Advertisement

Vermicompost significantly affects plant growth. A meta-analysis

  • Manuel BlouinEmail author
  • Julien Barrere
  • Nicolas Meyer
  • Silène Lartigue
  • Sébastien Barot
  • Jérôme Mathieu
Meta-analysis
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Waste use in agriculture

Abstract

Food production and waste management are two increasing issues ensuing from the growing world population. Recycling organic residues into amendment for food production seems to appear as an opportunity to partially solve this double challenge. Vermicomposting is a process whereby earthworms transform organic residues into compost that can be used as a substrate for plant growth. Many studies have evaluated the effect of vermicompost on plant growth, but a quantitative summary of these studies is still missing. This is the first meta-analysis providing a quantitative summary of the effect size of vermicompost on plant growth. We found that vermicompost brought about average increases of 26% in commercial yield, 13% in total biomass, 78% in shoot biomass, and 57% in root biomass. The positive effect of vermicompost on plant growth reached a maximum when vermicompost represented 30 to 50% of the soil volume. The best original material to be used for vermicompost production was cattle manure. The effect was stronger when no fertilizer was added, and lower when the standard Metro-Mix 360 substratum recommended by some authors was used as a growing medium in greenhouse or climatic chambers. Herbs (especially Cucurbitaceae and Asteraceae) and legumes exhibited the largest biomass increase in the presence of vermicompost. These results are discussed through an analysis of potential publication biases showing an over-representation of studies with a high effect size. We finally recommend authors of primary research to provide a minimum set of statistical parameters, output variables, and experimental condition parameters to make it easier to include their work in meta-analyses. Overall, our study provides synthetic information on the beneficial effects of vermicompost for plant growth, which could help bring waste management and agriculture together towards a society with a more circular economy.

Keywords

Commercial yield Earthworm-worked soil amendment Meta-analysis Plant growth Vermicompost 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Louis Gaetan for an initial analysis and Magalie Aferiat and Solenn Le Guillou who took part in the retrieving of data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Bibliography

