Advertisement

Review of Religious Research

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 217–238 | Cite as

Youth Group Cliques: How Religious Goals Can Disguise Discriminatory Group Dynamics

  • Patricia Snell HerzogEmail author
  • Robert Wedow
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper provides an in-depth, qualitative analysis of two Christian youth groups. Researchers conducted personal interviews with participating youth and their youth ministers and collected extensive field notes on participant observations of youth group events. Findings indicate the presence of youth group cliques with clear delineations about which participants are youth group insiders and which are outsiders. Results show that insider participants are typically socioeconomically-advantaged youth, while outsiders are typically youth from disadvantaged backgrounds. Despite the existence of these exclusionary practices within both groups, leaders in the two cases demonstrate differing levels of awareness of and response to these dynamics. This paper explores the specifics of both cases, illuminating who is targeted for exclusion within these groups and how this targeting varies across the two congregational contexts. Implications of these findings are that religious youth groups may perpetuate broader socioeconomic divisions. Specifically, the analysis reveals that rather than forming benign cliques, youth group members may be discriminating against others based on their relative socioeconomic advantage.

Keywords

Youth groups Socioeconomic status Religious stratification Church cultures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded through the generosity of a Lilly Endowment Inc. grant and institutional support from the University of Notre Dame. The authors wish to thank Christian Smith, Hilary Davidson, Katie Spencer, Brad Vermurlen, Brandon Vaidyanathan, Peter Mundey, and Kaitlyn Conway for their valuable feedback and contributions to the project.

References

  1. Adler, P.A., and P. Adler. 1995. Dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in preadolescent cliques. Social Psychology Quarterly 58(3): 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, P.E. 1999. Congregations in conflict: Cultural models of local religious life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charles, G. 2001. The bold alternative: Staying in Church in the 21st Century. Louisville: Geneva Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, E.G., and R.A. Lotan. 1995. Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Education Research Journal 32(1): 99–120.Google Scholar
  5. Croizet, J.-C. 1998. Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 588–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Emerson, M., and C. Smith. 2000. Divided by faith: Evangelical religion and the problem of race in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Form, W.H., and Gregory P. Stone. 1957. Urbanism, anonymity, and status symbolism. American Journal of Sociology 62(5): 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hestenes, R. 1985. An expanded syllabus for building Christian Community through small groups. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hoge, D.R., B. Johnson, and D.A. Luidens. 1994. Vanishing boundaries: The religion of mainline Protestant baby boomers. Westminster: John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hunter, J.D. 1983. American evangelicalism: Conservative religion and the quandary of modernity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kelley, D.M. 1986. Why conservative churches are growing: A study in sociology of religion. Macon: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Larson, Reed and David Hansen. 2006. Faith-based youth groups stand out in fostering teens’ growth experiences. College of ACES Illinois. 19 Oct. 2009. http://research.aces.illinois.edu/report/hcd/faith.
  13. Miech, R.A., A. Caspi, T.E. Moffitt, B.R. Entner Wright, and P.A. Silva. 1999. Low socioeconomic status and mental disorders: A longitudinal study of selection and causation during young adulthood. American Journal of Sociology 104(4): 112–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morison, P., and A.S. Masten. 1991. Peer reputation in middle childhood as a predictor of adaptation in adolescence: A seven-year follow-up. Child Development 62(5): 991–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nye, I.F., J.F. Short Jr., and V.J. Olson. 1958. Socioeconomic status and delinquent behavior. American Journal of Sociology 63(4): 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pyle, R.E., and J.D. Davidson. 2003. The origins of religious stratification in colonial America. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42(1): 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shlomo, S., and Y. Sharan. 1976. Small-group teaching. Englewood Cliffs: Education Technology Publication, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, C. 1998. American evangelicalism: Embattled and thriving. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, J.P. 2007. The impact of socioeconomic status on health over the life-course. Journal of Human Resources XLII: 739–764.Google Scholar
  20. Snell Herzog, P., C. Smith, C. Tavares, and K. Christoffersen. 2009. Denominational differences in congregational youth ministry programming and empirical evidence of systematic non-response biases in surveys. Review of Religious Research 51(1): 21–38.Google Scholar
  21. Sparkes, Jo. 1999. Schools, education and social exclusion. Centre for analysis of social exclusion London School of Sociology. 30 Nov. 2011. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/6482/1/Schools,_Education_and_Social_Exclusion.pdf.
  22. Steensland, B., J.Z. Park, M.D. Regnerus, L.D. Robinson, B. Wilcox, and R.D. Woodberry. 2000. The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces 79: 291–318.Google Scholar
  23. Tuvblad, C., M. Grann, and P. Lichtenstein. 2005. Heritability for adolescent antisocial behavior differs with socioeconomic status: Gene-environment interaction. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47(7): 734–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Religious Research Association, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations