Yeast and mold diversity in milk
Colonies (505) from 111 cow milk samples were isolated and selected based on differences in shape and color. This approach was selected to increase the probability of isolating a large number of species. The molecular identification approach using the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA region revealed that 339 (67%) of the isolates were yeasts that could be assigned to 37 species belonging to 11 genera (Table 2) and that the remaining isolates were molds that could be assigned to 33 species belonging to 25 genera (Table 3).
Table 2 Phylogenetic affiliation of 339 yeasts isolated from raw cow milk from 19 dairy farms between February and October 2009
Table 3 Phylogenetic affiliation of 166 molds isolated from raw cow milk from 19 dairy farms between February and October 2009
Of the 339 yeast isolates, Debaryomyces hansenii was the most abundant species (21%) and was detected in the milk from 14 of the 19 dairy farms. Candida was the most abundant genus (44%) and the most diverse, with 148 isolates and 11 species. Cryptoccocus spp. and Pichia spp. made up 10.9% and 8.0% of the yeast isolates, respectively. Of the 37 yeast species identified, 14 were isolated only once. Eurotium was the most abundant mold genus (39 isolates or 23.5%) and was detected in the milk from 13 of the 19 farms. Lichtheimia (Lichtheimia corymbifera) was the second most abundant mold genus, with 22 isolates (13.3%) from nine farms. Fifteen mold species were isolated only once.
Candida glaebosa was the second most frequent yeast isolate and was found in the raw milk from two farms (Table 2). However, 47 of the Candida glaebosa 48 isolates were found in the milk of a single dairy farm (dairy farm A). This species has been identified in cheeses affected by thread mould spoilage but has not been clearly associated with this phenomenon (Hocking and Faedo 1992). These findings indicate that the fungal profile of milk differs from one farm to another. While other investigators have reported that most of the species identified in our study are commonly found in dairy products (Borelli et al. 2006; El-Sharoud et al. 2009; Fadda et al. 2004; Lopandic et al. 2006; Montagna et al. 2004; Pereira-Dias et al. 2000; Prillinger et al. 1999; Roostita and Fleet 1995; Vasdinyei and Deák 2003), only a few have been shown to be part of the native fungal ecosystem of milk.
We also isolated Prototheca zopfii, a yeast-like algal species, from two milk samples. While this non-photosynthetic algal species is thought to be a putative causal agent of bovine mastitis, it has not been possible to make a definite correlation between the presence of Prototheca zopfii and the sub-clinical and clinical symptoms of the disease (Kishimoto et al. 2009; Marques et al. 2010).
Despite the large number of isolates, it is likely that only a fraction of the fungal species in the samples were actually identified. Some species may have had difficulties growing on the synthetic medium or were present in such small numbers that they were masked by the dominant species. However, this overview of the fungal microflora of the milk samples provides an inkling of the complexity of this ecosystem.
Semiquantitative analysis of fungi in milk from four dairy farms over a 5-month period
To determine whether the fungal ecosystem differed from farm to farm or changed over time for a given farm, the yeast and mold populations in milk samples from four dairy farms were analyzed over a 5-month period. However, rather than selecting colonies based on morphology, every colony was purified and identified by sequencing the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA region. This approach was used to eliminate any bias that may have been introduced by selecting colonies based on morphology.
Dairy farm A produced milk with the highest fungal count, with an average of 1.8 × 103 CFU.mL−1 (Online resource 1), while farm c produced milk with the lowest fungal count, with an average of 3.6 CFU.mL−1 (Online resource 2). Yeasts dominated the microflora of the milk from farms A–C, accounting for 91%, 86%, and 82% of the isolates, respectively. Molds dominated the microflora of the milk from farm D, accounting for 67% of the isolates (Online resource 3). While this systematic approach gave a more precise, quantitative portrait of the fungal ecosystem, less species diversity was observed. It also revealed that the dominant species and the composition of the ecosystem differed from one milk sample to another. The samples analyzed over the 5-month period revealed that the milk from farm A was dominated by the fungal species Candida glaebosa, which made up 59% of the isolates. This species was also present in every sample obtained from this farm. Candida zeylanoides and Candida parapsilosis were the dominant species in the milk of farm b, accounting for 31% and 25% of the isolates, respectively (Online resource 4). However, they were only found in three of the five milk samples.
Interestingly, D. hansenii was the dominant yeast species in the milk from farm C. On average, it made up 49% of the total fungal population and was found in four of the five samples. This species is commonly inoculated in dairy products. Some strains have a positive effect on cheese ripening through their proteolytic and lipolytic activities and are able to protect against contaminants (Breuer and Harms 2006; Corsetti et al. 2001). Farm D was unique in that, while D. hansenii (16%) was the predominant yeast species, the microflora of the milk was dominated by a diverse population of mold species (67% of isolates), including Lichtheimia corymbifera (found in all samples), Eurotium spp., Acremonium spp., Aspergillus spp., Cladosporium spp., and Penicillium spp. (Online resource 3).
