Skip to main content
Log in

Failing to Master Divinity: How Institutional Type, Financial Debt, Community Acceptance, and Gender Affect Seminary Graduates’ Career Choices

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Religious Research

Abstract

Seminaries, as both educational and religious organizations, have the goal of training religious leaders. In this article, I analyze the factors associated with the breakdown of this process, i.e. when a seminarian does not want to be in a religious career. I offer four reasons for this breakdown: institutional type, financial strain, community acceptance, and gender. Drawing on recent survey data of 3015 American and Canadian seminarians graduating with the Master of Divinity degree from 136 seminaries from the Association of Theological Schools, I interpret results from multilevel logistic regressions testing five hypotheses. I find that Master of Divinity graduates who attend a university-affiliated seminary are less likely to want to be in a religious career, while those who feel more accepted within the seminary community are more likely. Educational debt has no effect. Most importantly, gender has profound effects on the choice to enter a religious career.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There are other seminary degrees, such as the Master of Arts and the Master of Theological Studies, whose emphasis is not solely on religious leadership. This present study only focuses on the Master of Divinity because of its explicit emphasis to train religious leaders.

  2. I include both the seminary’s religious tradition as well as the student’s religious tradition because, while there is some overlap, the two are not coterminous. For instance, 37 % of students within Mainline seminaries are not in the Mainline Protestant tradition. For Evangelical schools, 27 % are not themselves Evangelical, and in Catholic seminaries, 30 % are not Catholic.

References

  • Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammerman, Nancy Tatom. 1990. Baptist battles: Social change and religious conflict in the Southern Baptist Convention. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartkowski, John P., and Sarah Shah. 2014. Religion and gender inequality. In Religion and inequality in America: Research and theory on religion’s role in stratification, ed. Lisa A. Keister, and Darren E. Sherkat, 173–194. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, Dallas A. 1981. Seminary effects on professional role orientations. Review of Religious Research 22(4): 346–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, David. 2014. What price a religious calling? Record seminary debt shows need for financial as well as divine guidance. Ahead of the Trend. http://blogs.thearda.com/trend/featured/what-price-a-religious-calling-record-seminary-debt-shows-need-for-financial-as-well-as-divine-guidance/. Retrieved 19 Feb 2014.

  • Carroll, Jackson W. 1971. Structural effects of professional schools on professional socialization: The case of protestant clergymen. Social Forces 50(1): 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Jackson W. 2006. God’s potters: Pastoral leadership and the shaping of congregations. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Jackson W., Barbara Hargrove, and Adair T. Lummis. 1983. Women of the cloth: A new opportunity for the churches. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Jackson W., Barbara G. Wheeler, Daniel O. Aleshire, and Penny Long Marler. 1997. Being there: Culture and formation in two theological schools. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, Mark. 1999. Ordaining women: Culture and conflict in religious organizations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, Mark. 2004. Congregations in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, Mark. 2011. American religion: Contemporary trends. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989: 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrow, Shoshana R., and Jennifer Tosti-Kharas. 2012. Listen to your heart? Calling and receptivity to career advice. Journal of Career Assessment 20(3): 264–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, Rachel E., Laura McCloud, and Randy Hodson. 2012. Debt and graduation from American universities. Social Forces 90(4): 1133–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, Alice H. 1987. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, Alice H., and Steven J. Karau. 2002. Role Congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109(3): 573–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Todd W., Brita Andercheck, Joshua C. Tom, Brandon C. Martinez, and Samuel Stroope. 2015. Occupational conditions, self-care, and obesity among clergy in the United States. Social Science Research 49: 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, Roger, and Kevin D. Dougherty. 2002. The effects of professional training: The social and religious capital acquired in seminaries. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 41(1): 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, Barbara. 1996. Do men and women have different goals for ministry? Evidence from Seminarians. Sociology of Religion 57(3): 311–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Sally K. 2003. Evangelical identity and gendered family life. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinier, Lani, Michelle Fine, Jane Balin, Ann Bartow, and Deborah Lee Stachel. 1994. Becoming gentlemen: Women’s experiences at one Ivy League law school. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143(1): 1–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, David A. 1997. An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management 23(6): 723–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoge, Dean R., and Jacqueline E. Wenger. 2005. Pastors in transition: Why clergy leave local church ministry. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J.J., and C.J.M. Maas. 2005. Sufficient Sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology 1(3): 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, Sherryl. 1984. Women in seminary: Dilemmas of professional socialization. Sociology of Education 57(4): 210–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, Anne M., Alice H. Eagly, Abigail A. Mitchell, and Tiina Ristikari. 2011. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin 137(4): 616–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, Edward C. 1993. Gender and work: The case of the clergy. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman Jr, Edward C. 1980. Placement of men and women in the ministry. Review of Religious Research 22(1): 18–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDuff, Elaine M., and Charles W. Mueller. 2000. The ministry as an occupational labor market: intentions to leave an employer (church) versus intentions to leave a profession (ministry). Work and Occupations 27(1): 89–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Sharon L., Kim Maphis Early, and Anthony Ruger. 2014. Taming the tempest: A team approach to reducing and managing student debt. Auburn Studies 19: 1–25.

