Advertisement

Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 70, Issue 6, pp 589–599 | Cite as

Variation in biomass expansion factors for China’s forests in relation to forest type, climate, and stand development

  • Yunjian LuoEmail author
  • Xiaoke WangEmail author
  • Xiaoquan Zhang
  • Yin Ren
  • Hendrik Poorter
Original Paper

Abstract

Context

Biomass expansion factors (BEFs, defined as the ratios of tree component biomass (branch, leaf, aboveground section, root, and whole) to stem biomass) are important parameters for quantifying forest biomass and carbon stock. However, little information is available about possible causes of the variability in BEFs at large scales.

Aims

We examined whether and how BEFs vary with forest types, climate (mean annual temperature, MAT; mean annual precipitation, MAP), and stand development (stand age and size) at the national scale for China.

Method

Using our compiled biomass dataset, we calculated values for BEFs and explored their relationships to forest types, climate, and stand development.

Results

BEFs varied greatly across forest types and functional groups. They were significantly related to climate and stand development (especially tree height). However, the relationships between BEFs and MAT and MAP were generally different in deciduous forests and evergreen forests, and BEF–climate relationships were weaker in deciduous forests than in evergreen forests and pine forests.

Conclusion

To reduce uncertainties induced by BEFs in estimates of forest biomass and carbon stock, values for BEFs should be applied for a specified forest, and BEF functions with influencing factors (e.g., tree height and climate) should be developed as predictor variables for the specified forest.

Keywords

Biomass expansion factors Forest type Temperature Precipitation Stand development China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) (XDA05060102 and XDA05050602), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200363 and 31270588), National Forestry Public Welfare Program of China (201304205 and 201204604), CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams (KZCX2-YW-T08), CAS Knowledge Innovation Program (KZCX-2-YW-453), CAS Youth Innovation Program (Y2L0331D60), and Fujian Provincial Science and Technology Program (2011Y0052). We thank Dr. Xiaohua Wei (The University of British Columbia), the anonymous reviewers, and the handling editor for their valuable comments on the manuscript, and also thank Dr. Jonathan Vause (Chinese Academy of Sciences) for his helpful language polishing.

References

  1. Antúnez I, Retamosa EC, Villar R (2001) Relative growth rate in phylogenetically related deciduous and evergreen woody species. Oecologia 128:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE (1989) Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. For Sci 35:881–902Google Scholar
  3. Cornelissen JHC, Castro-Díez P, Carnelli AL (1998) Variation in relative growth rate among woody species. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth: physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 363–392Google Scholar
  4. Fang J, Brown S, Tang Y, Nabuurs GJ, Wang X, Shen H (2006) Overestimated biomass carbon pools of the northern mid and high latitude forests. Clim Chang 74:355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng Z, Wang X, Wu G (1999) Biomass and productivity of forest ecosystems in China. Science Press, Beijing, 241pp (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Fukuda M, Iehara T, Matsumoto M (2003) Carbon stock estimates for sugi and hinoki forests in Japan. For Ecol Manag 184:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Houghton RA, Hall F, Goetz SJ (2009) Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle. J Geophys Res 114:G00E03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, KanagawaGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (vol. 4): agriculture, forestry and other land use. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, KanagawaGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson WC, Sharpe DM (1983) The ratio of total to merchantable forest biomass and its application to the global carbon budget. Can J For Res 13:372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kauppi PE, Tomppo E, Ferm A (1995) C and N storage in living trees within Finland since the 1950s. Plant Soil 168–169:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kloeke AEEO, Douma JC, Ordoñez JC, Reich PB, Bodegom PM (2012) Global quantification of contrasting leaf life span strategies for deciduous and evergreen species in response to environmental conditions. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:224–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Landsberg J, Sands P (2011) Physiological ecology of forest production: principles, processes and models. Academic, London, 331ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehtonen A, Mäkipää R, Heikkinen J, Sievänen R, Liski J (2004) Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 188:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levy PE, Hale SE, Nicoll BC (2004) Biomass expansion factors and root:shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. Forestry 77:421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lim H, Lee K-H, Lee KH, Park IH (2012) Biomass expansion factors and allometric equations in an age sequence for Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) in southern Korea. J For Res. doi: 10.1007/s10310-012-0353-2 Google Scholar
  18. Luo T (1996) Patterns of net primary productivity for Chinese major forest types and their mathematical models. Ph.D. dissertation, Commission for Integrated Survey of Natural Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 211pp (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  19. Luo Y, Wang X, Zhang X, Booth TH, Lu F (2012) Root:shoot ratios across China’s forests: forest type and climatic effects. For Ecol Manag 269:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mencuccini M, Martinez-Vilalta J, Vanderklein D, Hamid HA, Korakaki E, Lee S, Michiels B (2005) Size-mediated ageing reduces vigour in trees. Ecol Lett 8:1183–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nogueira EM, Fearnside PM, Nelson BW, Barbosa RI, Keizer EWH (2008) Estimates of forest biomass in the Brazilian Amazon: new allometric equations and adjustments to biomass from wood-volume inventories. For Ecol Manag 256:1853–1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pan Y, Luo T, Birdsey R, Hom J, Melillo J (2004) New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China’s forests: effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation. Clim Chang 67:211–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012) Biomass allocation to leaves, stems, and roots: meta-analysis of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol 193:30–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reich PB (1998) Variation among plant species in leaf turnover rates and associated traits: implications for growth at all life stages. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth: physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 467–487Google Scholar
  25. Ren Y, Yan J, Wei X, Wang Y, Yang Y, Hua L, Xiong Y, Niu X, Song X (2012) Effects of rapid urban sprawl on urban forest carbon stocks: integrating remotely sensed, GIS and forest inventory data. J Environ Manag 113:447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryan MG, Phillips N, Bond BJ (2006) The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revisited. Plant Cell Environ 29:367–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shao G, Dai L, Dukes JS, Jackson RB, Tang L, Zhao J (2011) Increasing forest carbon sequestration through cooperation and shared strategies between China and the United States. Environ Sci Technol 45:2033–2034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Somogyi Z, Cienciala E, Mäkipää R, Muukkonen P, Lehtonen A, Weiss P (2007) Indirect methods of large-scale forest biomass estimation. Eur J For Res 126:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tobin B, Nieuwenhuis M (2007) Biomass expansion factors for Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) in Ireland. Eur J For Res 126:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Usoltsev VA, Hoffmann CW (1997) Combining harvest sample data with inventory data to estimate forest biomass. Scand J For Res 12:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang X, Fang J, Zhu B (2008) Forest biomass and root-shoot allocation in northeast China. For Ecol Manag 255:4007–4020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang S, Slik JWF, Zhang J, Cao K (2011) Spatial patterns of wood traits in China are controlled by phylogeny and the environment. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang X (2007) Vegetation map of China and its geographic patterns. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, pp 91–124 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Zheng W, Bao W, Gu B, He X, Leng L (2007) Carbon concentration and its characteristics in terrestrial higher plants. Chin J Ecol 26:307–313 (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Urban MetabolismInstitute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesXiamenChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.The Nature Conservancy China ProgramBeijingChina
  4. 4.IBG-2 Plant SciencesForschungszentrum JülichJülich GmbHGermany

Personalised recommendations