The composition of the NSYM from milk differs from farm to farm but may also differ along the months. This study also corroborates other studies reporting that the period had a significant effect on the global yeast profile of milk. This could be due to the combined effects of the feeding regime, physiological state of the animal, the weather, and the indoor and outdoor environments (Baroiller and Schmidt 1990; Callon et al. 2007; Zheng et al. 2006). Moreover, cheesemaking process and equipment could be sources of NSYM, especially brine and ripening chambers (Seiler and Busse 1990; Prillinger et al. 1999; Zheng et al. 2006).
Non-starter yeasts and molds isolated from cheese samples
Non-starter yeasts and molds (103 isolates) were isolated from 28 surface and core samples from 1-week-old specialty cheeses produced from raw and pasteurized milk (Table 1, Table 4). The NSYM colonies were selected based on morphology in order to isolate as many NSYM species as possible. Given that some species are used as ripening cultures, including Penicillium camemberti, Geotrichum candidum (teleomorph Galactomyces candidus), Kluyveromyces lactis, and D. hansenii, isolates corresponding to these species were not included in the analysis since it was impossible to determine whether they were natural contaminants or members of the ripening culture.
Table 4 NSYM isolated from 28 cheeses after 7–10 days of ripening: isolates were recovered either from the rind or core of the cheese
Thirty different NSYM species were isolated from the rind and core samples. Of these, 12 species were isolated only once. Yeasts were isolated more frequently than molds, and accounted for 73% of the isolates. Many NSYM isolated from the cheese samples were not found in the milk, including Aspergillus fumigatus, Cochliobolus sativus, Fusarium domesticum, Mucor circinelloides, Cryptococcus diffluens, Pichia membranifaciens, Saccharomyces servazii, Trichosporon asahii, Trichosporon domesticus, and Trichosporon jirovecii. The proportion of these species in the milk samples may have been too low for them to be detected, or they may have been contaminants from the environment, workers, the ripening chamber, or other sources.
The most frequent yeast species isolated was I. orientalis (syn. P. kudriavzevii), which accounted for 25% of the yeast isolates. However, this frequency may have been due to its colonial morphology, which is different from the common white smooth regular colonies often observed with other species such as Candida zeylanoides, D. hansenii, and Candida glaebosa. I. orientalis was reported as a common species found in Graukäse cheese and was also isolated from brines (Prillinger et al. 1999; Seiler and Busse 1990). However, the contribution of this species to cheese ripening process needs to be investigated. M. racemosus was the most frequently isolated mold species. This species is frequently isolated as NSYM and is undesired in most specialty cheeses, such as Camembert (Bekada et al. 2008).
Most of the isolates (59%) came from the core samples. Seven of the 19 yeast species and seven of the 11 mold species from the core samples were not detected in the rind samples (Table 4). Because most cheeses analyzed in this study are surface ripened, the use of ripening culture may have reduced the number of NSYM isolated at the surface. F. domesticum, C. curvatus, Pichia membranifaciens, and Trichosporon aquatile were only isolated from the rind samples. Fewer species were isolated from the rind samples than from the core samples. However, the microflora of the ripening culture may have masked the NSYM species to some extent.
MLST genotyping of I. orientalis isolates
MLST genotyping was performed on 13 I. orientalis isolates (Table 5) to assess the distribution and persistence of non-starter yeasts in cheese. Leaving aside LMA-694, LMA-696, and LMA-726, two main groups were identified. The first group consisted of LMA-250, LMA-519, LMA-545, LMA-652, and LMA-805, which belong to the St-67 sequence type. The second group was more heterogeneous and was comprised of LMA-422, LMA-783, LMA-546, LMA-503, and LMA-666. The strains in this group shared many loci and all harbored the same ADE1 locus.
Table 5 MLST performed on 13 Issatchenkia orientalis strains isolated from milk and cheese samples
Eight MLST profiles were identified in the nine isolates from the milk samples, indicating that at least eight different strains were present. Four of these isolates came from the milk from farm A. LMA-545 and LMA-546 came from the same milk sample but had different MLST profiles.
The allelic St-67 profile encompassed all the isolates from cheese 1 (farm A), despite the fact that the cheese samples were collected from three different lots (April 3, June 12, and August 12), suggesting that this strain or close relatives persisted in the processing plant. Interestingly, the same MLST genotype was found in the raw milk samples from this farm, suggesting that I. orientalis in milk may have survive the cheesemaking process and grow in raw milk cheese. An isolate from cheese sample 2 from dairy farm A had a totally different genotype profile (LMA-503), confirming that several I. orientalis strains can coexist in the same cheesemaking environment and develop in cheeses.
It is noteworthy that LMA-250 and LMA-545 had the same MLST genotype but were isolated from different farms. This suggested that closely related strains could be found in widely separated locations. While the MLST analysis could not guarantee that these two isolates were identical strains, it did suggest a strong genetic affiliation.