. 1933. A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Research 17: 265–271.Google Scholar
  11. Bornstein, B.L., and M.K. Miller. 2009. God in the courtroom: Religion’s role at trial. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budd, K.M., and C. Mancini. 2016. Crime control theatre: Public (mis)perceptions of the effectiveness of sex offender residence restrictions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 22 (4): 362–374. Scholar
  13. Clear, T.R., B.D. Stout, H.R. Dammer, L. Kelly, P.L. Hardyman, and C. Shapiro. 1992. Does Involvement in Religion Help Prisoners Adjust to Prison?. National Institute of Justice: The National Council on Crime and Delinquency. U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, A.B., and P. Rozin. 2001. Religion and the morality of mentality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (4): 697–710. Scholar
  15. Corrigan, P.W., A.B. Edwards, A. Green, S.L. Diwan, and D.L. Penn. 2001. Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin 27: 219–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crisp, A., M. Gelder, S. Rix, and H. Meltzer. 2000. Stigmatisation of people with mental illnesses. British Journal of Psychiatry 177: 4–7. Scholar
  17. D’Amico, J. 2007. “Ask and you will receive”: Creating faith-based programs for former inmates. Corrections Today 69: 78–82.Google Scholar
  18. Dum, C. P., Yarrison, F., & Long, B. L. (2016). Would God Forgive? Public Attitudes towards Sex Offenders in Places of Worship. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Sociological Association, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  19. Dunkel, C.S., and E. Dutton. 2016. January). Religiosity as a predictor of in-group favoritism within and between religious groups. Personality and Individual Differences 98: 311–314. Scholar
  20. Duwe, G., and M. King. 2012. Can faith-based correctional programs work? An outcome evaluation of the Innerchange Freedom Initiative in Minnesota. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 57: 813–841. Scholar
  21. Evans, D.N., and M.A. Cubellis. 2015. Coping with stigma: How registered sex offenders manage theory public identities. American Journal of Criminal Justice 40: 593–619. Scholar
  22. Everett, J.A.C., N.S. Faber, and M. Crockett. 2015. Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9: 1–21. Scholar
  23. Falk, G. 2001. Stigma: How we treat outsiders. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gomory, T., D. Cohen, and S. Kirk. 2013. Madness or mental illness? Revisiting historians of psychiatry. Current Psychology 32: 119–135. Scholar
  25. Grasmick, H.G., and A.L. McGill. 1994. Religion, attribution style, and punitiveness toward juvenile offenders. Criminology 32: 23. Scholar
  26. Gmel, G., M. Mohler-Kuo, P. Dermota, J. Guame, N. Bertholet, J. Daeppen, and J. Studer. 2013. Religion is good, belief is better: Religion, religiosity, and substance use among Swiss men. Substance Use and Misuse 48: 1085–1098. Scholar
  27. Idler, E. (1999). Forgiveness. Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research: A Report of the Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group. Kalamazoo, MI.Google Scholar
  28. James, N. (2015). Offender reentry: Correctional statistics, reintegration into the community, and recidivism. Congressional Research Service Report. Retrieved from
  29. Johnson, B. 2004. Religious programs and recidivism among former inmates in prison fellowship programs: A long-term follow-up study. Justice Quarterly 21: 329–354. Scholar
  30. Johnson, M.K., W.C. Rowatt, and J.P. LaBouff. 2012. Religiosity and prejudice revisited: In-group favoritism, out-group derogation, or both? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 4: 154–168. Scholar
  31. Kivisto, A., and S. Swan. 2011. Attitudes toward the insanity defense in capital cases: (Im)partiality from Witherspoon to Witt. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 11 (4): 311–329. Scholar
  32. Koon-Magnin, S. 2015. Perceptions of and support for sex offender policies: Testing Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, and Baker’s findings. Journal of Criminal Justice 43: 80–88. Scholar
  33. Krause, N., C.G. Ellison, B. Shaw, J.P. Marcum, and J.D. Boardman. 2001. Church-based social support and religious coping. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 40: 637–656. Scholar
  34. Kravitz, D.A., B.L. Cutler, and P. Brock. 1993. Reliability and validity of the original and revised legal attitudes questionnaire*. Law and Human Behavior 17: 661–677. Scholar
  35. LaBouff, J.P., W.C. Rowatt, M.K. Johnson, and C. Finkle. 2012. Differences in attitudes toward outgroups in religious and nonreligious contexts in a multinational sample: A situational context priming study. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 22: 1–9. Scholar
  36. Levenson, J.S., Y.N. Brannon, T. Fortney, and J. Baker. 2007. Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 7 (1): 137–161.Google Scholar
  37. Maltby, J. 1998. Church attendance and anxiety change. The Journal of Social Psychology 138: 537–538. Scholar
  38. Maruna, S., and A. King. 2009. Once a criminal, always a criminal?: ‘Reedemability’ and the psychology of punitive public attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 15: 7–24. Scholar
  39. McRoberts, O. M. (2002). Religion, reform, community: Examining the idea of church-based prisoner reentry. In: Prisoner Reentry and the Institutions of Civil Society: Bridges and Barriers to Successful Reintegration. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Mears, D.P. 2007. Faith-based reentry programs: Cause for concern of showing promise? Corrections Today 69: 30–33.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, M.K., and R.D. Hayward. 2008. Religious characteristics and the death penalty. Law and Human Behavior 32: 113–123. Scholar
  42. Miller, M.K., J. Maskaly, C.D. Peoples, and A. Sigillo. 2014. The relationship between mock jurors’ religious characteristics and their verdicts and sentencing decisions. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 6: 188–197. Scholar
