Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 71, Issue 7, pp 771–780 | Cite as

Impact of local slope and aspect assessed from LiDAR records on tree diameter in radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) plantations

  • Hanieh SaremiEmail author
  • Lalit Kumar
  • Russell Turner
  • Christine Stone
  • Gavin Melville
Original Paper



Reliable information on tree stem diameter variation at local spatial scales and on the factors controlling it could potentially lead to improved biomass estimation over pine plantations.


This study addressed the relationship between local topography and tree diameter at breast height (DBH) within two even-aged radiata pine plantation sites in New South Wales, Australia.


A total of 85 plots were established, and 1,302 trees were sampled from the two sites. Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) was used to derive slope and aspect and to link them to each individual tree.


The results showed a significant relationship between DBH and local topography factors. At both sites, trees on slopes below 20° and on southerly aspects displayed significantly larger DBHs than trees on steeper slopes and northerly aspects. Older trees with similar heights also exhibited a significant relationship between DBH and aspect factor, where greater DBHs were found on southerly aspects.


The observed correlation between tree DBH and LiDAR-derived slope and aspect could contribute to the development of improved biomass estimation approaches in pine plantations. These topographical variables are easily attained with airborne LiDAR, and they could potentially improve DBH predictions in resource inventories (e.g. stand volume or biomass) and support field sampling design.


Topography LiDAR-derived metrics Height classes Canopy height model Digital elevation model Mixed linear models 



The authors would like to thank the Forestry Corporation (Forestry Corporation NSW) New South Wales for providing the LiDAR data and the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries for the help in conducting the field surveys used in this study. We would like to express our deep graduate to the editors and the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.


