Annals of Forest Science

, Volume 69, Issue 3, pp 387–397 | Cite as

Evaluation of the flammability of gorse (Ulex europaeus L.) managed by prescribed burning

  • Javier MadrigalEmail author
  • Eva Marino
  • Mercedes Guijarro
  • Carmen Hernando
  • Carmen Díez
Original Paper


• Introduction

The abandonment of rural areas has led to an increase of the fire-prone European gorse (Ulex europaeus L.) communities in some regions, where prescribed burning is a technique applied to control them. Understanding flammability changes after treatments is crucial for the sustainable use of fire.

• Objectives

The objectives of this study were to evaluate (1) any differences in the flammability of gorse plant parts 1 and 5 years after burning and (2) the flammability of whole plants, assessing complementarities of the results between full-scale and bench-scale tests.

• Results

Results showed the importance of the effect of the different scales and types of methods used to determine the four components of flammability of forest fuels: (1) Ignitability was highly dependent on the type of ignition source. (2) Combustibility was more dependent on the dead fraction than on live plant part characteristics. (3) Sustainability was mainly related to physical characteristics, like air flow interaction with fuel compactness. (4) Consumability, in terms of residual mass fraction, was similar at both scales.

• Conclusions

The results suggest the need for intensive management of gorse shrubland to maintain them at a very young age in order to reduce flammability associated with the rapid physiological and structural changes in this kind of vegetation.


Flammability Ulex europaeus Prescribed burning Full-scale testing Bench-scale testing Mass loss calorimeter 



We thank Antonio Arellano from the Departamento de Protección Ambiental, CIF-Lourizán (Forest Research Center of Lourizán, Spain) for field assistance. We acknowledge the critical reviews of two anonymous referees who helped improve this manuscript. The work carried out in this article was supported by the National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA) from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and cofounded by FEDER funds (Project RTA05-00244-C2-02 and RTA2009-00153-C03-02) and by the European Commission (Integrated Project FIRE PARADOX FP6-018505). Participation of Eva Marino in the study was possible through a PhD scholarship funded by INIA.


  1. Anderson HE (1970) Forest fuel ignitability. Fire Technol 6:312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson SAJ, Anderson WR (2010) Ignition and fire spread thresholds in gorse (Ulex europaeus). Int J Wildland Fire 19:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babrauskas V (2002) The cone calorimeter. In: Society of fire Protection Engineering (ed), SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 3rd edition. National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, Massachusetts, pp 3-63 – 3-81Google Scholar
  4. Babrauskas V (2006) Effective heat of combustion for flaming combustion of conifers. Can J For Res 36:659–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baeza MJ, De Luis M, Raventós J, Escarré A (2002) Factors influencing fire behaviour in shrublands of different stand ages and the implications for using prescribed burning to reduce wildfire risk. J Environ Manag 65:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baeza MJ, Raventós J, Escarré A, Vallejo VR (2003) The effect of shrub clearing on the control of fire-prone species Ulex parviflorus. For Ecol Manag 186:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beverly JL, Wotton BM (2007) Modelling the probability of sustained flaming: predictive value of fire weather index components compared with observations of site weather and fuel moisture conditions. Int J Wildland Fire 16:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo L, Tárrega R, De Luis E (2002) The dynamics of Mediterranean shrubs species over 12 years following perturbations. Plant Ecol 160:25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Luis M, Baeza MJ, Raventós J, González-Hidalgo JC (2004) Fuel characteristics and fire behaviour in mature Mediterranean gorse shrublands. Int J Wildland Fire 13:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dibble AC, White RH, Lebow PK (2007) Combustion characteristics of north-eastern USA vegetation tested in the cone calorimeter: invasive versus non-invasive plants. Int J Wildland Fire 16:426–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doran JD, Randall CK, Long AJ (2004) Fire in the wildland–urban interface: selecting and maintaining firewise plants for landscaping. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Services, Florida Cooperative Extension Service Circular 1445, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
  12. Enninful EK, Torvi DA (2005) Effect of moisture on heat release and smoke production of vegetation. Proceedings of the Spring Technical Meeting, the Combustion Institute Canadian Section, Halifax, NS, 16–18 MayGoogle Scholar
  13. Etlinger MG, Beall FC (2004) Development of a laboratory protocol for fire performance of landscape plants. Int J Wildland Fire 13:479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandes PM, Botelho HS (2003) A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. Int J Wildland Fire 12:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ganteaume A, Lampin-Maillet C, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Jappiot M, Fonturbel T, Pérez-Gorostiaga P, Vega JA (2009) Spot fires: fuel bed flammability and capability of firebrands to ignite fuel beds. Int J Wildland Fire 18:951–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoshovsky M (1989) Element stewardship abstract for Ulex europaeus gorse. The Nature Conservancy, TNC-ESA, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. International Organization for Standardization (1995) Determination of the heat of combustion (calorific value) (ISO 1716). International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. Madrigal J, Hernando C, Guijarro M, Díez C, Marino E, De Castro AJ (2009) Evaluation of forest fuel flammability and combustion properties with an adapted mass loss calorimeter device. J Fire Sci 27:323–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madrigal J, Villanueva S, Hernando C, Guijarro M, Díez C, Martínez I, Marino E, Barrio A, López M, Mordillo I (2010) Estimation of heat release rate of forest fuels during rapid flaming combustion: comparison between cone calorimeter and mass loss calorimeter devices. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Forest Fire Research, ADAI, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 15–18 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  20. Madrigal J, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Díez C, Marino E (2011a) Effective heat of combustion for flaming combustion of Mediterranean forest fuels. Fire Technol 47:461–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Madrigal J, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Díez C, Marino E (2011b) Estimation of peak heat release rate of a forest fuel bed in outdoor laboratory conditions. J Fire Sci 29:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marino E, Madrigal J, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Díez C, Fernández C (2010) Flammability descriptors of fine dead fuels resulting from two mechanicals treatments in shrubland: a comparative laboratory study. Int J Wildland Fire 19:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marino E, Guijarro M, Hernando C, Madrigal J, Díez C (2011) Fire hazard after prescribed burning in a gorse shrubland: implications for fuel management. J Environ Manag 92:1003–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin RE, Gordon DA, Gutierrez MA, Lee DS, Molina DE, Schroeder RA, Sapsis DB, Stephens SL, Chambers M (1994) Assessing the flammability of domestic and wildland vegetation. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD, Jekyll Island, GA, 26–28 October, pp 130–137Google Scholar
  25. Núñez-Regueira L, Rodríguez-Añón J, Proupin J (2004) Using calorimetry for determining the risk indices to prevent and fight forest fires. Thermochim Acta 422:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pausas JG, Llovet J, Rodrigo A, Vallejo R (2008) Are wildfires a disaster in the Mediterranean basin? A review. Int J Wildland Fire 17:713–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pereiras J, Casal M (2002) Dynamics of an Ulex shrubland community subjected to prescribed burning. In: Trabaud L, Prodon R (eds) Fire and biological processes. Blackhuys, Leiden, pp 43–56Google Scholar
  28. Potts JB, Marino E, Stephens SL (2010) Chaparral shrub recovery after fuel reduction: a comparison of prescribed fire and mastication techniques. Plant Ecol 210:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schemel CF, Simeoni A, Biteau H, Rivera JD, Torero JL (2008) A calorimetric study of wildland fuels. Exp Therm Flu Sci 32:1381–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith EE (1996) Heat release rate calorimetry. Fire Technol 32:334–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sullivan AL (2009) Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 1: Physical and quasi-physical models. Int J Wildland Fire 18:349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weise DR, White RH, Beall FC, Etlinger M (2005) Use of the cone calorimeter to detect seasonal differences in selected combustion characteristics of ornamental vegetation. Int J Wildland Fire 14:321–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. White RH (1987) Effect of lignin content and extractives on the higher heating value of wood. Wood Fiber Sci 19:446–452Google Scholar
  34. White RH, Zipperer WC (2010) Testing and classification of individual plants for fire behaviour: plant selection for the wildland–urban interface. Int J Wildland Fire 19:213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wickström U, Göransson U (1987) Prediction of heat release rates of surface materials in large-scale fire tests based on cone calorimeter results. J Test Eva 15:364–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA / Springer-Verlag France 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier Madrigal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eva Marino
    • 1
  • Mercedes Guijarro
    • 1
  • Carmen Hernando
    • 1
  • Carmen Díez
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Investigación ForestalInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations