Skip to main content

Biodegradable mulch instead of polyethylene for weed control of processing tomato production

Abstract

Black polyethylene (PE) film is used for mulching in processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum P. Mill.) in Spain achieving a generally high weed control but causing a serious waste problem. Few herbicides are available for tomato, so that a biodegradable mulching is the desired solution which should provide high yield, high weed control and be economically available. For 3 years, the same field trial was carried out in four areas of Spain using the following mulch materials in processing tomatoes: (1) untreated control, (2) manual weeding, (3) PE, black, 15 μm thick, (4) and (5) two types of biodegradable plastic mulch, black, 15 μm, (6) oxo-degradable plastic mulch, black, 15 μm, (7) paper mulch, black, 85 g m−2, (8) kraft paper mulch, brown, 140 g m−2 and (9) barley straw, 1 kg m−2.. Weed control, yield and economic aspects were analysed. Most frequent weed species were Convolvulus arvensis, Chenopodium album and Amaranthus spp. Here, we showed that despite differences in weed species, soil type and years, weed competition caused a similar yield decrease in all locations. A common regression coefficient could be estimated indicating that weed competition was responsible for a yield decrease of 3.3 to 4.4 t ha−1 for each 10% of efficacy loss. Weed control was high for biodegradable plastics, paper mulches and PE ranging between 80% and 100% for all of them; also, yield was similar for all plastic and paper mulching treatments ranging between 72% and 108% of the yield achieved by PE. Here, we demonstrate that technically viable biodegradable alternatives exist for all four locations. From the economic point of view, PE gave highest benefits, mainly due to its low market price and to high yields despite removal costs, showing that its substitution will depend on prohibition. For locations with low-density weed infestations, manual weeding can be an alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Alcántara C, Jiménez A, Balsera A (2007) Manejo ecológico de hierbas. Influencia sobre la producción de tomate y pimiento. Phytoma España 194:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson D, Garisto M, Bourrut J, Schonbeck M, Jaye R, Wurzberger A, De Gregorio R (1995) Evaluation of a paper mulch made from recycled materials as an alternative to plastic film mulch for vegetables. J Sustain Agric 7:39–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson RL (2007) Managing weeds with a dualistic approach of prevention and control. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 27:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anzalone A, Cirujeda A, Pardo G, Zaragoza C (2010) Effect of biodegradable mulch materials on weed control in processing tomato. Weed Technol 24:369–377. doi:10.1614/WT-09-020.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowley SR (1999) A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Statistics in Plant Biology. Any Old Subject Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 250 p

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark MS, Ferris H, Klansky K, Lanini WT, van Bruggen AHC, Zalom FG (1998) Agronomic, economic, and environmental comparison of pest management in conventional and alternative tomato and corn systems in northern California. Agr Ecosyst Environ 68:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Coolong T (2010) Performance of paper mulches using a mechanical plastic layer and water wheel transplanter for the production of summer squash. Horttech 20:319–324

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dagnelie P (1975) Théorie et Méthodes Statistiques. Aplications agronomiques. Les Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux A.S.B.L., vol. 2, 463 pp

  9. Gutiérrez M, Bruna P, Vallés M (2005) El cultivo de tomate de industria en Aragón. Informaciones Técnicas del Departamento de Agricultura y Alimentación del Gobierno de Aragón 163, 1–4. https://webmail.aragon.es/webmail/attach/PUBLICACIONES_163_INFORMACIONES_TECNICAS_2005.pdf

  10. Harrington KC, Bedford TA (2004) Control of weeds by paper mulch in vegetables and trees. New Zealand Plant Protection Series. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the New Zealand Plant Protection Society, Hamilton, New Zealand

  11. Maillet J, Abdel Fatah H (1983) Etudes preliminaires sur la concurrence entre Solanum nigrum ssp. eunigrum L. et Lycopersicon esculentum Mill en culture repiquee. Weed Res 23:217–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MARM Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino (2011a) http://www.mapa.es/estadistica/pags/anuario/2009/AE_2009_13_01_03_01.pdf. Accessed January 21st 2011

