Modeling forest site productivity using climate data and topographic imagery in Pinus elliottii plantations of central Argentina

Abstract

Key message

To be useful for silvicultural and forest management practices, the models of Site Index (SI) should be based on accessible predictor variables. In this study, we used spatially explicit data obtained from digital elevation models and climate data to develop SI prediction models with high local precision.

Context

Predicting tree growth and yield is a key component to sustainable forest management and depends on accurate measures of site quality.

Aims

The aim of this study was to develop both empirical models to predict site index (SI) from biophysical variables and a dynamic model of top height growth for plantations of Pinus elliottii Engelm. in Córdoba, Argentina.

Methods

Site productivity described by SI was related to environmental characteristics, including topographic and climatic variables. Separate models were created from only topographic data and the combination of topographic and climate data.

Results

Although SI can be adequately predicted through both types of models, the best results were obtained when combining topographic and climate variables (R2 = 0.83, RMSE% = 7.02%, for the best-fitting model). The key factors affecting site productivity were the landscape position and the mean precipitation of the last 5 years before the reference age, both related to the amount of plant-available water in the soils. Furthermore, the top height growth models developed are fairly accurate, considering the proportion of variance explained (R2 = 98%) and the precision of the estimates (RMSE% < 8%).

Conclusion

The models developed here are likely to have considerable application in forestry, since they are based on accessible predictor variables, which make them useful for silvicultural and forest management practices, particularly for non-forest areas and for the young or uneven-aged stands.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Albert M, Schmidt M (2010) Climate-sensitive modelling of site-productivity relationships for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). For Ecol Manag 259:739–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brandl S, Mette T, Falk W, Vallet P, Rötzer T, Pretzsch H (2018) Static site indices from different national forest inventories: harmonization and prediction from site conditions. Ann For Sci 75:56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bontemps JD, Bouriaud O (2013) Predictive approaches to forest site productivity: recent trends, challenges and future perspectives. Forestry 87:109–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brandl S, Falk W, Klemmt HJ, Stricker G, Bender A, Rötzer T, Pretzsch H (2014) Possibilities and limitations of spatially explicit site index modelling for spruce based on National Forest Inventory data and digital maps of soil and climate in Bavaria (SE Germany). Forests 5:2626–2646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breidenbach J, McGaughey RJ, Andersen HE, Kändler G, Reutebach SE (2007) A mixed effects model to estimate stand volume by means of small footprint airborne lidar data for an American and a German study site. In Proceedings of ISPRS workshop laser scanning, pp 12–14

  6. Chauchard L, Andenmatten E, Letourneau F (2013) Modelización del crecimiento y la producción de los rodales a través de Índices de Densidad. In Aplicaciones de modelos ecológicos a la gestión de recursos naturales, 1ra ed. OmniaScience Monographs, pp 109-124.

  7. Chen HYH, Krestov PV, Klinka K (2002) Trembling aspen site index in relation to environmental measures of site quality at two spatial scales. Can J For Res 32:102–119

    Google Scholar 

  8. Choubin B, Khalighi-Sigaroodi S, Malekian A, Kişi Ö (2016) Multiple linear regression, multi-layer perceptron network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for forecasting precipitation based on large-scale climate signals. Hydrol Sci J 61:1001–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cieszewski CJ, Harrison M, Martin SW (2000) Practical methods for estimating non-biased parameters in self-referencing growth and yield models. University of Georgia PMRC-TR 7

  10. Coelho Pereira Neto O, Limberger L (2004) Análisis de la precisión de mapas de pendientes utilizando modelos digitales de terreno. Revista Fac Agron Univ Nac La Plata 105:97–103

  11. De Reu J, Bourgeois J, Bats M, Zwertvaegher A, Gelorini V, De Smedt P et al (2013) Application of the topographic position index to heterogeneous landscapes. Geomorphology 186:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2017) InfoStat versión 2017. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. URL http://www.infostat.com.ar

  13. Diéguez-Aranda U, Rojo Alboreca A, Castedo-Dorado FF, Álvarez Gonzalez JG, Barrio-Anta M, Crecente-Campo JM et al (2009) Herramientas selvícolas para la gestión forestal sostenible en Galicia. Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela ISBN: 978-84-692-7395-1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fang Z, Bailey RL (2001) Nonlinear mixed effects modeling for slash pine dominant height growth following intensive silvicultural treatments. For Sci 47:287–300

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fiandino SI, Plevich JO, Tarico JC, Nuñez C, Rusch V, Gyenge JE (2018a) Effects of low-density Pinus elliottii (Slash Pine) afforestation on environmental conditions and native plant diversity, in the mountains of central Argentina. Appl Veg Sci 21:442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fiandino SI, Plevich JO, Tarico JC, Utello M, Gyenge J (2018b) Prediction of post-thinning stem volume in slash pine stands by means of state and transition models. New For 50:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9688-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hairston AB, Grigal DF (1991) Topographic influences on soils and trees within single mapping units on a sandy outwash landscape. For Ecol Manag 43:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Horn BK (1981) Hill shading and the reflectance map. Proc IEEE 69:14–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Iverson LR, Scott CT, Dale ME, Prasad A (1996) Development of an integrated moisture index for predicting species composition. In: Kohl M, Gertner GZ (eds) Caring for the Forest: Research in a Changing World. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, pp 101–116

