Review of Religious Research

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 443–465 | Cite as

Shepherds and Sheep: Parish Reconfiguration, Authority, and Activism in a Catholic Diocese

  • Matthew T. LovelandEmail author
  • Margret Ksander
Original Paper


This mixed method study describes contention over parish reconfiguration in a northeast Catholic diocese, and a case study of one merged parish. Guided by social movement theories about collective action frames and political opportunities in mobilization, we outline the diocesan frame of reconfiguration and the counter frame developed by activists who organized to oppose the process. While the diocesan frame focused on a shortage of priests that officials believed demanded reconfiguration of financially burdened parishes, the lay counter frame shifted the debate to questions about the role of the laity in the contemporary Catholic Church and what they perceived as failed leadership from their bishop. Our case study of Resurrection Parish shows how the merger process and the activists’ opposition to their diocesan leaders resulted in a parish that works to ensure the involvement of the laity, and continues to publicly dissent from Catholic leaders.


Catholicism Parishes Priests Authority Activism Organizations Protest Framing 



The authors wish to acknowledge generous grant support from the Louisville Institute. A version of this paper was previously presented at the 2013 meetings of the Eastern Sociological Society. We are grateful for the work of 3 anonymous reviewers and the editor who helped us prepare this manuscript. Special thanks to research assistants Catherine Farrell, Thomas Mickley-Doyle, and Katelyn Stevens.


  1. Becker, Penny E. 1999. Congregations in conflict: Cultural models of local religious life. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergengren, David. 2008a. Catholics bid farewell to churches., December 29. Retrieved May 21, 2013.
  4. Bergengren, David. 2008b. Catholics in western Massachusetts mourn as churches prepare to close., December 29. Retrieved May 21, 2013.
  5. Cavendish, James. 2001. To march or not to march: Clergy mobilization strategies and grassroots antidrug activism. In Christian clergy in American politics, ed. Sue E.S. Crawford, and Laura R. Olson, 2033–2223. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chaves, Mark. 2011. American religion: Contemporary trends. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Congregation for the Clergy. 2002. The priest, pastor and leader of the parish community. Rome: Congregation for the Clergy. Retrieved January 8, 2012.
  8. D’Antonio, William V., Michele Dillon, and Mary L. Gautier. 2013. American Catholics in transition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Davidson, James D., and Suzanne C. Fournier. 2006. Recent research on Catholic parishes: A research note. Review of Religious Research 48: 72–81.Google Scholar
  10. Diocese of Syracuse. 1988. A people of faith: A pastoral response to the transition in the patterns of parochial and specialized ministerial leadership in the church of Syracuse, New York. Syracuse, NY: Diocese of Syracuse.Google Scholar
  11. Diocese of Syracuse. 2001. Equipping the saints for the work of ministry. Syracuse, NY: Diocese of Syracuse.Google Scholar
  12. Diocese of Syracuse. 2012. Fortnight for freedom. Retrieved May 22, 2013.
  13. Dougherty, Kevin D., Jared Maier, and Brian Vander Lugt. 2008. When the final bell tolls: Patterns of church closings in two protestant denominations. Review of Religious Research 50: 49–73.Google Scholar
  14. Gadoua, Renee. 2008. Officials planning to close more churches., April 30. Retrieved May 21, 2013.
  15. Gray, Mark M., Mary L. Gautier, and Melissa A. Cidade. 2011. The changing face of U.S. Catholic parishes. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate at Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  16. Hadaway, C.Kirk. 1982. Church growth (and decline) in a southern city. Review of Religious Research 23: 372–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris, Margaret. 1998. A special case of voluntary associations? Towards a theory of congregational organization. The British Journal of Sociology 49: 602–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartzell, Dan. 2009. Church closings announced; consolidating: Scranton Catholic diocese to shut about 35, combine parishes. Morning Call (Allentown, Pennsylvania) Local:B1.Google Scholar
  19. Hendricks, Kathy. 2009. Parish life coordinators: Profile of an emerging ministry. Chicago: Loyola Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hoegeman, Catherine, and Tricia Bruce. 2013. Leadership characteristics and responses to diversity: Predicting Catholic bishops’ use of personal parishes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, November 8–10, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Loveland, Matthew T. 2013. Sacred inequalities: Narratives of parish and priest in a changing Catholic Church. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 10–13, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, David S., and Debra C. Minkoff. 2004. Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces 82: 1457–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKinney, William, and Dean R. Hoge. 1983. Community and congregational factors in the growth and decline of protestant churches. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 22: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mogilka, Mark, and Kate Wiskus. 2009. Pastoring multiple parishes: An emerging model of pastoral leadership. Chicago: Loyola Press.Google Scholar
  25. O’Malley, Michael. 2012. Catholic activist from Boston says priests should publicly call for bishop’s removal., June 15th. Retrieved December 20, 2013.
  26. Padgett, Deborah. 2004. The qualitative research experience. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  27. Padovano, Anthony T. 1982. The human journey: Thomas Merton, symbol of a century. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, Gregory A. 2005. The influence of priests on the political attitudes of Roman Catholics. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44: 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spellers, Stephanie. 2008. Radical welcome: Embracing God, the other, and the spirit of transformation. New York: Church Publishing Incorporated.Google Scholar
  30. Stark, Rodney, and Roger Finke. 2000. Catholic religious vocations: Decline and revival. Review of Religious Research 42: 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. 2013. Fortnight for freedom. Retrieved May 21, 2013.
  32. Wills, Garry. 2013. Why priests? A failed tradition. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  33. Zech, Charles E. 1994. An empirical analysis of options for dealing with the U.S. Catholic priest shortage. Review of Religious Research 35: 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zech, Charles, and Mary L. Gautier. 2004. Catholic parish organizational structure and parish outcomes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 43: 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anthropology, Criminology, and SociologyLe Moyne CollegeSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Onondaga Community CollegeSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations