Analyzing work organization on livestock farm by the Work Assessment Method

  • Sylvie CournutEmail author
  • Sophie Chauvat
  • Pastora Correa
  • Joel Carneiro Dos Santos Filho
  • Francisco Diéguez
  • Nathalie Hostiou
  • Duy Khanh Pham
  • Gérard Servière
  • Mohammed Taher Sraïri
  • Amélie Turlot
  • Benoît Dedieu
Review Article


All over the world, farmers have to face up to increasing uncertainties (market and climate). They have to adapt their activity to the new contexts and challenges of livestock farming (producing more and better, and satisfying the expectations of society, consumers, and of downstream operators), while at the same time responding to their own expectations in terms of income, quality of life, and working conditions. In order to understand these changes and consider the future, work organization must be taken into account. The Work Assessment Method, developed by French livestock researchers, provides a framework able to capture work organization, taking into account the specifics of the livestock activity. Based on a comparative analysis of nine case studies that used the Work Assessment Method from six contrasted countries, this review (1) gives generic ideas on work organization indicators and their variation; (2) identifies four generic patterns of work organization which are not linked to the local context but marked by the workforce composition; (3) demonstrates that the relevance of the Work Assessment Method to tackle work issues, and its capacities to be adapted to a variety of livestock farming contexts throughout the world, is linked to the properties of its framework, which was developed by combining different disciplinary approaches; (4) highlights the principal limits of the method: lack of coordination with other dimensions of work (labor productivity; sense of the job), and limited characterization of the work organization flexibility; and (5) proposes some possibilities of change to better respond to the diversity of work situations and questions about work, and take better into account the evolutions of livestock farming systems.


Work organization Liveability Assessment method Livestock farming systems Labor 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Anzalone G, Purseigle F (2014) Délégation d’activités et sous-traitance : au service de la transmission de l’exploitation ou d’un patrimoine? In: Gasselin P, Choisis J-P, Petit S, Purseigle F (eds) L’agriculture en famille : travailler, réinventer, transmettre. EDP Science, Les Ulis, pp 327–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubron C, Cochet H, Brunschwig G, Moulin C-H (2009) Labor and its productivity in Andean dairy farming systems: a comparative approach. Hum Ecol 37:407–419. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubron C, Noël L, Lasseur J (2016) Labor as a driver of changes in herd feeding patterns: evidence from a diachronic approach in Mediterranean France and lessons for agroecology. Ecol Econ 127:68–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bewley J, Palmer RW, Jackson-Smith DB (2001) Modeling milk production and labor efficiency in modernized Wisconsin dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 84:705–716. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bischoff O, Balard J, Pin A, Chauvat S, Dumonthier P, Serviere G, Dedieu B (2008) L’organisation du travail en élevage. Enseigner la méthode Bilan Travail. Supagro Florac/ INRA/ Institut de l’Elevage, Ed Educagri, Dijon 154 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Bostad E, Swensson C, Pinzke S (2011) Labour input in specialist beef Bull Production in Sweden. Agric Eng Int CIGR J 13(3):21Google Scholar
  7. Cellier J-M, Marquié J-C (1980) Systèmes d’activité et régulations dans l’exploitation agricole. Le Trav Hum 43:321–336Google Scholar
  8. Charroin T, Veysset PP, DEVIENNE S et al (2012) Productivité du travail et économie en élevages d’herbivores : définition des concepts, analyse et enjeux. INRA Prod Anim 25:193–210Google Scholar
  9. Chauvat S, Servière G, Cournut S (2016) Taking into account the meaning, the organization and the productivity of work to better advise farmers transformations in work organization in farms. ISWA Maringa 10 pGoogle Scholar
  10. Cochet H (2015) Controverses sur l’efficacité économique des agricultures familiales : indicateurs pour une comparaison rigoureuse avec d’autres agricultures. Rev Tiers Monde 1:9–25.
  11. Contzen S, Forney J (2017) Family farming and gendered division of labour on the move: a typology of farming-family configurations. Agric Hum Values 34:27–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coquil X, Béguin P, Dedieu B (2014) Transition to self-sufficient mixed crop–dairy farming systems. Renew Agric Food Syst 29:195–205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Correa P, Dieguez F, Dedieu B et al (2011) Comprendre l’organisation du travail pour preciser les strategies d’eleveurs laitiers uruguayens. In: Beguin P, Dedieu B, Sabourin E (eds) Le travail en agriculture : son organisation et ses valeurs face a l’innovation. L’Harmattan, Paris, pp 135–153Google Scholar
  14. Cournut S, Chauvat S (2012) L’organisation du travail en exploitation d’élevage : analyse de 630 Bilans Travail réalisés dans huit filières animales. INRA Prod Anim 25:101–112Google Scholar
  15. Cournut S, Jordan A, Dedieu B, Servière G (2009). Analyse de groupe des Bilans Travail. Guide méthodologique. Document Institut de l’Elevage,
  16. Cournut S, Servière G, Hostiou N et al (2010) L’organisation du travail en exploitations familiales d’élevage. Cah Agric 19:338–347. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darnhofer I, Bellon S, Dedieu B, Milestad R (2010) Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:545–555. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B (2012) Farming systems research: an approach to inquiry. In: Farming systems research into the 21st century: the new dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dedieu B, Ingrand S (2010) Incertitude et adaptation : cadres théoriques et application à l’analyse de la dynamique des systèmes d’élevage. INRA Prod Anim 23:81–90Google Scholar
  20. Dedieu B, Servière G (1999) La méthode Bilan Travail et son application. In: Rubino R, Morand-Fehr P (eds) Systems of sheep and goat production: Organization of husbandry and role of extension services, Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 38. CIHEAM, Zaragoza, pp 353–364 Google Scholar
  21. Dedieu B, Servière G (2012) Vingt ans de recherche-développement sur le travail en élevage : acquis et perspectives. INRA Prod Anim 25:85–100Google Scholar
  22. Dedieu B, Servière G (2016) Changes in work and its organization: the example of livestock farming. 1st International Symposium on Work in agriculture, 8–11 nov 2016 Maringá, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  23. Dedieu B, Laurent C, Mundler P (1999) Organisation du travail dans les systèmes d’activités complexes [Intérêt et limites de la méthode Bilan Travail]. Économie Rurale 253:28–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dedieu B, Chauvat S, Servière G, Tchakerian E (2000) Bilan travail pour l'étude du fonctionnement des exploitations d'élevage : Méthode d'analyse et documents d'enquête. Collection Lignes, Institut de l’Élevage, Paris 27 pGoogle Scholar
  25. Dieguez F (2009) Une expérience de formation au Bilan Travail à distance. 3emes rencontres nationales travail en élevage.
  26. Dieguez F, Morales H, Cournut S (2010) La méthode Bilan travail pour l’approche du fonctionnement des élevages extensifs uruguayens. Cah Agric 19:316–322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dockès AC, Chauvat S, Correa P, Turlot A, Nettle R (2018) Advice and advisory roles about work conditions. An analysis based on case studies in Australia, Belgium, France and Uruguay, to be published in this issueGoogle Scholar
  28. Dufour A, Dedieu B (2010) Rapports au temps de travail et modes d’organisation en élevage laitier. Cah Agric 19:377–382. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Errington A, Gasson R (1996) The increasing flexibility of the farm and horticultural workforce in England and Wales. J Rural Stud 12:127–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fagon J, Sabatte N (2010) Référentiel travail en élevages bovins lait. Synthèse de 190 Bilans Travail. Document Institut de l’Elevage, 36p.
  31. Ferris CP, Frost JC, Binnie RC, Patterson D (2006) Dairy cow performance and labour inputs associated with two silage feeding systems. Grass Forage Sci 61:304–314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fiorelli C, Mouret S, Porcher J (2012) Les rationalités du travail avec les animaux d’élevage : produire, vivre ensemble et se construire. INRA Prod Anim 25:181–192Google Scholar
  33. García-Martínez A, Olaizola A, Bernués A (2009) Trajectories of evolution and drivers of change in European mountain cattle farming systems. Animal 3:152–165. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gibon A, Sibbald AR, Flamant JC, Lhoste P, Revilla R, Rubino R, Sørensen JT (1999) Livestock farming systems research in Europe and its potential contribution for managing towards sustainability in livestock farming. Livest Prod Sci 61:121–137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gleeson D, O’Brien B, O’Donovan K (2008) The labour input associated with calf care on Irish dairy farms. Livest Sci 116:82–89. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hemme T, Otte J (2010) Status and prospects for smallholder milk production. A global perspective. FAO, Rome, p 186Google Scholar
  37. Hervieu B, Purseigle F (2013) Sociologie des mondes agricoles, Paris, Armand Colin, coll. U 664 Sociologie, 318 pGoogle Scholar
  38. Hostiou N, Dedieu B (2012) A method for assessing work productivity and flexibility in livestock farms. Animal 6:852–862. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hostiou N, Khanh PD, Duteurtre G, Binh VT, Dedieu B (2012) Relationships between work organisation and size of dairy farms: a case study based in Vietnam. Trop Anim Health Prod 44:1709–1716. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hostiou N, Cialdella N, Vazquez V, Müller AG, le Gal PY (2015) Work organization on smallholder dairy farms: a process unique to each farm. Trop Anim Health Prod 47:1271–1278. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Hostiou N, Fagon J, Chauvat S et al (2017) Impact of precision livestock farming on work and human- animal interactions on dairy farms. A review. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 21:1–8Google Scholar
  42. Jafry T, O’Neill DH (2000) The application of ergonomics in rural development: a review. Appl Ergon 31:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jago J, Eastwood C, Kerrisk K, Yule I (2013) Precision dairy farming in Australasia: adoption, risks and opportunities. Anim Prod Sci 53:907–916. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jean N, Lacroix A, Maamoun M, Mollard A (1988) Durée et intensité du travail des agriculteurs dans la crise économique. Actes et Communications 3:45–82Google Scholar
  45. Jousseins C, Fagon J, Belvèze J, Servière G (2011) Livestock farm networks, a system at the center of French farming development. 9th international rangeland congress, Rosario, Argentina. 117–113.
