Decomposing Immigrants’ Religious Mobility: Structural Shifts and Inter-religion Exchanges Among Chinese Overseas Students

Abstract

The religious mobility of immigrants has rarely received a systematic investigation that separates the two mutually exclusive mechanisms: the structural shift that occurs due to an overall environment favorable to certain religions, and the exchange effect that occurs when people voluntarily flow between any pair of two religions. Chinese overseas students constitute the largest foreign student body in the US whose religious mobility pattern remains unexplored and may differ significantly from other types of immigrants in earlier generations, especially regarding the assumed growth of Christianity and changes within other religions and non-religions. Applying quasi-symmetry log-linear model to the pre- and post-immigration religious identifications in a new sample of Chinese oversea students collected from the Midwest in 2016 (n = 916), this study shows that (1) Abrahamic religions including Christianity and Islam have the biggest structural advantage; (2) Eastern religions including Buddhism, Chinese folk religions, and generic polytheism have suffered from structural disadvantages; (3) religious nones (i.e. atheists and agnostics) have remained relatively stable with little structural variation; (4) net of the structural effects, there is a higher level of mutual exchange of members between Buddhism and polytheism, between atheism and agnostic, and between Christianity and atheism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/11/globalization-american-higher-ed/416502/.

References

  1. Babchuk, N., and H.P. Whitt. 1990. R-order and religious switching. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 29(2): 246–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, P.E., and P.H. Dhingra. 2001. Religious involvement and volunteering: Implications for civil society. Sociology of Religion 62(3): 315–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/3712353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, J., and J.L. Snell. 1957. On the concept of equal exchange. Behavioral Science 2(2): 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner, P.S. 2016. Cross-national trends in religious service attendance. Public Opinion Quarterly 80(2): 563–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cadge, W., and E. Howard Ecklund. 2007. Immigration and religion. Annual Review of Sociology 33:359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carnes, T., and F. Yang. 2004. Asian American religions: The making and remaking of borders and boundaries. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Casanova, J. 2001. Religion, the new millennium, and globalization: 2000 Presidential Address. Sociology of Religion 62(4): 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheong, W.K., and J.K. Tong. 2017. The localization of charismatic Christianity among the Chinese in Malaysia: A study of Full Gospel Tabernacle. In Global Chinese Pentecostal and charismatic Christianity, ed. F. Yang, J.K. Tong, and A. Anderson, 309. Boston, MA: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chong, K.H. 1998. What it means to be Christian: The role of religion in the construction of ethnic identity and boundary among second-generation Korean Americans. Sociology of Religion 59(3): 259–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Edgell, P., J. Gerteis, and D. Hartmann. 2006. Atheists as “Other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review 71(2): 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Foner, N., and R. Alba. 2008. Immigrant religion in the US and Western Europe: Bridge or barrier to inclusion? International Migration Review 42(2): 360–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00128.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gladney, D.C. 1998. Ethnic identity in China: The making of a Muslim minority nationality. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goldthorpe, J.H. 2005. Progress in sociology: The case of social mobility research. In Analyzing inequality: Life chances and social mobility in comparative perspective, ed. S. Svallfors, 56–82. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hall, B. 2006. Social and cultural contexts in conversion to Christianity among Chinese American college students. Sociology of Religion 67(2): 131–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hodgson, P.C. 2005. Hegel and Christian theology: A reading of the lectures on the philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, A., and R.J. Leamaster. 2015. Intergenerational religious mobility in contemporary China. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54(1): 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leamaster, R.J., and A. Hu. 2014. Popular Buddhists: The relationship between popular religious involvement and Buddhist identity in contemporary China. Sociology of Religion 75(2): 234–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srt057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lien, P.-T., and T. Carnes. 2004. The religious demography of Asian American boundary crossing. In Asian American religions: The making and remaking of borders and boundaries, ed. T. Carnes and F. Yang, 38–51. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lim, C., C.A. MacGregor, and R.D. Putnam. 2010. Secular and liminal: Discovering heterogeneity among religious nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49(4): 596–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01533.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, H. 2005. New migrants and the revival of overseas Chinese nationalism. Journal of Contemporary China 14(43): 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560500065611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Löwith, K. 1949. Meaning in history: The theological implications of the philosophy of history. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mooijaart, A. 1998. Log-linear and Markov modeling of categorical longitudinal data. In Longitudinal data analysis: Designs, models and methods, ed. C.C. Bijleveld, 318–370. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Overmyer, D.L. 1976. Folk Buddhist religion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Persson, G. 1977. Pure mobility and pure exchange mobility. Quality & Quantity 11(1): 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pew Research Center. (2013). The Rise of Asian Americans. Retrieved from Washington, DC. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/06/19/the-rise-of-asian-americans/.

