Effects of Various Post-Weld Heat Treatments on Austenite and Carbide Formation in a 13Cr4Ni Steel Multipass Weld
Multipass welding procedures are common methods for 13Cr4Ni steels' fabrication and repairs. Compared to a single-pass weld procedure, the weld microstructure in a multipass weld is more heterogeneous due to the complex local thermal cycles imposed by adjacent weld passes. Furthermore, the final microstructure and mechanical properties of these steels are very sensitive to their thermal history which increases the microstructure heterogeneities. Thus, post-weld heat treatments are performed to reduce heterogeneities and produce a relatively homogenous weld. It has been found that the best option to improve mechanical properties of 13Cr4Ni steels is forming a “room temperature stable austenite” phase by heat treatments. This study focuses on the effects of these post-weld heat treatments on the austenite phase and carbide formations and the related evolutions of microhardness distribution. The study shows that nanometer-size carbides form at martensite lath interfaces and sub-block boundaries, and then at higher temperatures austenite lamellae appear at these locations. Results also show that the highest percentage of stable austenite achievable by a single-stage tempering was obtained at 610 °C. When the heat treatment temperature is lower than 610 °C, longer holding time produces softer steel while longer heat treatments at temperatures higher than 610 °C, produces harder steel. Still, double-stage heat treatments are more effective and produce the highest percentage of austenite and the lowest hardness of all heat treatments.
Keywords13Cr4NiMo steel Multipass weld Post-weld heat treatment Tempering Hardness Reversed austenite Carbides
The authors would like to acknowledge Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Institut de Recherche d’Hydro-Québec (IREQ), Alstom Power Co., and École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS) for the technical and financial supports. The authors are grateful to ÉTS and IREQ metallography laboratory for austenite electropolishing and metallography studies.
- 1.J.C. Lippold, D.J. Kotecki, Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steels (Wiley, New York, 2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Y.A. Sagalevich, Y.M. Potak, V.V. Sachkov, The Effect of Delta-Ferrite on the Properties of Low-Carbon Martensite Stainless Steels, No. FTD-MT-24-385-69 (Foreign Technology Div Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH, 1970)Google Scholar
- 8.M.M. Amrei, et al., Microstructure characterization of single and multipass 13Cr4Ni steel welded joints. Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal. 4(3), 207–218 (2015)Google Scholar
- 11.G.F.V. Voort, Martensite and retained austenite. Indus. Heat. 76(The Institution of Engineering and Technology), 51–54 (2009)Google Scholar
- 15.ASTM A743/A743M-03, Standard Specification for Castings, Iron-Chromium, Iron-Chromium-Nickel, Corrosion Resistant, for General Application (ASTM International, 2003)Google Scholar
- 17.I.D.R. Hydro-Québec, Scompi robot, robotic system for generating station work, U.S. Patent, Editor. 2011, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 18.G.F. Vander Voort, ed., Chemical and electrolytic polishing, in ASM Handbook, Vol. 9: Metallography and Microstructures (ASM International, 2004), pp. 281–293Google Scholar
- 21.S. Godin, Effet D’un Enrichissement en Nickel Sur la Stabilité Mécanique de L’austénite de Réversion Lorsque Soumise À de La Fatigue Oligocyclique (2014)Google Scholar