  13. MARM Ministerio de Medio Ambiente (2011b) Borrador del I Plan Nacional de Residuos de Plásticos de Uso Agrario http://www.mma.es/secciones/calidad_contaminacion/residuos/planificacion_residuos/pdf/borradorpnir_anexo11.pdf. Accessed January 21st 2011

  14. Martín-Closas L, Soler J, Pelacho AM (2003) Effect of different biodegradable mulch materials on an organic tomato production system. KTBL Darmstadt Schrift 414:78–85

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oerke EC (2006) Crop losses to pests. Centenary review. J Agr Sci 144:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patrap M, Kumar BV, Shaik M (1997) Effect of herbicides and time of weeding on weed control and fruit yield of tomato. Crop Res 14:113–117

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salemi F, Lamagna G, Coco V, Barone LG (2008) Proceedings of the International Symposium on High Technology for Greenhouse System Management. Acta Hort 801:203–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. SAS Institute (1991) Sas Systems for Linear Models. SAS Series in Statistical Applications. SAS Institute, Cary NC, USA

  19. Radics L, Szekelyne EB, Pusztai P, Horvath K (2006) Role of mulching in weed control of organic tomato. 23rd German Conference on Weed Biology and Weed Control, 643–650

  20. Scott G (2005) Biodegradable plastics in agriculture. In: Smith Woodhead R (ed) Biodegradable Polymers for Industrial Applications. R. Smith Woodhead, London, UK, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shogren RI, Hochmuth RC (2004) Field evaluation of watermelon grown on paper-polymerized vegetable oil mulches. HortSci 39:1588–1591

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tabaglio V, Gavazzi C, Schulz M, Marocco A (2008) Alternative weed control using the allelopathic effect of natural benzoxazinoids from rye Munch. Agron Sustain Dev 28:397–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tei F (2001) Il disherbo delle colture orticole. In: Catizone P, Zanin G (eds) Malerbologia. Patron Edit, Bologna, Italy, pp 777–814

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tiwari KN, Mal PK, Singh RM, Chattopadhyay A (1998) Response of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.) to drip irrigation under mulch and non-mulch conditions. Agr Water Manage 38:91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tiwari KN, Singh A, Mal PK (2003) Effect of drip irrigation on yield of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata). Agr Water Manage 58:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Toth N, Fabek S, Custic MH, Zutic I, Borosic J (2008) Organic soil mulching impacts on lettuce agronomic traits. Cereal Res Commun 36:395–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vandenberg J, Tiessen H (1972) Influence of wax-coated and polyethylene-coated paper mulch on growth and flowering of tomato. HortSci 7:464–465

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vázquez N, Huete J, Pardo A, Suso ML, Tobar V (2011) Use of soil moisture sensors for automatic high-frequency drip irrigation in processing tomato. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 922, 229-235

  29. Weaver SE, Tan CS (1983) Critical period of weed interference in transplanted tomato: growth analysis. Weed Sci 31:476–481

    Google Scholar 

  30. William RD, Warren GF (1975) Competition between purple nutsedge and vegetables. Weed Sci 23:317–323

    Google Scholar 

  31. Woldetsadik K, Gertsson U, Ascard J (2003) Response of shallots to mulching and nitrogen fertilization. HortSci 38:217–221

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the Project RTA2005-00189-C05 of the INIA in Spain. The authors specially thank the valuable technical assistance of F. Arrieta, J.M. Royo, J. A. Alins, M. León, C. Asensio, P. Vivo, J. García, I. Tenas, J. Villena and I. Mancebo for their help during harvest and counting weeds. We also thank the companies Saica, Gemplast, Barbier, MimCord S.A.and Novamont S.p.A. for their collaboration providing their materials.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia Cirujeda.

About this article

Cite this article

Cirujeda, A., Aibar, J., Anzalone, Á. et al. Biodegradable mulch instead of polyethylene for weed control of processing tomato production. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 889–897 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0084-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Polyethylene
  • Biodegradable mulch
  • Paper
  • Barley straw