Gendered Religiosity

Abstract

This study uses measures of cognitive and expressive aspects of gender as a social identity from the General Social Survey to examine whether and how they relate to religiosity. I find that religiosity is clearly gendered, but in different ways for women and men. Consistent with the feminine-typing of religion in the Christian-majority context of the United States, gender expression is linked with more religiousness among women but not men. Consistent with religion being a sometimes patriarchal institution, those with more pride in being men are more religious. I conclude that religiosity is gendered, that degendering and secularization processes could go hand-in-hand, and that future research on gender differences in religiosity should further examine variation among women and among men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this study I talk about “gender as a social identity” instead of “gender identity” because I am referring not to whether someone identifies as a man, woman, or non-binary, but instead aspects of gender as a social identity (e.g., the strength of their in-group identity with men or women) (Tajfel 1981).

  2. 2.

    Data for this study were downloaded from http://www.thearda.com/Archive/Files/Downloads/GSS2014_DL.asp. I focus on cases with complete information on gender pride and expression—which were fielded to a subsample of GSS respondents—religiosity, and covariates. Only 14 cases, or 1% of cases, were excluded for missing data on covariates. A more substantial amount of data were missing on sexual orientation and religious affiliation, so I created additional categories of “missing” for the sexual orientation and religious affiliation measures. Additional analyses using multiple-imputation indicate that missing data do not bias the results.

  3. 3.

    Although typically described as a measure of sex (i.e., female/male), the binary “sex” measure in the GSS is interviewer-coded. Therefore, it may be more of a measure of gender (i.e., woman/man), and related gender expression, than is often assumed.

  4. 4.

    I originally conducted a factor analysis and found support for one religiosity factor. Analyses with that factor yield equivalent results to the summative scale analyses presented here.

  5. 5.

    Additional analyses with additional covariates excluded for empirical and/or theoretical reasons—such as mother’s and father’s SES, political views, and gender ideology—yielded similar substantive patterns.

  6. 6.

    Multicollinearity checks demonstrate appropriate VIFs across models. In no model are the VIFs for gender in-group pride or gender expression over 2.

  7. 7.

    Gender in-group pride does positively and significantly predict religiosity among women when gender expression is not included in the model. Therefore, gender pride does seem to matter, but only as it relates to feminine gender expression.

  8. 8.

    Additional analyses considered whether the patterns varied among those with non-Christian affiliations. There were only 15 women and 32 men affiliated with a religion besides Christianity. Among non-Christian women, the gender expression coefficient reverses from what it is among Christian women. But among non-Christian men the gender pride coefficient is in the same direction and actually larger (though not significant due to the small sample size). Therefore, these very limited supplemental analyses are suggestive that Christianity may be feminine-typed in a way other religions are not, but that the link between men’s gender in-group pride and religiosity is not limited to Christians.

  9. 9.

    Given the available data I cannot determine whether it is men’s gender pride reinforcing religiosity, religiosity reinforcing men’s gender pride, or, more likely, both.

References

  1. Avishai, Orit. 2016. Theorizing Gender from religion cases: Agency, feminist activism, and masculinity. Sociology of Religion 77 (3): 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avishai, Orit, Afshan Jafar, and Rachel Rinaldo. 2015. A gender lens on religion. Gender and Society 29 (1): 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartkowski, John P., and Jen’nan Ghazal Read. 2003. Veiled submission: Gender, power, and identity among evangelical and muslim women in the United States. Qualitative Sociology 26 (1): 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bem, Sandra L. 1974. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42 (2): 1S5–1S162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charlton, Joy C. 2015. Revisiting gender and religion. Review of Religious Research 57 (3): 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Collett, Jessica L., and Omar Lizardo. 2009. A power-control theory of gender and religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48 (2): 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornwall, Marie. 2009. Reifying sex difference isn’t the answer: Gendering processes, risk, and religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48 (2): 252–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Francis, Leslie J., and Carolyn Wilcox. 1996. Religion and gender orientation. Personality and Individual Differences 20 (I): 119–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Francis, Leslie J., and Carolyn Wilcox. 1998. Religiosity and femininity: Do women really hold a more positive attitude toward christianity? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37 (3): 462–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Freese, Jeremy. 2004. Risk preferences and gender differences in religiousness: Evidence from the world values survey. Review of Religious Research 46 (1): 88–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hackett, Conrad, Caryle Murphy, and David McClendon. 2016. The gender gap in religion around the world. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffmann, John P., and John P. Bartkowski. 2008. Gender, religious tradition, and biblical literalism. Social Forces 86 (3): 1245–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Irby, Courtney Ann. 2014. Dating in light of christ: Young evangelicals negotiating gender in the context of religious and secular American culture. Sociology of Religion 75 (2): 260–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levitt, Mairi. 1995. Sexual identity and religious socialization. British Journal of Sociology 46 (3): 529–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorber, Judith. 2000. Using gender to undo gender: A feminist degendering movement. Feminist Theory 1 (1): 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lummis, Adair T. 1999. Gender and religion. In Handbook of the sociology of gender, ed. Janet Saltzman Chafetz. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lummis, Adair T. 2004. A research note: Real men and church participation. Review of Religious Research 45 (4): 404–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, Alan S., and Rodney Stark. 2002. Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology 107 (6): 1399–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schnabel, Landon. 2015. How religious are American women and men? Gender differences and similarities. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 54 (3): 616–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schnabel, Landon. 2016a. Gender and homosexuality attitudes across religious groups from the 1970s to 2014: Similarity, distinction, and adaptation. Social Science Research 55 (1): 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schnabel, Landon. 2016b. Religion and gender equality worldwide: A country-level analysis. Social Indicators Research 129 (2): 893–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schnabel, Landon. 2016c. The gender pray gap: Wage labor and the religiosity of high-earning women and men. Gender and Society 30 (4): 643–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sherkat, Darren E. 2002. Sexuality and religious commitment in the United States: An empirical examination. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41 (2): 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherkat, Darren E. 2017. Sexuality and religious commitment revisited: Exploring the religious commitments of sexual minorities from 1991–2014. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 55: 756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Steensland, Brian, et al. 2000. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79 (1): 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sullins, D.Paul. 2006. Gender and religion: Deconstructing universality, constructing complexity. American Journal of Sociology 112 (3): 838–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sumerau, J.E. 2012. ‘That’s what a man is supposed to do’: Compensatory manhood acts in an LGBT Christian Church. Gender and Society 26 (3): 461–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sumerau, J.E., Ryan T. Cragun, and Lain A.B. Mathers. 2016. Contemporary religion and the cisgendering of reality. Social Currents 3 (3): 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human groups and social categories. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson, Edward H. 1991. Beneath the status characteristic: Gender variations in religiousness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 30 (4): 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson, Edward H., and Kathryn R. Remmes. 2002. Does masculinity thwart being religious? An examination of older men’s religiousness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41 (3): 521–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. West, Candace, and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender and Society 1 (2): 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wilcox, W.Bradford. 2004. Soft Patriarchs, New Men. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the four anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Landon Schnabel.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 OLS regression of standardized gender in-group pride and gender expression predicting standardized religiosity among women and among men with covariate coefficients

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schnabel, L. Gendered Religiosity. Rev Relig Res 59, 547–556 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-017-0302-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Religion
  • Social Identity