  1. Aira M, Monroy F, Domínguez J (2005) Ageing effects on nitrogen dynamics and enzyme activities in casts of Aporrectodea caliginosa (Lumbricidae). Pedobiologia 49:467–473.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA (2011) The use of vermicomposts as soil amendments for production of field crops. In: Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Sherman R (eds) Vermiculture technology: earthworms, organic wastes, and environmental management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 129–151Google Scholar
  3. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P et al (2005) Effects of vermicomposts produced from cattle manure, food waste and paper waste on the growth and yield of peppers in the field. Pedobiologia 49:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Yardim EN et al (2007) Suppression of two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae), mealy bug (Pseudococcus sp) and aphid (Myzus persicae) populations and damage by vermicomposts. Crop Prot 26:29–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker GH, Carter PJ, Barrett VJ (1999) Influence of earthworms, Aporrectodea spp. (Lumbricidae), on pasture production in South-Eastern Australia. Aust J Agric Res 50:1247–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Caraco NF (2001) Human impact on erodable phosphorus and eutrophication : a global perspective. Bioscience 51:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertrand M, Barot S, Blouin M et al (2015a) Earthworm services for cropping systems. A review. Agron Sust Dev 35:553–567.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0269-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertrand M, Blouin M, Barot S et al (2015b) Biocontrol of eyespot fungal disease on two winter wheat cultivars by an anecic earthworm (L. terrestris, L.). Appl Soil Ecol 96:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blouin M, Zuily-Fodil Y, Pham-Thi AT et al (2005) Belowground organism activities affect plant aboveground phenotype, inducing plant tolerance to parasites. Ecol Lett 8:202–208.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00711.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blouin M, Barot S, Lavelle P (2006) Earthworms (Millsonia anomala, Megascolecidae) do not increase rice growth through enhanced nitrogen mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2063–2068.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blouin M, Hodson ME, Delgado EA et al (2013) A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. Eur J Soil Sci 64:161–182.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouché MB (1977) Stratégies lombriciennes. In: Lohm U, Persson T (eds) Soil organisms as components of ecosystems. Ecology Bulletin/NFR, Stockholm, pp 122–132Google Scholar
  14. Brown GG, Pashanasi B, Villenave C et al (1999) Effects of earthworms on plant production in the tropics. In: Lavelle P, Brussaard L, Hendrix P (eds) Earthworm management in tropical agroecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 87–148Google Scholar
  15. Bureau of International Recycling (BIR) (2008) Report on the environmental benefits of recycling. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  16. Chan KY, Baker GH, Conyers MK et al (2004) Complementary ability of three European earthworms (Lumbricidae) to bury lime and increase pasture production in acidic soils of South-Eastern Australia. Appl Soil Ecol 26:257–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chaoui H, Edwards CA, Brickner M et al (2002) Suppression of the plant diseases Pythium, Rhizoctonia, and Verticillium by vermicompost. Proc Bright Crop Prot Conf Pests Dis 2:711–715Google Scholar
  18. Chaudhary DR, Bhandari SC, Shukla LM (2004) Role of vermicompost in sustainable agriculture—a review. Agric Rev 25:29–39Google Scholar
  19. Cochran WG (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dignac M-F, Derrien D, Barré P et al (2017) Increasing soil carbon storage: mechanisms, effects of agricultural practices and proxies. A review. Agron Sust Dev 37:14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0421-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dominguez J (2004) State-of-the-art and new perspectives on vermicomposting research. In: Earthworm ecology. CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 401–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drew MC, Saker LR, Ashley TW (1973) Nutrient supply and the growth of the seminal root system in barley: I. The effect of nitrate concentration on the growth of axes and laterals. J Exp Bot 24:1189–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Edixhoven JD, Gupta J, Savenije HHG (2014) Recent revisions of phosphate rock reserves and resources: reassuring or misleading? An in-depth literature review of global estimates of phosphate rock reserves and resources. Earth Syst Dyn 5:491–507.  https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-491-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edwards CA, Dominguez J, Arancon NQ (2004) 18. The influence of vermicomposts on plant growth and pest incidence. In: Soil zoology for sustainable development in the 21st century. Cairo, Egypt, pp 397–420Google Scholar
  25. Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Vasko-Bennett M et al (2010a) Effect of aqueous extracts from vermicomposts on attacks by cucumber beetles (Acalymna vittatum) (Fabr.) on cucumbers and tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) (L.) on tomatoes. Pedobiologia 53:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Food Security Information Network (2017) Global report on food crises. World Food Program 2017Google Scholar
  27. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812.  https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939388 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoornweg D, Bhada-Tata P (2012) What a waste. A global review of solid waste management. World Bank Group, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Jouquet P, Plumere T, Thuy DT et al (2010) The rehabilitation of tropical soils using compost and vermicompost is affected by the presence of endogeic earthworms. Appl Soil Ecol 46:125–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kummu M, De Moel H, Porkka M et al (2012) Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci Tot Environ 438:477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laossi KR, Ginot A, Noguera DC et al (2010) Earthworm effects on plant growth do not necessarily decrease with soil fertility. Plant Soil 328:109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0086-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lavelle P, Melendez G, Pashanasi B, Schaefer R (1992) Nitrogen mineralization and reorganization in casts of the geophagous tropical earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus (Glossoscolecidae). Biol Fertil Soils 14:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lazcano C, Domínguez J (2011) The use of vermicompost in sustainable agriculture: impact on plant growth and soil fertility. In: Miransari M (ed) Soil nutrients. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  36. Lee KE (1985) Earthworms their ecology and relationships with soils and land use. Academic Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  37. Light RJ, Pillemer DB (1984) Summing up: the science of reviewing research. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. Milcu A, Puga-Freitas R, Ellison AM et al (2018) Genotypic variability enhances the reproducibility of an ecological study. Nat Ecol Evol 3194:279–287.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0434-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy BW (2014) Soil organic matter and soil function—review of the literature and underlying data. Department of the Environment, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  40. Puga-Freitas R, Blouin M (2015) A review of the effects of soil organisms on plant hormone signalling pathways. Environ Exp Bot 114:104–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Puga-Freitas R, Abbad S, Gigon A et al (2012a) Control of cultivable IAA-producing bacteria by the plant Arabidopsis thaliana and the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2012:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/307415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Puga-Freitas R, Barot S, Taconnat L et al (2012b) Signal molecules mediate the impact of the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa on growth, development and defence of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One 7:e49504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Puga-Freitas R, Belkacem L, Barot S et al (2016) Ability of the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa to reduce the severity of take-all disease of wheat. Eur J Plant Pathol 144:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richter SH, Garner JP, Wurbel H (2009) Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments? Nat Meth 6:257–261. dx.doi.org.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson D (1994) The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytol 127:635–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J (2000) MetaWin: statistical software for meta-analysis. Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosenthal R (1979) The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 86:638–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shiralipour A, McConnell DB, Wayne HS (1992) Uses and benefits of MSW compost: a review and an assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 3:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Szabo L, Soria A, Forsström J et al (2009) A world model of the pulp and paper industry: demand, energy consumption and emission scenarios to 2030. Environ Sci Pol 12:257–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B et al (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1057544 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. van Groenigen JW, Lubbers IM, Vos HMJ et al (2014) Earthworms increase plant production: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 4:6365.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06365 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW et al (1997) Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–750Google Scholar
  53. Wilson BJ (1988) A review of evidence on the control of shoot:root ratio, in relation to models. Ann Bot 61:433–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further reading