  26. Portes, A., and M. Zhou. 1993. The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530: 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Putnam, R.D. 2001. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Robinson, R., and S. Clarke. 2003. Religious conversion in India: Modes, motivations, and meanings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sherkat, D.E. 2014. Changing faith: The dynamics and consequences of Americans’ shifting religious identities. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sobel, M.E., M. Hout, and O.D. Duncan. 1985. Exchange, structure, and symmetry in occupational mobility. American Journal of Sociology 91: 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stark, R., and R. Finke. 2000. Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stark, R., and L.R. Iannaccone. 1994. A supply-side reinterpretation of the “Secularization” of Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 33(3): 230–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Van der Veer, P. 1996. Conversion to modernities: The globalization of Christianity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vermunt, J.K. 1997. Department of methodology and statistics. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Voas, D. 2003. Intermarriage and the demography of secularization. The British journal of sociology 54(1): 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131032000045914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Voas, D., and M. Chaves. 2016. Is the United States a counterexample to the secularization thesis? American Journal of Sociology 121(5): 1517–1556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. von Eye, A., and E.Y. Mun. 2013. Log-linear modeling: Concepts, interpretation, and application. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, Y. (2016). Soul-searching among Chinese expatriates in Dubai: Reconsidering the contextual factors in religious conversion. In Paper presented at the center on religion and Chinese society. West Lafayette, IN.

  39. Wang, Y., and F. Yang. 2006. More than evangelical and ethnic: The ecological factor in Chinese conversion to Christianity in the United States. Sociology of Religion 67(2): 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Weber, M. (2002/1905). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism: And other writings. Middlesex: Penguin.

  41. Wuthnow, R. 2002. Religious involvement and status-bridging social capital. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41(4): 669–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yan, K., and D.C. Berliner. 2016. The unique features of Chinese international students in the United States. In Spotlight on China: Chinese education in the globalized world, eds. S. Guo and Y. Guo, 129–150. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yang, C.K. 1961. Religion in Chinese society: A study of contemporary social functions of religion and some of their historical factors. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yang, F. 2005. Lost in the market, saved at McDonald’s: Conversion to Christianity in urban China. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44(4): 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang, F. 2006. The red, black, and gray markets of religion in China. The Sociological Quarterly 47(1): 93–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang, F. 2000. Chinese Christians in America: Conversion, assimilation, and adhesive identities. College Station, PA: Penn State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yang, F., and A. Hu. 2012. Mapping Chinese folk religion in mainland China and Taiwan. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 51(3): 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang, X. Y., & Yang, F. (in press). Estimating religious populations with the network scale-up method: a practical alternative to self-report. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

  49. Zhou, M. 1997. Segmented assimilation: Issues, controversies, and recent research on the new second generation. The International Migration Review 31(4): 975–1008. https://doi.org/10.2307/2547421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by John Templeton Foundation (Grant No. 56480).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fenggang Yang.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 The representativeness of sample by programs and grades

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, X.Y., Hu, A. & Yang, F. Decomposing Immigrants’ Religious Mobility: Structural Shifts and Inter-religion Exchanges Among Chinese Overseas Students. Rev Relig Res 60, 183–198 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-017-0318-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Conversion
  • Religious identification
  • Log linear modeling
  • Chinese overseas students
  • Immigration