Skip to main content
Log in

Glomerular filtration rate assessed by using creatinine and cystatin in patients treated with dabigatran

  • Articolo originale
  • Published:
La Rivista Italiana della Medicina di Laboratorio - Italian Journal of Laboratory Medicine

Summary

Background

Dabigatran (DAB) is 80 % renally excreted. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation is recommended to evaluate the kidney function for DAB dosage adjusting. In this paper we report same results about evaluation of creatinine (CRE) GFR and cystatin-C (CYS) GFR in comparison with drug concentration in a group of patients treated with DAB.

Methods

We considered 77 patients in which an evaluation of kidney function using CRE and CYS based GFR was performed. After GFR-CRE and GFR-CYS calculation these patients were classified as recommended by KDIGO guidelines. Moreover we evaluated the relationship between trough DAB concentration and GFR-CRE or GFR-CYS.

Results

We observed a satisfactory correlation between GFR-CRE and GFR-CYS (\(R=0.85\)). Following KDIGO criteria, patients’ classification performed by using GFR-CRE or GFR-CYS was concordant in 52 (68 %) subjects and discordant in 25 (32 %). We observed an inverse relationship between trough DAB concentration versus GFR-CRE (\(R=-0.71\)) and GFR-CYS (\(R=-0.79\)).

Conclusions

Results obtained in this study, although preliminary, suggested that, in this particular subset of patients, the determination of GFR-CYS can be a better renal function indicator than GFR-CRE. Moreover, we observed that GFR evaluation alone is not able to explain in a satisfactory manner, individual responses to dabigatran etexilate evaluated as a trough DAB concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baglin T, Keeling D, Kitchen S (2012) Effects on routine coagulation screens and assessment of anticoagulant intensity in patients taking oral Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban: guidance from the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Br J Haematol 159:427–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blech S, Ebner T, Ludwig-Schwellinger E et al. (2008) The metabolism and disposition of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, in humans. Drug Metab Dispos 36:386–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stähle H et al. (2010) Influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral dabigatran etexilate: an open-label, parallel-group, single centre study. Clin Pharmacokinet 49:259–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB et al. (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 130:461–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH et al. (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150:604–612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. KDIGO (2012) Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney International Supplements 3:1–150

    Google Scholar 

  8. Graziani MS (2014) Un aggiornamento delle linee guida internazionali per la valutazione e la gestione della malattia renale cronica. Biochimica Clinica 38:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grubb A (2010) Non-invasive estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The Lund model: simultaneous use of cystatin C and creatinine-based GFR-prediction equations, clinical data and an internal quality check. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 70:65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nyman U, Grubb A, Sterner G et al. (2009) Different equations to combine creatinine and cystatin C to predict GFR. Arithmetic mean of existing equations performs as well as complex combinations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 69:619–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Florkowski CM, Chew-Harris JS (2011) Methods of estimating GFR different equations including CKD-EPI. Clin Biochem Rev 32:75–79

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Earley A, Miskulin D, Lamb EJ et al. (2012) Estimating equations for glomerular filtration rate in the era of creatinine standardization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 156:785–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaeffner ES, Ebert N, Delanaye P et al. (2012) Two novel equations to estimate kidney function in persons aged 70 years or older. Ann Intern Med 157:471–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kooiman J, van de Peppel WR, van der Meer FJ et al. (2011) Incidence of chronic kidney disease in patients with atrial fibrillation and its relevance for prescribing new oral antithrombotic drugs. J Thromb Haemost 9:1652–1653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH et al. (2008) Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 51:395–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Macisaac RJ, Tsalamandris C, Thomas MC et al. (2006) Estimating glomerular filtration rate in diabetes: a comparison of cystatin-C and creatinine-based methods. Diabetologia 49:1686–1689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tan GD, Lewis AV, James TJ et al. (2002) Clinical usefulness of cystatin C for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetes: reproducibility and accuracy compared with standard measures and iohexol clearance. Diabetes Care 25:2004–2009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Woo KS, Choi JL, Kim BR et al. (2014) Clinical usefulness of serum cystatin C as a marker of renal function. Diabetes Metab J 38:278–284

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nitta K, Hayashi T, Uchida K et al. (2002) Serum cystatin C concentration as a marker of glomerular filtration rate in patients with various renal diseases. Intern Med 41:931–935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kazama JJ, Kutsuwada K, Ataka K et al. (2002) Serum cystatin C reliably detects renal dysfunction in patients with various renal diseases. Nephron 91:13–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H et al. (2012) Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med 367:20–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Inker LA, Eckfeldt J, Levey AS et al. (2011) Expressing the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) cystatin C equations for estimating GFR with standardized serum cystatin C values. Am J Kidney Dis 58:682–684

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Matzke GR, Aronoff GR, Atkinson AJ Jr et al. (2011) Drug dosing consideration in patients with acute and chronic kidney disease a clinical update from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 80:1122–1137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG. Pradaxa. Summary of product characteristics. European Medicines Agency. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000829/WC500041059.pdf (Accessed 4 November 2016)

  25. Reilly P, Lehr T, Haertter S et al. (2014) The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: the RE-LY Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy). Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63:321–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harel Z, Sood MM, Perl J (2015) Comparison of novel oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 24:183–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chin PK, Vella-Brincat JW, Walker SL et al. (2013) Dosing of dabigatran etexilate in relation to renal function and drug interactions at a Tertiary hospital. Intern Med J 43:778–783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hart RG, Eikelboom JW, Ingram AJ et al. (2012) Anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients with chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 8:569–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mack DR, Kim JJ (2012) Pharmacokinetic and clinical implications of dabigatran use in severe renal impairment for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Pharmacother 46:1105–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Helldén A, Odar-Cederlöf I, Nilsson G et al. (2013) Renal function estimations and dose recommendations for dabigatran, gabapentin and valaciclovir: a data simulation study focused on the elderly. BMJ Open 3:pii:e002686. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hijazi Z, Hohnloser SH, Oldgren J et al. (2014) Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin in relation to baseline renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation: a RE-LY (Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial analysis. Circulation 129:961–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Connolly SJ, Wallentin L, Ezekowitz MD et al. (2013) The long-term multicenter observational study of dabigatran treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study. Circulation 128:237–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the following technicians of our Laboratory: L. Penzo, F. Giusto and E. Speranza for the execution of laboratory tests. Moreover we wish thanks Dr. P. Bellati (EMEA Marketing Director Tosoh Bioscience) and Dr. A. Pacioni (Scientific Affair Dasit) for technical assistance and helpful discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Gessoni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Studies carried out on human being and animals

This study protocol was evaluated by the ethical committee of our institution.

Informed consent

A written consent was obtained from each patient evaluated in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gessoni, G., Valverde, S., Gessoni, F. et al. Glomerular filtration rate assessed by using creatinine and cystatin in patients treated with dabigatran. Riv Ital Med Lab 12, 243–248 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13631-016-0136-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13631-016-0136-4

Keywords

Navigation