  46. Kling-Eveillard F, Chauvat S, Dedieu B, Servière G, Sabatté S (2010) The “work on livestock farms” network (WLFN): building a new domain of learning and intervention. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, 1158–1168Google Scholar
  47. Kling-Eveillard F, Cerf M, Chauvat S, Sabatté N (2012) Le travail, sujet intime et multifacette: premières recommandations pour l'aborder dans le conseil en élevage. Prod Anim 25(2):211Google Scholar
  48. Kunda G, Barley SR, Evans J (2002) Why do contractors contract? The experience of highly skilled technical professionals in a contingent labor market. Ind Labor Relat Rev 55:234–261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lacroix A, Mollard A (1991) Mesurer le travail agricole. De l’enregistrement à la reconstitution analytique. Cah d’Econ Sociol Rural 20:27–46Google Scholar
  50. Lallement M, Spurk J (eds) (2003) Stratégies de la comparaison internationale. CNRS Editions, ParisGoogle Scholar
  51. Lémery B (2003) Les agriculteurs dans la fabrique d’une nouvelle agriculture. Sociol du Trav 45:9–25. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leplat J (1994) Collective activity in work: some ways of research. Le Trav Hum 57:209–226Google Scholar
  53. Madelrieux S, Dedieu B (2008) Qualification and assessment of work organisation in livestock farms. Animal 2:435–446. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Malanski PD, Hostiou N, Ingrand S (2016) Evolution pathways of employees’ work on dairy farms according to task content, specialization, and autonomy. Cah Agric 26:1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Martel G, Dourmad J-Y, Dedieu B (2008) Do labour productivity and preferences about work load distribution affect reproduction management and performance in pig farms. Livest Sci 116:96–107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meul M, Passel S, Fremaut D, Haesaert G (2012) Higher sustainability performance of intensive grazing versus zero-grazing dairy systems. Agron Sustain Dev 32:629–638. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Milestad R, Dedieu B, Darnhofer I, Bellon S (2012) Farms and farmers facing change: the adaptive approach. In: Farming systems research into the 21st century: the new dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 365–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morgan-Davies C, Lambe N, Wishart H, Waterhouse T, Kenyon F, McBean D, McCracken D (2018) Impacts of using a precision livestock system targeted approach in mountain sheep flocks. Livest Sci 208:67–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mundler P, Jean-Gagnon J (2017) La productivité du travail dans les exploitations agricoles en circuits courts. 11emes journées de recherches en sciences sociales (JRSS) Lyon Déc 2017. 26 pGoogle Scholar
  60. Mundler P, Laurent C (2003) Flexibilité du travail en agriculture : méthodes d’observation et évolutions en cours. Ruralia, 12/13.
  61. Nicholson C, Thornton P, Muinga R (2004) Household-level impacts of dairy cow ownership in coastal Kenya. J Agric Econ 55:175–195. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nozières MO, Moulin CH, Dedieu B (2011) The herd, a source of flexibility for livestock farming systems faced with uncertainties? Animal 5:1442–1457. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Nye C (2018). The ‘blind spot’ of agricultural research: Labour flexibility, composition and worker availability in the South West of England. Cah. Agric. 27: 35002.
