Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing coppice forests for rockfall protection: lessons from modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Annals of Forest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

One eighth of Europe’s forests are still managed as coppice. In some European countries, more than half of the forest exhibits coppice structures from the past or present coppice management. Many of these forests grow in the broadleaf zone of mountainous regions, often on steep slopes. Here, they play an important role in rockfall protection. However, it remains unclear how coppice forests should be structured for optimal rockfall protection or how the protection effect changes during the aging of the coppice.

Aim

A few studies have applied rock trajectory analyses, but so far, no process-based model has been used to quantify the protective effect of differently structured coppice forests. The present study compared 40 coppice patches from two chronosequences in South Tyrol, North Italy, regarding their protective effect against rocks of two sizes using the rockfall simulation model Rockyfor3D.

Results

The results indicate that coppice stands older than 30 years better protect against rockfall than medium-aged and young stands, although the old ones have lower stem densities. Surprisingly, a random stem distribution had a better protective effect than the clumped stem distribution typical for coppice stands.

Conclusion

Implications for future management are discussed in detail, including the relevance of standards in coppice forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Autonome Provinz Bozen–Südtirol (2010) Waldtypisierung Südtirol, Band 1 & 2. Bozen

  • Bertrand D, Bourrier F, Olmedo-Manich I, Brun M, Berger F, Limam I (2013) Experimental and numerical dynamic analysis of a live tree stem impacted by a Mouton Charpy’s pendulum. Int J Solids Struct 50:1689–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciabocco G, Boccia L, Ripa MN (2009) Energy dissipation of rockfalls by coppice structures. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:993–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorren LKA (2012) Rockyfor3D (v4.1) revealed—transparent description of the complete 3D rockfall model. ecorisQ paper

  • Dorren LKA, Berger F (2005) Stem breakage of trees and energy dissipation during rockfall impacts. Tree Physiol 26:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorren LKA, Berger F, Putters US (2006) Real size experiments and 3D simulation of rockfall on forested and non-forested slopes. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorren LKA, Berger F, Jonsson M, Krautblatter M, Mölk M, Stoffel M, Wehrli A (2007) State of the art in rockfall–forest interactions. Schweiz Z Forstwes 158:128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frehner M, Wasser B, Schwitter R (2005) Nachhaltigkeit und Erfolgskontrolle im Schutzwald. Wegleitung für Pflegemassnahmen in Wäldern mit Schutzfunktion

  • Gerber C, Elsener O (1998) Niederwaldbetrieb im Steinschlaggebiet. Wald Holz 14:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gsteiger P (1993) Steinschlag Schutzwald. Ein Beitrag zur Abgrenzung, Beurteilung und Bewirtschaftung. Schweiz Z Forstwes 144:115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan JA, Wong MA (1979) A K-means clustering algorithm. Appl Stat 28:100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Jancke O (2012) Quantifying the mechanical resistance of coppice trees against rockfall. University of Hamburg, Germany, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Jancke O, Dorren LKA, Berger F, Fuhr M, Köhl M (2009) Implications of coppice stand characteristics on the rockfall protection function. For Ecol Manag 259:124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jancke O, Berger F, Dorren LKA (2013) Mechanical resistance of coppice stems derived from full-scale impact tests. Earth Surf Process Landf 38:994–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson MJO (2007) Energy absorption of trees in a rockfall protection forest. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Switzerland, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert S, Bourrier F, Toe D (2013) Improving three-dimensional rockfall trajectory simulation codes for assessing the efficiency of protective embankments. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 60:26–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyer I, Wesche K (2007) Multivariate Statistik in der Ökologie: Eine Einführung. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundstrom T, Jonsson MJ, Volkwein A, Stoffel M (2009) Reactions and energy absorption of trees subject to rockfall: a detailed assessment using a new experimental method. Tree Physiol 29:345–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matula R, Svatek M, Kurova J, Uradnicek L, Kadavy J, Kneifl M (2012) The sprouting ability of the main tree species in Central European coppices: implications for coppice restoration. Eur J For Res 131:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notaro S, Paletto A (2012) The economic valuation of natural hazards in mountain forests: an approach based on the replacement cost method. J For Econ 18:318–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2012) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-3

  • Pelissier R, Goreaud F (2010) ads: spatial point patterns analysis. R package version 1.2-10

  • Piussi P (2006) Close to nature forestry criteria and coppice management. In: Diaci J (ed) Nature-based forestry in Central Europe: alternatives to industrial forestry and strict preservation, vol 126. Studia Forestalia Slovenia, Slovenia, pp 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Piussi P, Farrell EP (2000) Interactions between society and forest ecosystems: challenges for the near future. For Ecol Manag 132:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puumalainen J (2001) Structural, compositional and functional aspects of forest biodiversity in Europe (no. ECE/TIM/DP/22). United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 22 June 2012

  • Radtke A, Ambraß S, Zerbe S, Tonon G, Fontana V, Ammer C (2013) Traditional coppice forest management drives the invasion of Ailanthus altissima and Robinia pseudoacacia into deciduous forests. For Ecol Manag 291:308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas V, Zas R, Solla A (2009) Spatial structure of deciduous forest stands with contrasting human influence in northwest Spain. Eur J Forest Res 128:273–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes A, Salin F, Kokutse AD, Berthier S, Jeannin H, Mochan S, Dorren L, Kokutse N, Abd. Ghani M, Fourcaud T (2005) Mechanical resistance of different tree species to rockfall in the French Alps. Plant Soil 278:107–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein A, Schellenberg K, Labiouse V, Agliardi F, Berger F, Bourrier F, Dorren LKA, Gerber W, Jaboyedoff M (2011) Rockfall characterisation and structural protection—a review. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:2617–2651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrli A, Zingg A, Bugmann H, Huth A (2005) Using a forest patch model to predict the dynamics of stand structure in Swiss mountain forests. For Ecol Manag 205:149–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrli A, Dorren LKA, Berger F, Zingg A, Schönenberger W, Brang P (2006) Modelling long-term effects of forest dynamics on the protective effect against rockfall. For Snow Landsc Res 80:57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltjer M, Rammer W, Brauner M, Seidl R, Mohren GMJ, Lexer MJ (2008) Coupling a 3D patch model and a rockfall module to assess rockfall protection in mountain forests. J Environ Manag 87:373–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Theresa Wagner and Joseph Molyneux for their help in the field, to Giustino Tonon and Verena Larcher for their support with the sampling design, and most importantly, to Oliver Jancke for numerous enlightening discussions about rockfall in coppice forests. Thomas Cordonnier gave valuable advice for the spatial analyses of the tree distributions. The study was supported by the forest service of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano. Joseph Bartho corrected the English. We thank Barry Gardiner and one anonymous reviewer for their very valuable comments to improve the manuscript.

Funding

The EcoRAlps project was funded by the Stemmler and Immerschitt foundations within the “Stifterverband für die deutsche Wissenschaft” (Association of Foundations for German Science) and the Foundation of the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Radtke.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Barry Alan Gardiner

Contributions of the co-authors

Toe: running the data analysis.

Bourrier: writing the paper, supervising the work, help in running the data analysis

Zerbe: coordinating the research project (named EcoRAlps)

Berger: supervising the work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radtke, A., Toe, D., Berger, F. et al. Managing coppice forests for rockfall protection: lessons from modeling. Annals of Forest Science 71, 485–494 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0339-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0339-z

Keywords

Navigation