Agronomy for Sustainable Development

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 817–827 | Cite as

Positive effects of composted biochar on plant growth and soil fertility

  • Hardy Schulz
  • Gerald Dunst
  • Bruno Glaser
Research Article


Mankind is actually facing serious issues due to the overexploitation of fossil fuels, biomass, soils, nitrogen, and phosphorus. It is claimed that biochar addition to soil improves C sequestration to prevent CO2 from atmospheric cycling. Biochar addition should also increase soil fertility in a similar way as anthropogenic dark earths of Central Amazonia. Previous studies have shown that biochar stimulates plant growth and increase fertilizer efficiency, especially when biochar is combined with organic fertilizers such as compost. However, little is known about optimum addition amounts and mixture ratios of biochar and compost. Indeed most experiments to mimic Terra preta de Indio focused on biochar alone or biochar in combination with mineral fertilizers. Therefore, we studied optimum biochar and compost amounts and mixture ratios with respect to plant response and soil fertility. We tested the effect of total amount from 0 to 200 Mg/ha, and biochar proportion from 0 % to 50 % biochar, of 18 different compost mixtures on growth of oat (Avena sativa L.) and soil properties in a fully randomized greenhouse study with sandy and loamy soil substrates. We sampled soil substrates before and after plant growth and analyzed plant growth and yield, total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), mineralized nitrogen (Nmin), soil reaction (pH), and electrical conductivity (EC) applying standard procedures. Results show that biomass production was increased with rising biochar and compost amounts. Oat plant height and seed weight was improved only with rising biochar amounts, but not with compost amounts. This could be explained by increase of total organic C and total N but not by plant-available ammonium and nitrate. The positive influence of composted biochar on plant growth and soil properties suggests that composting is a good way to overcome biochar’s inherent nutrient deficiency, making it a suitable technique helping to refine farm-scale nutrient cycles.


Climate change mitigation Soil amendment Soil fertility Terra preta C sequestration 



The authors acknowledge the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) for financial support within the coordinated project “Climate protection: CO2 sequestration by use of biomass in a PYREG reactor with steam engine” (01LY0809F). We are indebted to Daniel Fischer, Georg Lemmer, Ananda Erben, and Bianca and Katharina Karnstedt for the help in the greenhouse and with soil analyses.