  1. Ali M, Griffiths AJ, Williams KP, Jones DL (2007) Evaluating the growth characteristics of lettuce in vermicompost and green waste compost. Eur J Soil Biol 43:316–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allardice RP, Kapp C, Botha A, Valentine A (2015) Optimizing vermicompost concentrations for the N cutrition and production of the legume Lupinus angustifolius. Compost Sci Util 23:217–236.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2015.1038399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreev N, Ronteltap M, Lens PNL et al (2016) Lacto-fermented mix of faeces and bio-waste supplemented by biochar improves the growth and yield of corn (Zea mays L.). Agric Ecosyst Environ 232:263–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P et al (2003a) Effects of vermicomposts on growth and marketable fruits of field-grown tomatoes, peppers and strawberries. Pedobiologia 47:731–735.  https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arancon NQ, Lee S, Edwards CA, Atiyeh R (2003b) Effects of humic acids derived from cattle, food and paper-waste vermicomposts on growth of greenhouse plants. Pedobiologia 47:741–744.  https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Lee S, Byrne R (2006) Effects of humic acids from vermicomposts on plant growth. Eur J Soil Biol 42:65–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2006.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Babenko A et al (2008) Influences of vermicomposts, produced by earthworms and microorganisms from cattle manure, food waste and paper waste, on the germination, growth and flowering of petunias in the greenhouse. Appl Soil Ecol 39:91–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arancon NQ, Pant A, Radovich T et al (2012) Seed germination and seedling growth of tomato and lettuce as affected by vermicompost water extracts (teas). HortScience 47:1722–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aremu AO, Kulkarni MG, Bairu MW et al (2012) Growth stimulation effects of smoke-water and vermicompost leachate on greenhouse grown-tissue-cultured “Williams” bananas. Plant Growth Regul 66:111–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-011-9634-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aremu AO, Masondo NA, Van Staden J (2014) Physiological and phytochemical responses of three nutrient-stressed bulbous plants subjected to vermicompost leachate treatment. Acta Physiol Plant 36:721–731.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-013-1450-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Argüello JA, Seisdedos L, Goldfarb MCD et al (2013) Anatomophysiological modifications induced by solid agricultural waste (vermicompost) in lettuce seedlings (Lactuca sativa L.). Phyton 82:289–295Google Scholar
  12. Arthur GD, Aremu AO, Kulkarni MG, Van Staden J (2012) Vermicompost leachate alleviates deficiency of phosphorus and potassium in tomato seedlings. HortScience 47:1304–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Atiyeh RM, Domínguez J, Subler S, Edwards CA (2000) Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Bouché) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia 44:709–724.  https://doi.org/10.1078/S0031-4056(04)70084-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Atiyeh RM, Subler S, Edwards CA et al (2000b) Effects of vermicomposts and composts on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia 44:579–590.  https://doi.org/10.1078/S0031-4056(04)70073-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Atiyeh RM, Edwards CA, Subler S, Metzger JD (2001) Pig manure vermicompost as a component of a horticultural bedding plant medium : effects on physicochemical properties and plant growth. Bioresour Technol 78:11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00172-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Atiyeh RM, Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Metzger JD (2002) The influence of earthworm-processed pig manure on the growth and productivity of marigolds. Bioresour Technol 81:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00122-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bharti N, Barnawal D, Shukla S et al (2016a) Integrated application of Exiguobacterium oxidotolerans, Glomus fasciculatum, and vermicompost improves growth, yield and quality of Mentha arvensis in salt-stressed soils. Ind Crop Prod 83:717–728.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bharti N, Barnawal D, Wasnik K et al (2016b) Co-inoculation of Dietzia natronolimnaea and Glomus intraradices with vermicompost positively influences Ocimum basilicum growth and resident microbial community structure in salt affected low fertility soils. Appl Soil Ecol 100:211–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Croria-Cayupan YS, Sanchez de Pinto MI, Azucuena Nazareno M (2009) Variations in bioactive substance contents and crop yields of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivated in soils with different fertilization treatments. J Agric Food Chem 57:10122–10129.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf903019d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Souza MEP, de Carvalho AMX, de Cássia Deliberali D et al (2013) Vermicomposting with rock powder increases plant growth. Appl Soil Ecol 69:56–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.01.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doan TT, Ngo PT, Rumpel C et al (2013) Interactions between compost, vermicompost and earthworms influence plant growth and yield: a one-year greenhouse experiment. Sci Hortic 160:148–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.05.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Vasko-Bennett M et al (2010b) Suppression of green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) (Sulz.), citrus mealybug (Planococcus citri) (Risso), and two spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) (Koch.) attacks on tomatoes and cucumbers by aqueous extracts from vermicomposts. Crop Prot 29:80–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ersahin YS, Haktanir K, Yanar Y (2009) Vermicompost suppresses Rhizoctonia solani Kühn in cucumber seedlings. J Plant Dis Prot 116:182–188.  https://doi.org/10.1007/2FBF03356308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fernández-Gómez MJ, Quirantes M, Vivas A, Nogales R (2012) Vermicomposts and/or arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation in relation to metal availability and biochemical quality of a soil contaminated with heavy metals. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:2707–2718.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-1061-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. García AC, Santos LA, de Souza LGA et al (2016) Vermicompost humic acids modulate the accumulation and metabolism of ROS in rice plants. J Plant Physiol 192:56–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0307-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo L, Wu G, Li C et al (2015) Vermicomposting with maize increases agricultural benefits by 304%. Agron Sust Dev 35:1149–1155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0307-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta M, Srivastava PK, Niranjan A, Tewari SK (2016) Use of a bioaugmented organic soil amendment in combination with gypsum for Withania somnifera growth on sodic soil. Pedosphere 26:299–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60044-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jayakumar M, Sivakami T, Ambika D, Karmegam N (2013) Effect of Turkey litter (Meleagris gallopavo L.) vermicompost on growth and yield characteristics of paddy, Oryza sativa (ADT-37). African J Biotechnol 10:15295–15304.  https://doi.org/10.4314/ajb.v10i68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kandari L, Kulkarni M, van Staden J (2011) Vermicompost leachate improves seedling emergence and vigour of aged seeds of commercially grown Eucalyptus species. South For J For Sci 73:117–122.  https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2011.610923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karlsons A, Osvalde A, Andersone-Ozola U, Ievinsh G (2016) Vermicompost from municipal sewage sludge affects growth and mineral nutrition of winter rye (Secale cereale) plants. J Plant Nutr 39:765–780.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2015.1087566 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar R, Kaur I, Bhatnagar AK (2013) Enhancing soil health and productivity of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. using Sargassum johnstonii Setchell & Gardner as a soil conditioner and fertilizer. J Appl Phycol 25:1225–1235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9933-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar R, Shamet GS, Alam NM, Jana C (2016) Influence of growing medium and seed size on germination and seedling growth of Pinus gerardiana Wall. Compost Sci Util 24:98–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2015.1048906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Larchevêque M, Desrochers A, Bussière B et al (2013) Revegetation of non-acid-generating, thickened tailings with boreal trees: a greenhouse study. J Environ Qual 42:351–360.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2012.0111 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lazcano C, Revilla P, Malvar RA, Domínguez J (2011) Yield and fruit quality of four sweet corn hybrids (Zea mays) under conventional and integrated fertilization with vermicompost. J Sci Food Agric 91:1244–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4306 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lazcano C, Gómez-Brandón M, Revilla P, Domínguez J (2013) Short-term effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil microbial community structure and function. Biol Fertil Soils 49:723–733.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0761-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levinsh G (2011) Vermicompost treatment differentially affects seed germination, seedling growth and physiological status of vegetable crop species. Plant Growth Regul 65:169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-011-9586-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mahmoud EK, Ibrahim MM (2012) Effect of vermicompost and its mixtures with water treatment residuals on soil chemical properties and barley growth. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 12:431–440.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162012005000005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mani D, Kumar C, Patel NK (2016) Integrated micro-biochemical approach for phytoremediation of cadmium and lead contaminated soils using Gladiolus grandiflorus L cut flower. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 124:435–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.11.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Masondo NA, Kulkarni MG, Rengasamy KRR et al (2016) Effect of vermicompost leachate in Ceratotheca triloba under nutrient deficiency. Acta Physiol Plant 38:236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2252-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Molina-Maldonado JR, Salvador-Figueroa M, Montes-Molina JA et al (2012) Vermicompost effect on growth and production of secondary metabolites in Ardisia escallonioides. Gayana Bot 69:82–88Google Scholar