  64. O’Donovan K, O’Brien B, Ruane DJ et al (2008) Labour Input on Irish Dairy Farms and the Effect of Scale and Seasonality. J Farm Manag 13:327–342Google Scholar
  65. O'Brien B, O'Donovan K, Gleeson D, Ruane DJ, Kinsella J (2006) Improving labour productivity to facilitate viability on smaller Irish Dairy Farms. J Intern Farm Manag 3(4):19–37Google Scholar
  66. Porcher J (2017) The ethics of animal labor: a collaborative utopia, 2017th edn. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Purseigle F, Chouquer G, Collectif (2013) Etudes rurales, N° 191 : Les agricultures de firme, vol 2. Délocalisation et évictions. Editions de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, ParisGoogle Scholar
  68. Rault G (2005) Approche sociologique du travail en élevage et questions sur le conseil agricole. Actes du Séminaire de l’Association Française de Production Fourragère « Élevage, prairies, travail », Paris, 20 octobre 2005Google Scholar
  69. Riegel M, Schick M (2007) Working time requirement in agriculture–recording method, model calculation and work budget. Society for Engineering in agriculture. In 2007 National Conference. Agriculture and engineering–challenge today, technology tomorrow, Vol. 23, p. 26Google Scholar
  70. Ryschawy J, Joannon A, Choisis JP, Gibon A, le Gal PY (2014) Participative assessment of innovative technical scenarios for enhancing sustainability of French mixed crop-livestock farms. Agric Syst 129:1–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Santos Filho JCD, Hostiou N, Damasceno JC, Dedieu B (2012) Room for manoeuvre in time of the workforce in dairy production systems. Rev Bras Zootec 41(12):2450–2457. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sarzeaud P, Chauvat S (2011) Travibov Démarche de conseil sur le travail en élevage Bovin viande.
  73. Shreck A, Getz C, Feenstra G (2006) Social sustainability, farm labor, and organic agriculture: findings from an exploratory analysis. Agric Hum Values 23:439–449. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Solano C, León H, Pérez E, Tole L, Fawcett RH, Herrero M (2006) Using farmer decision-making profiles and managerial capacity as predictors of farm management and performance in Costa Rican dairy farms. Agric Syst 88:395–428. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sraïri MT, Ghabiyel Y (2017) Coping with the work constraints in crop-livestock farming systems. Ann Agric Sci 62:23–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sraïri MT, Bahri S, Kuper M (2013) Le travail et sa contribution aux stratégies d’adaptation de petites exploitations agricoles familiales mixtes d’élevage bovin/polyculture au Maroc. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 17:463–474Google Scholar
  77. Turlot A (2014) Mise en place de repères pour des exploitations laitières durables en Wallonie. DuraLait Plus, Rapport technique final. Centre de recherches agronomiques, 143pGoogle Scholar
  78. Turlot A, Froidmont E, Bauraind C, Burny P, Bouquiaux JM, Ledur A, Wavreille J (2013) La dimension" travail", un élément clé pour le maintien de nos systèmes laitiers. 18ème Carrefour des Productions Animales" Nouvelles approches pour une optimisation de nos élevages laitiers", 32–40Google Scholar
  79. Veysset P, Lherm M, Roulenc M, et al (2015) Analyse diachronique de l’efficience technique des systèmes de production bovin viande. Baisse de la productivité des facteurs variables sur 23 ans. Écon Rural:149–169Google Scholar
  80. Veysset P, Lherm M, Boussemart J-P, Natier P (2017) Formation et répartition des gains de productivité en élevage bovin viande. Qui sont les gagnants et les perdants entre 1980 et 2015? Écon Rural:71–91Google Scholar
  81. Weber M (2003) Economie et société, tome 1 : Les Catégories de la sociologie, Nouvelle. Pocket, ParisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvie Cournut
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sophie Chauvat
    • 2
  • Pastora Correa
    • 3
  • Joel Carneiro Dos Santos Filho
    • 4
  • Francisco Diéguez
    • 5
  • Nathalie Hostiou
    • 1
  • Duy Khanh Pham
    • 6
  • Gérard Servière
    • 7
  • Mohammed Taher Sraïri
    • 8
  • Amélie Turlot
    • 9
  • Benoît Dedieu
    • 10
  1. 1.Université Clermont Auvergne, AgroParisTech, INRA, Irstea, VetAgro Sup, UMR TerritoiresAubièreFrance
  2. 2.Institut de l’ElevageMontpellier Cedex 2France
  3. 3.Facultad de Agronomía-EEFAS-UdelaRSaltoUruguay
  4. 4.EmaterCuritibaBrazil
  5. 5.Facultad de Veterinaria IPAV – UdelaRLibertadUruguay
  6. 6.Rudec-IpsardHanoïVietnam
  7. 7.Institut de l’ElevageAubièreFrance
  8. 8.Hassan II Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine InstituteRabatMorocco
  9. 9.Centre Wallon de Recherches AgronomiquesGemblouxBelgium
  10. 10.Inra Département SADSaint Genes ChampanelleFrance

Personalised recommendations