  1. Atkinson C, Fitzgerald J, Hipps N (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337(1):1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrow CJ (2011) Biochar: potential for countering land degradation and for improving agriculture. Appl Geogr 34:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berglund LM, DeLuca TH, Zackrisson O (2004) Activated carbon amendments to soil alters nitrification rates in Scots pine forests. Soil Biol Biochem 36(12):2067–2073. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodowski S, John B, Flessa H, Amelung W (2006) Aggregate-occluded black carbon in soil. Eur J Soil Sci 57(4):539–546. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00807.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeLuca TH, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson O (2002) Nitrogen mineralization and phenol accumulation along a fire chronosequence in northern Sweden. Oecologia 133(2):206–214. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1025-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer D, Glaser B (2012) Synergisms between compost and biochar for sustainable soil amelioration. In: Sunil K, Bharti A (eds) Management of organic waste. InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp 167–198. doi: 10.5772/31200 Google Scholar
  7. Gerzabek MH, Pichlmayer F, Kirchmann H, Haberhauer G (1997) The response of soil organic matter to manure amendments in a long-term experiment at Ultuna, Sweden. Eur J Soil Sci 48(2):273–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00547.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230. doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaser B, Balashov E, Haumaier L, Guggenberger G, Zech W (2000) Black carbon in density fractions of anthropogenic soils of the Brazilian Amazon region. Org Geochem 31:669–678. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6380(00)00044-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hossain MK, Strezo V, Chan KY, Ziolkowski A, Nelson PF (2011) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production and nutrient properties of wastewater sludge biochar. J Environ Manag 92(1):223–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144(1):175–187. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones DL, Rousk J, Edwards-Jones G, DeLuca TH, Murphy DV (2011) Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial. Soil Biol Biochem. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.10.012 Google Scholar
  13. Kimetu JM, Lehmann J (2010) Stability and stabilisation of biochar and green manure in soil with different organic carbon contents. Soil Research 48(7):577–585. doi: 10.1071/SR10036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolb S (2007) Understanding the mechanisms by which a manure-based charcoal product affects microbial biomass and activity. Dissertation, University of WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuzyakov Y, Subbotina I, Chen H, Bogomolova I, Xu X (2009) Black carbon decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil Biol Biochem 41(2):210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lal R (2009) Soil degradation as a reason for inadequate human nutrition. Food Security 1(1):45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan Publications Ltd: London, pp. 251270 Google Scholar
  18. Lehmann J, Pereira da Silva J, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249(2):343–357. doi: 10.1023/A:1022833116184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang B, Lehmann J, Sohi SP, Thies JE, O’Neill B, Trujillo L et al (2010) Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soil. Org Geochem 41(2):206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luo Y, Durenkamp M, deNobili M, Lin Q, Brookes PC (2011) Short term soil priming effects and the mineralisation of biochar following its incorporation to soils of different pH. Soil Biol Biochem 43(11):2304–2314. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lynch D, VoroneyRP WPR (2005) Soil physical properties and organic matter fractions under forages receiving composts, manure or fertilizer. Compost Sci Utilization 13(4):252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mankasingh U, Choi P-C, Ragnarsdottir V (2011) Biochar application in a tropical, agricultural region: A plot scale study in Tamil Nadu, India. Appl Geochem 26(S):218–221. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.03.108
  23. Marris E (2006) Putting the carbon back: Black is the new green. Nature 442(7103):624–626. doi: 10.1038/442624a PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mehlich A (1984) Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15(12):1409–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nguyen BT, Lehmann J (2009) Black carbon decomposition under varying water regimes. Org Geochem 40:846–853. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2009.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prost K, Borchard N, Siemens J, Kautz T, Séquaris JM, Möller A, Amelung W (2013) Biochar affected by composting with farmyard manure. J Environ Qual 4:164–172. doi: 10.2134/jeq2012.0064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schulz H, Glaser B (2012) Effects of biochar compared to organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil quality and plant growth in a greenhouse experiment. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175:410–422. doi: 10.1002/jpln.201100143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez–Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 105:47–82. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spaccini R, Piccolo A, Conte P, Haberhauer G, Gerzabek MH (2002) Increased soil organic carbon sequestration through hydrophobic protection by humic substances. Soil Biol Biochem 34(12):1839–1851. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00197-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Nehls T, de Macêdo JLV, Blum WEH, Zech W (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291(1):275–290. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9193-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thun R, Herrmann R, Knickmann E, Hoffmann G (1991) Handbuch der Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchs- und Untersuchungsmethodik (1): A 1.2.2 Die Untersuchung von Böden. Neumann, Radebeul/BerlinGoogle Scholar
  32. Tryon EH (1948) Effect of charcoal on certain physical, chemical, and biological properties of forest soils. Ecol Monogr 18:81–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wardle DA, Nilsson MC, Zackrisson O (2008) Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus. Science 320(5876):629. doi: 10.1126/science.1154960 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waters D, van Zwieten L, Singh BP, Downie A, Cowie AL, Lehmann J (2011) Biochar in soil for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Soil Health Clim Change 29:345–368. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20256-8_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yao Y, Gao B, Inyang M, Zimmerman AR, Cao X, Pullammanappallil P, Yang L (2011) Biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings: characterization and phosphate removal potential. Bioresour Technol 102(10):6273–6278. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil BiogeochemistryMartin Luther University Halle-WittenbergHalleGermany
  2. 2.Sonnenerde GmbHRiedlingsdorfAustria

Personalised recommendations