  41. Morales-Corts MR, Gómez-Sánchez MÁ, Pérez-Sánchez R (2014) Evaluation of green/pruning wastes compost and vermicompost, slumgum compost and their mixes as growing media for horticultural production. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 172:155–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.03.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Niranjan RK, Pal A, Gupta HK et al (2010) Performance of different vermicomposts on yield and yield components of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in major soils of Bundelkhand region, India. J Ecophysiol Occup Heal 10:61–70.  https://doi.org/10.18311/jeoh/2010/18262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oo AN, Iwai CB, Saenjan P (2015) Soil properties and maize growth in saline and nonsaline soils using cassava-industrial waste compost and vermicompost with or without earthworms. L Degrad Dev 26:300–310.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pandey V, Patel A, Patra DD (2016) Integrated nutrient regimes ameliorate crop productivity, nutritive value, antioxidant activity and volatiles in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Ind Crop Prod 87:124–131.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pant AP, Radovich TJK, Hue NV et al (2009) Vermicompost extracts influence growth , mineral nutrients , phytonutrients and antioxidant activity in pak choi (Brassica rapa cv. Bonsai, Chinensis group) grown under vermicompost and chemical fertiliser. J Sci Food Agric 89:2383–2392.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3732 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pant AP, Radovich TJK, Hue NV, Miyasaka SC (2012) Pak Choi (Brassica rapa, Chinensis group) yield, phytonutrient content, and soil biological properties as affected by vermicompost-to-water ratio used for extraction. Hortic Sci 47:395–402Google Scholar
  47. Patel D, Saraf M (2014) Comparative study of different soil amendments and microbes for integrated nutrient management and growth promotion of Jatropha curcas. J Plant Nutr 37:2209–2226.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.920382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roy S, Arunachalam K, Kumar B, Arunachalam A (2010) Effect of organic amendments of soil on growth and productivity of three common crops viz. Zea mays, Phaseolus vulgaris and Abelmoschus esculentus. Appl Soil Ecol 45:78–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sainz MJ, Taboada-Castro MT, Vilariño A (1998) Growth, mineral nutrition and mycorrhizal colonization of red clover and cucumber plants grown in a soil amended with composted urban wastes. Plant Soil 205:85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004357330318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sangwan P, Garg VK, Kaushik CP (2010) Growth and yield response of marigold to potting media containing vermicompost produced from different wastes. Environmentalist 30:123–130.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-009-9251-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharif F, Danish MU, Ali AS et al (2016) Salinity tolerance of earthworms and effects of salinity and vermi amendments on growth of Sorghum bicolor. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:1169–1181.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2015.1132838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shen T, Wang C, Yang H et al (2016) Identification, solid-state fermentation and biocontrol effects of Streptomyces hygroscopicus B04 on strawberry root rot. Appl Soil Ecol 103:36–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.02.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh R, Soni SK, Awasthi A, Kalra A (2012) Evaluation of vermicompost doses for management of root-rot disease complex in Coleus forskohlii under organic field conditions. Austral Plant Pathol 41:397–403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-012-0134-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Singh S, Kulkarni MG, Van Staden J (2014) Biochemical changes associated with gibberellic acid-like activity of smoke-water, karrikinolide and vermicompost leachate during seedling development of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Seed Sci Res 24:63–70.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258513000408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Song X, Liu M, Wu D et al (2015) Interaction matters: synergy between vermicompost and PGPR agents improves soil quality, crop quality and crop yield in the field. Appl Soil Ecol 89:25–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Suthar S (2009) Impact of vermicompost and composted farmyard manure on growth and yield of garlic (Allium sativum L.) field crop. Int J Plant Prod 3:27–38Google Scholar
  57. Tejada M, Benitez C (2011) Organic amendment based on vermicompost and compost: differences on soil properties and maize yield. Waste Manag Res 29:1185–1196.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X10383622 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tejada M, Gonzalez JL (2009) Application of two vermicomposts on a rice crop: effects on soil biological properties and rice quality and yield. Agron J 101:336–344.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Verma SK, Pankaj U, Khan K et al (2016) Bioinoculants and vermicompost improve Ocimum basilicum yield and soil health in a sustainable production system. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water 44:686–693.  https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201400639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zaller JG (2007) Vermicompost in seedling potting media can affect germination, biomass allocation, yields and fruit quality of three tomato varieties. Eur J Soil Biol 43:332–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, CNRS, INRAUniversity of Bourgogne Franche-ComtéDijonFrance
  2. 2.Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences of Paris (UMR 7618 IEES-Paris, CNRS, INRA, UPMC, IRD, UPEC)Sorbonne UniversitéParisFrance

Personalised recommendations