  1. Álvarez J, Allen HL, Albaugh TJ, Stape JL, Bullock BP, Song C (2013) Factors influencing the growth of radiata pine plantations in Chile. Forestry 86:13–26. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cps072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auslander M, Nevo E, Inbar M (2003) The effects of slope orientation on plant growth, developmental instability and susceptibility to herbivores. J Arid Environ 55:405–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton P, Gurrin L, Sly P (1998) Extending the simple linear regression model to account for correlated responses: an introduction to generalized estimating equations and multi-level mixed modelling. Stat Med 17:1261–1291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen JM, Chen X, Ju W (2013) Effects of vegetation heterogeneity and surface topography on spatial scaling of net primary productivity. Biogeosciences 10:4879–4896. doi: 10.5194/bg-10-4879-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferry B, Morneau F, Bontemps JD, Blanc L, Freycon V (2010) Higher treefall rates on slopes and waterlogged soils result in lower stand biomass and productivity in a tropical rain forest. J Ecol 98:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fielding JM (1964) Notes on a monterey pine seed orchard on Tallaganda State Forest in New South Wales. Aust For 28:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gleason CJ, Im J (2012) Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches. Remote Sens Environ 125:80–91. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hawbaker TJ, Keuler NS, Lesak AA, Gobakken T, Contrucci K, Radeloff VC (2009) Improved estimates of forest vegetation structure and biomass with a LiDAR-optimized sampling design. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 114:G00E04. doi: 10.1029/2008jg000870 Google Scholar
  9. Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49:12–35Google Scholar
  10. Junttila V, Finley AO, Bradford JB, Kauranne T (2013) Strategies for minimizing sample size for use in airborne LiDAR-based forest inventory. Forest Ecol Manag 292:75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kraus K, Pfeifer N (1998) Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 53:193–203. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00009-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar L, Skidmore AK, Knowles E (1997) Modelling topographic variation in solar radiation in a GIS environment. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 11:475–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. LAStools (2014) rapidlasso GmbH. Accessed 14 Mar 2014
  14. Lee W-K, Gadow KV, Chung D-J, Lee J-L, Shin M-Y (2004) DBH growth model for Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis mixed forests in central Korea. Ecol Model 176:187–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li Y, Wang C, Tang H (2006) Research advances in nutrient runoff on sloping land in watersheds. Aquat Ecosys Health Manag 9:27–32. doi: 10.1080/14634980600559379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Y, Andersen H-E, McGaughey R (2008) A comparison of statistical methods for estimating forest biomass from light detection and ranging data. West J Appl For 23:223–231Google Scholar
  17. Maltamo M, Bollandsås OM, Næsset E, Gobakken T, Packalén P (2011) Different plot selection strategies for field training data in ALS-assisted forest inventory. Forestry 84:23–31. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpq039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGaughey RJ (2007) FUSION manual, version 2.90. USDA Forest ServiceGoogle Scholar
  19. McGaughey RJ (2013) FUSION/LDV: software for LiDAR data analysis and visualisation, vol Version 3.30. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  20. Moore JR (2010) Allometric equations to predict the total above-ground biomass of radiata pine trees. Ann For Sci 67:806. doi: 10.1051/forest/2010042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Næsset E (1997) Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 52:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nevo E (2001) Evolution of genome-phenome diversity under environmental stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:6233–6240PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Popescu SC (2007) Estimating biomass of individual pine trees using airborne lidar. Biomass Bioenergy 31:646–655. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  25. Radiata Pine Breeding Company (RPBC) (2002) Rating the genetic quality of radiata pine. RPBC Information Bulletin No. 1. Rotorua, New Zealand.
  26. Robert A (2003) Simulation of the effect of topography and tree falls on stand dynamics and stand structure of tropical forests. Ecol Model 167:287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryan PJ, Holmes GI (1986) Geology of Hanging Rock and Nundle State Forests. Technical paper; no. 37. SydneyGoogle Scholar
  28. Schröder M, Rehrauer H, Seidel K, Datcu M (1998) Spatial information retrieval from remote sensing images—part II: Gibbs Markov random fields. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 36:1446–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Silvergieter MP, Lank DB (2011) Marbled murrelets select distinctive nest trees within old-growth forest patches. Avian Conserv Ecol 6:3Google Scholar
  30. Snowdon P, Woollons RC, Benson ML (1998) Incorporation of climatic indices into models of growth of Pinus radiata in a spacing experiment. New For 16:101–123. doi: 10.1023/a:1006524609459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stage AR, Salas C (2007) Interactions of elevation, aspect, and slope in models of forest species composition and productivity. For Sci 53:486–492Google Scholar
  32. Turner J, Lambert M, Hopmans P, McGrath J (2001) Site variation in Pinus radiata plantations and implications for site specific management. New For 21:249–282. doi: 10.1023/a:1012240720833 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vanclay JK (2009) Tree diameter, height and stocking in even-aged forests. Ann For Sci 66:702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. White JC, Wulder MA, Varhola A, Vastaranta M, Coops NC, Cook BD, Pitt D, Woods M (2013) A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach. For Chron 89:722–723. doi: 10.5558/tfc2013-132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Woollons RC, Snowdon P, Mitchell ND (1997) Augmenting empirical stand projection equations with edaphic and climatic variables. For Ecol Manag 98:267–275. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00090-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Worrell R, Malcolm DC (1990) Productivity of Sitka spruce in Northern Britain 2. Prediction from site factors. Forestry 63:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu T, Hutchinson MF (2011) ANUCLIM Version 6.1 User Guide. The Australian National University, Fenner School of Environment and Society, CanberraGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanieh Saremi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lalit Kumar
    • 1
  • Russell Turner
    • 2
  • Christine Stone
    • 3
  • Gavin Melville
    • 4
  1. 1.Ecosystem Management, School of Environmental and Rural ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.Remote Census Pty LtdMorissetAustralia
  3. 3.Forest Science, New South Wales, Department of Primary IndustriesParramattaAustralia
  4. 4.New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Trangie Agricultural Research CentreNew South WalesAustralia

Personalised recommendations