Skip to main content
Log in

Study of Pieces of the Ensenada de Barragán Fort Historical Museum by Non-destructive Testing

  • Peer-Reviewed Paper
  • Published:
Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Barragán Fort was built in 1731, at the time of the Spanish Viceroyalty of the Río de La Plata. The Ensenada de Barragán was a defense site against various invasion attempts by Portuguese, English and Anglo-French forces between 1730 and 1847. Cannonballs and bayonets found at the site have been analyzed by non-destructive metallography, X-ray fluorescence and Brinell hardness, to preserve the integrity of the historical pieces. The studies have revealed that the surface microstructure of cannonballs corresponds to a white cast iron, with Brinell hardness between 450 and 480 HB. The bayonets presented a ferritic structure, with recrystallized grains and oriented silicate-type inclusions. Hardness values were between 100 and 130 HB. It is presumed that the bayonets were made by the direct reduction method and later hot worked by hammering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.A. Asnaghi, Ensenada una lección de historia. Par Impresores S.R.L., in spanish, Ensenada (2004)

  2. A.S.J. de Paula, La Ciudad de La Plata sus tierras y su arquitectura. Ediciones del Banco de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, in spanish, Buenos Aires (1987)

  3. A. Bührig-Polackzek, D. dos Santos, Solidification of eutectic alloys—Cast Iron, in Casting ASM Handbook, vol 15, ed. by S. Viswanathan (ASM International, Ohio, 2008), pp.317–329

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scott D.A.: Metallography and microstructure of ancient and historic metals, in Structure and properties of cast iron, Chap. 8, ed. by I. Averkieff (The J. Paul Getty Trust, Singapore, 1991), pp. 37–42

  5. D.R. Stefanescu, A history of cast iron, in Cast Iron Science and Technology. ASM Handbook, vol 1A, ed. by D.M. Stefanescu (ASM International, Ohio, 2017), pp.3–11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Lacaze, S. Dawson, A. Hazotte, Cast iron: a historical and green material worthy of continuous research. Int. J. Technol. Fac. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v12i6.5235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Biloni, W.J. Boettinger, Solidification, in Physical Metallurgy, vol 1, ed. by R.W. Cahn, P. Haasen (Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, 1996), pp.669–842

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. G.M. Goodrich, Introduction to cast irons, in Casting ASM Handbook, vol 15, ed. by S. Viswanathan (ASM International, Ohio, 2008), pp.785–811

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.V. Subramanian, D.A.R. Kay, G.R. Purdy, Compacted graphite morphology control. AFS Trans. 90, 589–603 (1982)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Fraś, H.F. Lopez, M. Kawalec, M. Gorny, Role of alloying additions in the solidification kinetics and resultant chilling tendency and chill of cast iron. Metals. (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/met5010256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Lacaze, U. de La Torre, J. Sertucha, A. Regordosa, Comparison of solidification kinetics of compacted and lamellar cast irons, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (IOP Publishing, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/861/1/012050

  12. A.L. Caporaso, C.G. Carlson-Drexler, J. Masters, Metallurgical Analysis of shell and case shot artillery from the civil war battles of Pea Ridge and Wilson’s Creek. Tech. Br. Hist. Archaeol. 3, 15–24 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Cvikel, D. Ashkenazi, A. Stern, Y. Kahanov, Characterization of a 12-pdr wrought-iron cannonball from the Akko 1 shipwreck. Mater. Charact. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2013.06.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Ajona Isal, Caracterización metalúrgica de diversas bolas de cañón procedentes de las Fábricas de Armas de Orbaiceta y Eugi (Metallurgical characterization of various cannon balls from the Arms Factories of Orbaiceta and Eugi), Available from Public University of Navarra, Spain, in Spanish (2015)

  15. C.R. Loper Jr., S. Shirvani, T.H. Witter, Graphite inoculants for gray cast iron, in The physical metallurgy of cast iron, vol 34, ed. by H. Fredriksson, M. Hillert (Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., New York, 1985), pp.89–98

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.A. Gadd, G.H.J. Bennet, The physical chemistry of inoculation of cast iron, in The physical metallurgy of cast iron, vol 34, ed. by H. Fredriksson, M. Hillert (Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., New York, 1985), pp.99–108

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.C. Borse, Y.E. Mangulkar, Review on grey cast iron inoculation. Int. J. Innovative Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. National Conference—VISHWATECH 2014, vol. 3(4) (Ahmednagar, Maharastra, India, 2014) pp. 30–36

  18. D. Cvikel, E.D. Mentovich, D. Ashkenazi, Y. Kahanov, Casting techniques of cannonballs from the akko 1 shipwreck: archaeometallurgical investigation. J. Min. Metall. Sect. B-Metall. (2013). https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB120216022C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O.P. Nicholson, J.G. McDonnell, A Study of some 18th century cast iron ammunition. Rev. Archéom. (1981). https://doi.org/10.3406/arsci.1981.1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Hernandez, M. Hernandez-Escampa, C. Abreu, J. Uruchurtu, M. Bethencourt, A. Covelo, Characterization of a historical cannonball from the fortress of San Juan de Ulúa exposed to a marine environment. Archaeometry. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. I. Zalakain, C. Berlanga, L. Alvarez, L. Asa, P. Labé, P. Rivero, J. Valencia, R. Rodríguez, Characterization of two iron bullets from the royal ammunition factory of Eugi (Spain). J. Min. Metall. Sect. B-Metall. (2018). https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB160718012Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/search/object/nmah_1695585

  23. http://middlesexvillagetrading.com/cart/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=67

  24. https://ageofrevolution.org/200-object/french-musket-bayonet/(2014-2020)

  25. https://irongatearmory.com/product/charleville-flintlock-musket-with-bayonet-france-1777/

  26. ASTM E45–97. Standard Test Methods for Determining the Inclusion Content of Steel. American Society for Testing and Materials.

  27. V.F. Buchwald, H. Wivel, Slag analysis as a method for the characterization and provenancing of ancient iron objects. Mater. Character. 40, 73–96 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. R.F. Tylecote, A history of metallurgy (The Metals Society, London, 1976), pp.81–104

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. Tomàs, The Catalan process for the direct production of malleable iron and its spread to Europe and the Americas. Contrib. Sci. 1(2), 225–232 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  30. J.L. Coze, Purification of iron and steel a continuous effort from 2000 BC to AD 2000. Mater. Trans. 41(1), 219–232 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D. Ashkenazi, D. Cvikel, A. Stern, A. Pasternak, O. Barkai, A. Aronson, Y. Kahanov, Archaeometallurgical investigation of joining processes of metal objects from Shipwrecks: three test cases. Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-014-0153-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J.A. Berger, C.A. Hawks, J.L. Grimm, The metallurgical study of Fort Ligonier Bayonet Sections, hand forged spikes, and copper powder Keg Hoop Sections. Northeast Hist. Archaeol. (1976). https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol5/iss1/4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. W. Gregorutti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This invited article is part of a special topical issue of the journal Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis on Archaeometallurgy. The issue was organized by Dr. Patricia Carrizo, National Technological University – Mendoza Regional, and Dr. Omid Oudbashi, Art University of Isfahan and The Metropolitan Museum of Art, on behalf of the ASM International Archaeometallurgy Committee.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ringuelet, T., Pérez Galetta, I., Rossi, M. et al. Study of Pieces of the Ensenada de Barragán Fort Historical Museum by Non-destructive Testing. Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal. 12, 306–311 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-023-00943-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-023-00943-5

Keywords

Navigation