  43. Miller, R.D. 2002. Automatic commitment of insanity acquittees: Keeping up with the Jones? Journal of Psychiatry and Law 30: 59–95. Scholar
  44. Nooney, J., and E. Woodrum. 2002. Religious coping and church-based social support as predictors of mental health outcomes: Testing a conceptual model. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41 (2): 359–368. Scholar
  45. Perlin, M. 1996. Myths, realities, and the political world: The anthropology of insanity defense attitudes. The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 24: 5–26.Google Scholar
  46. Pichon, I., and V. Saroglou. 2009. Religion and helping: The impact of target thinking styles and just-world beliefs. Archive for the Psychology of Religion 31: 215–236. Scholar
  47. Putney, S., and R. Middleton. 1961. Dimensions and correlates of religious ideologies. Social Forces 39: 285–290. Scholar
  48. Ritter, R.S., and J.L. Preston. 2013. Representations of religious words: Insights for religious priming research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52 (3): 494–507. Scholar
  49. Rogers, E.B., and M.S. Stanford. 2015. A church-based peer-led group intervention for mental illness. Mental Health, Religion & Culture 18 (6): 470–481. Scholar
  50. Salas-Wright, C.P., M.G. Vaughn, D.R. Hodge, and B.E. Perron. 2012. Religiosity profiles of American youth in relation to substance use, violence, and delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 41: 1560–1575. Scholar
  51. Schlesinger, L. 2000. Serial offenders: Current thought recent findings. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scomerus, G., C. Schwahn, A. Holzinger, P.W. Corigan, H.J. Grabe, M.G. Carta, and M.C. Angermeyer. 2012. Evolution of public attitudes about mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 125: 440–452. Scholar
  53. Shariff, A.F., A.K. Willard, T. Andersen, and A. Norenzayan. 2016. Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on pro-sociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review 20: 27–48. Scholar
  54. Shaw, M.F. 2007. After the insanity defense: When the acquitted return to the community. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Skeem, J.L., J.E. Louden, and J. Evans. 2004. Venirepersons’ attitudes toward the insanity defense: Developing, refining, and validating a scale. Law and Human Behavior 28: 623–648. Scholar
  56. Stanford, M.S. 2007. Demon or disorder: A survey of attitudes toward mental illness in the Christian church. Mental Health, Religion & Culture 1: 1–5. Scholar
  57. Stanford, M.S., and K.R. McAlister. 2008. Perceptions of serious mental illness in the local church. Journal of Religion, Disability & Health 12: 144–153. Scholar
  58. Steadman, H.J. 1985. Insanity defense research and treatment of insanity acquittees. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 3: 37–48. Scholar
  59. Steadman, H.J., and J.J. Cocozza. 1978a. Selective reporting and the public’s misconceptions of insanity acquittees. The Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 523–533. Scholar
  60. Steadman, H.J., and J.J. Cocozza. 1978b. Public perceptions of the criminally insane. Hospital & Community Psychiatry 29: 457. Scholar
  61. Strawbridge, W.J., S.J. Shema, R.D. Cohen, and G.A. Kaplan. 2001. Religious attendance increases survival by improving and maintaining good health behaviors, mental health, and social relationships. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 23: 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor, S.M., and M.J. Dear. 1981. Scaling community attitudes toward the mentally ill. Schizophrenia Bulletin 7: 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Templeton, L.J., and T.F. Hartnagel. 2012. Causal attributions of the crime and the public’s sentencing goals. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 54: 45–65. Scholar
  64. Torchalla, I., K. Li, V. Strehlau, I.A. Linden, and M. Krausz. 2014. Religious participation and substance use behaviors in a Canadian sample of homeless people. Community Mental Health Journal 50: 862–869. Scholar
  65. Travis, J., and M. Waul. 2003. Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wesselmann, E.D., and W.G. Graziano. 2010. Sinful and/or possessed? Religious beliefs and mental illness stigma. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 29 (4): 402–437. Scholar
  67. Willison, J.B., D. Brazzell, and K. Kim. 2010. Faith-based corrections and reentry programs: Advancing a conceptual framework for research and evaluation. Washington DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  68. Yelderman, L.A., and M.K. Miller. 2016. Religious fundamentalism and attitudes toward the insanity defense: The mediating roles of criminal attributions and perceptions of the mentally ill. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 23: 872–884. Scholar
  69. Yelderman, L.A., and M.K. Miller. 2017. Religious fundamentalism, religiosity, and priming: Effects on attitudes, perceptions, and mock jurors’ decisions in an insanity defense case. Psychology, Crime, & Law 23: 147–170. Scholar
  70. Young, R.L. 1992. Religious orientation, race and support for the death penalty. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 31: 76–87. Scholar
  71. Young, R.L. 2000. Symposium: Religion’s role in the administration of the death penalty: Punishment at all costs: On religion, convicting the innocent, and supporting the death penalty. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 9: 237–245.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Logan A. Yelderman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Matthew P. West
    • 2
  • Monica K. Miller
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Juvenile Justice and PsychologyPrairie View A&M UniversityPrairie ViewUSA
  2. 2.University of Nevada, Las VegasLas VegasUSA
  3. 3.University of Nevada, RenoRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations