Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evidence for weed quantity as the major information gathered by organic farmers for weed management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present major agricultural issues are to feed the world and reduce negative environmental impacts. To this end, organic farming appears as a promising solution. However organic farming has several drawbacks such as difficult weed management. Indeed weeds can reduce crop yields. Therefore there is a need for improved decision support tools for weed management in organic farming. An existing weed competition model actually predicts the effect of early multispecies weed density, both on organic wheat yield loss and on the weed density at flowering stage. However main existing models do not take into account the activity of end-users, e.g. farmers, during model design. Therefore we analysed weed information acquisition by farmers using the dynamic environment theory to design a decision support system that takes into account end-users. We interviewed eight French organic farmers. We analysed interview data using a coding scheme inspired by dynamic environment theory. Our results show that weed quantity was the information most frequently collected by organic farmers both for short- and long-term crop management. This information was compatible with early weed density, the main input of the previously developed models. Findings also show that procedures for gathering information and processing depended on farmer profiles. We also show that a conceptual model based on dynamic situations and a coding structure were appropriate for taking into account the information elaborated by end-users. Finally we propose further design of a decision support system for tactical organic weed management using a participatory approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. a
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubry C, Papy F, Capillon A (1998) Modelling decision-making processes for annual crop management. Agric Syst 56:45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bàrberi P (2002) Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? Weed Res 42:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond W, Grundy AC (2001) Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems. Weed Res 41:383–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casagrande M, Makowski D, Jeuffroy M-H, Valantin-Morison M, David C (2010) The benefits of using quantile regression for analysing the effect of weeds on organic winter wheat. Weed Res 50:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatelin M-H, Aubry C, Poussin J et al (2005) DéciBlé®, a software package for wheat crop management simulation. Agric Syst 83:77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbach N, Dessaint F, Forcella F (2000) Evaluating field-scale sampling methods for the estimation of mean plant densities of weeds. Weed Res 40:411–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R, Doyle CJ, Wilson BJ, Cussans GW (1986) Modelling the economics of controlling Avena fatua in winter wheat. Pestic Sci 17:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox PG (1996) Some issues in the design of agricultural decision support systems. Agric Syst 52:355–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David C, Mundler P, Demarle O, Ingrand S (2010) Long-term strategies and flexibility of organic farmers in southeastern France. Int J Agr Sustain 8:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoc J-M, Amalberti R (2005) Modeling naturalistic decision-making cognitive activities in dynamic situations: the role of a coding scheme. In: Montgomery H, Brehmer B, Lipshitz R (eds) How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 319–334

    Google Scholar 

  • US North-Central Regional Research in Farm Information Systems (2000) Farm information systems: their development and use in decision-making. Iowa State University, Bulletin 601

  • Jakku E, Thorburn PJ (2010) A conceptual framework for guiding the participatory development of agricultural decision support systems. Agric Syst 103:675–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen K, Rasmussen IA (2002) The use of a Bayesian network in the design of a decision support system for growing malting barley without use of pesticides. Comput Electron Agric 33:197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macé K, Morlon P, Munier-Jolain NM, Quéré L (2007) Time scales as a factor in decision-making by French farmers on weed management in annual crops. Agric Syst 93:115–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magne M-A, Cerf M, Ingrand S (2010) A conceptual model of farmers’ informational activity: a tool for improved support of livestock farming management. Anim 4:842–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCown RL (2002) Changing systems for supporting farmers’ decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects. Agric Syst 74:179–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menalled FD, Gross KL, Hammond M (2001) Weed aboveground and seedbank community responses to agricultural management systems. Ecol Appl 11:1586–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munier-Jolain NM, Savois V, Kubiak P, et al. (2004) DECID'Herb: a web decision support system for weed control programs in cultivated fields. In: AFPP-Dix-neuvième conférence du COLUMA Journées Internationales sur la lutte contre les mauvaises herbes, Dijon

  • Neef A, Neubert D (2010) Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agr Human Values 28:179–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff D, Schulz DG, Köpke U (2004) Application of a decision support system (DSS-WECOF) for weed management in organic winter wheat production. In: XII Colloque International sur la Biologie des Mauvaises Herbes, Dijon

  • Parker CG (2004) Decision support systems: barriers to uptake and use. Aspects Appl Biol 72:31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons DJ, Benjamin LR, Clarke J et al (2009) Weed Manager—a model-based decision support system for weed management in arable crops. Comput Electron Agric 65:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Primot S, Valantin-Morison M, Makowski D (2006) Predicting the risk of weed infestation in winter oilseed rape crops. Weed Res 46:22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reganold JP, Glover JD, Andrews PK, Hinman HR (2001) Sustainability of three apple production systems. Nature 410:926–930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rydahl P, Boejer, OQ (2007) A Danish Decision Support System for integrated management of weeds. In: 14th European Weed Research Society Symposium, Hamar, pp 135

  • Solano C, Leon H, Pérez E, Herrero M (2003) The role of personal information sources on the decision-making process of Costa Rican dairy farmers. Agric Syst 76:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen CG, Pesonen L, Fountas S et al (2010) A user-centric approach for information modelling in arable farming. Comput Electron Agric 73:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson GG, Wiles LJ, Bennett AC (2002) Weed management decision models: pitfalls, perceptions, and possibilities of the economic threshold approach. Weed Sci 50:411–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding from the European Community financial participation under the Sixth Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities, for the Integrated Project QUALITYLOWINPUTFOOD, FP6-FOOD-CT-2003-506358. We would like to thank M Cerf (UMR 1048 SAD-APT, INRA) for her useful reading recommendations about cognitive ergonomics. We would like to give special thanks to the organic farmers. We also thank C Holland and FK Murphy for their editorial work in English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Casagrande.

About this article

Cite this article

Casagrande, M., Joly, N., Jeuffroy, MH. et al. Evidence for weed quantity as the major information gathered by organic farmers for weed management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 715–726 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0073-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0073-6

Keywords

Navigation