  • Niebuhr, H.Richard, Daniel Day Williams, and James M. Gustafson. 1957. The advancement of theological education. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl, Paul, and Patricia M.Y. Chang. 2000. Credentialism across creeds: Clergy education and stratification in protestant denominations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 39(2): 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D., and David E. Campbell. 2010. American grace: How religion divides and unites us. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, Stephen W., and Anthony S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2011. Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Shelley J. Correll. 2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society 18(4): 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruger, Anthony, Sharon L. Miller, and Kim Maphis Early. 2005. The gathering storm: The educational debt of theological students. Auburn Studies 12: 1–28.

  • Ruger, Anthony and Barbara G. Wheeler. 1995. Manna from heaven? Theological and rabbinical student debt. Auburn Studies 3: 1–28.

  • Southern Baptist Theological seminary. 2013. About. http://www.sbts.edu/about/. Retrieved 24 April 2013.

  • Stark, Rodney, and Roger Finke. 2000. Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steensland, Brian, et al. 2000. The measure of american religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79(1): 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Lesley. 1989. Different voice/different voices: Anglican women in ministry. Review of Religious Research 30(3): 262–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullins, Paul. 2000. The stained glass ceiling: Career attainment for women clergy. Sociology of Religion 61(3): 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Association of Theological Schools. 2002. Graduating Student Questionnaire: 2001–2002 Profile of participants. http://www.ats.edu/Resources/Student/Documents/Questionnaire/GSQ/2001-2002GSQ.pdf. Retrieved 25 April 2013.

  • The Association of Theological Schools. 2012a. Educational and degree program standards. Bulletin. Retrieved http://www.ats.edu/Accrediting/Documents/DegreeProgramStandards.pdf.

  • The Association of Theological Schools. 2012b. Graduating Student Questionnaire: 2011–2012 Profile of participants. http://www.ats.edu/Resources/Student/Documents/Questionnaire/GSQ/2011-2012GSQ.pdf. Retrieved 25 April 2013.

  • The Association of Theological Schools. 2013. 2012–2013 Annual data tables. Retrieved http://docs.ats.edu/uploads/resources/institutional-data/annual-data-tables/2012-2013-annual-data-tables.pdf.

  • University of Chicago. 2013. Divinity School at the University of Chicago: About. History and Mission. http://divinity.uchicago.edu/about/history.shtml. Retrieved 24 April 2013.

  • Wang, Jichuan, Haiyi Xie, and James H. Fischer. 2012. Multilevel models applications using SAS. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Barbara G. 2001. Is there a problem? Theological students and religious leadership for the future. Auburn Studies 8: 1–28.

  • Wheeler, Barbara G., Sharon L. Miller, and Daniel O. Aleshire. 2007. How are we doing? The effectiveness of theological schools as measured by the vocations and views of graduates. Auburn Studies 13: 1–32.

  • Wheeler, David R. 2014. Higher calling, lower wages: The vanishing of the middle-class clergy. The Atlantic, July 22. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/07/higher-calling-lower-wages-the-collapse-of-the-middle-class-clergy/374786/. Retrieved July 23, 2014.

  • Wilcox, W.Bradford. 2004. Soft Patriarchs, new men: How christianity shapes fathers and husbands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zikmund, Barbara Brown, Adair T. Lummis, and Patricia M.Y. Chang. 1998. Clergy women: An uphill calling. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Baylor University’s Institute for Studies of Religion and Baylor University’s Department of Sociology. The data are provided by the Association of Theological Schools. The author would like to offer a special thank you to Kevin Dougherty, Christopher Pieper, Paul Froese, Byron Johnson, Charles Tolbert, Dennis Tucker, and Helen Blier, and the journal’s anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd W. Ferguson.

Appendix

Appendix

Q15c: What would you like to be doing 5 years from now?

  • Parish ministry

  • Campus ministry

  • Inner-city ministry

  • Pastoral counseling

  • Hospital or hospice chaplaincy

  • Secondary/prep school teaching

  • College/University teaching

  • Church administration

  • Seminary teaching

  • Social work/services

  • Foreign missions

  • Home missions

  • Church planting/evangelism

  • Youth ministry

  • Church musician

  • Christian education

  • Spiritual direction

  • Social justice ministry

  • Further graduate study

  • Professional lay ministry

  • Other

Source: Association of Theological Schools 2012–2013 Graduate Student Questionnaire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferguson, T.W. Failing to Master Divinity: How Institutional Type, Financial Debt, Community Acceptance, and Gender Affect Seminary Graduates’ Career Choices. Rev Relig Res 57, 341–363 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-015-0209-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-015-0209-2

Keywords

Navigation