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jarsún B, Gorgas J, Zamora A, Bosnero H, Lovera E, Ravelo A, Tassile JL (2006) Recursos naturales de la Provincia de Córdoba: Los Suelos. Agencia Córdoba Ambiente, Córdoba

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kariuki M (2002) Height estimation in complete stem analysis using annual radial growth measurements. Forestry 75:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lappi J, Malinen J (1994) Random-parameter height/age models when stand parameters and stand age are correlated. For Sci 40:715–731

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee YJ, Hong SC (1999) Estimation of site index curves for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) Plantations. J Korean For Soc 88:285–291

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mayer DG, Butler DG (1993) Statistical validation. Ecol Model 68:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Menéndez-Miguélez M, Álvarez-Álvarez P, Majada J, Canga E (2015) Effects of soil nutrients and environmental factors on site productivity in Castanea sativa Mill. coppice stands in NW Spain. New For 46:217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paulo JA, Palma JH, Gomes AA, Faias SP, Tomé J, Tomé M (2015) Predicting site index from climate and soil variables for cork oak (Quercus suber L.) stands in Portugal. New For 46:293–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Parresol BR, Scott DA, Zarnoch SJ, Edwards LA, Blake JI (2017) Modeling forest site productivity using mapped geospatial attributes within a South Carolina Landscape, USA. For Ecol Manag 406:196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pienaar LV, Shiver BD (1984) The effect of planting density on dominant height in unthinned slash pine plantations. For Sci 30:1059–1066

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pienaar LV, Harrison WM (1989) Simultaneous growth and yield prediction equations for Pinus elliottii plantations in Zululand. South Afr For J 149:48–53

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pienaar LV, Rheney JW (1993) Yield prediction for mechanically site-prepared slash pine plantations in the southeastern coastal plain. South J Appl For 17:163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pietrzykowski M, Socha J, van Doorn NS (2015) Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) site index in relation to physico-chemical and biological properties in reclaimed mine soils. New For 46:247–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinno BD, Paré D, Guindon L, Bélanger N (2009) Predicting productivity of trembling aspen in the Boreal Shield ecozone of Quebec using different sources of soil and site information. For Ecol Manag 257:782–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Plevich JO, Gyenge J, Delgado AS, Tarico JC, Fiandino SI, Utello MJ (2019) Production of fodder in a treeless system and in silvopastoral System in Central Argentina. Floresta Ambient 26. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.051716

  35. QGIS Development Team (2018) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org

  36. Sabatia CO, Burkhart HE (2014) Predicting site index of plantation loblolly pine from biophysical variables. For Ecol Manag 326:142–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sauer TJ, Logsdon SD, Van Brahana J, Murdoch JF (2005) Variation in infiltration with landscape position: implications for forest productivity and surface water quality. For Ecol Manag 220:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schafer GN (1988) A site growth model for Pinus elliottii in the Southern Cape. South Afr For J 146:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sharma M, Subedi N, Ter-Mikaelian M, Parton J (2014) Modeling climatic effects on stand height/site index of plantation-grown jack pine and black spruce trees. For Sci 61:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Socha J (2008) Effect of topography and geology on the site index of Picea abies in the West Carpathian, Poland. Scand J For Res 23:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tagil S, Jenness J (2008) GIS-based automated landform classification and topographic, landcover and geologic attributes of landforms around the Yazoren Polje, Turkey. J Appl Sci 8:910–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Watt MS, Dash JP, Bhandari S, Watt P (2015) Comparing parametric and non-parametric methods of predicting Site Index for radiata pine using combinations of data derived from environmental surfaces, satellite imagery and airborne laser scanning. For Ecol Manag 357:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Weiss A (2001) Topographic position and landforms analysis. In Poster presentation, ESRI user conference, San Diego, CA

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the FAV-UNRC Agrometeorology research group for providing the meteorological data of the study area, and Mr. Ignacio Fernandez Corradi and Mr. Franco Banchero for their help in the forest inventories. We also thank to the people in charge of “Las Guindas” and “Pozo del Carril” rural establishments for their help and support. Finally, we thank Dr. Fernando Casanoves for his advice on modeling methods.

Funding

This research was funded through a PPI (SECyT-UNRC) and CONICET (postdoctoral position).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santiago Fiandino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contribution of co-authors Jose Plevich: Contributed analysis tools.

Juan Tarico: Collected the data.

Marco Utello: Collected the data.

Marcela Demaestri: Contributed data.

Javier Gyenge: Participated in the design of the analysis and the writing of the paper.

Handling Editor: Jean-Michel Leban

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 313 kb).

ESM 2

(PDF 2293 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fiandino, S., Plevich, J., Tarico, J. et al. Modeling forest site productivity using climate data and topographic imagery in Pinus elliottii plantations of central Argentina. Annals of Forest Science 77, 95 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-01006-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Site index
  • Biophysical factors
  • Digital elevation models
  • Prediction models
  • Forest productivity
  • Córdoba