Agronomy for Sustainable Development

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 339–346 | Cite as

Long-term feasibility of reduced tillage in organic farming

  • Laura Armengot
  • Alfred Berner
  • José M. Blanco-Moreno
  • Paul Mäder
  • F. Xavier Sans
Research Article

Abstract

Agricultural practices such as soil tillage emit greenhouse gases such as CO2 and N2O. As a consequence, reducing the tillage could both reduce greenhouse emissions and improve soil quality. In Europe about 25 % of arable land is managed under reduced tillage and no tillage, mainly using herbicides to get rid of weeds. Therefore, a major drawback for organic farmers is that the lack of herbicide and soil inversion could increase weed infestation. Here, we compared reduced tillage and conventional tillage in a 2002–2011 field experiment under organic management in Switzerland. We analyzed crop production and weed flora, with a focus on perennials and grasses. Data on yield, cover, richness, and composition of the weed flora were collected for wheat in 2003 and 2009, sunflower in 2004 and 2010, and spelt in 2005 and 2011, through two complete rotations. We found that weed abundance was 2.3 times higher under reduced tillage, though we did not observe a systematic increase with time. The average abundance of perennials almost doubled over time under reduced tillage, thus changing the community composition between tillage systems. Despite the weed increase, yields were similar for reduced tillage and conventional tillage. As a consequence, this study represents the first long-term trial under organic management showing that reduced tillage improves the environmental performance of this cropping system.

Keywords

Perennial species Weed species richness and composition Chisel and moldboard plow Crop yields 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank E. Lichtfouse and two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript. L.A wishes to thank her colleagues at the FiBL for their kind hospitality during the research period in Switzerland. This research was conducted within the framework of the TILMAN-ORG project funded by the CORE Organic II Funding Bodies and partners of the FP7 ERANet (www.coreorganic2.org) and with funding from the Swiss Federal Office for Agriculture, the Catalan Government (2012AGEC00027), the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of the Spanish Government, and the following foundations: Stiftung zur Pflege von Mensch, Mitwelt und Erde (Switzerland) and Software AG-Stiftung (Germany).

References

  1. Armengot L, José-María L, Chamorro L, Sans FX (2013) Weed harrowing in organically grown cereals crops avoids yield losses without reducing weed diversity. Agron Sustain Dev 33:405–411. doi: 10.1007/s13593-012-0107-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M, Dai B (2008) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Version 0.999375-27. http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed 19 Feb 2009
  3. Baayen RH (2008) languageR: data sets and functions with “analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 0.953. Accessed 19 Feb 2009Google Scholar
  4. Basch G, González-Sánchez EJ, Gómez McPherson H, Kassam A (2011) Opportunities for conservation agriculture in the EU Common Agricultural Policy 2014-2020. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress of Conservation Agriculture incorporation 3rd Farming System Design Conference, Brisbane, Australia. http://aciar.gov.au/files/node/13994/opportunitiesforca_author_pdf_14070.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2013
  5. Berner A, Hildermann A, Flieβbach PL, Niggli U, Mäder P (2008) Crop yield and soil fertility response to reduced tillage under organic management. Soil Tillage Res 101:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2008.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardina J, Herms CP, Doohan DJ (2002) Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks. Weed Sci 50:448–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clergue B, Amiaud B, Pervanchon F, Lasserre-Joulin F, Plantureux S (2005) Biodiversity: function and assessment in agricultural areas. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 25:1–15. doi: 10.1051/agro:2004049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fried G, Norton LR, Reboud X (2008) Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agric Ecosyst Environ 128:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gruber S, Claupein W (2009) Effect of tillage intensity on weed infestation in organic farming. Soil Tillage Res 105:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2009.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heap I (2013) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. WeedScience.org http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed 12 Dec 2013
  11. Hernandez Plaza E, Kozak M, Navarrete L, González-Andújar JL (2011) Tillage system did not affect weed diversity in a 23-year experiment in Mediterranean dryland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:102–105. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hobbs R, Sayre K, Gupta R (2008) The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:543–555. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2169 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holland JM (2004) The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: reviewing the evidence. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103:1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2003.12.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kassam A, Friedrich T, Derpsch R (2010) Conservation agriculture in the 21st century: a paradigm of sustainable agriculture. European congress on conservation agriculture, Madrid. http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/CA-Publications/ECAF_congress_Madrid_2010.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2013
  15. Légère A, Vanasse A, Craig Stevenson F (2013) Low-input management and mature conservation tillage: agronomic potential in a cool, humid climate. Agron J 105:745–754. doi: 10.2134/agronj2012.0483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Melander B, Munier-Jolain N, Charles R, Wirth J, Schwarz J, van der Weide R, Bonin L, Jensen PK, Kudsk P (2013) European perspectives on the adoption of nonchemical weed management in reduced-tillage systems for arable crops. Weed Technol 27:231–240. doi: 10.1614/WT-12-00066.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Melander B, Holst N, Rasmussen IA, Hansen PK (2012) Direct control of perennial weeds between crops - Implications for organic farming. Crop Prot 40:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Sólymos P, Stevens MH, Wagner H (2013) Vegan – Community Ecology Package Project. R Packaged version 2.06. At: http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed 10 July 2013
  19. Peigné J, Ball BC, Roger-Estrade J, David C (2007) Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? Soil Use Manag 23:129–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00082.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 19 Feb 2009
  21. Romero A, Chamorro L, Sans FX (2008) Weed diversity in crop edges and inner fields of organic and conventional dryland winter cereal crops in NE Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sans FX, Berner A, Armengot L, Mäder P (2011) Tillage effects on weed communities in an organic winter wheat-sunflower-spelt cropping sequence. Weed Res 51:413–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2011.00859.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Santín-Montanyá MI, Martín-Lammerding D, Walter I, Zambrana E, Tenorio JL (2013) Effects of tillage, crop systems and fertilization on weed abundance and diversity in 4-year dry land winter wheat. Eur J Agron 48:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stavi I, Lal R (2013) Agriculture and greenhouse gases, a common tragedy. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:275–289. doi: 10.1007/s13593-012-0110-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stavi I, Lal R, Owens LB (2011) On-farm effects of no-till versus occasional tillage on soil quality and crop yields in eastern Ohio. Agron Sustain Dev 31:475–482. doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0006-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vakali C, Zaller JG, Köpke U (2011) Reduced tillage effects on soil properties and growth of cereals and associated weeds under organic farming. Soil Tillage Res 111:113–141. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2010.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van der Weide RY, Huiting HF, Bleeker PO, Riemens MM (2011) Pro’s and con’s of reduced tillage in maize with respect to weeds. In: Cloutier DC (ed) Proceedings of the 9th EWRS Workshop of Physical and Cultural Weed Control, Samsun, Turkey, p 13–14. http://www.ewrs.org/pwc/proceedings.asp. Accessed 11 Dec 2013
  28. Vermulen SJ, Campbell BM, Ingram JSI (2012) Climate change and food systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:195–222. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-020411-130608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zikeli S, Gruber S, Teufel C, Hartung K, Wilhelm C (2013) Effects of reduced tillage on crop yield, plant available nutrients and soil organic matter in a 12-year long-term trial under organic management. Sustainability 5:3876–3894. doi: 10.3390/su5093876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Armengot
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alfred Berner
    • 2
  • José M. Blanco-Moreno
    • 1
  • Paul Mäder
    • 2
  • F. Xavier Sans
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Biology and IrBioUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Research Institute of Organic Farming (FiBL)FrickSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations